₦airaland Forum

It's only those with eyes wide shut still believe in the ball earth (theory) which it is

He won his second term aspiration. To him all that remains now is too misbehave and fool around. That's what second term governors do in Nigeria.

samsard:
Flat earth conspiracy theorist

Well well what do we have here. Someone trying to be smart. So not believing in the above makes you a conspiracy theorist. Your brain has been cloned to only good a regurgitating info filtered into it.
#AutoIdiota

989900:
Wow!

Don't be deceived. It's all bs

Emusan:
What's the name of that man making a call to men on the moon?

Though I'm not 100% subscribed to moon landing theory because of some reasons, one of it is space communication.

I watch a documentary about ISS from BBB (Big Bigger Biggest) the leap2: is Communication. That is, the challenge they must overcome.


Skylab which is the second ISS launched with three crews needs to be communicating back to earth. To overcome this, NASA has to fix receiver across the globe (more than 10), some receivers were fixed on the deck of ship and 8 special aircrafts equipped with receivers were made to fly also.

If it could take Skylab all these processes to communicate to earth as at 1973, how does it easy for moon men in 196.. to have communicated to earth?

This was the question I asked myself after watching the documentary.

//www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzHRv-TnOd4

aiir2303:
Bro. I think your reasoning is sound. One let me clarify this to you we never went to no moon and two the iss is a hoax. (there are proofs to be given here)
If you you've examined the processes and analysed the equipment and technology back then you'll figure out that there's no way. Come on, the technology available then is not advanced as your smart phone. To really know more go to you tube and search for the video of Armstrong and buzz Aldrin's press interview after the so-called landing. Then come back and we can talk some more .

*modified *
That was president Richard Nixon

Emusan:
What's the name of that man making a call to men on the moon?

Though I'm not 100% subscribed to moon landing theory because of some reasons, one of it is space communication.

I watch a documentary about ISS from BBB (Big Bigger Biggest) the leap2: is Communication. That is, the challenge they must overcome.


Skylab which is the second ISS launched with three crews needs to be communicating back to earth. To overcome this, NASA has to fix receiver across the globe (more than 10), some receivers were fixed on the deck of ship and 8 special aircrafts equipped with receivers were made to fly also.
//www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzHRv-TnOd4

If it could take Skylab all these processes to communicate to earth as at 1973, how does it easy for moon men in 196.. to have communicated to earth?

This was the question I asked myself after watching the documentary.

Bro. I think your reasoning is sound. One let me clarify this to you we never went to no moon and two the iss is a hoax. (there are proofs to be given here)
If you you've examined the processes and analysed the equipment and technology back then you'll figure out that there's no way. Come on, the technology available then is not advanced as your smart phone. To really know more go to you tube and search for the video of Armstrong and buzz Aldrin's press interview after the so-called landing. Then come back and we can talk some more .

omoadeleye:
I don't why they are spending money on NASA, that profession is just waste of funds to me, the money directed to them should spend on medicals on this earth, and no some astronaut just traveling up and down to space and giving us some news we can't do nothing about and still searching for some imaginary aliens . Damn them

Your head dey there.. Taking over $50m daily for doing nothing except pushing out cgi images

Sitting and reasoning the mysteries of FE

Science and scientism.. Know the difference

Fft
Research FE

Here

Im blown. It explains a lot, argument backed by scripture and also fantastically put

By Femi Aribisala

When Daddy Freeze identified tithing as a modern-day scam in a fascinating interview, I was also asked to weigh in on the same issue by Sahara Reporters. But I declined because I did not think it was necessary to add anything to what he said. However, I have changed my mind seeing that some church heavyweights have come out swinging at him in the bid to undermine his message and safeguard their illicit financial bottom line.
They have tried to muddy the waters by deriding Daddy Freeze’s assertion that in biblical times, it was scriptural to eat your tithe in the house of God and wash it down with a glass of beer. They also hastened to intimidate Christians by insisting if they don’t tithe, they would be cursed.
That is a lot of hogwash. The very attempt to invoke curses in a simple debate about tithing indicates a bankruptcy of reason. Threatening Christians in order to force them to give is witchcraft; it is not the way of Christ. The New Testament position says: “Let each one give as he purposes in his heart, not grudgingly or of necessity; for God loves a cheerful giver.” (II Corinthians 9:7). Giving in order to avoid curses is giving “of necessity;” not cheerful giving.

“Winebibbers”

It is biblical to drink beer in church. The word of a General Overseer cannot override the scriptures. Moses says take your tithe: “to the place the Lord your God has chosen. When you arrive, you may use the money to buy any kind of food you want—cattle, sheep, goats, wine, or other alcoholic drink. Then feast there in the presence of the Lord your God and celebrate with your household.” (Deuteronomy 14:25-26). Beer is an alcoholic drink; that means you could drink it in the “house of God.”
A General Overseer cannot be holier than Jesus. Jesus drank alcohol. That is why his self-righteous opponents called him a “drunkard.” (Matthew 11:19). In the first miracle he performed, Jesus did not turn water into Ribena or orange juice. He turned water into wine. Don’t buy the lie: biblical wine is fermented and therefore alcoholic. Moses specifically says: “wine or other alcoholic drink.” (Deuteronomy 14:26). That means the tithing wine is alcoholic.

Drinking alcohol is not a sin, but drunkenness is. (Romans 13:13). Paul says: “Do not get drunk on wine.” (Ephesians 5:18). He does not say: “do not drink wine.” Drink it, but not to the point of drunkenness. The wine used for Holy Communion is alcoholic. When the Corinthians were having Communion in an unruly manner, Paul complained that: “some go hungry while others get drunk.” (I Corinthians 11:21). No-body gets drunk on non-alcoholic wine.

Curses and blessings

Let no believer be intimidated by vain curses: “Curses will not harm someone who is innocent.” (Proverbs 26:2). Tithe or no tithe, believers are blessed: “with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places in Christ.” (Ephesians 1:3). Therefore, God would never curse us. As God said to Balaam concerning Israel, “You must not put a curse on those people, because they are blessed.” (Numbers 22:12).

Pastors and General Overseers should desist from manipulating Christians with threats of curses. God says to Abraham: “I will curse whoever curses you.” (Genesis 12:3). Therefore, if your General Overseer curses you, the curse will only fall on his head. If these curses were not vain, I would be a dead man already. But I dare anyone to curse a prophet of God for doing his work.

Moreover, tell the eminent General Overseer, there is nothing special about a church building. The church is not the house of God. If it ever was, it no longer is. “The Most High does not dwell in temples made with hands.” (Acts 7:48). It is morally wrong, in any case, to prescribe one conduct for the church and another outside the church. Believers don’t worship God in churches. Jesus says we worship God “in Spirit and truth.” (John 4:23).

Fleecing the flock

The only people authorised to receive tithes were the Levites. (Hebrews 7:5). Therefore, Daddy Freeze is right: no Nigerian prophet, so-called pastor or highfalutin General Overseer is qualified to receive tithes from members of his or her congregation.

Even Jesus could not have received the tithe because he was not from the tribe of Levi but from Judah. Today, Jewish rabbis who still follow the Mosaic Code no longer receive tithes because Levi is one of the lost tribes of Israel. All Jewish genealogical records were lost with the destruction of the temple in AD 70. How then can Nigerian pastors who are not even Jewish, how much more Levites, receive tithes?

In any case, God did not accept money as tithe. The tithe was tied to the land, which was God’s gift to Israel. Therefore, it was a tenth of the seed and fruit of the land and of the animals which ate of the land. (Leviticus 27:30-32). That is why God says: “Bring all the tithes into the storehouse, that there may be FOOD in my house.” (Malachi 3:10). He does not say “that there may be MONEY in my house.”

If you bring money, you must convert it to foodstuff. Your tithe is then eaten in the presence of the Lord, and given to the Levites, strangers, widows and the fatherless. (Deute-ronomy 14:24-26). However, pastors today only accept money as tithe, showing they are nothing but money-grubbers who fleece the flock.

Servants who worked on the land did not tithe because the land did not belong to them. Since only agricultural resources were tithe-able, only farmers and keepers of livestock gave tithes. So if you are neither, tell your 419 pastor tithing is scripturally inapplicable to you.

Law and grace

John says: “The law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ.” (John 1:17). Tithing belongs to the Law of Moses. But Christians are not under the law but under grace. (Romans 6:14). The law was not given to Nigerians, it was given to Jews. (Psalms 147:19-20; Malachi 4:4). Therefore, the Law on tithes is inapplicable to Nigerians.

Tithing was primarily applicable to Jews in Israel. When Jewish po-pulations grew in Babylon, Ammon, Moab and Syria, these lands also became tithe-able lands. However, tithes were unacceptable from strictly Gentile lands. So it makes no sense to tithe in Nigeria.

Levites were not given any land in Israel. God says: “Instead, I give to the Levites as their inheritance the tithes that the Israelites present as an offering to the Lord.” (Numbers 18:24). But today’s pastors own lands and houses. Therefore, they do not live as Levites and should stop pretending to be Levi-tes.

You cannot cherry-pick what to obey in the law: “The person who keeps all of the laws except one is as guilty as a person who has broken all of God’s laws.” (James 2:10).

Therefore, if Nigerian pastors insist on tithing, they must also insist on all other stringent requirements of the law; including the stoning to death of adulterers, disobedient children, homosexuals and Sabbath violators. They should also restore blood-sacrifices for good measure.

The fact that they don’t attests eloquently to their duplicity.

Source : Vanguard

ProEnergy:
you speak of albinos probably maltreated in the olden times. in my clan (of igbo), fair babies have their pinkies decapitated at birth (my dad had his decapitated, my aunt too). could this be related to your claim?

It's not my claim, and which claim is that. You can read further on the source site I got this material from.

jantavanta:
The greatest weapon of colonisation was The School; from Kindergarten to University.

True... There no better weapon. It's so bad that I was discussing with some of my family members about certain topics relating to this. I'm still amazed by the strong beliefs held by our people who see white people as super humans while denigrating the black skin and the black man. Also ignorantly stating that the colored man contributed nothing to civilization.
The damage the white man has done is beyond repair.

We present these histories to you in an Interwoven running Chronology Format. That is to say, we are telling all of the histories at the same time (sort of): By clicking Next at the bottom of each page, we take you through the entire presentation in related order. This format provides a wonderful opportunity to see how developments in one place, effects what happens in another. Needless to say, these histories out of necessity must be condensed. However, great care has been taken to insure that this presentation delivers accurate history, and preserves a true "sense" of each civilization. Our presentation is comprehensive, and covers All of man's original civilizations. Just click the start below to begin, or use the menu selections, above and below, to go to a specific civilization.
#copied from realhistoryww. >com

All blacks aren't Africans

And some theorize that it was simply to insure that Blacks would not one day become resurgent, and return the favor. Others say that it was more recent, and was just a way to rationalize the American Slave trade. Whatever the reason, it certainly exists today, and has resulted not only in the mistreatment of Blacks, but in the really strange practice of writing Blacks out of history. It seems a really pathetic thing to want to do, but that is exactly what Whites have been doing for centuries. White academics, together with those in what seems to be an industry of people making fake "White-looking" statues and artifacts of Black ancients, to support their false history. Not to mention the defaced Black statues, which make it difficult to determine race, all used in a seemly "matter of fact like" conspiracy to write Blacks out of history.

The "matter of fact like" character of it, seems to be analogous to the early days of the film industry, when a part called for a Black person, a black-faced White person was used instead. All done as if it was the most natural thing in the world. Of course, denying the value and accomplishments of an entire race of people is NOT natural or normal. The point being, that Whites seem to have developed a phobia about acknowledging what Blacks had accomplished. It's as though they were thinking "If they find out who they actually are, what will they do? This inbred fear of what Blacks with power will do, is very apparent in the American psyche since their election of the first Black President. This even though, it is plain to all that he seeks to do good for all, regardless of race.

And to bring this lunacy full-circle, all the while, there has been White scientist who have been busily uncovering material, which proves them liars. And so it is with the artifacts and data, for the most part uncovered by White scientists, that we present our histories of "Ancient Man and His First Civilizations". The artifacts pictured are authentic, and are found in museums around the world. The actual histories presented are conventional, and can be found in encyclopedias or history books. The difference being, that where Whites conveniently neglect to identify people by race, we do. Where Blacks were written out of history, we write them back in. Where bogus White artifacts were used, we use authentic Black artifacts.

In 1492 Christopher Columbus "discovered" the new world, that set in motion the murder, conquest, and subjugation of the native Americans (which were Blacks and Mongols), and the movement of millions upon millions of Whites to the Americas. The result was that out of the approximately 100 million people living in the Americas at the time of Christopher Columbus's landing, by 1650 A.D, only 15 million remained alive. And oh, by the way, as it turns out, Blacks have the LEAST susceptibility to disease of all Humans. So clearly, the "diseases killed the original Americans" story, was just one of many Albino lies!
Which brings us to today, and our current dilemma. Sometime after the European middle ages, perhaps even before, Whites created Racism, a system whereby they started to denigrate Blacks and instituted a system of ill treatment towards Blacks. Some theorize that this my be a result of ancient memories of the way Blacks treated Whites when they were still Albinos in Africa - treatment that was most foul indeed - Click the link for modern examples of the horrors that Albinos suffer in Africa

With the entire known World under their control, millions upon millions of Whites from Central Asia, poured into Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East, thereby changing the complexion of these areas (pun intended), the Germans and Turks being the last in at about 600s A.D.

Please make special note: In these pages we often refer to "Turks" singularity, without differentiating between the original Turks, and the modern populations. This is factually incorrect, and done solely for convenience. The original Turkish people were a White or Caucasian people, the "Modern" Turks of today; who inhabit Turkey, North Africa, The Middle East, Western Asia, Parts of Arabia, and parts of Eastern Europe; reflect different degrees of admixture between the Blacks who originally inhabited those lands, and the Greeks, Romans, and finally Turks, who in their turn, later conquered those lands.

As previously stated, the preceding is generally accepted as scientific fact (except for the Albinos - for obvious reasons). There is no lack of scientific evidence to support it, and the conclusions are certainly logical and straight-forward, so why is this scientific history, so different from the history that all of us are taught?

The problem is that the previously alluded to "Caucasians" sometime around 2,000 B.C, and for unknown reasons, decided to leave their Central Asian homelands and move West and South - see the Kurgan Hypothesis. They reached India (the Arian's) at about 1,700 B.C, and conquered the Black Dravidians who had created the Indus Valley civilizations there. At about the same time, other groups reached Eastern Europe, where they eventually conquered the Black cultures there.

At about 1,200 B.C, the Hellenes and Latin's invaded Southern Europe. The Hellenes conquered the native Pelasgians and Mycenaeans in Greece, while the Latin's conquered the native Etruscans and Gaul's in Italy, France, and surrounding areas. After usurping these civilizations, they eventually moved south into Anatolia, the Middle East, and North Africa. All the Black civilizations in these places were also conquered and usurped - this as a result of the great war-making abilities of Alexander the great, and his victory over the first Persian Empire in 334 B.C. (Egypt was by then a Persian vassal state). The last of the Black civilizations to fall, was the resurgent second Persian Empire (the Sassanian) at about 642 A.D. (This was ostensibly an Arab victory, but was in fact accomplished with mostly White troops).

The second migration (OOA) at about 50,000 years ago, saw at least three groups of Modern Man take an "Inland" route through Southern Asia and up into Northern Asia. There one group, (that we call Mongols) eventually founded the Xia and Shang civilizations in China. Another group, (that we call Jomon), migrated to Japan. And another group, that were probably initially Albinos; (not a put-down, that is simply what the evidence indicates - Click here >>>. Today we call these people, who because of admixture, are no longer Albinos "Caucasians'), they migrated to Central Asia. Soon after that time, the Glaciers in Europe started to melt, and "Modern man" (not Cro-Magnon, he entered later at about 35,000 ya), in the person of "Grimaldi Man" entered Europe through the Straits of Gibraltar at about 45,000 years ago. There is general consensus in the worlds scientific community that the preceding is accurate to a best "available evidence" certainty.

All the while, Modern man was also migrating northward "In" Africa. Some of these people found their way to the Nile Valley and founded the Egyptian civilization. Others kept going, and founded the Canaanite civilization in modern Israel/Palestine, the Sumerian civilization in Iraq, the Anatolian civilizations in Turkey, the Elamite civilization in Iran, (there is no certainty as to which group started the Indus Valley civilization). There is also uncertainty as to which group, (the Nile Valley people, or Grimaldi man), founded the Minoan and Mycenaean civilizations in Crete and Greece, and the Etruscan civilization in Italy.

The REAL non-African history of Modern Man, begins when Modern man started his out of Africa (OOA) migrations from Southern Africa some 60,000 years ago. He started a process that would eventually result in Modern man populating every habitable corner of the world. That first migration saw Modern man take a coastal route through Southern Asia, down through Malaysia, and "Islanding Hopping" to Australia. All along the way, leaving behind settlements of people who would populate those areas. The evidence indicates that at least two groups (perhaps at different times) made this journey, the Australoids and the Polynesians - the skeletons of these "Australoids and Polynesians" will later be found in the Americas, where they were also the first inhabitants.

A surprising number of people, do not understand that Museum Art, Movies, and Television, reflect what is called "Artistic license" (also known as dramatic license, historical license, poetic license, narrative license, licentia poetica, or simply license), it is a colloquial term, or euphemism, used to denote the distortion of fact. Using examples above: Modern Man evolved in Equatorial Africa, though the temperature there is perfect for unclothed Man (min. temp. 69 F - max. temp. 79 F): But it is also the place were the Suns UV intensity is at it's maximum (11): An unclothed White person in that environment, would Sunburn in less than 15 minutes, and die from Sunburn or Skin Cancer in short order - Nature gave Black Skin to natural Humans for a reason, it has a Function!
Beginning during the renaissance and even earlier, European artists took to depicting historical people, as they hoped or imagined them to look. And in doing so, they made everyone White, but that is not reality. In reality: as shown by REAL artifacts, ancient White Greeks, who originated in Central Asia: by the classical period, were mostly a mixed-race people, owing to admixture with the original Black Europeans they encountered when they arrived in Europe (circa 1,200 B.C.). Troy was an Anatolian City, REAL artifacts clearly show that Anatolians were Black people. Jesus was a Hebrew, REAL artifacts clearly show that Hebrews were Black people, same with Persians and Egyptians. But one special mention concerning the Egyptian image: that does not reflect "Artistic license" rather, that reflects a simple attempt to lie! Because in fact, it is the image of a real ruler of Egypt: a GREEK ruler of Egypt during the Ptolemaic period. Greek and Roman artifacts from their respective periods of occupation in Egypt, are routinely used, along with fake and re-worked artifacts of Egyptians and others too, by degenerate racists to portray them as REAL Egyptians, thus indicating that Egyptians, and other ancients, were White people. That is purposeful revisionist history - a lie!

Legitimate Black researchers, (as opposed to those who do it to gain favor with the Albinos and thus make money), must out of necessity, try to reconstruct history by bits and pieces. The Albinos have after all, had over 200 years to create their false paintings, statues, and false translations of historical documents.

The task of parsing their lies from the truth is indeed daunting. But every now and then, we uncover an artifact so revealing, that it answers many of our questions, such as; What race were the Holy Roman Emperors? What race were the Inca? Who was the last Black Spanish King? When did the Spanish start depicting Jesus as an Albino instead of a Black man? All of these question have been answered by a painting of the Inca king list, painted circa 1800 in Peru

Most or perhaps all, of what the average person knows about history, is derived from White media - of one kind or another. The problem is that White media's function is to entertain White audiences, not to enlighten anyone. After all, it is made-up fantasy.
So first of all, let us clarify what is REAL, and what is fantasy.

The British, with the "Modern" Germans, were the originators of revisionist history. It was they who first began to write Blacks out of history after the “Race/Religious Wars" of the late medieval. Now look, the British will soon start teaching their children the truth: that Blacks were the original people of Britain. But please know, this is not the result of truth seeking, those truths were always known. Rather, this is them succumbing to the pressure of sources like Realhistoryww, and others, who publish the truth. The truth causes people to ask uncomfortable questions of authority. Accordingly, we call upon students and truth seekers everywhere to keep the pressure up, demand the truth - it works! Click here for the News Stories: >>>

I remembered initially when I saw this thread I actually didn't believe a word of it though I became a little bit skeptical. Im a kind of a person who doesn't just dismiss things. Haven't forgotten about this I fell on some other materials online treating different topics I discovered that all we were taught were false and at best stories and white fantasies especially history. Going down different rabbit holes encountering evidences and proofs, I kinda understood what info this thread was passing across.
Op, it would be quite difficult to actually convince most cause the damage has been done through the indoctrination camps (schools) forcing down our throats the white man's narrative on history. Well if you're a skeptic or skeptical bout what you know I'll advice you to look at history from the available evidence (s) around, and avoid the mainstream channel of information. Pls visit this site and you'll see history and the world differently
http://realhistoryww.com

I'm also glad I can see some peeps actually waking up

Well I'm speechless.