₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,325,402 members, 8,421,746 topics. Date: Saturday, 06 June 2026 at 11:11 PM

Toggle theme

Bapel's Posts

Nairaland ForumBapel's ProfileBapel's Posts

1 (of 1 pages)

Science/TechnologyRe: New Specie Of Pit Viper, Devil-Eyed Frog & Others Found In Bolivian Andes by bapel: 8:39am On Dec 17, 2020
ibuildstuff:
So what ur own theory if evolution is fallacy. According to u it doesn't make sense that a complex being should evolve from a single cell. But do u know that a zygote is a single cell?


U don't even have right to disprove evolution wen u believe that a god just existed suddenly and talk everything into actualization.

U have not even prove ur god exist, u just believe with faith (believing without evidence) and here u are talking trash about evolution u know nothing about.

I mean if u study evolution and science deep enough, it totally made more sense than the Bible creation story.
First of all, It’s unfortunate that Pelecius was banned for allegedly spamming, hence, a delay in responding


Like I do say, it comes to CLEARLY explaining what evolution entails. If you read what was written very well, you should have seen the objections raised.
Now, he never said evolution is a fallacy (which is why I want to believe that you didn’t comprehend the argument). And the response is still found in what you quoted.


Again, a good understanding of someone’s argument is very important. A zygote develops to become a baby who goes on to grow and develop into an adult because the fertilized ovum contains all the INFORMATION (manual) needed for such development in its DNA (those which codes for protein, those that regulate, etc). That is the key – the information. You should read extensively on that.


Again, when you set up a strawman to attack, it does not portray you as a smart guy. No informed Christian believes that God existed SUDDENLY. Again, you should understand who God is and his nature, then you should be able to make sound argument.
About him not having right is a fallacy called non sequitur. It’s like saying that Bible believers such as Louis Pasteur, Isaac Newton, etc. don’t have right to critique evolution theory because they believe in God.


Then, this is not about God exist or not. It is about seeing if a theory fits the observation.
You claim he knows nothing about evolution and yet, you think that a simple organism (say a bacteria) should become complex (a mammal?) because a zygote (which already contain every INFORMATION it needs to develop into an adult) develops. Remove the log in your eyes so you’ll be able to see clearly


You don’t need say this, it’s meant for you and on a final note, you should comprehend arguments well before confronting it

1 (of 1 pages)