₦airaland Forum

jibsiddy456:
Dey play. It's meant to be spent.. Let's assume i gift you 30 pi. Does that mean my account will be banned for sending pi out.. How can they differentiate btw normal transaction and gift

If your transaction was a barter one through the Pi Blockchain with a GCV conversion rate of $314159, the system will identify it and you won't encounter any issues. However, those who continue dealing with Pi and those selling on the black market will soon regret their actions.

Dear,GCV Community..💜💜

GCV 314159 USD will not change and definitely win!!

◾️I hope all GCV Community stay patient,don't transfer Pi to any Exchanges until there is an official announcement from CT. Don't waste your Pi that will be used by Exchanges to pay their IOU debts to 'IOU Players'.Your account is at risk of being confiscated by CT!! GCV is too big for Exchanges that bear IOU debts.

◾️Euler's Shield is the main Anchor of Pi Network besides Stellar.The GCV value has been officially set in Eulers Shield.Major Exchanges that are authorized by CT to list Pi will definitely list Pi with the GCV value.

jibsiddy456:
Regreting what.. I didn't sell anything. Even the blackmarket rate presently is $1.5 per pi still i didn't sell. So you believe 1 pi can worth 314159. Pls who will provide such liquidity. You are a learned person now my brother. Gvc was staged to make pi price get some value at blackmarket and they have achieved it. If the blackmarket could trade at $1.5. They can only do that price range or double. So be expecting $3 my oga

The unfortunate reality is that individuals who purchased Pi on the black market will have their account confiscated after OM, and their accounts will be barred for an entire century. Those who traded Pi on this illicit market are now experiencing regret.

1) The project team announced the mainnet launch date, which led to all hidden devils and monsters coming out. If they don't seize this opportunity to exploit, they won't have another chance once the mainnet is online! There are many gullible people waiting in line to be exploited by these vampires. What can we do? I've never seen people so eager to deceive others! Won't the truth be revealed in 7 days? Why rush to become victims?

2) Whether Pi can be listed on exchanges depends on the Pi project team! Exchanges need the project's authorization to list Pi. Currently, exchanges that have not obtained authorization have already delisted Pi. Don't be in a rush to be fooled! Some scammers are using various means to deceive Pioneers' Pi because they see the value reflected by the code is $314,159. Everyone, don't fall before dawn! Don't sell your Pi now; wait a few days and you will gain considerable wealth.

3) Everyone, please stay calm. Success is imminent, don't make irrational decisions and collapse before reaching the destination! Many scammers, websites, and exchanges want to take advantage of this opportunity to steal what we have mined for years. At this moment, stay vigilant! Why are they willing to buy your coins at double the price? Because the mainnet is imminent, and once the GCV price is revealed, they won't have the chance.

Jayboi:
As usual, we all know where this will end. Premium tears loading....

Please don't be jealous. You'll soon see things clearly.😂😂😂😂

jibsiddy456:
Do you think im a newbie when it comes to crypto. I started mining pi since 2020. How do you even think such bogus price is possible. They will the most successful mining project even they launch at $3. The only good thing about the token is that demand for it will be more than the supply. Forget all the gvc price.. It's delusional

Listen, I am confident that you sold your pi on the black market and you're now regretting not believing in the GCV value of 1 pi at $314159. Please refer to the attachment below. The GCV price at $314159 is already a settled matter. Pi isn't going to be listed on any exchange because it's a currency in its own right.

Dundalk:
oga u too dey make noise ,lower your voice jare,pi no go reach that price common, use your sense Biko.

I trust you'll return on the 20th to relate exactly as I said.

ZombieDredd:
If you hold 150,000 pi and it hits a dollar,
Na to call Mama be dat....

10 Pi would be sufficient for a lifetime if managed properly. It would enable you to purchase any car of your choice, invest in real estate, travel wherever you wish, and more. Pi is tangible and its significance will become widely understood within the next week.

uzohrome:
It won't be possible, no liquidity for now, I think maybe 0.05 might be obtainable.

I understand your skepticism, but I think there’s a bit more to Pi Network than comparing it to other mining apps like those on Telegram. Pi is designed to be a legitimate cryptocurrency with its own blockchain, not just a quick mining app.

jibsiddy456:
How is that even possible. The realistic price here is $2-$5

Are you under the impression that Pi Network is similar to a Telegram app like Hamster Combat? Pi Network is a unique currency of its own. Soon, it will surprise those who didn't believe in it. It would take approximately two years to mine one Pi after the OM. So, keep an eye out for it.

SUPERPACK:
Delusion. It will be lucky to see a dollar on listing. Easy come easy go

No exchange has the authority to list pi, only pi itself is able to list an exchange under certain conditions. The Pi network is incomparable to anything else.

WhiteIverson:
Keep giving yourself false hope

Come back here in a week and repeat those words to me. 😂😂😂😂

sharpwriter:
Lol.. Bàbá stop dreaming. At most if one Pi will have value more than 3, 10 or 20 dollars, it would be at best the current market price fluctuating between 43 to 51 dollars just as it has been doing since the last two months.

Also, if it would have great value like you said it should be nearing or be at par with Ethereum. It can't have value more than Bitcoin.

Even this bitcoin sef, did it just skyrocket at once? I still remember it when 1 bitcoin was $10,000

Now, your funny sef wants Pi at 314k dolls. What a bombshellic joke 🤣🤣🤣

All na pipe dream sha

You seem to be misunderstanding. Pi iou is not the same as Pi network. Pi network is a currency that cannot be traded on any exchange. It's worth noting that 1 Pi network has already reached a value of $314159.

I talk am

See

People are already regretting not mining pi.

Again, pi network at $314159 already achieved. 1000%

April4th:
Pi is already selling for $90 in the international market for the past 6 months. It would definitely surpass the $100 mark, when it finally launches

This is not the Pi network, but a fake Pi IOU. Pi is not a typical mining app that you trade on the exchange. Rather, Pi network is a currency in its own right. You might be thinking that Pi coin is similar to the Hamster Combat game. Do you think that Nigerian banks engaged in mining the Pi network have no idea what they're doing? In a week's time, you'll start questioning your local community as to why they blinded you from mining Pi earlier. Quite humorous, isn't it?

SUPERPACK:
Delusion. It will be lucky to see a dollar on listing. Easy come easy go

Skepticism and pessimistic views typically originate from individuals like you who didn't mine the Pi Network. Yet, the GCV reaching $314159 is already a 1000% reality.

Babalakin:
You are sick, and you have no one to tell you. Thank your God if you see $1

Your eyes will soon see the truth. I'll be here, chuckling at everyone who said it wasn't possible. GCV reaching $314158 has already been accomplished.

What would happen if the Pi network officially launched with a value of $314,159 per Pi coin? In about 7 days, on the 20th of February, the Pi network will officially launch its Open Mainnet (OM), with a global consensus value of 1 Pi at $314,159. Can you imagine how those who were aware of it but didn't mine it would feel? Be aware that the Pi network is not a simple app like other telegram mining apps, it's a currency in its own right. Let's not forget that all Nigerian banks, telecommunications companies, and other major corporations are mining Pi because no entity is bigger than Pi. Make way for those mining Pi, as they are likely to be the future billionaires in our midst.

Akpakomiza2:
I am very sure they won't win. I am a veteran of election matters. But they can win at the tribunal just like Oyetola and lose at supreme

You should be ashamed of yourself. Your credibility has diminished and people no longer take you seriously. The name Akpakomiza2 clearly depicts your character. Worthless.

Non-Compliance with the Electoral Act

1. Failure to record serial numbers of sensitive materials (ballot papers, result sheets, BVAS machines) in the prescribed form. This requirement is seen in Section 73(2) of the Electoral Act and clause 2.3.6 (b) in INEC’s Manual for Election Officials; and is a strict liability clause. Failure to do so in *any* polling unit renders the election in that unit *invalid*. There are 320 polling units affected by this.

2. Over-Voting. Here Asue Ighodalo is alleging that in 133 polling units the number of votes cast was more than the number of accredited voters. This was determined by an examination of polling unit results and the BVAS extract/machines. Instead of canceling these results, INEC collated them. APC of course won in these units where there were over-voting. Asue Ighodalo is asking that the results be canceled.

Majority of lawful votes

1. Here we have 236 polling units where the incorrect unit results were collated. This is the sub-head where instead of using the correct results recorded at the PUs and uploaded onto the Irev portal; INEC manufactured results sheets either unsigned by any agent or clearly manipulatedand used these to declare a winner. Ighodalo is asking the Tribunal to collate the correct results as captured in their Irev CTCs and PDP agents copies.

2. Failure to collate Ikpoba Okha Ward 2 results. Here INEC curiously omitted results from 76 out of 77 PUs in this ward. Only one PU had the form EC40G uploaded onto the Irev portal. All the others did not have polling unit results uploaded *and* BVAS machines shows that accreditation took place. INEC claimed there was BVAS bypass but provided no evidence of this. Ighodalo is therefore asking the courts to collate the results in this ward.

The above is the case of Asue Ighodalo in a nutshell.

Ighodalo did not need to call thousands of witnesses to prove his case. It was why I laughed at the ignorance of John Mayaki and other Monday Okpebholo hirelings when they shamelessly showed their ignorance trying to mock the PDP and Asue Ighodalo for presenting only twelve witnesses.

Section 137 of the Electoral Act says when alleging non-compliance, oral evidence is not required if documents tendered manifestly prove the said non-compliance. This is why the lawyers to Asue Ighodalo did not call the 453 polling unit agents, as the CTCs and original documents proved the case.

With all these clear evidence of non compliance by INEC, over voting, wrong qa of results and non serialization of sensitive materials, INEC had no defence ,quickly closing its case like a defiant armed robber facing death by firing squad who has resigned to fate and accepted a just punishment albeit without any show of penitence.

Only INEC could have defended the EC25B issue; as the requirement to comply is INEC’s alone. INEC’s failure to put anyone on the stand has left the APC in a fatal quagmire.

Why then are people like John Mayaki, Jarret Tenebe, Etinosa Igiebor and others showing much confidence on social media spaces? It is called Dutch courage and their belief that President Bola Tinubu will step in to save the day...

Culled from the Essay, WEEP NOT EDO, JOY IS COMING By Daniel Aroren Noah Osa-Ogbegie,Esq.

The (Asue Ighodalo)petition is built of 4 segments or pillars warehoused under two separate roofs.

*Non-Compliance with the Electoral Act*

1. Failure to record serial numbers of sensitive materials (ballot papers, result sheets, BVAS machines) in the prescribed form. This requirement is seen in Section 73(2) of the Electoral Act and clause 2.3.6 (b) in INEC’s Manual for Election Officials; and is a strict liability clause. Failure to do so in *any* polling unit renders the election in that unit *invalid*. There are 320 polling units affected by this.

2. Over-Voting. Here Asue Ighodalo is alleging that in 133 polling units the number of votes cast was more than the number of accredited voters. This was determined by an examination of polling unit results and the BVAS extract/machines. Instead of canceling these results, INEC collated them. APC of course won in these units where there were over-voting. Asue Ighodalo is asking that the results be canceled.

*Majority of lawful votes*

1. Here we have 236 polling units where the incorrect unit results were collated. This is the sub-head where instead of using the correct results recorded at the PUs and uploaded onto the Irev portal; INEC manufactured results sheets either unsigned by any agent or clearly manipulatedand used these to declare a winner. Ighodalo is asking the Tribunal to collate the correct results as captured in their Irev CTCs and PDP agents copies.

2. Failure to collate Ikpoba Okha Ward 2 results. Here INEC curiously omitted results from 76 out of 77 PUs in this ward. Only one PU had the form EC40G uploaded onto the Irev portal. All the others did not have polling unit results uploaded *and* BVAS machines shows that accreditation took place. INEC claimed there was BVAS bypass but provided no evidence of this. Ighodalo is therefore asking the courts to collate the results in this ward.

The above is the case of Asue Ighodalo in a nutshell.

Ighodalo did not need to call thousands of witnesses to prove his case. It was why I laughed at the ignorance of John Mayaki and other Monday Okpebholo hirelings when they shamelessly showed their ignorance trying to mock the PDP and Asue Ighodalo for presenting only twelve witnesses.

Section 137 of the Electoral Act says when alleging non-compliance, oral evidence is not required if documents tendered manifestly prove the said non-compliance. This is why the lawyers to Asue Ighodalo did not call the 453 polling unit agents, as the CTCs and original documents proved the case.

With all these clear evidence of non compliance by INEC, over voting, wrong qa of results and non serialization of sensitive materials, INEC had no defence ,quickly closing its case like a defiant armed robber facing death by firing squad who has resigned to fate and accepted a just punishment albeit without any show of penitence.

Only INEC could have defended the EC25B issue; as the requirement to comply is INEC’s alone. INEC’s failure to put anyone on the stand has left the APC in a fatal quagmire.

Why then are people like John Mayaki, Jarret Tenebe, Etinosa Igiebor and others showing much confidence on social media spaces? It is called Dutch courage and their belief that President Bola Tinubu will step in to save the day...

Culled from the Essay, WEEP NOT EDO, JOY IS COMING By Daniel Aroren Noah Osa-Ogbegie,Esq.

Akpakomiza2:
PDP failed to substantiate the over voting in any of the 133 units.this particular units was already cancelled so back to square 0

The voting results from this unit was invalidated, but the same result remained posted on IREV. The total accredited votes were 189, yet the total votes cast was 204. This unit results was added up and led to the Governor's lead over Ighodalo. What's your take on this my brother? 😂😂😂

Gandrova:
Why should he accepts to be part of them in the first place?
I hope he would stomach what ever happened to him aftermath.
If you can't do the time don't do the crime.

He is aware that he would face imprisonment if he were to say otherwise. He has no desire to perjure himself.

OldSkoolHeadBoy:
[b]You guys don't know how the electoral and legal system works !

The first issue is it that it is universally recognized that there is no election that is 100% flawless anywhere in the world. The witness that has been called, despite scoring an own goal has only confirmed that there was over voting in only one (1) Polling Unit, out of several hundred Polling Units that were used during the election in Edo State. The judgement to sustain or overturn the election result would be determined based on if there are several of such infractions in several Polling Units that would be sufficient to affect the declared results in favour of the APC Gubernatorial Candidate. The volume of possible number of votes in the affected Polling Units where over voting took place must be greater than the margin of difference between the declared APC winner and the PDP loser that is challenging the process.

Therefore, before you get unnecessarily excited and at the end of the day the judgement does go in your favour, please note that there would have to be several of this type of revelation that must be in overwhelming volume, if not the result of the election stands as declared ![/b]

Over voting has taken place in 133 units across the entire state, not only in this particular unit. The individual testifying for the second respondent acknowledged over voting in his unit. The same acknowledgment is expected from others. If you subtract those units where over voting transpired, the PDP will emerge as the winner.

famology:
There's really nothing to defend. The pdp already destroyed their case. I also do not expect the apc to present witnesses too. The burden of proof lies with the petitioner not the respondent.

I see Akpakomiza2 here. Your eyes will soon clear.

adioolayi:
I agree with you..

They will cancel few LGAs and order rerun...

But then, can PDP win incumbent APC in a rerun elections, having lost same elections when they were ruling?

The prayers from the PDP did not request a rerun in case.

ElevationD:
Akpakomiza are you there? Is this correct of the proceedings?

Let’s here from you.

He won't show his face on this.

We wanted to present more than 100 witnesses because we didn't have confidence that INEC will bring in the BVAS machine which we actually wanted to prove our Case of over voting and wrong collation by INEC, it's obvious Inec has brought them to the Court after a lot of pressure, If APC must know BVAS was what was missing in the puzzle. Which has been presented before the tribunal, BVAS, IREV, CTC and EC8A are the sensitive material that are evidence of his own that does not need witnesses to prove is authenticity. All they need to do is to end the case to give room for defense by both Inec and APC so that calculation will start as you know the tribunal is time bound. It's too early for APC to start celebrating. All this has gone to show that APC didn't even know what PDP is actually asking for from the beginning till now. When this is done the Court will declare the rightful winner based on the evidence presented before it.

DR ASUE IGHODALO IS Coming to govern Edo State and the state will be better for it.

Akpakomiza2:
Lol, and pdp are closing their case prematurely?

Some people obviously want the rigging of Edo State gubernatorial election to stand even when the rigging was obviously proven in our petition.

You said we can't win because we presented 19 witnesses. I wish you understood what the witnesses have done to INEC fraudulently conducted election and the implication.

Our proofs are sufficient and we equally have documents to show more proofs.

You can continue to read the misleading reports from the likes of John Mayaki and Fred Itua. The end of this shortlived administration of terror, thuggery and misappropriation is near as the people's choice Asue Ighodalo warms up for the seat of governance to drive major and satisfactory development in Edo State.

My dearest friends and colleagues in the struggle, be confident, be strong and resilient. In the face of the intimidation, JOY IS CERTAIN and has arrived.

Asue Ighodalo will be our Governor 💯