₦airaland Forum

nilla:
i typed t-h-r-u and the forum modified it to through

LanreDaMan:
Why is everybody blaming the Mgt of IBPLC, 80% of the balme should be put on the applicants
Intercon did not expect the crowd they got because they actually sent invitation to one third of the applicants that appeared the remaining 66% forged invitations (Relible source Info)
How you ask ?

Well, they had one of their friends send the invitation text to them and save that friends name as IBPLC.

So that was why they had to attend to only the people with theLetters first.

2. Why can't we just listen to and obey simple instructions? like

1 Queue / line up
2 Move back
3 Wait

It is like these we forget the meaning of theses words when we go for test

The reason test conducted by UBA and First bank were succesful were

1. All applicant Listened to and followed instructions
2. The management were prepared for the crowd they got

With incidents Like this happening over and over in IBPLC and sterling,
Management might be forced to call only a particular class of graduates just to minmize these kind of situations
Please do not let our eagerness and zeals to get better now kill the few opportunities we have
Please let us always organise and comport ourselves in test venues
It is well

My brother, I totally agree with you, I wasn't at the venues but i've heard soo many stories about what went down, and i can only imagine the sheer amount of people there wanting to write the test, I actually thought the problem was insufficient planning, but u've shown me another side to it, the "uninvited candidates", and i believe they caused most of the problems, cos my cousin that wrote the test in Ph was also not invited,

Anyway I hope they learn from this and prepare better next time,