₦airaland Forum

Kalashnikov49:
Aswani
FSBoperator


You have been given sn open floor to come and rsnt. Why run away?

People don't really understand why mazi made this post, I guess he has some people in mind. Let me explain using an all$ged kidnapper and accomplices.

Coming or going home is always supposed to be a thing of joy for sane people, that is if st.@te sponsored kidn@ppers masquarading as UGM or repented bandits are not everywhere over there.

Now can you imagine when st@.te spon.sored cr!minals think visiting Nigeria is punishment.... like when you visit your own country is a pun.ishment...... tufiakwaaaa

This is why we will and must go hard until St@.te sponsored cr!minals on are dislodged and their oga in Aso Rock removed by Nigerians in 2027 elections.

It's a matter of time, all the criminals recruited by Aso Rock to cause mayhem in Igbo land will be exposed and made to face justice.

thomas2024:
Oga, how are the real IPOB or you mean unknown gunmen recruited by the illegitimate government of APC to discredit them. You think na Gen Z full here bah wey you fit hoodwink?

Continue. Everything will change for you once we lay our hands on your identity together with Aswani, and in case we don't, Osewa will be held responsible till he provides them. It will be like a horror movie come true for you and Aswani. We always take our time

FSBoperator:
Aswani , the guy is a raging lunatic

They license to insult people..... but the same cannot be met to them. It's very well noted. Continue

FSBoperator:
You are insane

Go and listen to Amupitan..... you will have a reconsideration of your wishful thinking. One way or the other, Tinubu will not spend a night in Aso Rock beyond May 29 2027. Mark this post.

HacheNoire:
It’s a good development to avoid court cases after elections.

It still won’t change the outcome!

How can a normal person trust a man reputed for trafficking heroin in the US? Same man currently at the mercy of a mid-level career judge in a US District court?

Mandem05:
Nobody Trusts Tinubu to Run a Free and Fair Election, Including His Own Supporters - Momodu

We're forensically unmasking his rigging plans..... and thwart it. As you can see, all results declared at the polling unit will be collated and announced for the world to see before Amupitan will ever have the chance to rig the election for Tinubu

HacheNoire:
Monday morning gibberish!

The Demigod- His Excellency, President Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu (GCFR) will NEVER rig any election.

The structure and formation of our Great party is now hidden and open for anyone to see and reach conclusion!

Rig an election that was already won a year ago!

2027 is just for formality’s. A winner already emerged!

You can check for confirmation on INEC website!

He has deployed his SW kinsmen & their wives to take over key posts in INEC

This woman here is Oluyemi Titilayo Adeyemi-Showunmi. She is alleged to be the wife of Segun Showunmi. Yes Segun Showunmi who is attacking and threatening Nigerians with treason for demanding electoral fairness and credible elections in 2027. When we tell you criminals and terrorists have taken over Nigeria you think we don't know more.

But there is good news. Just make sure you go out that day to vote, stay in your Polling units until the local INEC official count, fill the results in the declaration sheet and announce it. Scan/snap the declared Polling unit results and upload it online for independent collation.

Tinubu plan is to fill INEC with his SW relatives and use them to rig the election. You owe your generation an act of eternal duty to stop the rigging plans of that heroin trafficker in Aso Rock
Oluyemi Titilayo Adeyemi-Showunmi was newly appointed by Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu as the Director of Electoral Operations at the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). Yes that INEC currently headed by Prof Josiah Amupitan.

You can now know the reason why Segun Showunmi is all out attacking and threatening Nigerians with treason for demanding electoral fairness and credible elections in 2027.

What other evidence do you need?

PURE CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Nigerians must defend their votes by all necessary means necessarily and at whatever cost.

We challenge Segun Showunmi to deny this.

BREAKING NEWS: UPDATE ON SIMON EKPA’S RELEASE 🇫🇮

THIS IS OFFICIAL COMMUNICATION FROM THE LEGAL TEAM — 18 OCTOBER 2026

1. EXPECTED RELEASE DATE
Simon Ekpa is expected to be released before, or on or around, 17 NOVEMBER 2026.

2. UNCONDITIONAL RELEASE
The legal team’s position is that his release will be unconditional, with no conditions attached to his release.

3. HIS DESTINATION AFTER RELEASE
Simon Ekpa is a Finnish national and has a home in Finland. Following his release, he will return to his home in Finland. Nothing has changed .

4. SIXTY (60) DAYS TO CHALLENGE THE CONVICTION
Following his Appeal court release, we have a period of sixty (60) days to pursue the appropriate legal process seeking to have the conviction quashed, in accordance with the applicable procedure under Finnish law.

5. APPEAL TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FINLAND
When SIMON EKPA is out and FREE, the legal team intends to apply for a leave to appeal at the Supreme Court of Finland to challenge the conviction and seek its quashing.

6. SPECIAL GROUNDS FOR QUASHING THE CONVICTION
The legal team in consultation have identified special grounds upon which we intend to base the application for leave to appeal, to have the conviction quashed.

7. STRENGTH OF LEGAL STRATEGY
I'm glad to announce that this small struggling company called Bigkoko uncovered the most outrageous State conspiracies against African dissents. A conspiracy that involved Nigeria, the UK, Findland, global Oil companies and which saw Nigeria vice president Shettima visited Sweden in the summer of 2024.

With Bigkoko, you know where you stand!

That is why I laugh at people like Segun....if only he knew why Amupitan is committing the election to his god, rather than entrenching transparency and proper vote count .

Even if Tinubu like let him and Amupitan change all INEC staff to their SW kinsman.... the election results announced at the close of the poll at the polling unit will be aggregated, collated and announced before rogues in INEC can change anything. Through that aggregation, and collation Nigerians will know their new president before 10pm that same day

Ofunaofu:
Election results collation must be undertaken by every patriotic Nigerian. The era of passivity is over

Your Excellency, Peter Gregory Obi.

Greetings & love from the Bigkoko Group.

You are no doubt doing well in all the opinion polls, raw data intake from the street and even from diplomatic sources we sometimes talk to. Your intentions & also are great for Nigerians, and that is exactly why criminal cartels in Europe are fighting tool & nails to make sure Bola continues the plunder of Nigeria resources on their behalf.

If the Will of the people is not subverted at INEC through direct interference by criminal cartels in Paris~London~Brussels axis, we can well congratulate you right now as the incoming preside of Nigeria 2027~2031. But a lot needs to be done to make this a reality. Ndi Mmuo has spoken and that is why I’m writing you this message.

Your main competitor HE Atiku Abubaker has done quite well for his candidacy by engaging a Lobbyist called Von Batten.
This DC firm might not improve AA’s chances on the polls, rather it has just one sole goal: Making sure Tinubu doesn’t get legitimacy in Washington. So far, despite an alleged splashing of $9M on equal measures on American bureaucracy, Tinubu efforts have proved ineffective. Von Batten has severed Tinubu from Trump. Washington DC is firmly out of reach for Bola Ahmed Tinubu, partly due to Tinubu’s alleged drug past, partly due to his strange love for M/M ticket in a secular Nigeria and partly due to his abysmal failure at governance and sickness. If all goes well….we can well say, Tinubu won’t spend a night in Ask Rock beyond May 29 2027.

Now, to my advise and warning.
I will tell you a secret which no one will be bold enough to tell you. Ndi Mmuo and Ndi egede have aligned to help you get in there. And a choice has been presented to them that hold counsel for the Divine….. the template given to the criminal cartels in Europe to choose is “JUSTICE OR JUDGEMENT “

If the cartels chooses Justice….you’re the next president of Nigeria. The whole people of Nigeria and by large Africa will win. But if the cartels arrogantly chooses Judgement because in their belief that by the time the judgement arrives, they would have plundered Nigeria beyond recognition, then Mazi Nnamdi Kanu will win!

The grace following you is what we call “Follow~come. It was not bestowed on you by the god of the Catholic Church, which i no doubt respects since i was a member in my infant years, a decision made by my mom though. Don't bother about my current spirituality.

Take a look at Mazi Nnamdi Kanu….same grace, wisdom and strength of character. Both of you exhume the epitome of Ikenga and Ngwu join together through the Igbo spirituality of Oji Ofor ga ana! These things freely given to both of you are what others are paying heavily to get. And they can't.

Now, here comes a strange twist from Anambra. The frustrations of Soludo is because the task given to him against you is not having an effect on you because Igbos believe in Ojio Ofor ga na. Both of you pretend to be Catholics but indeed differently mantled. One buys power and become a slave to his vanities, while the other seeks power and power fights to locate him.

Soludo going after traditional priests is not something of fantasy but rather the task which the one who stole 2023 elections assigned him to do….believing that when those who offer Libation to Ndi Ichi na Ndi egede are chased from your state….Ndi Mmuo will be too busy proving themselves than fortifying your path to victory! Take a look at the grace, love and welcome you receive from the people….it is the very sign that Ndi ichi na Ndi egede are not busy….neither have Ndi Mmuo left the battle. Voice of the people is the voice of God.

But I tell you the elections is already won & lost….what we now wait to hear from Ndi Mmuo is the choice the criminal cartels in Paris~London~Brussels axis made. Like we always tell those who look for our trouble, we say it again to the criminal cartels in Paris~London~Brussels axis CHOOSE YOUR PENAL WELL!

For now….you need to get your own European lobbyist before they foolishly choose Judgement!

Thanks

https://fb.watch/v/3SxTUU3yJ/

Abiola: From Symbol of Democracy to an Example of Imprisonment?#Abiola #Apc #atruthatatime #Democracy pic.twitter.com/nba4VxwY1k

— Mimi (@Mimi_yakigar) October 17, 2026

Listen for your self!

Chidi Odinkalu a prominent Human Rights campaigner in Nigeria wrote:

The supporters of a very popular incumbent president clearly do not want a count & are not interested in a campaign.

They only ever exercise their mandibles to threaten anybody & everybody darkly with everything from losing their wives, to losing their fingers, to losing their habitations or lives.

@SegunShowunmi has gone further to call it treason to do what Obafemi Awolowo & Michael Ajasin did in Ondo State in 1983: have party agents willing to go the extra mile to collect the Form EC8As from every polling unit.

He calls it treason for parties to do that which they are entitled to under law.

These guys should just say it straight: forget the vote, they will write the results!


Here’s the twist: OPPOSITION Parties will declared their own results! Segun Showumi and his co-travellers can threaten all they want, 2027 election can not be rigged! If Bola goes ahead to rig it, he will be dragged out of Aso Rock….and i hope he is not beaten like a common drug trafficker!

WHY ELECTION RESULTS MUST BE INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED: THE NIGERIAN COLLATION CENTRE IS WHERE POLITICIANS USUALLY RIG & REWRITE ELECTION RESULTS WHILE POLLING UNITS IS WHERE DEMOCRACY MUST PROVE ITSELF!

All declared election results at the polling units must be independently collated and quickly announced. The hyenas banking on Amupitan announcing a forged election results will be disappointed.

However, this globs best practice isn’t new or a Nigerian thing. All over the world the media, politicians, political parties independently collate results from each of the polling units….and compared it with what the election body announced. Saying people or political parties should not collate results independently smack of a hidden plan to rig election for Bola who already knew he is not going to win.

If every polling unit has declared its results, why should the people have to wait until a central collation centre to discover who actually won? In the just concluded election in Sweden, it was even the media that announced the leading parties even though it was a mere 3 points difference (176 vs 173). That was also exactly what the election body also announced.

Why is Tinubu and his kinsmen afraid of elections announced at the polling units Why INEC officials? Opposition parties never said they will announce their own manufactured results, rather, they hinted on collating all the results announced at the polling units before the hyenas rig & rewrite it at the Collation center!

This is one of the most important questions in electoral integrity.

Across democracies, election authorities have the legal responsibility to compile, verify and certify results. But the media, accredited election observers, civil-society organisations and political parties often conduct their own independent tallies—not because they are authorised to replace the electoral commission, but because transparency requires that the official figures can be checked against the original records.

The electoral commission certifies the result. Independent verification tests whether the result is consistent with the evidence.

The two functions should complement each other, not compete.

1. The global best practice: Make every polling unit verifiable

The ACE Electoral Knowledge Network’s guidance on election results management recommends transparency throughout the counting and tabulation process. Party representatives and observers should be able to obtain official copies of polling-station results, follow the figures through successive levels of collation and identify discrepancies. Relevant tally sheets and other documents should be publicly accessible under the applicable legal framework. .

A credible results-management system should therefore make it possible to answer five questions:

1. What were the votes recorded at each polling unit?
2. Where is the official result form supporting those figures?
3. Were the figures transmitted and entered correctly at the next collation level?
4. If a figure changed, was the change supported by a lawful, documented correction or recount?
5. Can the final certified result be reconciled with the underlying polling-unit records?

This is the foundation of an auditable election.

The best systems make results available quickly, preserve the original records, document every authorised correction and allow observers to trace the numbers from the polling unit to the final declaration.

2. Why do media organisations, observers and political parties conduct independent tallies?

Because independent verification creates multiple opportunities to detect errors and irregularities.

Imagine an election with 10,000 polling units. At each unit, officials count the votes and complete an official result form. Accredited party agents obtain copies, observers document the process, and the results are transmitted to the appropriate collation centre.

Now imagine that journalists, civil-society organisations and political parties independently enter the figures from those forms into their own databases.

They can compare their totals with the figures released by the electoral commission.

If the numbers agree, that provides an additional layer of confidence—although it does not, by itself, prove that every aspect of the election was fair.

If the numbers disagree, the discrepancy can be traced back to particular polling units and investigated.

This is the logic behind parallel vote tabulation and other forms of independent results verification. Such methods must use transparent sampling or sufficiently complete data, disclose their methodology and distinguish estimates from official results.

Independent verification is not an alternative to the electoral commission. It is an accountability mechanism that helps the public assess the commission’s work.

3. Why is the collation centre so sensitive?

Because collation brings together the individual results that determine the overall outcome.

The counting at a polling unit may be witnessed by voters, party agents and observers. The result may be written on an official form and displayed publicly.

But the result must then travel through a chain of custody: transmission, receipt, verification, aggregation and certification.

Every additional stage creates an operational responsibility which Nigerian politicians historically take advantage off to rig. It also creates a potential point of failure if procedures are weak, documentation is missing or officials exercise unauthorised discretion.

The ACE Electoral Knowledge Network specifically identifies the need to maintain transparency and preserve the ability to trace polling-unit results through the tabulation process. .

This is why collation centres require careful observation.

A discrepancy could arise from a genuine arithmetic error, a transcription mistake, a missing result form, a technical failure or an unlawful alteration. The evidence must establish which explanation applies.

The objective should not be to presume that every discrepancy proves fraud. It should be to ensure that no discrepancy capable of affecting the result is left unexplained.

4. Why might politicians try to subvert the people’s choice at collation?.

Where political office offers access to public resources, influence over appointments, patronage and considerable personal power, the stakes of losing an election can be exceptionally high.

A candidate who believes that losing office carries significant political or financial costs may have a strong incentive to challenge an unfavourable result. In an environment where oversight is weak and sanctions are unlikely, that incentive can become an incentive to manipulate the process.

The institutional lesson is clear: electoral systems should be designed so that neither an honest mistake nor deliberate interference can easily remain undetected.

5. With polling-unit results available, why should the people be left guessing?

This is where the argument becomes especially important.

Suppose the official polling-unit records show Candidate A with 400,000 votes and Candidate B with 350,000 votes across the relevant units. If the final declaration differs materially from the sum of those records, the electoral authority should be able to explain the difference through documented, lawful adjustments.

A proper reconciliation should account for every relevant polling unit, including units where results were rejected, cancelled, corrected or subject to a lawful recount. It should also account for legally recognised categories of special voting where applicable.

The principle is not that the media’s arithmetic automatically overrides the official declaration. The principle is that the official declaration must be capable of being tested against the underlying evidence.

Where the records are complete and publicly accessible, candidates, observers, journalists and citizens can calculate the provisional standings themselves.

That does not eliminate every dispute, but it makes unexplained changes more difficult to conceal.

A transparent election should not require citizens to choose between blind trust and unsupported suspicion. It should provide evidence that permits informed scrutiny.

6. The reform Nigeria—and other democracies—should take seriously

The practical solution is not to abolish collation centres. Electoral authorities need mechanisms to receive, verify and aggregate results, and the law must determine how official results are certified.

The solution is to make every stage auditable.

A credible framework should include:

First, immediate publication. Make each polling-unit result form publicly available as soon as legally and operationally feasible, subject to safeguards against premature disclosure where polls have not yet closed. Nigeria constitution already provided for this: the polling unit officials after counting must announced the polling unit results. That’s where opposition parties will get their results!

Second, authenticated source records. Preserve the original signed forms and provide reliable copies or digital images so that the public can compare entered figures with the source document. The Nigeria constitution als provided for this, agents of political parties will be allowed to get a copy of the results announced by INEC officials at the polling units . Is Amupitan and Bola planning to change what was announced at the polling units?

Third, a public results portal. Publish polling-unit figures, collation-level totals and the final aggregate in machine-readable formats wherever feasible. Since Amupitan and the hordes of crooks would rather allow. Gap for rigging, the Opposition should fix this gap. Create your public results portal where each of your agents will quickly upload each copy of the announced results at the polling units. While Amupitan and Bola will be engaged Trying to cook up figure, NIGERIA will erupt in victory celebration!

Fourth, a documented correction process. Any change to a submitted result should identify the original figure, the corrected figure, the reason, the supporting evidence, the authorised decision-maker and the time of the change.

Fifth, independent access. Accredited party agents and observers should be able to monitor the relevant stages of collation and receive copies of the records in accordance with the law.

Sixth, rapid dispute resolution. Establish clear procedures and deadlines for challenging discrepancies, preserving evidence and obtaining a reasoned decision before the dispute becomes politically destabilising.

Seventh, consequences for proven misconduct. Electoral offences should be investigated impartially, and sanctions should follow the evidence and due process—not political affiliation.

A democratic election is not credible merely because citizens were permitted to cast ballots.

It is credible when the votes cast can be traced through the counting process, the aggregation is accurate, the rules are applied consistently, disputes are resolved lawfully and the final declaration can be reconciled with the evidence.

The question every electoral commission should be prepared to answer is straightforward:

Can an independent observer take the authenticated results from the individual polling units, follow the lawful corrections and recounts, reproduce the final totals and understand every material difference?

If the answer is yes, transparency becomes a source of institutional strength.

If the answer is no, the system must explain why—and correct the weakness.

My closing argument

When polling-unit results are documented, authenticated and made accessible, the public does not have to depend exclusively on the statements of political candidates or election officials.

The evidence becomes available for independent scrutiny.

Candidates can assess their standing. Parties can identify discrepancies. Journalists can verify claims. Observers can report on the process. Citizens can understand how the outcome was reached.

The media should not declare itself the electoral commission. Political parties should not replace lawful certification with their own preferred figures. Observers should not present estimates as official results.

But neither should official certification become an excuse to withhold the evidence needed to verify the result.

The ballot expresses the people’s choice. Transparent counting preserves it. Independent verification tests it. Lawful certification gives it official effect.

And when a result is challenged, the answer should not be intimidation, secrecy or political rhetoric.

It should be the records.

Let every polling-unit result be visible. Let every material correction be explained. Let every final declaration be auditable.

Because democracy is not merely the right to vote.

It is the right to expect that your vote will be counted accurately—and that the evidence will show how the result was reached.

Round one! Simon Ekpa legal ambush proves effective to force a change in the sentence!

Shame on those who plotted in darkness against any IGBO just to safeguard oil interests!

We are the Bigkoko Group.......through strategic intelligence, research, advocacy and constructive consultation, we achieve our goals!

The Finnish appeal court has ruled. The years was reduced from 6 to 4. Since he has already served some times, Ekpa will soon walk!

But here is the catch: HATE OR LOVE SIMMON EKPA, the Finnish State improperly imprisoned him, due to political & economic pressures from Nigeria and Uk, and backed with the dossiers we released, it not far fetch why the Appeal court reduced the imprisonment from six years to four years!

The Finnish State was caught red handed pressuring their Judiciary to imprison a dissident!

Since the Appeal court has ruled, so

What changed? Is Ekpa no longer their terrorist?Salient questions to answer!

If Ekpa knows what is good for him, he and his legal should immediately approach the Finnish Supreme Court to grant them leave to appeal, appeal the decision of the Appeal court and if successful, his conviction will be upturned and the Finnish State will pay him a huge compensation for wrongful imprisonment!

You guys have no idea what this document actually meant! It was the connecting dots of why he was imprisoned in the first place!

About 100 Israeli passengers from the Flydubai flight attacked on their way to Israel are preparing lawsuits reportedly seeking hundreds of millions of US dollars. They have authorized a committee to organize claims against three potential defendants: The airline (FLY DUBAI), State of Israel and potentially other parties (could be other Middle Eastern countries).

Lawyers are still being selected. The committee is led by Tzvika Manes, an Israeli finance executive who helped restrain the attacker. UAE prosecutors say the co pilot intended to crash the plane into Ben Gurion Airport. Passengers and crew intervened, and the aircraft landed safely in Saudi Arabia.

They deserve much more..... imagine the FLY DUBAI co-pilot wasn't restrained quickly?

Let the legal battle begin!

Nigerians have been inundated with weird lessons of criminality, heroin trafficking, gender manipulation, identity theft, certificate forgery and links to drug cartels concerning one of their president.......the same old man is currently at the mercy of US based DC lobbying Firm Von Batten and a career District judge in the US -- honorable judge Howell Merlyn.


Now, a very louded project called Coastal highway supposedly running from Western Nigeria State of Lagos to Southern Nigeria State of Cross Rivers has been cunningly routed. Nevermind that the unvetted project was given to a fellow drug cartel member.....

But I tell you it's been Lagos-Ogun coastal highway all along.

Nevermind.... once a people's government get sworn in in 2027..... every bit of that money will traced to where ever it has been laundered to, all properties purchased from it forfeited just like the heroin money the Americans sized from the drug bagman in 1993

Even if Tinubu makes his wife Remi the INEC Chairman and his son Seyi the deputy..... Bola will still be defeated. But meanwhile, the names of those doing the ballot paper printing is important

politicoNG:
https://www.vanguardngr.com/2026/10/2027-atiku-demands-names-of-firms-printing-inecs-ballot-papers/amp/

Their plans have failed even before it started..... Is it France who can not quell a riot the drug dealer in Aso Rock wants to depend on to rig election for him?

kingthreat:
Once I saw that post, I realized that there was a plan to declare fake election results which will be backed by the EU most especially France. Opposition better have a strong plan.

Yes...I agree with you even though Tinubu appointees think otherwise.

Qadaffi2idiamin:
When the head is rotten the rest of the body has excuses to smell.

Bola the Chicago trader has damaged Nigeria's reputation beyond imagination

He isn't not BIGKOKO.

We're not like those in Aso Rock.

RealityKings1:
What happened to your bigkoko moniker

A Nuremberg styled trial for Igbo origined politicians May come as too direct or not the normal Nigerian or African style but I tell you it will reset the mindset of future political contractors who were promised political positions to cause chaos in Igbo land.

Do a personal research on these two names despite their known association with those who sowed chaos in South East, I have been following them since 2018…..they actually surprised me:

Rochas Okorocha and Orji Uzor Kalu.
I
RAO despite his famed Iberiberism somehow managed to keep IMO state peaceful throughout his tenure. Could it be that his refusal to allow his state become a bloodletting ground prompted his total sideline from National politics?

Only a regional Nuremberg styled trial can expose the truths. We all knew what IMO state immediately became soon as the bleaching governor who actually came 3rd was foisted on Imolites by the Supreme Court! For your information, the IMO state i know is made up of daddy’s boys, guys who prefer going to All Seasons hotel than hiding in the bush. Were some trouble makers released from Nigeria prison? Only a Nuremberg styled trial will expose the truth!

2018–2026: Why the South-East Needs a Nuremberg-Style Accountability Process for Political Actors Who Enabled Chaos in Igbo Land

By Bigkoko Consultancy & Lobbying Unit
Research. Advocacy. Strategic Intelligence.
.

What happens when politicians discover that violence can be politically useful, that public fear can be converted into electoral leverage, position and that communities can be left to pay the price long after the political contractors have moved on?

What happens when young people die, businesses close, families flee, and ordinary citizens are forced to negotiate daily life around insecurity—while those who claim to speak for them continue to compete for political relevance?

And what happens when nobody establishes, through credible evidence and an independent legal process, who financed, encouraged, enabled, exploited or failed to prevent the violence?

These are questions the South-East of Nigeria can no longer afford to postpone. Other regions can continue as they wish….but the South East should set examples on how a region should be run.

From 2018 to 2023, the region has experienced intense political contestation, agitations, armed attacks, allegations of state abuses and serious insecurity. Amnesty International’s August 2025 report, Nigeria: A Decade of Impunity, documented grave abuses and unlawful killings in the South-East, identifying suspected responsibility across multiple categories of state and non-state actors. Its findings reinforce a central point: accountability cannot be selective. It must examine every credible allegation, regardless of the identity, political affiliation or institutional position of the person concerned.

The people of Igbo land deserve an evidence-led investigation into the political economy of insecurity.

Not another political declaration. Not another committee designed to disappear quietly. Not another exercise in blaming only the people who carry weapons while ignoring those who may have financed, organised, encouraged or politically benefited from violence. We have it record how some people boosted of sending in agents from the creeks….so we don’t need to look too far for who to subpoena during testimonies.

The Igbos deserve an accountability process.

Why use the Nuremberg analogy?

The Nuremberg trials became an enduring symbol of the principle that political authority does not place individuals above the law, and that responsibility for serious wrongdoing must be established through evidence and legal process.

The South-East does not need a literal copy of the post-Second World War tribunals. It needs a process appropriate to Nigerian constitutional law, the country’s courts and the human-rights obligations binding on Nigeria.

Just a guiding simple question: Who sent non state actors who the Nigerian presidency and Nigerian press calls “UNKNOWN GUNMEN “.

The answers this question will release will shock even the most virulent non Igbo doubter!

I use the expression “Nuremberg-style” to describe the seriousness, independence, documentary rigour and public accountability required—not to declare anyone guilty in advance.

The proposed process should investigate credible evidence of political sponsorship of violence, unlawful detention, killings, abductions, intimidation, financing of armed actors, misuse of public resources and deliberate efforts to destabilise communities.

It must examine allegations against public officials, security personnel, non-state armed groups, financiers, political intermediaries and anyone else against whom credible evidence exists.

It must also protect witnesses, preserve records, respect the rights of the accused and refer potential criminal cases to competent authorities.

The objective should be truth, justice, reparations where warranted and prevention of future violence.

Two political figures who deserve serious historical scrutiny—not prejudgment

In my own assessment of South-East politics since 2018, two prominent Igbo-origin political figures have particularly attracted my attention: Rochas Okorocha and Orji Uzor Kalu.

Their public careers, political choices and relationships with national power deserve examination as part of a wider study of how political elites have responded to insecurity and instability in the region.

That is not an allegation that either man sponsored violence. I am not presenting evidence establishing such a claim, and neither man should be treated as criminally responsible without evidence and due process.

The point is that a credible inquiry must be prepared to examine the conduct of influential political actors—including those who enjoy considerable name recognition, political networks or access to national institutions.

Rochas Okorocha: What does the historical record show?

Rochas Okorocha governed Imo State from 2011 to 2019. His tenure was politically controversial, and his administration’s legacy remains contested. The famous Iberiberism sticks as one of his low points….however, IMO state was largely shedded from violence. How did he managed that? Was this management the reason or reasons he was routinely ignored in National politics?

Subsequent disputes included allegations concerning public assets and public finances, which must be distinguished from any separate question about responsibility for violence. These controversies do not establish that he sponsored, prevented or facilitated armed activity. provides an example of the public record that requires careful reading and corroboration.

One question I believe deserves independent investigation is whether political decisions, security policies and relationships with influential actors helped prevent violence in some periods—or whether any political incentives, omissions or interventions contributed to insecurity in others.

If evidence shows that an individual acted to protect civilians, that should be acknowledged. If evidence supports allegations of wrongdoing, those allegations should be examined fairly. If the record is inconclusive, the conclusion must say so.

The inquiry should not be built around my suspicions or anyone else’s political preferences. It should be built around records, testimony, chronology and verifiable facts.

Orji Uzor Kalu: Political influence must also be examined

Orji Uzor Kalu has served as Abia State governor and later as a senator. His political influence and public positions make his role in the region’s political history a legitimate subject for historical and policy analysis.

But influence is not proof of complicity. Public association with national political actors is not proof of sponsorship of violence. And a political disagreement is not evidence of criminal conduct.

A serious inquiry would examine documented statements, decisions, political alliances and any credible evidence of involvement in relevant events. It would give the person concerned a fair opportunity to respond and would publish findings only when supported by the evidence.

The same standard must apply to every other political figure, regardless of party, office, ethnicity or personal reputation.

The Imo question cannot be separated from the 2019 election dispute

The transition from Rochas Okorocha’s administration to the government that followed was marked by intense political controversy. The 2019 Imo governorship election became one of the most consequential electoral disputes in the state’s recent history.

In January 2020, Nigeria’s Supreme Court declared Hope Uzodimma the winner after accepting arguments concerning votes from polling units that had not been included in the initial collation. The decision overturned the result previously announced by the electoral commission. The circumstances and implications of that judgment remain part of public debate. and other Nigerian news organisations reported extensively on the judgment and its aftermath.

It is important to state the facts accurately: Uzodimma was not the candidate initially announced as the winner; he was elevated to the governorship through the Supreme Court’s decision. That legal outcome is not, by itself, proof that he or any other individual sponsored subsequent violence.

Nevertheless, the political consequences of contested elections deserve serious study. When citizens lose confidence in electoral institutions, when political competition is perceived as disconnected from the popular vote, and when communities believe that power can be obtained through processes they regard as illegitimate, the damage to public trust can endure.

A credible inquiry should ask whether political disputes, institutional decisions, security responses and the conduct of competing political actors contributed to later instability. It should not begin with a predetermined verdict.

Were armed actors enabled, protected, released or politically useful?

These are serious questions. They should not be answered through rumour.

Claims that particular troublemakers were released from prison, that political sponsors financed armed groups, or that specific officials deliberately allowed bloodshed must be verified against prison and court records, financial evidence, communications, credible witness accounts and other independently corroborated material.

The appropriate questions include:

Were individuals credibly linked to violent offences released, and under what legal authority?

Were there documented relationships between political actors and people later implicated in violence?

Did public money, private financing or logistical support reach armed actors?

Did officials receive credible warnings about planned attacks, and how did they respond?

Did investigations obstructed, evidence destroyed or suspects protected from lawful accountability?

Did any political actors benefit from insecurity, and is there evidence that they deliberately contributed to it?

These questions should be asked of every relevant party, including state institutions and non-state groups. A finding of political benefit alone does not prove that someone caused or sponsored the underlying violence.

The distinction between suspicion and proof is the difference between responsible accountability and political persecution.

What should the South-East establish?

I propose a regionally supported but institutionally independent South-East Truth, Accountability and Public Safety Commission, established through a lawful mechanism enacted by all Five state house of Assembly…….and designed to operate independently of the politicians whose conduct it may examine. You will be shocked how this will prevent future unknown gunmen syndrome.

Its mandate should include five priorities.

1. Establish a verified chronology of violence, 2018–2026.

Compile a documented timeline of killings, abductions, attacks on public institutions, destruction of property, alleged unlawful security operations and other serious incidents. Each entry should distinguish confirmed facts, allegations, disputed accounts and unknowns.

2. Investigate the political economy of insecurity.

Where credible evidence exists, trace funding, logistics, recruitment, communications, political relationships and the use of public resources. No individual should be accused merely because they are influential, unpopular or associated with a particular political camp.

3. Give victims and witnesses a protected platform.

Victims, families, community leaders, journalists, civil-society organisations, security personnel and former members of armed groups may hold relevant information. Their testimony must be handled with appropriate safeguards against retaliation, intimidation and unlawful disclosure.

4. Refer evidence to competent authorities, a special criminal tribunal to swiftly try prima facie cases.

The commission should have a mandate to function as a tribunal. Where evidence indicates a potential offence, the material should be referred to the appropriate investigative or prosecutorial authority who works in collaborations. Any prosecution must respect the presumption of innocence, fair-trial rights and the rules of evidence.

5. Recommend safeguards against future political violence.

The process should propose transparent political financing, credible investigations, protection for whistle-blowers, better civilian oversight, witness protection and meaningful consequences for anyone found responsible through a lawful process.

The political lesson for the next generation

Every generation observes what happens to the people who exercise power.

If political actors learn that they can benefit from instability without serious scrutiny, the lesson transmitted to future political contractors is dangerous.

If young people are recruited into violence while their political sponsors remain beyond examination, the region risks repeating the same cycle.

But if the South-East demonstrates that allegations of serious wrongdoing will be investigated impartially, that public office does not confer immunity from lawful scrutiny, and that political disputes must be resolved without violence, a different lesson becomes possible.

The message should be unmistakable:

No political office is a licence to endanger civilians. No party affiliation is a shield against lawful investigation. No accusation is a substitute for proof.

And no individual should be condemned merely because of identity, association or political disagreement.

Conclusion: The region needs truth, not another political vendetta

I know that calling for a Nuremberg-style process may sound confrontational. It may be dismissed as politically unrealistic or culturally unfamiliar. But the principle behind it is not foreign to Nigeria: accountability under law, equal treatment and the right of every accused person to a fair hearing are essential to legitimate government.

The purpose is not to settle political scores with Rochas Okorocha, Orji Uzor Kalu or any other named figure. It is to establish a fair, evidence-based process capable of examining the conduct of all relevant actors—including those who hold power today.

If the evidence clears someone, the process should say so. If the evidence supports prosecution, the appropriate authorities should act. If the evidence is insufficient, the public should be told that as well.

The South-East deserves an account of what happened, why it happened, who was responsible where responsibility can be established, and what must change to prevent a recurrence.

The future of Igbo land cannot be built on selective memory, political intimidation or permanent suspicion. It must be built on verified truth, equal justice and civilian safety.

That is the accountability debate I believe we need to begin.

Bigkoko Consultancy & Lobbying Unit
Research. Advocacy. Strategic Intelligence.
Bigkoko — Now You Know.

Are you mistaking Bola Ahmed Tinubu for Peter Obi? Sorry ohh!

Nigeria is the only country on earth whose president is begging a career judge in a foreign country not to release his criminal investigations!

Not even the talibans will allow such a moral-deficient crook to lead them! But hey…. In Nigeria, the voice of hunger, man made though, is louder than the voice of common sense! If in doubt ask Reno…he is a clear case study

garykoeman:
A fraud and a fraudster.

Nigeria like a senseless ashawo has been handed over European & American criminals by a local ev!l criminals in 2015.

2015-2023, the criminals in 10 Downing Street London got the first turn to use Nigeria as they like. They got their way!

2023-2027…..While Nigerians were still behaving nice, and expecting European criminals to let go, vrooom they toss in the next crook into Ask Rock in the dead of the night…..

They will want to continue in 2027…..but Nigerians must show them what they are made off!


As far as we know, the American part of the criminals who form part of the triparte in 2015 has been rendered inefficient by the Trump Administration & the rugged black stallion Von Batten!

So be rest assured Nigerians have only the European criminals to worry about!

It is a Task that must be done!

The Economist can employ the heroin crook as their board chairman. After all he and his Lebanese criminal friends have stolen so much, he May not need to draw a salary!

Daguccizgreat:
No matter what Apc and macron do, Tinubu must go next year

You know why European criminals are restless and looking for resources to plunder?

France is out quashing riots….. chaotic. No meaningful economic activities going on there. Disgraced and butted out by the Sahelians from the Uranium mines in Niger & Gold mines in Burkina Faso!

The Americans are slowly displacing Belgians from the rare earth mineral pits in DR Congo. They can’t fight the Rwandans not to talk of the Americans.


London has fallen! Scots, Welsh & Irish are United in a renewed push to disintegrate the Island country of UK. BP Plc is on a mad rush to sell off its North Sea Oul & Gas assets for cash because 80% of it will go to Scotland if a Referendum establishes independence for Scotland! Uk more or less is now a glorified 3rd world country with ruined infrastructures! Ask those who live there they will tell you!


Finland has the worse unemployment rate in the whole EU….the weird looking Slavic ruling the unfortunate country has led his country into catastrophic unemployment crisis….no meaningful economic activities going on there beside drinking coffee & speaking in two broken stance!

They dare not try the Asians in their mad wish to steal resources….since Africa is the only continent where foreign controlled crooks positioned to snatch elections, all their focus is in Nigeria currently!

Now you know why the focus is Africa!

Person wey e left hand don die maim this one think say dem go rig enter Aso Rock in 2027? Well, I wish you good luck if you are one of those kept to snatch ballot boxes.

Take a good look at this picture….and learn some lesson

In the coming months, the Bigkoko Group will lead a European effort to demand criminals in 10 Downing Street London, Paris & Brussels stand down on their alleged plans to rig 2027 elections in favour of the heroin crook in Aso Rock!

The fat ball from Zimbabwe notorious for selling technology used by African despots, true to a prediction by an X handle, has gone to meet his ancestors! Just after he May have also tried to sell his merchandise of doom to the heroin crook in Ask Rock!