Aiir2303's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Aiir2303's Profile › Aiir2303's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 11 pages)
ShyCypher:Good response. #Awesome |
BrightNonso2:The dude is something else. He goes about spewing rubbish with nothing to back it up. |
Lucasbalo:look at this tu*d. how is he despotic kindly explain. I have peeps who are actually studying and living in there and there's no harassment either by the police or the average citizen there, compare that to the brutality and death experienced by your brothers at the hand of the police in the US and don't forget to include the incarceration rate among your brothers there. I know you've been feeding fat on western propaganda and programming for some time only that i did'nt know that it's this bad. In this day and age theirs no excuse to be a drone lapping up all forms of propaganda and displaying it's symptoms online. western Anglo Zionist slaves always think their thoughts are their own #pathetic lot though. break away from your programming and stop your consumption of fluoride maybe you'll be able to redeem some little bits and pieces of your old life before you plugged in to the programming
|
Lucasbalo:hey brainwashed midget back up your claim with proofs if not shut the bleep up. western propaganda fed f**ls think they really know things except that when they open their mouth one can surely predict the number of hours the id*ota had spent steering into the conditioned programming shown on his screen. |
Lee Camp is an American stand-up comedian, writer, actor, and activist. Dubbed by Salon as the “John Oliver of Russia Today”, Camp is the host of RT America’s first comedy news show Redacted Tonight, which tackles the news agenda with a healthy dose of humor and satire. Lee’s writing credits are vast, having written for The Onion, Comedy Central and Huffington Post, as well as the acclaimed essay collections Moment of Clarity and Neither Sophisticated Nor Intelligent. Lee’s stand-up comedy has also been featured on Comedy Central, ABC’s Good Morning America, Showtime’s The Green Room with Paul Provenza, Al-Jazeera, BBC’s Newsnight, E!, MTV, and Spike TV. This article was originally published by Truthdig. The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT. |
Right now you may be thinking, “But, Lee, your theory is ridiculous. If these invasions were about the banking, then the rebels in Libya—getting help from NATO and the United States—would have set up a new banking system after bringing down Gadhafi.” Actually, they didn’t wait that long. In the middle of the brutal war, the Libyan rebels formed their own central bank. Brown said, “Several writers have noted the odd fact that the Libyan rebels took time out from their rebellion in March to create their own central bank—this before they even had a government.” Wow, that sure does sound like it’s all about the banking. Many of you know about Gen. Wesley Clark’s famous quote about seven countries in five years. Clark is a four-star general, the former head of NATO Supreme Allied Command, and he ran for president in 2008 (clearly he’s an underachiever). But it’s quite possible that 100 years from now, the one thing he’ll be remembered for is the fact that he told us that the Pentagon said to him in 2002: “We’re going to take down seven countries in five years. We’re going to start with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, then Libya, Somalia, Sudan. We’re going to come back and get Iran in five years.” Most of this has happened. We have, of course, added some countries to the list, such as Yemen. We’re helping to destroy Yemen largely to make Saudi Arabia happy. Apparently our government/media care only about Syrian children (in order to justify regime change). We couldn’t care less about Yemeni children, Iraqi children, Afghan children, Palestinian children, North Korean children, Somali children, Flint (Michigan) children, Baltimore children, Native American children, Puerto Rican children, Na’vi children … oh wait, I think that’s from “Avatar.” Was that fiction? My memories and 3-D movies are starting to blur together. Brown goes even further in her analysis of Clark’s bombshell: What do these seven countries have in common? … [N]one of them is listed among the 56 member banks of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). That evidently puts them outside the long regulatory arm of the central bankers’ central bank in Switzerland. The most renegade of the lot could be Libya and Iraq, the two that have actually been attacked. What I’m trying to say is: It’s all about the banking. So right now you’re thinking, “But, Lee, then why is the US so eager to turn Syria into a failed state if Syria never dropped the dollar? Your whole stupid theory falls apart right there.” First, I don’t appreciate your tone. Second, in February 2006, Syria dropped the dollar as its primary hard currency. I think I’m noticing a trend. In fact, on Jan. 4, it was reported that Pakistan was ditching the dollar in its trade with China, and that same day, the US placed it on the watch list for religious freedom violations. The same day? Are we really supposed to believe that it just so happened that Pakistan stopped using the dollar with China on the same day it started punching Christians in the nose for no good reason? No, clearly Pakistan had violated our religion of cold hard cash. This leaves only one question: Who will be next on the list of US illegal invasions cloaked in bullshit justifications? Well, last week, Iran finally did it: It switched from the dollar to the euro. And sure enough, this week, the US military-industrial complex, the corporate media and Israel all got together to claim that Iran is lying about its nuclear weapons development. What are the odds that this news would break within days of Iran dropping the dollar? What. Are. The. Odds? The one nice thing about our corporate state’s manufacturing of consent is how predictable it is. We will now see the mainstream media running an increasing number of reports pushing the idea that Iran is a sponsor of terrorism and is trying to develop nuclear weapons (which are WMDs, but for some strange reason, our media are shying away from saying, “They have WMDs”). Here’s a 2017 PBS article claiming that Iran is the top state sponsor of terrorism. One must assume this list of terror sponsors does not include the country that made the arms that significantly enhanced Islamic State’s military capabilities. (It’s the US) Or the country that drops hundreds of bombs per day on the Middle East. (It’s the US) But those bombs don’t cause any terror. Those are the happy bombs, clearly. Apparently, we just drop 1995 Richard Simmons down on unsuspecting people. Point is, as we watch our pathetic corporate media continue their manufacturing of consent for war with Iran, don’t fall for it. These wars are all about the banking. And millions of innocent people are killed in them. Millions more have their lives destroyed. You and I are just pawns in this game, and the last thing the ruling elite want are pawns who question the official narrative. |
By the end of this column, it will be clear which country the United States will invade and topple next. Or failing that, it will be clear which country our military-intelligence-industrial complex will be aching to invade next. We all want to know why America does what it does. And I don’t mean why Americans do what we do. I think that question still will be pondered eons from now by a future professor showing his students a video mind-meld of present-day UFC fighters booting each other in the head while thrilled onlookers cheer (not for either of the fighters but rather for more booting in the head). But we all seem to assume that America—the entity, the corporation—has some sort of larger reasoning behind the actions it takes, the actions put forward by the ruling elite. And almost all of us know that the reasons we’re given by the press secretaries and caricature-shaped heads on the nightly news are the ripest, most fetid grade of bullshit. We now know that the invasion of Iraq had nothing to do with weapons of mass destruction. We now know that the crushing of Libya had nothing to do with “stopping a bad man.” If one does even a cursory check of what dictators around the world are up to recently, you’ll find that the US doesn’t care in the slightest whether they are bad or good, whether they’re using their free time to kill thousands of innocent people or to harmonize their rock garden. In fact, the US gives military aid to 70 percent of the world’s dictators. (One would hope that’s only around the holidays though.) So if it’s not for the stated reasons, why does the US. overrun, topple and sometimes occupy the countries it does? Obviously, there are oil resources or rare minerals to be had. But there’s something else that links almost all of our recent wars. As The Guardian reported near the beginning of the Iraq War, “In October 2000, Iraq insisted on dumping the US dollar—the currency of the enemy—for the more multilateral euro.” However, one example does not make a trend. If it did, I would be a world-renowned beer pong champion rather than touting a 1-27 record. (I certainly can’t go pro with those numbers.) But there’s more. Soon after Libya began moving toward an African gold-based currency—and lining up all its African neighbors to join it—we invaded it as well, with the help of NATO. Author Ellen Brown pointed this out at the time of the invasion: [Moammar Gadhafi] initiated a movement to refuse the dollar and the euro, and called on Arab and African nations to use a new currency instead, the gold dinar. John Perkins, author of “Confessions of an Economic Hitman,” also has said that the true reason for the attack on Libya was Gadhafi’s move away from the dollar and the euro. This week, The Intercept reported that the ousting of Gadhafi, which was in many ways led by President Nicolas Sarkozy of France, actually had to do with Sarkozy secretly receiving millions from Gadhafi, and it seemed that his corruption was about to be revealed. But, the article also noted, “[Sarkozy’s] real military zeal and desire for regime change came only after [Hillary] Clinton and the Arab League broadcasted their desire to see [Gadhafi] go.” And the fact that Gadhafi was planning to upend the petrodollar in Africa certainly provides the motivation necessary. (It doesn’t take much to get the US excited about a new bombing campaign. I’m pretty sure we invaded Madagascar once in the 1970s because they smoked our good weed.)
|
Quelme:Yeah ! I certainly agree he's had too much junk and also a little bit too much of western propaganda |
Guidette:Im feeling your points. You sure do know how to think critically |
.. |
All those Anglo Zionist fanboys ran outta this thread at the sight of the evidence that they had always been screaming for. #pathetic lot |
And. .. |
LordReed:You're the one whose deep into the misconception that that Russian media is heavily controlled and if I may ask where did you get that notion And also we know who have turned nations into drones drumming western propaganda around the world in order to achieve the specific goals and some come to light . *we haven't forgotten the WMD in Iraq *The use of chemical weapons use in Syria blaming it on the government in power * The accusations of Ghadaffis Human Rights abuses and etc forgetting that it's number one ally in the Middle East is the #1 culprit in areas of human rights abuses and what of its crimes against in Yemen as its starves both women and children to death. How many of these does your CNN and the likes tell you rather than brain wash and conditioning you into the state of mind their puppet master want you (brain dead) . So, dear drone when CNN says Russian state media like you yourself have lapped up just know another round Of brain washing is starting you might like to take it hook line and sinker but I'll advise to stop and tune off
|
LordReed:Well... What do you know when you're hooked on CNN and the likes. |
Ikio:What are you even saying |
Ikio:Yah!..the problem with that is that there was no evidence or proofs given. Or should every one take Britain's word for it. What happened to the "innocent until proven guilty ". Should anyone be mailed to a cross on mere accusations only .The so called evidence was circumstantial at best. |
Ikio:...this is an alleged claim in a totally different setting. The Kremlin asked for Joint investigation and that was refused. They tried again by asking for a sample so that they can check out the substance and that was also rejected then boom the next thing is starting a russophobia campaign and also began giving sanctions without proofs or evidence and they couldn't even wait for the Opcw. Critical thinking proves that something is fishy and they want to move on quickly with their intended objectives |
Ikio:The official narrative is "alleged" use by ... And where did you get the info that the peeps in Kremlin are the culprits even your propaganda media houses dont make that claim anymore. You must be close to that buffoon Boris (the liar). |
Ikio:And what are you. Western brainwashed and conditioned drone who alone quotes himself |
Zoharariel:My comrade Zoharariel... What shall I make of this for in the sharing of those corporation thou omitted my name. Or do I not have enough Kremlin blood coursing through my veins that I should not able to join the feast at the table of Uncle Vlad |
mojeer678:Absolutely on point bro.. I'm just on the look out for those drones who don't think but rather believe the west and their mainstream propaganda media narrative by shutting down their Critical reasoning skills. Same false Flags also have been used as a pretext to attack Assad and some peeps are believing it and not asking questions. The west and the neocon's punks want and are pushing for war, they'll get it in full measure soon |
Forget the Novichok-Skripal narrative peddled out by Boris “the buffoon” Johnson, Theresa May and the Deep State mainstream media stenographers. Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has just dropped a bombshell revelation that blows the Salisbury poisoning hoax apart…A Swiss lab says that ‘BZ toxin’ was used in Salisbury. The toxin was not produced in Russia, but was in service in the US and UK, as well as other NATO member states. The substance used on Sergei Skripal was an agent called BZ, according to a Swiss lab, the Russian foreign minister said. The toxin was never produced in Russia, but was in service in the US, UK, and other NATO states. Sergei Skripal, a former Russian double agent, and his daughter Yulia were poisoned with an incapacitating toxin known as 3-Quinuclidinyl benzilate or BZ, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said, citing the results of the examination conducted by a Swiss chemical lab that worked with the samples that London handed over to the Organisation for the Prohibition of the Chemical Weapons (OPCW). The Swiss center sent the results to the OPCW. However, the UN chemical watchdog limited itself only to confirming the formula of the substance used to poison the Skripals in its final report without mentioning anything about the other facts presented in the Swiss document, the Russian foreign minister added. He went on to say that Moscow would ask the OPCW about its decision to not include any other information provided by the Swiss in its report. The Swiss center mentioned by Lavrov is the Spiez Laboratory controlled by the Swiss Federal Office for Civil Protection and ultimately by the country’s defense minister. The lab is also an internationally recognized center of excellence in the field of the nuclear, biological, and chemical protection and is one of the five centers permanently authorized by the OPCW. The Russian foreign minister said that London refused to answer dozens of “very specific” questions asked by Moscow about the Salisbury case, as well as to provide any substantial evidence that could shed light on the incident. Instead, the UK accused Russia of failing to answer its own questions, he said, adding that, in fact, London did not ask any questions but wanted Moscow to admit that it was responsible for the delivery of the chemical agent to the UK. |
The controversial American/English/French coalitions missile strikes in Syria last night have resulted in minimal damage to the Syrian army, as ZeroHedge overviews. According to Russian and Syrian media, Out of the 103 Tomahawk Missiles utilized by coalition forces against the Syrian army targets, 71 were successfully deflected by the Syrian army using outdated 30 year old Soviet era anti aircraft systems. They're calling him 'Neocon Don' The state media reported that three Syrians were injured by the strikes, with no military personnel killed. The Dumeir military airfield, one of the coalition targets, emerged completely unharmed. It seems this entire attack appears to have been a hollow show of force as the Syrians have emerged unscathed. Here’s the report from Russian TV News with English subs. Full transcript below: According to the Russian Ministry of Defense the Syrian air defense shot down a considerable part of the missiles. Evgeny Nippot knows what equipment the country has for the air defense. That is a salvage of the Tomahawk missile shot down by the Syrian air defense. The Syrian authorities tried to maintain the operability of the air defense systems, despite the exhausting conflict in the country. Igor Korotchenko, editor-in-chief of the Natsionalnaya Oborona magazine: "The Syrian army was trained and equipped with the help of the Soviet Union. For the last several years, the Russian servicemen have been operating in Syria, and they helped the Syrians to plan and conduct ground operations against the terrorists and militants. It's clear that today Syria has only two military allies, which are Russia and Iran." The base of the Syrian air shed is made up of the Soviet equipment, mainly the S-75, S-125 and S-200 complexes. Victor Murakhovsky, editor-in-chief of the Arsenal Otechestva magazine: "Moreover, Russia has supplied Buk M2E mid-range air-defense complexes but this is about an insignificant quantity, about 1 or 2 battalions. Pantsir S air defense systems were also supplied, about 40 units. Apparently, 8 batteries with 4 units in each are defending mostly facilities in Damascus, and 2 batteries with 8 units each are used for training the air-defense specialists." Experts say local military are trained by the instructors from Russia and Iran. The new equipment helped to enhance the potential of the Syrian air-defense. Thus, the Buk is capable of hitting targets at the height of about 20 kilometers, the effective range is more than 30, the complex can detect 24 targets at once. And the Pantsir is carrying 12 missiles. Moreover, it carries about 1,500 rounds which can hit targets at a range of 20 kilometers. Victor Murakhovsky: "The most protected are: Damascus, government facilities such as the Ministry of Defense, the general staff, communication complexes, and some facilities near Damascus, such as the government airfield, And among the most protected are the objects near the Golan Heights, at the border with Israel, because the Syrian air-defense has been developed to resist the strikes from Israel." Meanwhile, the Syrian authorities claim that due to the actions of the military, the missiles failed to reach all its targets on the territory of Syria. And the Ministry of Information has addressed the citizens, urging them "not to believe the enemy TV-channels, who intentionally exaggerate the scale of the attack". |
And it begins. The great war of our time. Let amerikanks and her allies that we are not fooled and all this would not end well for anyone. |
fineguy11:Your head dey there... The outcome would favour no one and the US would lick its wounds |
Putin is saying in Gandalf's voice "you shall not pass "
|
Brilliant!!
|
White Helmets staged Douma ‘chemical weapons attack’ on civilians — Russian General Staff Military & Defense April 11, 17:46 More: http://tass. com/defense/999108 On April 7, a number of NGOs, including the White Helmets, alleged that chemical weapons were used in Douma, Eastern Ghouta MOSCOW, April 11. /TASS/. The chemical weapons attack on civilians in the Syrian town of Douma was staged and filmed by members of the White Helmets organization, First Deputy Chief of the Russian General Staff’s Main Operations Department Lieutenant General Viktor Poznikhir told reporters on Wednesday. "On April 7, probably the last attempt to stage a chemical weapons attack in Eastern Ghouta was made. The notorious White Helmets, who operate as part of terrorist groups, staged and filmed a chemical weapons attack on civilians in the town of Douma," he said. Terrorists have failed to fake any chemical weapon attacks against civilians in Eastern Ghouta, he added. "During the humanitarian operation, the illegal armed units fighting in Eastern Ghouta have incessantly attempted to organize provocations involving the alleged use of toxic chemicals so as to put the blame for the use of chemical weapons on the Syrian government forces," he said. "Since the beginning of the humanitarian operation in Eastern Ghouta terrorists have failed to fake a single so-called chemical weapon attack against the civilian population," the general said. A workshop where militants had been loading ammunition with poisonous chemical agents has been found in underground tunnels in Syria, he went on. He said the militants had been plotting provocations involving the use of war gases, but all those plans had been timely exposed by the Syrian authorities and the Russian center for the reconciliation of conflicting parties. "For instance, on March 3 the militants’ workshop was found in an underground tunnel in Hazrama. Makeshift ammunition pieces were charged with poisonous agents there," he said. On April 7, a number of NGOs, including the White Helmets, alleged that chemical weapons were used in Douma, Eastern Ghouta. According to the statement published on the organization’s website on April 8, chlorine bombs had been dropped on the city, killing dozens and poisoning many locals who had to be brought to the hospital. The Russian Foreign Ministry dismissed that report as fake news. The Defense Ministry added that the White Helmets were notorious for spreading falsehoods. Regardless of that fact, on Sunday, when asked about the alleged use of chemical weapons in Syria, Trump blamed Russia and Iran for supporting Assad’s regime. On April 9, Russian military chemists visited the site of the alleged chemical weapons attack in Douma, including the health facility shown in the White Helmets’ footage, but found neither cases of exposure to chemical weapons nor traces of toxic agents.
|
Putin... The head of all irunmole's worldwide. |
Zoharariel:My brother... Your head is well greased ![]() Looking at things with a critical red pill lens unlike some conditioned and brainwashed imb**iles. Those five questions raised are valid ones |
adedehinbo:Hopefully ....the result of the investigation is already out and they said they can't trace the source. The question is why pin it on Russia when it has been established that any one with sufficient knowledge of organic chemistry with a good lab can cook this.. Plus there's evidence of its sale on the black market |
Nice piece. People should start to think critically about things and not eat up every bit of western propaganda. Skripal's case comes to mind. Pls people, listen more to alt media, gather info from more than one source(s) and filter you get little bits of truth which you can piece together. Avoid CNN, BBC and Co cause they'll do more than just brainwashing
|

