.........................

..................

Babymama1:

Internet is indeed a leveler
In what other avenue would I have anything to do with this scumbag
Remember you promised to show my pictures and those of the boys you mentioned
This is two weeks and the forum is still waiting

oh be patient. every info is released when i want not at ur request beatrice.

again are u are doctor?

Scatter1:


JUST GIVE ME FEW MINS, WILL START FROM THOSE CANADA PICS. HOLD ON ABEG

check emaila

Babymama1: Tired old recycled tale
After seeing that picture I actually beat myself up from responding to some of these people and engaging them in a discussion
Confirmed jobless touts looking for who to pick pocket

the yarns of a busted old woman forming youngy on NL

ok beatrice ohiri, are you a doctor like you claim on NL before i disgrace u finally.

Scatter1:

SHUTUP DIRTY OLD BITCH. YOU ARE ONLY DECEIVING YOURSELF BEATRICE OSISI

dont mind d dunce

all the bucca boys u Bleep on the regular behind ur husband betrayed u

and yet this hypocrite will come on NL to say I love my husband 10 times a day while fvucking YORUBA boys BIG KONDO

............

Babymama

u are a member of fountain of faith ministries houston and yet u come of NL to do evil and curse

say hello to reginald nworkwo

Beatrice Ohiri babaymama1 babyosisi

Enjoy

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
OHIRI v. GONZALES
233 Fed.Appx. 354 (5th Cir. 2007)

Decided May 18, 2007

Judge(s)
PER CURIAM:[fn*] [fn*] Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Add Annotation
355
356

Beatrice OHIRI, also known as Beatrice Osisi, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-60839, Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 18, 2007. *355

Willie James Wheaton, Law Offices of Willie J. Wheaton, Houston, TX, for Petitioner.

Thomas Ward Hussey, Director, Robert N. Markle, Michelle E. Gorden Latour, U.S. Department of Justice Office of Immigration Litigation, Phillip Michael Truman, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Trey Lund, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Field Office Director, New Orleans, LA, Sharon A. Hudson, U.S. Citizenship Immigration Services, Houston, TX, for Respondent.

Alberto R. Gonzales, Washington, DC, pro se.

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals, BIA No. A76 833 295.

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges,

PER CURIAM:[fn*] [fn*] Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Beatrice Ohiri petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals's (BIA) denial as untimely of her motion to reopen removal proceedings. She argues that her failure to timely file her motion to reopen was the direct result of the ineffective assistance of her two prior attorneys and that, as a result, the BIA should reopen her case pursuant to its "sua sponte" discretionary authority. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) ("The Board may at any time reopen or reconsider on its own motion any case in which it has rendered a decision.".

We review the BIA's denial of a motion to reopen "under a highly deferential abuse of discretion standard." Manzano-Garcia v. Gonzales, 413 F.3d 462, 469 (5th Cir. 2005). Subject to certain exceptions, motions to reopen deportation proceedings must be filed within 90 days of *356 the date of the final administrative decision. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) and (c)(3). Ohiri concedes that her motion was not filed within the 90-day window and does not argue that an exception to the timeliness requirement is applicable to her motion to reopen. Accordingly, the BIA did not err in denying her motion as untimely.

We lack jurisdiction to review Ohiri's argument that the BIA erred when it declined to exercise its "sua sponte" authority to reopen her appeal due to ineffective assistance of counsel. Where, as conceded here, a motion to reopen is untimely, the petitioner has but one recourse to open her case: the BIA's equitable, discretionary authority to "at any time reopen or reconsider on its own motion any case in which it has rendered a decision." Id. § 1003.2(a). Because this "sua sponte" relief is entirely discretionary and the BIA is under no obligation to reopen a case on an untimely motion, this Court lacks jurisdiction to review the BIA's denial of equitable relief. Enriquez-Alvarado v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 246, 250 (5th Cir. 2004) ("[A] reviewing court has no legal standard against which to judge an IJ's decision not to invoke its sua sponte authority. . . . Because Supreme Court precedent prohibits review of such discretionary decisions . . . this Court lacks jurisdiction.".

Ohiri's claim that her due process right to effective assistance of counsel was violated is meritless because she has no liberty interest in an adjustment of status. Gutierrez-Morales v. Homan, 461 F.3d 605, 609 (5th Cir. 2006). "[W]hen there is no due process right to the ultimate relief sought, there is no due process right to effective assistance of counsel in pursuit of that relief." Id. Ohiri attempts to distinguish her case from Gutierrez-Morales by explaining that her lawyer's conduct was egregious, but the extent of her attorney's ineffective conduct is irrelevant to our decision that there is no liberty interest in an adjustment of status.

The petition for review is DENIED.

Babymama1:

This is why I declared earlier that you were indeed crazy
No be only ugliness dey worry you

.......................... yeah yeah beatrice, let us hear word abeg

...............

chidozie i thot u said u are from delta state?

chidozie
ebere
kas

amelikana mama1

pics of her secondary school. she finished in 1982 at age 22.

chino dont care if all his men are exposed, so we will help

sorry chidozie

...............

may our mothers never bleach

sorry ebere

our amelicana

first and last pic is secondary school she finished in 1982 at age 22

.....................

sorry dozie. i will soon give u a break and concentrate on someone else. but till then sorry

...................

all is fair

..................

dozziebaba

oneeast2: My boy have you taken your HIV meds today.. ?

As a friend I need to advice you to take your drugs often, you are dying just take a look at you pix below..

U mean hiv meds for u and chinonso??

relax and watch d show

chino d driver

chinonso dike, how market?

..............

I will introduce two new ones people have not seen yet.

i think it is time to widen the entertainment

.................

sorry chiebere customized13

........

sorry chidozie

Babymama1:

Chinaza,you can engage people all you want but posting pictures of people and their family is low
I have said it many times
Someone is going to get seriously hurt someday and I want to be on record that I sounded this warning
There should be a line decent people shouldn't cross

SHUT UP YOUR PUTRID DIRTY FAT MOUTH!!!

U PUT UP THE SUPPOSED PIC OF KASNTROL ON THIS FORUM U OLD WITCH.

THIS WILL CONTINUE TILL U CALL CHINO TO ORDER

..........................

sorry this will go on perpetually

....................

sorry dozie and customized

..............

...................

chidozie sorry

.....................

The owners know who these are