₦airaland Forum

olabode89:
Wetin dey worry Rashford for Christ sake!!!

Trevor012:
We are battling to win Nottingham forest at home with red card and needed an Awoof penalty. The entire United is already in the mud 😂

Jokerman:
Mhen Antony dey see ball well

akwesenana:
Wanbissaka sha.

AdisaOwala:
Omo, e be like say Case don activate pensioner mode o

Wtf is this?

Expert17:
Useless Martial

olabode89:
Why is Eriksen in this team... MF can't win a fucking duel.

Qatari £5bn Man Utd bid still on table but concerns Glazers won't sell.

https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11667/12945698/manchester-united-takeover-sheikh-jassims-5bn-offer-remains-on-table-but-concerns-glazer-family-will-not-sell

CrystalTiger:
Just like someone predicted few pages back, next PR move would be the "takeover" nonsense to finally give fans hard-on till September1st..

My tired is seriously tired abeg 😕😕..

donjazzet:
Well, yes private business individuals acted upon their individual rights to discriminate upon black people and refuse them service and this went on for soo many years infact it was encoded into law at a certain time that blacks were 3\5th of a human and were not equal to a white man, I will also add that Interracial marriage was also forbidden.

As for your question, my answer is yes, but not in the way you framed it, saying there should be a law that "compels" and individual to make cake for gay couples even to his dislike frames it wrongly.

I would rather frame it that it should be illegal to discriminate another individual on the basis of religion, sexual orientation, race, gender etcetera.
Once there is a hint that a business owner wouldn't attend to someone on the basis of these aforementioned factors, the business should be sanctioned. Because that is blatant discrimination and as a society we should seek to be more tolerant, and not to sanction hate.

When you apply that question with another example, you see the problem, should a Catholic cake baker decide not to bake cake for a Muslim because of his beliefs?

Should a white cake baker decide not to bake cake for a black man because of his racism? We have been here before and we know that it is not a good place to be.

donjazzet:
This statement has plagued the American supreme court for ages.

Are you aware that this statement you just made was the basis for racial segregation in the United States and then Apartheid in South Africa which went on for many years?

That statement is very dangerous, that private businesses should not be legally obligated to offer their services to who they wish not to. You are infact sanctioning discrimination.

White men who owned hotels will refuse to offer services to black people because "IT WAS THEIR INDIVIDUAL RIGHT".
White men who owned cinemas or offered one service or the other would blatantly refuse to do so for black people.
Private Schools were segregated between racial lines because white owners felt it was their right to make that decision.

Since it's their business, they have the right to attend to who they soo wish to, not until anti-discriminiation laws enshrined under civil rights were enacted..

In cases where discrimination is blatant, the employer can be punished for discriminating another human being.

So I differ, laws should constantly be updated to reflect the challenges of the time. For instance I think Nigeria needs an anti-tribal discrimination law.
Recently there seems to be a rise in tribal hate speech with some calling other tribes cannibals on the internet and then some people of different tribes acting out these differences in public like we saw during elections. If left unchecked, nigeria could see itself in a much troublesome society ahead.

ChristineC:
just yesterday, I overheard a group of Spanish and Indian ladies on a bench wondering why the kiss events during the women world cup trophy presentations was generating much noise on social media.
there are things that, maybe 10 years ago, will not be looked at twice or settled at the back between adults involved and everyone shakes hands and be on their merry ways. these days they are like madness, to the extent the people involved will be forced to put out some form of statement.
someone thinks it's about fighting for minority rights.
don't be surprised that the idea of Greenwood and the lady opting to settle down into a traditional marriage angers a lot of these guys. it may should ridiculous but when you listen some conversations you'd shudder.

donjazzet:
I mean the absence of discrimination on unfair bases.
A white man not wanting to employ a black man.
A yoruba man not wanting to employ an Igbo man. An Igbo man not wanting to sell to an Hausa man.
A police recruiter not wanting to recruit women.

A church not wanting to accept a gay person into his congregation.

I'm advocating for elimination of these social barriers amongst ourselves as humans.

A fair and equitable world.

donjazzet:
Nope! Sounds like a liberal who wishes for a more open society that treats all human beings as equal irrespective of tribe, gender, race, religion or any barriers we as humans continue to set for ourselves!

Just a human being who wishes for a fairer and more compassionate society.

afrodoc2:
I always knew they would. Only a sale to the Qataris might have saved him. The Glazers don't have the stomach to face cancel culture and i am not sure even Greenwood could have survived hate that was about to be unleashed on him. What is more important now is for him to get a club in a quality league to revive his career.

odizeey:
Court says not guilty.

Private investigations says not guilty.
But some people will rather hang on to "evidence" that they don't know its origin.

Well, I hope he gets a good club and achieve the greatness he was destined for.

Well, glazers don give them what they want. Glazers is here to stay for life.

Glazer must stay in Jesus name.

Ballzproblem2:
Chelsea will win easily

Ballzproblem2:
Manchester united downfall dey give me joy shay una call us 12th fc , tomorrow the big boys play