₦airaland Forum

Tiopii:
you're emotional, nothing I said warranted insults. what predicament? I'm not any predicament.

I'm not bothered by how you feel.

And i care?. Enjoy your time here, tool.

Tiopii:
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂. I dunno why you're pained. You said axis of resistance first when I replied you changed to axis of evil. And ofc I stuck with the original statement.

You're just too emotional. I hope you grow up at some point.

Haven’t you now acknowledged your own foolishness?, having now seen my original post?. You spew venom from your loud mouth and now you’ll be choked by it. Saying my bad and for the second time since I engaged you. Slow your mouth so your brain can actually get a chance to catch up. You’re nothing but a tool and that’s me being extremely modest

Tiopii:
Oh my bad. I was wrong then.

The US has a fair chance, one thing I'm certain is the war won't be fought on American soil.

As things stand, China would avoid war with the US, their biggest market is the US, And China's economy is in shambles, Xi admitted this when he visited the US and was trying to assure US/European investors that China is safe place to invest and saying they don't want war with the US.

Russia is also in no shape to fight with the US, they are too occupied in Ukraine, US military bases would be handy.

The Iran/Hamas, Iraq, N.Korea, would be on the defensive all through the hypothetical war.

The chance of an all out war is slim. I doubt China would fall for the same provocations tht Russia fell for.

But fair chance for the US, that is bar a nuclear conflict. The wild card however would be China.

After you laid false claims on me and called me emotional for wanting you to see the truth then you find out you were in the wrong and you say my bad?. If you took all that time and brain cells you used to type all that rubbish to actually go check my original post you wouldn’t be in this predicament right now. I hope now you can understand why I wouldn’t be having any conversations with you anymore. Learn to think.

Tiopii:
You said the Axis of resistance was Iran, Hamas, Iraq, China, N.Korea Russia, and I said the axis of resistance I know is Iraq, Iran/Hamas, N.Korea, why did you add Russia and China, you started insulting 😂😂😂😂😂😂. You're very emotional. Atleast you'd have made your point if it was valid.

So the statement by a group of congressmen is official statement of the US govt?

You're an angry clown😂😂😂😂😂😂😂. As you can't be sensible you resort to insults.

What a total and absolute fool. Learn the difference between the so called axis of evil and axis of resistance. I educated you but your comprehension skills can’t just keep up. And for the record i said axis of evil. Fool.

@Tiopii i thought i was talking to someone with some sense, not a baby who mistakes his fantasies for truth or reality. Do us all a favour, stop polluting this space with your filth. I just hope readers aren’t swayed by your wet dream induced posts and take them as truth because I would no longer be here to correct your misinformation. Wasn’t educative having a discuss with you. Adieu.

Tiopii:
So why did you add Russia and China as been part of the axis of resistance?

You can’t do without trying to tweak my words can you?, i said axis of evil and you referred to something else, I corrected you and you’re still saying the same damn thing. Would i be wrong to call you a fool?. To what is supposed to be your question I didn’t add them to the US’s idea of an axis of evil, i have no power to, rather it was said Just right after the start of the hamas israeli war by a group of US Congressmen of which were majorly republicans. Can’t keep educating an unapologetic fool.

Tiopii:
Axis of resistance is Iran, Iraq and N.Korea.

Axis of resistance is iran and her proxies in the middle east you damned tool, i had to respond to this to correct your misinformation for silent readers just like i once was till this thread was infested by you lots. Shut your loud mouth if you can’t verify first the things you say.

Tiopii:
Link to the US saying China, Russia, Iran/Hamas, N.Korea are the axis of resistance. Thanks. This seems like a personal opinion.

Axis of evil you tool. I’m done with you.

Tiopii:
Lol. I made a claim, if it's a lie debunk it simple. Leave matter for Mathias

🤐💩

Tiopii:
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂.

Mr intellectual 😂😂😂😂😂. If everyone is claiming to be having intellectual convos, do you think you should be among?

You read my post, I'm there are lies there, debunk it, for go all emotional.

The US has the most advanced Nuclear programme, I'm saying it again, bring evidence against this. Quality>>>> Quantity.

First of all edit your write up so it’ll be easier for readers like myself to try to assimilate what you say, using good vocabulary. And secondly, if you knew any better you wouldn’t ask people to disprove a claim you haven’t proven yourself. That’s not how debates are conducted young man, but I wouldn’t expect you to know that.

Tiopii:
Maryinka is a town not a city, Russia are making claims they have captured it but some far, there has been no pictorial evidence, if you have any evidence pls share. Thanks

Just like bahkmut is a small village with no strategic importance according to the ukrainians after it’s capture. Gotta love these fools. And no, i have no pictorial evidence for you. You’ll have to wait till later this year when you’re informed by your non independent mainstream media

Tiopii:
Who are the axis of evil?

That would be according to the US iran, hamas, russia, china and north korea

Tiopii:
My bad, I thought you would recognize sarcasm but it's fine.

That wasn’t sarcasm you tool, that was a deliberate attempt to classify anyone who has a counter opinion into a group, saying your motherland. Just like others like you have learnt to use words like putard when they try to demean anyone that doesn’t agree with the mainstream narrative. Stop being a tool

Tiopii:
Bros, I just asked a question, I wonder why you're making assumptions and conclusions on my behalf.

I asked a simple question, I didn't ask for an epistle.

Did i answer your question or not man?, if you didn’t have serious comprehension and bias issues reading wouldn’t be your problem

Tiopii:
Atleast tell me, what Ukrainian city Russia captured last?

🤢

Tiopii:
You can justify how you want, 30 vs 1, 85 vs 1, 1m vs 1. It doesn't change the simple fact that Russia stands no chance against NATO. That's what I want you to know.

The US would stomp Russia anywhere in the World. The US is steadying increasing influence in the Baltics, Russia's backyard.

And I suppose the US of A stands a chance against a coalition of their favorite enemies and in their words ‘ the axis of evil’, correct?

Tiopii:
Oh, so what city did Russia last capture?

I bet you haven’t heard about the name maryinka, and many others before and after that but I wouldn’t be the one to educate you, like someone rightly said perhaps this year you’d be informed by your mainstream false media about the russian victories of last year

Tiopii:
😂😂😂😂😂😂. Who wants to educate me in this thread? Who?

Absolutely no one dude, you already said bahkmut was that last russian captured city, that’s all the education you need

Tiopii:
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂.

The US has the most advanced Nuclear programme in the World. The kind of destruction that Russia would probably need 7 to do would probably be 1 or 2 for NATO.

As regard landmass, not all part of Russia is habitable, for most they are all cramped together which is easy target.

Outnumbered in the fact that there are more nations with Nukes Russia would be risking facing off with and can strike from different positions, from Land and the Seas, and Outmatched by the fact that the US and by extension NATO has the most advanced Nuclear programme in the World.

Russia would come out worst hit. Both sides would take significant damages nevertheless.

The vomit that comes out of your mouth. Your bias has eaten a hole up your brain, you can’t learn to think and in essence can’t stop talking rubbish. Most advanced nuclear programme my foot, what a colossal waste of my time. Even said one Nato nuke is equal to 7 russian nukes. You don’t deserve to be discussed with on an intellectual level man.

Tiopii:
Lobbying is party of politics.

Lobbying is corruption.

Tiopii:
Ni

My bad, I got the country wrong, I meant Georgia. This happened 2008 I think. I'm guessing Georgia was trying to join NATO.

You see why Russia's neighbours don't trust them. Once bitten twice shy.

Even at that my assertion is still correct, ukraine and georgia in 2008 were announced as potential intakes into the nato alliance despite all of russia’s protests

Tiopii:
Do you think it would be fair if Russia went against like 6 other nuke capable countries? If there's any chance of survival for those countries Russia would come out the worst hit.

Even in the nukes battle they are outmatched and outnumbered.

Do you actually hear yourself talk Sir?, i do and it’s without logic or common sense. Now take your 6 nuclear capable nations and add up their warheads, is it anything close to the number of warheads russia possesses? No sir. Now add the land mass of those same nations together and compare to that of Russia, does it come close? No Sir. So acre for acre, warhead for warhead pray tell how in your mind does russia come out worse hit?. How are they outmatched and outnumbered Nuclearly if i may use that term and i need you to think this time before you respond to me

Tiopii:
What's your preferred form of govt?

Your problem is that you think everything is black and white. Democracy good, autocracy bad when in reality and through time we’ve had and still have democracies that have been highly and ruthlessly authoritarian and we’ve also had and still have autocracies that have been very democratic, expressing only the will of the people. As they are the government of the people themselves. So to your question frankly I wouldn’t know, democracy has proven to be a pain in my own country and i wish it wouldn’t continue this way for us. A military or autocratic rule could do better or worse for us, but only the people should choose how they are governed. No one else has a right to dictate or imply what type of government is good and what is bad. All systems of government currently on our green earth are flawed, none better than the other. We only have good and bad peoples, good and bad leaders.

Tiopii:
Lol, whenever your Motherland have issues with their neighbors, they invade them and you're wondering why Ukraine were skeptical Russia would stick to their part of the agreement.

My motherland?. My motherland is Nigeria you assuming fvck. Learn to think

Tiopii:
Obviously you're not following the war. Like I always so quote what I said not what someone else said.

Would you look at this able people, he’s looking for someone to give him an education

Tiopii:
I'm glad you admit Russia has no chance conventionally. If it's by conventional means the War would be fought in Russia.

And you talk like only Russia possess nukes, if any scenario when nukes are used between the US and Russia, Russia would be in the worst situation.

Might for might, militarily and economically, The US is obviously the stronger country. Even the USSR struggled against the US and it led to it's eventual collapse.

You just like to feel like Russia is fighting NATO, while there's no doubt NATO is aiding Ukraine, the scenario would be by far different if it's an actual NATO vs Russia.

Russia has no response to the US arsenal. It isn't sentiment it's pure fact. This Russia/Ukraine war has given substantial data bout Russia military tech to NATO.

Is that something to be proud of?, that a single country does not outnumber a group of 30 Nations?. Learn to think

Tiopii:
I'm glad you admit Russia has no chance conventionally. If it's by conventional means the War would be fought in Russia.

And you talk like only Russia possess nukes, if any scenario when nukes are used between the US and Russia, Russia would be in the worst situation.

Might for might, militarily and economically, The US is obviously the stronger country. Even the USSR struggled against the US and it led to it's eventual collapse.

You just like to feel like Russia is fighting NATO, while there's no doubt NATO is aiding Ukraine, the scenario would be by far different if it's an actual NATO vs Russia.

Russia has no response to the US arsenal. It isn't sentiment it's pure fact. This Russia/Ukraine war has given substantial data bout Russia military tech to NATO.

All i can say to you is to shut up with you opinions and get an education. Would do you much good than just talking. Now you assume i mean russia wouldn’t be devastated after a nuclear holocaust, when in fact you can’t hide your ugly bias for the clowns you support. Saying Russia would lose more from a nuclear holocaust, how can that be?. A country that possesses more nuclear weapons than the combination of all the nuclear weapons of her enemies?, a country with a lot more land size than her enemies combined?. You must be tripping. Russia doesn’t have any response to the US’s arsenal?, boy you’re clowning. And economy wise who has the most to lose?, your favorite organisations that’s who so how dare you downplay their losses in the event of a nuclear war and say all that vomit you regurgitated up there. Learn to think man

Tiopii:
The last Ukraine city Russia captured was Bahkmut and that was over a year ago. The majority of Russia's advance came in the beginning of the war, when Ukraine was unprepared and getting themselves in order.

You finally proved beyond all reasonable doubt that you know nothing about what you say, would have taken you literally seconds to find out if your claim is true but you’d rather make it anyways. Educate yourself young man. Your claim on bahkmut being russia’s last captured city is false

Tiopii:
That's politics.

So much for a democracy 🤢

Tiopii:
According to what you posted, Ukraine didn't go along with the deal cos they didn't feel like they could trust Russia.

When Russia invaded and annexed part of Finland, was Finland trying to join NATO too?

Nato wasn’t even born then, and it was the ussr. You might want to read about the circumstances surrounding their three and a half month war as your comment shows you know little or nothing at all about it

Tiopii:
Russia by their actions is a terrorist state, there's no emotions to it.

There's nobody winning in the Ukraine/Russia war, no side is making any big advances. technically it seems like a stalemate rn.

Ukraine by their actions is a terrorist state. I say let ‘em keep fighting. Stalemate? Nice cope from such losers to make you feel better. Let them keep fighting till they gain the initiative, stalemate my black ass

Tiopii:
LOL. Russia doesn't war with NATO, conventionally it has no chance. It is very clear. Russia don't have the economy or military might to succeed.

A fight with nato would never be a conventional one, stop the pipe dream, there would be no boots on the ground and there would be no iota of human sympathy from Russia. Russia would be greatly outnumbered making it a fight for its very survival. So happy to brag about how a singular entity cannot match a cowardly bunch of over 30 collective entities militarily and somehow you feel justified in that logic?. Russia’s might isn’t even a question here as they are more than capable to protect their nation and it’s interests. The day nato feels arrogant enough to confront russia militarily is the day their Collective paradise crumbles. And you bet they have the means to achieve this. There would be no ideal world without Russia.