₦airaland Forum

benalvino3:
lmao. people respond to the decision like you are the ones crying. I am only telling people like you to chill... that abortion will be decided by the states and the people will be voted out if they mumu. stop projecting and stop crying.

didn't I tell you "good" when you said people are raising money for women to get abortions in other states? So why are you crying?

But Mike Pence said it should be banned.
It will be decided by the states fine women will be airlifted to States where they can get the care they need so why does it bother you that the bans will not be effective and they will want to go national.

Lol, every abortion fund and employees are making plans to protect their women while mailing abortion pills to them as well.

You are the one crying

itchie:
I don't need to call the clown, let him do his worse when states start implementing their laws. The federal government may control the UPSS but woe betide you if you are caught using those pills in a state where they are banned, you'll be going to jail and there's nothing Merrick Garland can do to help you.

Nobody will be going to jail they will get the abortions they need when they fly to other states.
Merrick Garland has spoken and the FDA has spoken save your tears it has not even started.

basilico:
I am for millions of babies who will not be killed. This ruling will encourage people to have safe sex, I dont see that as a problem

You are not for anything just a clown deceiving himself sharing thoughts and prayers when the kids are in cages and shot in schools.

It will only make women die, there is no statistical fact that suggest abortions bans encourages safe sex. Access to reproductive care of all types is what does
Anyway Clarence Thomas has told us that safe sex is dead once he overturns Griswold.

basilico:
What a nice thing . Mail abortion pills to deserving women who cant close their legs

Yes since there are no pills for men who ejaculate and are capable of impregnating multiple women in a month that will do for now.

benalvino3:
Stop crying. abortion is still happening. The Court did well for them.. also, try to be a responsible person and not rely on abortion for child prevention

Nobody is crying the only person lamenting here is you because you do not like the response this decision is getting.
You will cry more this November.

benalvino3:
To you, controlling your body means you can open your legs to any GloriousGbola you see and then run into planned parenthood. You cannot control your body by drinking and driving, the states do not allow you because life will be killed. you cannot run over a bunch of pigeons on the streets or dogs as well.

you will not allow a man to control his body if the woman decides to have a baby he does not want.

make we hear the word. You want to take cocaine, no, you cannot control your body, and you cannot sell it as well. there are things you cannot do as laws are set. these people still have their abortions.

What are you rambling about because you are saying nonsense as it stands

itchie:
A state doesn't need to challenge it, all the states need to do is implement their laws and let's see what the clown DOJ will do about it. My guess is absolutely nothing!! Because they know they are blowing hot air and don't have any Power to decide for the states how to proceed on Abortion. The supreme court justices were very clear on that.

The DOJ has spoken.

Call Merrick Garland to tell him otherwise as it stands abortion pills will remain accessible to every state and the federal government controls the UPSS. They will still mail it.

itchie:
Killing another living human is not controling your body. Controling your body means making wise safe sex and contraceptive decisions or controlling your legs by keeping them closed if you don't want to get pregnant.

It is not a living human it does not have inalienable rights or personhood.
Why is this fact so difficult to understand for you?
Go and read bodily autonomy instead of talking like an illiterate going by this argument of yours you are already admitting that a woman should be responsible enough to decide if she wants an abortion.
My problem with some men is how stupid they are two people had sex but somehow it is the woman's fault it all went wrong the woman then says ok let me choose you men say no she alone must suffer the consequences.
If that is not wickedness I have no idea what is.

See you all later going back to my hiatus out of naira land.

This decision was what brought me back here see you all soon when the drama unfolds and those clowns lose.

I will drop by once in a while to read comments.

itchie:
Lol, this is really funny, what power does the DOJ have to make laws for states? If a state decides to ban abortion pills, what is the DOJ going to do about it?

They have said it let a state challenge it let us see.

The fight is not over but we all know how it will end. This victory will be short lived.

Cc. Livelystone01

This is the goal they better start working towards it.

I thank the GQP for giving democrats ammo this midterms.

Idiots want to force their unpopular agenda down the throats of the majority where is that done?

Thoughts and prayers.

benalvino3:
it is dumb to tell women to be responsible? lol...

the same people pushing this women's rights are gone are the same people telling you men can be pregnant, they don't know what a woman is, they want men to be in women bathroom and take over women's sports.
women's rights are being taken away and it is the pro-life side that is fighting to keep them.

after this initial cry, everything will go back to normal. people will still have abortions, they will travel to neighboring states to have it if it is not available in their state. I go to Lagos and Abuja to do stuff concerning documents I wish I could do in port harcourt.

everyone should enjoy killing their babies if their states allow it... if it does not, then vote the lawmakers out. the supreme court just helped everyone and you are still crying. it is not the decision of the court to decide where abortion should be done, it is of the states to decide that. it is that simple. stop crying

When part of women being responsible omits them from being responsible enough to control their bodies I will ask again are you this dumb?

benalvino3:
Men could get pregnant... they are called birthing people. also, women are now womxn. the rights of women do not exist anymore since men can be women at will and no one, even the soon-to-be supreme court judge cannot define what a woman is.

Are you always this dumb or do you just take this persona on this forum?

Why am I even engaging these detached fellows who will all be alive to see what this decision will cause and see it get reversed in the future?
Why should I even bother myself I am done discussing with you are the other detached from reality fellows

benalvino3:
like I say, except a rape is going on, all the time it is the woman who decides to who she opens her legs. you also see this in the animal world. if a female lion does not want to mate, she will die closing her legs... when she wants to mate, she picks the fittest and the strongest male lion, the Alpha male. they don't let any lion mate with them.

as a woman, you should close your legs only to responsible men. do I have to tell you this or it is just common sense?

Then let the woman also decide what she wants. How on earth do you argue this and not argue that don't be silly. Let the woman decide that and stop being silly since according to you the man should not be held responsible why then should he be given the right to tell her what to do? Because that will be the commonsense rationale based on this argument right?
Going by this statement are you implying that married women should close their legs to their husbands because you are skipping the fact that married women get abortions, sometimes before commenting read so that you do not get to embarrass yourself

If men could get pregnant abortion will be legal everywhere.

If men were held responsible for their actions and start paying child support from the moment of conception abortion will be legal everywhere.

But no the woman is obligated to close her legs but not obligated to have rights over her body.

This is why I can never take these forced birthers seriously it is about controlling women

gambojimeta:
Ya dey ah pro death party .. poor women Ina Red state
who kannat affords ta travel ah dies likey chickens Ina back alleys abortions ors da ectopic pregnantcy


Kikikikikikiki

Yes, so long as the babies are alive and the mother is dead the white race must dominate.

benalvino3:
they should get their abortion where ever they want. good, they can donate but the good thing was done.
any woman who will rely on a donation to sleep with random men and not use proper measures is just stupid. let them close their legs or do the right things

Shut up where is the responsibility and accountability of the men. And married women who get abortions should close their legs from their husbands going by your asinine comments.
You cannot even pretend that this was never about babies but subjugating women.
Many abortions in the USA are done by married women.

Also the DOJ will not permit any state to ban abortion pills and these will be mailed to women in states where they are second class citizens.

The day a woman/girl dies for not receiving abortion care maybe these clowns will understand how extreme abortion bans springing up are terrible.

A rapist doesn't get a life time in prison in these states but a woman does? And this is not about controlling women but protecting babies by putting the lives of these women at risk

itchie:
A woman that doesn't want to have babies at any stage of her life has so many other safe sex options available to her. Abortion is not a contraceptive.

Abortion is a contraceptive as long as pregnancies are complicated abortions are a contraceptive and necessary options for many to mitigate difficult pregnancies and what not.

Stop arguing about something you have zero idea about.

Donations to fund out-of-state abortions have skyrocketed in hours.

These people don't know what they have done

basilico:
To you being alive is breathing. A person being fed O₂ is not fit to live. A baby in the womb is a thing because not eating, breathing outside, etc.
A peron in a comma also gets all his/her bodily functions taken over
Euthanisia is merciful killing. A lot of people get out of commas, some recover others become vegetables. Medical consent is where the docs advice you no hope here Let go,

Oh my goodness illiterates don't understand English what part of inalienable did you not understand? why am I still engaging you when you can enlighten yourself instead of going to Qanon sites reading that Biden lost the election.

Lastly I am pro-choice and I have always been a supporter of individual liberty.
Abortion is not something I will do unless unless and that is my own choice to make I will not make it for another woman and the government should not make that decision for me especially when they have done nothing to make maternal mortality rates low, health care and education easily accessible or made my children safe in schools.
You can not be pro-life you are a forced birther if you cared about life you will not support a man who put children in cages and health care access difficult for women and children. And yes America has over 400,000 children in foster care ask these hypocrites how many they have fed, adopted and donated to.

basilico:
ah ah then it can be killed because its not breathing by itself. What about someone in a ventilator in ICU. Cannot survive without being in ICU but can now be killed.
What logic? Are you a pervert?

The person can still gain consciousnesss the person is likely concious the difference is very clear one is a breathing human with inalienable rights(personhood) the other is a foetus second to the woman with no inalienable rights you can't apply rights to what cannot be seen because rights comes with responsibilities.
You get the logic right also study Euthanasia and medical consent before bringing up a terrible analogy.

Lastly, study what it means to be a pervert you can't be this embarrassing.

saxywale1:
It's bad when Manchin complains. *Shocking?*

Collins got played like a ping-pong?

They are lying if they are serious we don't need to wait till November to codify Roe.

At the end or at some points democrats will have to expand SCOTUS because let's say these rights are codified these people can still strike it down but that will be a slippery slope especially after the people have made their voices heard and they lied under that pretext of it not being decided by the people to overturn Roe.
They are shameless hypocrites so do not be surprised if they do it.

madrid5:
Your last paragraph is telling,according to US constitution ,america is a secular country , whether God loves them or not does not matter.

When will you all realise that their plan is to turn America into Afghanistan a Christo-fascist state with no separation of the church and state.
This week's religious funding case decision was the memo of their plans ahead.
Gay rights are next. Welcome to Christo-extremist evangelical America.

Livelystone01


Anti spam did it again

So here is a screenshot of my response to you.

The power of the court reviewing the works of the executive and legislature should be reversed because after all there is no where that is explicitly written in the constitution.

Read the screenshot carefully.

For the next 24 hours I will not respond to any mention.