Some Expected Outcomes With The Implementation Of The “Electronic Transmission” - Politics

Some Expected Outcomes With The Implementation Of The “Electronic Transmission” - Politics - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum › Nairaland General › Politics › Some Expected Outcomes With The Implementation Of The “Electronic Transmission” (5469 Views)

Poll: Do You Think That The INEC Can Diligently Carry Out The Electronic Transmission Of Results Instantly And Seamlessly Without ANY Unforeseen Failures?

YES.. I Trust Them 100% 11% (23 votes)

YES.. But not up to 100% 23% (47 votes)

I only trust them about 20% 5% (10 votes)

NO.. I Don't Trust Then At All 59% (116 votes)

This poll has ended

1 2 Reply (Go Down)

Some Expected Outcomes With The Implementation Of The “Electronic Transmission” by BluntCrazeMan(op): 1:49pm On Mar 18

SOME EXPECTED OUTCOMES WITH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NEWLY INCLUDED “ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION” INSIDE THE NEWLY ENACTED “ELECTORAL ACT 2026”.

1. Most of the Presiding Officers would transmit the results from the Polling-Units with the BVAS Machines as usual; but then, THE TRANSMITTED RESULTS WOULD MOST-DEFINITELY NOT BE VISIBLE ON THE IREV PORTAL IMMEDIATELY.
This is just exactly the way it had always been happening in all those past elections where there was no direct provision for the “Electronic Transmission” inside the Electoral Act --- But now, according to the requirements of the new Electoral Act 2026, “the Presiding Officer shall ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMIT the results from each polling unit to IREV Portal”.
This means that there is not supposed to be much delays between the time when the transmission was done and the time when the transmitted results appear on the IREV Portal --- except of course if (and only “if”) there is “communication failure”, then that would be the only “excuse” why the transmitted results may not appear immediately on the IREV Portal.

2. Some of the Presiding Officers wouldn't even do any transmission of any results in the first place --- and they will quickly declare that “THERE IS COMMUNICATION FAILURE”; and that the “transmission” itself even refused to work from the BVAS Machines.

3. Some of the Presiding Officers would genuinely try the transmission of the results many times, BUT THE TRANSMISSION FROM THE BVAS MACHINES WOULD ACTUALLY REFUSE TO WORK, not to talk of the results appearing on the IREV Portal. And then, the INEC would end up Not providing the reasons or excuse for such failures which were not as a result of “Communication Failure” of any sort.

4. Due to some sharp games which might be played by the INEC Officials at the different levels of the results management, there might end up being up to five different versions of THE SAME Polling-Unit Results..
a) the INEC’s version which are provided in the CTCs
b) the BVAS version which were captured and stored inside the BVAS Machines
c) the IREV version which were successfully transmitted to the IREV-Portal.
d) the PARTIES Duplicate version which were the duplicate copies that were given to the PARTIES.
e) the POLICE Duplicate version which were the duplicate copies that were given to the POLICE.
All these five versions of the results are fully supported by the Electoral Act, and they are all supposed to be the same thing all through.
If at any point, there are discrepancies between any two or all of the five versions of the same results, then it becomes a clear case of “Institutional Manipulation of Results.

5. All of the above-mentioned scenarios would definitely happen on the Election Day, and still nobody would say (or do) anything about them, and FINAL RESULTS would still be announced --- (even when the discrepancies in the various versions of THE SAME RESULTS are very clearly visible to everyone).

1 Like 1 Share

Re: Some Expected Outcomes With The Implementation Of The “Electronic Transmission” by BluntCrazeMan(op): 3:56pm On Mar 18

Lalasticlala, Nlfpmod

Please read

Re: Some Expected Outcomes With The Implementation Of The “Electronic Transmission” by BIGTinfotech: 4:31pm On Mar 18

Election malpractices can be curbed. But it requires matching the opposition money for money and thug for thugry as well. Now, that is the challenge with the current opposition. They don't want to SPEND money and don't want to get involved with thugry.
Enforcing rig and die.

2 Likes

Re: Some Expected Outcomes With The Implementation Of The “Electronic Transmission” by Pastorsarynzay: 4:33pm On Mar 18

They fail to tell inec not to announce winner before auditing results

3 Likes

Re: Some Expected Outcomes With The Implementation Of The “Electronic Transmission” by DeepSight(m): 4:33pm On Mar 18

The desperation and corruption of the Frog are so total that it is very unlikely that he can lose any election in this country even if no one votes for him.

1 Like

Re: Some Expected Outcomes With The Implementation Of The “Electronic Transmission” by Lostprince(m): 4:34pm On Mar 18

I can categorically tell you that we are not ready for this🤣🤣🤣

2 Likes

Re: Some Expected Outcomes With The Implementation Of The “Electronic Transmission” by karmaolu1(m): 4:35pm On Mar 18

With or without bvas

Tinubu is a goal

1 Like

Re: Some Expected Outcomes With The Implementation Of The “Electronic Transmission” by honestivo(m): 4:35pm On Mar 18

You failed to mention the fact that the PO can actually transfer the results in an offline mode and delete it there after, some PO use that to deceived party agents in 2023

3 Likes 1 Share

Re: Some Expected Outcomes With The Implementation Of The “Electronic Transmission” by Nextjs: 4:36pm On Mar 18

We are speaking grammar. Let them mandate e transmission

3 Likes

Re: Some Expected Outcomes With The Implementation Of The “Electronic Transmission” by PigTormentor: 4:40pm On Mar 18

BIGTinfotech:
Election malpractices can be curbed. But it requires matching the opposition money for money and thug for thugry as well. Now, that is the challenge with the current opposition. They don't want to SPEND money and don't want to get involved with thugry.
Enforcing rig and die.

You wrote as if only those in power rig elections. The opposition are also in rhe habit of rigging.
In fact there were more rigging in areas that Obi won in 2023 than in other places.

5 Likes 2 Shares

Re: Some Expected Outcomes With The Implementation Of The “Electronic Transmission” by OnyeObowo1: 4:41pm On Mar 18

This next election is revolution

Most APC politicians will be on the run..

This i have seen

3 Likes 1 Share

Re: Some Expected Outcomes With The Implementation Of The “Electronic Transmission” by PigTormentor: 4:44pm On Mar 18*

Electronic transmission has nothing to do with rigging. Most rigging occurs at the polling units with an agreement between those polling agents.
They will agree among themselves and then transmit whatever they have written down on the result sheets.
All these noise about transmission is all an excuse for the opposition knowing full well that the election is slipping away from their hands.

2 Likes 2 Shares

Re: Some Expected Outcomes With The Implementation Of The “Electronic Transmission” by adioolayi(m): 4:49pm On Mar 18

All you have put up here are all negativities...

Not even a single glimpse of positive outcome..

Why are we like this huh

Why not let's take a look at how the new electoral act 2026 performed in the just concluded FCT LGA elections huh

Can you really say the PU officers failed to upload results huh

Na wa o

4 Likes 2 Shares

Re: Some Expected Outcomes With The Implementation Of The “Electronic Transmission” by Authoreety: 4:55pm On Mar 18

Nothing wey dem go tell me...

If not for corruption, wd for don pas ds level a long time ago

1 Like 1 Share

Re: Some Expected Outcomes With The Implementation Of The “Electronic Transmission” by Image123(m): 4:57pm On Mar 18

Don't worry, obidents will use their coldspot to help officer.

Re: Some Expected Outcomes With The Implementation Of The “Electronic Transmission” by Racoon(m): 4:57pm On Mar 18

Every sane and citizen that mean this nation well should should see to it that the electoral process is devoid of any maleficent that keeps on turning out useless leaders.

1 Like

Re: Some Expected Outcomes With The Implementation Of The “Electronic Transmission” by iwaeda: 4:58pm On Mar 18

This is the plan of APC, but surprises await them. grin

1 Like 1 Share

Re: Some Expected Outcomes With The Implementation Of The “Electronic Transmission” by hotseat: 4:59pm On Mar 18

Conspiracy theories, all meant to discredit the outcome of the 2027 general elections, particularly, the presidential election.

It's like accepting defeat in advance!

As far as the opposition parties are concerned, the elections can only be free, fair and transparent if INEC declares any of them winners even where they glaringly failed.

This can only come from skewed minds.

@hotseat

2 Likes

Re: Some Expected Outcomes With The Implementation Of The “Electronic Transmission” by ejimatic: 5:02pm On Mar 18

I'm

BluntCrazeMan:
SOME EXPECTED OUTCOMES WITH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NEWLY INCLUDED “ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION” INSIDE THE NEWLY ENACTED “ELECTORAL ACT 2026”.

1. Most of the Presiding Officers would transmit the results from the Polling-Units with the BVAS Machines as usual; but then, THE TRANSMITTED RESULTS WOULD MOST-DEFINITELY NOT BE VISIBLE ON THE IREV PORTAL IMMEDIATELY.
This is just exactly the way it had always been happening in all those past elections where there was no direct provision for the “Electronic Transmission” inside the Electoral Act --- But now, according to the requirements of the new Electoral Act 2026, “the Presiding Officer shall ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMIT the results from each polling unit to IREV Portal”.
This means that there is not supposed to be much delays between the time when the transmission was done and the time when the transmitted results appear on the IREV Portal --- except of course if (and only “if”) there is “communication failure”, then that would be the only “excuse” why the transmitted results may not appear immediately on the IREV Portal.

2. Some of the Presiding Officers wouldn't even do any transmission of any results in the first place --- and they will quickly declare that “THERE IS COMMUNICATION FAILURE”; and that the “transmission” itself even refused to work from the BVAS Machines.

3. Some of the Presiding Officers would genuinely try the transmission of the results many times, BUT THE TRANSMISSION FROM THE BVAS MACHINES WOULD ACTUALLY REFUSE TO WORK, not to talk of the results appearing on the IREV Portal. And then, the INEC would end up Not providing the reasons or excuse for such failures which were not as a result of “Communication Failure” of any sort.

4. Due to some sharp games which might be played by the INEC Officials at the different levels of the results management, there might end up being up to five different versions of THE SAME Polling-Unit Results..
a) the INEC’s version which are provided in the CTCs
b) the BVAS version which were captured and stored inside the BVAS Machines
c) the IREV version which were successfully transmitted to the IREV-Portal.
d) the PARTIES Duplicate version which were the duplicate copies that were given to the PARTIES.
e) the POLICE Duplicate version which were the duplicate copies that were given to the POLICE.
All these five versions of the results are fully supported by the Electoral Act, and they are all supposed to be the same thing all through.
If at any point, there are discrepancies between any two or all of the five versions of the same results, then it becomes a clear case of “Institutional Manipulation of Results.

5. All of the above-mentioned scenarios would definitely happen on the Election Day, and still nobody would say (or do) anything about them, and FINAL RESULTS would still be announced --- (even when the discrepancies in the various versions of THE SAME RESULTS are very clearly visible to everyone).

Be wasting time on election that has been won already by the BAT.

1 Like

Re: Some Expected Outcomes With The Implementation Of The “Electronic Transmission” by callmemakaveli: 5:02pm On Mar 18

Politics is not for the weak mehn

Re: Some Expected Outcomes With The Implementation Of The “Electronic Transmission” by Inspirer1: 5:08pm On Mar 18

I pray there's even a contest talk less of the BVAS machine functionality possible outcomes...

A much touted "democratic" party constantly trying to ensure no major opponents contests beats my imagination

2 Likes

Re: Some Expected Outcomes With The Implementation Of The “Electronic Transmission” by Ibehchizzy: 5:35pm On Mar 18

Nigeria my country
Corruption and rigging personified
From top to bottom
It’s well

1 Like 1 Share

Re: Some Expected Outcomes With The Implementation Of The “Electronic Transmission” by Jonjam269: 5:38pm On Mar 18

There is no such thing as a perfect electoral law anywhere in the world. What sustains democracy is trust in the process, losers accept defeat, congratulate the winners, and challenge results in court if necessary. Until our politicians learn to accept defeat in good faith, we will keep chasing the illusion of a “perfect” electoral law.

Re: Some Expected Outcomes With The Implementation Of The “Electronic Transmission” by EXPRESSSMAN(m): 5:39pm On Mar 18

You're 100% correct. The election will be a sham. At the end INEC will accept any version it like and announce without auditing or verification.
This is how it has been.
No body will be reprimand or prosecute. The cycle continues.
The opposition keeps wasting their time in an election without any direction.

1 Like 1 Share

Re: Some Expected Outcomes With The Implementation Of The “Electronic Transmission” by Tupacx: 5:47pm On Mar 18

BluntCrazeMan:
SOME EXPECTED OUTCOMES WITH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NEWLY INCLUDED “ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION” INSIDE THE NEWLY ENACTED “ELECTORAL ACT 2026”.

1. Most of the Presiding Officers would transmit the results from the Polling-Units with the BVAS Machines as usual; but then, THE TRANSMITTED RESULTS WOULD MOST-DEFINITELY NOT BE VISIBLE ON THE IREV PORTAL IMMEDIATELY.
This is just exactly the way it had always been happening in all those past elections where there was no direct provision for the “Electronic Transmission” inside the Electoral Act --- But now, according to the requirements of the new Electoral Act 2026, “the Presiding Officer shall ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMIT the results from each polling unit to IREV Portal”.
This means that there is not supposed to be much delays between the time when the transmission was done and the time when the transmitted results appear on the IREV Portal --- except of course if (and only “if”) there is “communication failure”, then that would be the only “excuse” why the transmitted results may not appear immediately on the IREV Portal.

2. Some of the Presiding Officers wouldn't even do any transmission of any results in the first place --- and they will quickly declare that “THERE IS COMMUNICATION FAILURE”; and that the “transmission” itself even refused to work from the BVAS Machines.

3. Some of the Presiding Officers would genuinely try the transmission of the results many times, BUT THE TRANSMISSION FROM THE BVAS MACHINES WOULD ACTUALLY REFUSE TO WORK, not to talk of the results appearing on the IREV Portal. And then, the INEC would end up Not providing the reasons or excuse for such failures which were not as a result of “Communication Failure” of any sort.

4. Due to some sharp games which might be played by the INEC Officials at the different levels of the results management, there might end up being up to five different versions of THE SAME Polling-Unit Results..
a) the INEC’s version which are provided in the CTCs
b) the BVAS version which were captured and stored inside the BVAS Machines
c) the IREV version which were successfully transmitted to the IREV-Portal.
d) the PARTIES Duplicate version which were the duplicate copies that were given to the PARTIES.
e) the POLICE Duplicate version which were the duplicate copies that were given to the POLICE.
All these five versions of the results are fully supported by the Electoral Act, and they are all supposed to be the same thing all through.
If at any point, there are discrepancies between any two or all of the five versions of the same results, then it becomes a clear case of “Institutional Manipulation of Results.

5. All of the above-mentioned scenarios would definitely happen on the Election Day, and still nobody would say (or do) anything about them, and FINAL RESULTS would still be announced --- (even when the discrepancies in the various versions of THE SAME RESULTS are very clearly visible to everyone).

The writter does not know the difference between Cabon Copy and version.

The copies with the Police, Agents, INEC and others are Cabon copies not versions.

Re: Some Expected Outcomes With The Implementation Of The “Electronic Transmission” by Empresa: 5:50pm On Mar 18

INEC Will rig the election. This is a certainty, the probability that INEC Will rig is 1.

How can you say anybody with Forged results can contest election and decide the future of honest, hard working Nigerians. This is the foundation for rigging.

1 Like 1 Share

Re: Some Expected Outcomes With The Implementation Of The “Electronic Transmission” by BluntCrazeMan(op): 6:01pm On Mar 18

ejimatic:
Be wasting time on election that has been won already by the BAT.

We always expect people to say things like this.......

But Nevertheless,, we continue Pushing.!!

WE MOVE.!!

1 Like 2 Shares

Re: Some Expected Outcomes With The Implementation Of The “Electronic Transmission” by 7upnigeria: 6:04pm On Mar 18

BluntCrazeMan:
SOME EXPECTED OUTCOMES WITH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NEWLY INCLUDED “ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION” INSIDE THE NEWLY ENACTED “ELECTORAL ACT 2026”.

1. Most of the Presiding Officers would transmit the results from the Polling-Units with the BVAS Machines as usual; but then, THE TRANSMITTED RESULTS WOULD MOST-DEFINITELY NOT BE VISIBLE ON THE IREV PORTAL IMMEDIATELY.
This is just exactly the way it had always been happening in all those past elections where there was no direct provision for the “Electronic Transmission” inside the Electoral Act --- But now, according to the requirements of the new Electoral Act 2026, “the Presiding Officer shall ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMIT the results from each polling unit to IREV Portal”.
This means that there is not supposed to be much delays between the time when the transmission was done and the time when the transmitted results appear on the IREV Portal --- except of course if (and only “if”) there is “communication failure”, then that would be the only “excuse” why the transmitted results may not appear immediately on the IREV Portal.

2. Some of the Presiding Officers wouldn't even do any transmission of any results in the first place --- and they will quickly declare that “THERE IS COMMUNICATION FAILURE”; and that the “transmission” itself even refused to work from the BVAS Machines.

3. Some of the Presiding Officers would genuinely try the transmission of the results many times, BUT THE TRANSMISSION FROM THE BVAS MACHINES WOULD ACTUALLY REFUSE TO WORK, not to talk of the results appearing on the IREV Portal. And then, the INEC would end up Not providing the reasons or excuse for such failures which were not as a result of “Communication Failure” of any sort.

4. Due to some sharp games which might be played by the INEC Officials at the different levels of the results management, there might end up being up to five different versions of THE SAME Polling-Unit Results..
a) the INEC’s version which are provided in the CTCs
b) the BVAS version which were captured and stored inside the BVAS Machines
c) the IREV version which were successfully transmitted to the IREV-Portal.
d) the PARTIES Duplicate version which were the duplicate copies that were given to the PARTIES.
e) the POLICE Duplicate version which were the duplicate copies that were given to the POLICE.
All these five versions of the results are fully supported by the Electoral Act, and they are all supposed to be the same thing all through.
If at any point, there are discrepancies between any two or all of the five versions of the same results, then it becomes a clear case of “Institutional Manipulation of Results.

5. All of the above-mentioned scenarios would definitely happen on the Election Day, and still nobody would say (or do) anything about them, and FINAL RESULTS would still be announced --- (even when the discrepancies in the various versions of THE SAME RESULTS are very clearly visible to everyone).

ZOMBIEDIENTS, you're already rehearsing how you will react to your loss on election day.

Before you go further, akk election results in the 2023 elections have been uploaded on iRev, KINDLY SCREENSHOT any manual result that is not in agreement with the one uploaded in iRev. Election has not been help but you're already crying rigging, SORE LOSER.

Re: Some Expected Outcomes With The Implementation Of The “Electronic Transmission” by BluntCrazeMan(op): 6:07pm On Mar 18

Tupacx:
The writter does not know the difference between Cabon Copy and version.

The copies with the Police, Agents, INEC and others are Cabon copies not versions.

The Edo State Election of 24th-September-2024 made us to see that the Duplicate Copies (or carbon copies) that were given to the Party Agents were totally different from the CTCs of those same results which the INEC gave to the petitioners..
They were not supposed to be different, but they were totally different..
And that means, they were different versions of the same results.

1 2 Reply

Anambra Election: INEC Publishes The Electronic Copy Of The Voters Register • APC Senators Reject Electronic Transmission Of Election Results • INEC Demonstrated The Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) In Abuja Today • 2 • 3 • 4

No Major Power Plant Financed Since 2015 — Nnaji • South East Monarchs, Workers, Congratulate Ugwuanyi On His Re-election • Concrete Work On 21 Storey Office Complex Uyo Complete, Glass Facade Begins