₦airaland Forum

bengreat: Best answer @www.google.com

google sarcasm

Its easier to keep ur cash intact in a las vegas strip bar casino than that so called nice jewish girl• True story= a friend gets deployed to afganistan leaves behind high school sweet heart and three kids • Gets phucked by burecracy and ends up doing two tours• Comes home after two yrs wife is dating his neckbeard loser nieghbour and into swinging and p•rn• Muthaphucker gets instant ptsd and is now on twenty four hour suicide watch in a vet asylum

Les: If they weren't drunk driving, Sorry o. But if they were drunk driving, mhen, sorry to say dat they are probably burning in d lake dat burns wit fire and sulphur!! D moral of this news shouldn't be about drunk driving cos e don tey we dem don begin to de hammer on it, d moral should be REPENTANCE while you still gat d chance, there's noting you'll loose if you repent- tink am!!!

c u in hell

Drunks just wasted that bmw z three• Stoopid drunks •

Waste of good rides

Nice cars

I will totally rip that azz up and beat that puzzy to a pulp after am thru there will be a crater of lunar proportions that the cops will have to yellow tape off

I am partly caucasian please what is HIV

From my experience single girls are hard to woo• If she is single beautiful and not a lesbian or a moral gay then she obviously chose to remain single or has really high standards• Married women and engaged women are the easiest and fun to be with• No emotional wahala and its basically free• Finally only engaged women cheat• Ponder about this• The only skill needed is to be highly matured and confident and be very discrete• Most engaged ladies I have been with are at first just interested in passionate sex and don't need another clinging relationship• They are everywhere in your office car park shopping mall etc• U just have to open ur eyes•

Smeer ur balls with a thick coat of fresh chicken shitt leave for at least twelve hours den use a sharp blade to scrape off then apply a generous amount of paint thinner or any highly volatile substance do this near open flame source•

Tinibu wants to build a shopping mall for his wife at the market.

[quote author=Jaidey-one]Your hatred for Awolowo has beclouded your sense of reasoning. So it was Awo that ceded bakassi to Cameroun? Keep exhibiting your folly[/quote]It was AWO that directed the civil policy during the war and Yes I have no love lost for a hypocrite tribalist who enriched himself through corrupt means. Once again you yoruba people can only think within the tribalism sphere, Tinibu is out formenting hate and xenophobia at his own benefit but you would rather blame others for your woes. I wonder why your people have not yet decided to opt out of Nigeria, you parasitic cowards!

Allah be praised! This is what true Islam is all about. Nothing to do with peace or tolerance but pure evil.

The devil has many names but one face.

nasyl: @Cunning, try and watch 'The Arrivals' maybe you will have some thoughts about your Religion......Trust me, those people have more shit! on xtains(with evidence and i believe some) than you do on muslim.

well, i dont believe in Religion...but i believe in God.

i realise something about this 'End of the World conspiracy' like 'The Beast','Anti-Christ and all that....

They are mystery and they should remain mystery....the problems start when people start digging up such a mystery. people like Cunning, the Authors of 'The Arrivals' and many others like them....you will always find answers that favours your religion and disapproves the other.

my advice: Dump all these findings about Muslims being the Beast/Anti-Christ or Christains being the same..
just go on with your life...and live it right before you drive yourself crazy.

trust me, have been there!

dont dwell on those YOUTUBE videos or documentaries.....the videos are also ways the devil gain control of your thoughts.

as for the OP....LOL.....what matters to me the most is ME! my opinion, motive, intention and meaning to things...therefore my own meaning is Laugh Out Loud....dont care about other craps people are coming up with.

###no replies!

I am not making a comparison and the new testament is all a christian needs and not these fat cat pastors.

The Negro Eunuch of Arabia

Omar was a very old, wizened little black man who served as a eunuch looking after a harem of Philippino girls kept by one of the Saudi princes. In the 1980s Cory Aquino, then President of the Philippines, had made a diplomatic issue out of young Philippino girls being hired to go to Saudi Arabia as housemaids, but when they arrived being obliged to serve as sex slaves. President Aquino banned single Philippino women from travelling there. King Fahd felt insulted by the suggested restriction, and reacted by stating that all Philippinos, whether male or female, would be forbidden from working in Saudi Arabia if this ban was enforced. As the Philippines depended on their people working in the oil-rich lands of the Middle East and sending their money back to support their families, her attempt to help the girls failed.

Omar worked for one unpleasant Saudi prince. The women he guarded were not locked in, for if they left without passports and the appropriate papers signed by a Saudi man they could be picked up and brought back, to certain punishment. Also, many of such women had actually been sold by their parents who lived in desperate poverty.

In the not-so-distant past there were many eunuchs on Arabia, for although Islam forbade Muslims to castrate young boys, they were not forbidden from owning them as slaves. They were considered prized possessions, and huge sums were paid for them. They supervised women’s quarters, and helped at mosques where they were assigned to separate women from men.

In 1962 the American President John F. Kennedy personally appealed to Prince Faisal, who was then Prime Minister, to abolish slavery in Saudi Arabia. The government then purchased freedom for every slave in the country for a price of nearly 5,000 Saudi riyals per head, but many chose to stay in the households they were familiar with.

The eunuch Omar was rescued from one unpleasant household by a Saudi prince at the request of his wife, who felt sorrow for man’s plight. The prince would have let him go his way, but Omar requested to say, for he could see he had been brought to a kind household. What follows is his story.

‘I remember little of bilad as-Sudan, known as the ‘land of black peoples’, but I do know that my family’s tribe, the Humr, were nomadic cattlemen. We followed the rains and the tall grasses.

Those were dangerous days. Many African chiefs worked closely with Muslim slave traders, capturing and selling their own people. Every Humr mother was burdened with the worry that her children would be stolen from her. Even now, I remember the soft brown eyes of my mother as she looked at me, and her stern warning that I was not to stray far from members of my tribe. I was young and foolish, and failed to obey my mother.

It was the aim of every young Humr male to be praised as a hunter. Small boys were always gathering stones to toss at birds or small animals. I was no different, and one day while gathering smooth stones, I foolishly wandered some distance from the tribe. Just as I was about to toss a stone at a bustard, I was suddenly grabbed from behind and taken away from that place. I never saw my mother again. I was only eight years old.

But that was a long, long time ago,’ he said, even after all those years brushing away his tears. He was now eighty-eight years old.

‘I was not alone in my misery,’ he went on. ‘Many men, women and children had been taken from their villages or tribes. We were tied together and led across the land towards the Red Sea. We spent many days and nights travelling. When we finally arrived at the Red Sea, an Egyptian Christian met with our leader. There was low talk concerning the young male captives. Panic ran down the line when the man was overheard saying that a certain number of the youngest boys were to be relieved of their three precious gifts. Unsure of what those precious gifts were, I did not protest too loudly when I was pulled from the line and taken a short distance away from the other captives.

The man was well-prepared for his duty. His razor was sharp, and without knowing what was about to happen, I was suddenly relieved of my three manly items.’

The princess gasped loudly. ‘Allah’s word was mocked by those people and their cruel actions!’ she cried.

‘Allah was nowhere to be found on that day,’ Omar said wistfully, ‘although His name was invoked more than once by every boy subjected to this cruel treatment.’

He remembered every detail of his ordeal.

‘A tube was inserted into the opening that was left of the place of my penis so that the hole would not close. I was bleeding badly, but the bleeding stopped when that man’s assistant poured boiling oil on my wounds. He presented me with my genitals in a jar, even as I lay writhing in pain! I kept that jar and its contents for many years, until fifteen years ago when it was stolen by a cruel prankster.

I survived, as you see. A total of ten boys were castrated that day. One died immediately, the rest of us were buried up to our necks in the sand. Who knows what cruel fool decided that hot sand was a remedy for survival? For three days and nights we were given no food or water. At the end, only three of the nine were still among the living.’

The princess shuddered. Although she had known that in the past eunuchs had been prized in many countries, she had never considered the terrible agony those poor men had undergone. She sincerely hoped that Allah had reserved the hottest places in Hell for the vile men who committed such acts.

‘Congratulations went all around when the Christian pulled the tube away from my small passageway that remained for water, and liquid spurted out. Those men knew that whoever passed water would survive. Only two of the three still living were able to urinate, myself and one other boy. The third boy’s hapless body was poisoned by his own urine, and he soon died a tortured, screaming death.

After the fourth day, we were packed into a ship that set sail for a slave emporium in Constantinople (Istanbul now). I had survived castration, and the slave trader knew that I would bring a large sum of money. In those days, eunuchs were prized as trustworthy guards for Muslim women – only impotent men were allowed into their quarters.

Therefore, the slave trader treated us two castrated boys much more kindly than the other slaves. We were housed on the top deck and fed good food, while those other poor souls kept below were stacked on top of one another during the sea journey. As far as I could tell, they received no food or water. Many were dead by the time we arrived at the harbour of Constantinople.

I was purchased by a wealthy Turkish man. He owned a number of slaves, but only two eunuchs, and both were growing old. I was told that when I grew tall and strong, I would be the one to guard his womenfolk.

That same year my master travelled to Makkah for the Hajj. He was a fat fool who ate too much grease and sugar, and dropped dead while circling the Ka’bah. I was taken away by the authorities. They gave me to the grandfather of the man from whom you rescued me, to whom a favour was owed.

My time with that family was not unhappy. My food was the family’s food. At fourteen years of age I was entrusted to guard the family’s womenfolk. Time flowed smoothly until the deaths of the grandfather and father. I had nowhere else to live, so I remained with that man. He was nothing like his father or grandfather. If the master of the house beats a tambourine, do not condemn those there for dancing.

But today, I am more happy than I have ever been.’

For this eunuch’s safety, the prince decided that he should not live in Arabia but was sent to his villa in Egypt, as a free man. In Egypt a small black man with a high-pitched voice would not be so conspicuous, and the prince sent him a monthly allowance which provided him with a personal financial freedom he had never known.


Slavery and the Teachings of Islam

As background to this sad case history, it is worth knowing that although slavery existed long before the coming of Islam, the coming of that faith brought a fresh look at the morality of it. The rules of Islam are briefly given here, although throughout history to their shame many who claimed/claim to be Muslims have not lived up to the high standards laid down by Allah’s revelation.

Slavery as such was not prohibited, for it had traditionally been a way that persons in dire need had been able to find a home and security when unable to cope without such protection, and many who fell into debt could arrange set lengths of servitude in order to pay off those debts. No Muslim should ever acknowledge any master but God – whether King or road-sweeper. However, under the new revelation of Islam, persons were not to be regarded as objects that were ‘owned’, and were granted many new rights. It was regarded as one of the most noble acts of charity to grant freedom to a slave, or buy the freedom for slaves in other households if they wished to leave.

Muslims were ordered not to abuse their servants, and could be taken to court if they did. They were not to force sex upon any servant, and in fact were forbidden sexual relationships outside the marriage contract. A free woman expected a dowry or mahr if she married; if a man took a wife from among his servants (the phrase frequently used was ‘those his right hand possesseed’), she should be granted her freedom in lieu of mahr. This was automatic for those who bore children.

It was forbidden for Muslims to capture and keep any person against their will. The crime of hirabah bil jabr (forcibly taking a person – which includes enforced slavery and kidnapping) can carry the death penalty in Shari’ah law.

There were stringent rules for the treatment of people taken as prisoners-of-war, and guidance towards arranging their ransom. They were to be treated, fed and clothed to the same standard as family members, and if ransom was not forthcoming, could be released for token sums or even a good act, like teaching someone to read.

[quote author=Find Out!]that would be you bro.[/quote]go and get a translated copy of your quaran and relevant books and stop been spoon-fed whatever your mallam teaches you.

In Islam, Jesus (Arabic: عيسى‎ ʿĪsā) is considered to be a Messenger of God and the Masih (Messiah) who was sent to guide the Children of Israel (banī isrā'īl) with a new scripture, the Injīl or Gospel. The belief in Jesus (and all other messengers of God) is required in Islam, and a requirement of being a Muslim. The Qur'an mentions Jesus twenty-five times, more often, by name, than Muhammad.

Then why do you contemporary muslims denounce Christ?

Numerous other titles are given to Jesus in Islamic literature, the most common being al-Masīḥ ("the messiah". Jesus is also, at times, called "Seal of the Israelite Prophets", because, in general Muslim belief, Jesus was the last prophet sent by God to guide the Children of Israel. Jesus is seen in Islam as a precursor to Muhammad, and is believed by Muslims to have foretold the latter's coming.[455][456] To aid in his ministry to the Jewish people, Jesus was given the ability to perform miracles, all by the permission of God rather than of his own power.
The Qur'an emphasizes that Jesus was a mortal human being who, like all other prophets, had been divinely chosen to spread God's message. Islamic texts forbid the association of partners with God (shirk), emphasizing a strict notion of monotheism (tawhīd). Like all prophets in Islam, Jesus is considered to have been a Muslim (i.e., one who submits to the will of God), as he preached that his followers should adopt the "straight path" as commanded by God.

tintingz: you wellcome bro. . .i will expose jehovah in the bible till this is closed

this is not about taking sides. If your allah is still the same jehovah then you are being blasphemous.

Islam will have to stand alone and defend herself rather diverting attention from her atrocities.

If you can give me a valid excuse on why the following are permissible in Islam then I will eagerly listen but as long as you want to play the blame game.

Lets start with:

Killing of non believers

R@ping and selling women and children as booty during Jihad.

Islam's hatred for the Jews and Christians wherein you claim that Your Allah is the same as that of the people of the book and of the folowers of the cross.

I will also like to know why you denounce Jesus when it is written in your Quaran that Isa will return and fight alongside the muslims and also that the first true Muslim(or believer was Jesus).

There are several but lets start with the above.

Reliability of his ahadith

In hadith studies, ibn Isḥaq's hadith is generally thought to be "good" (ḥasan) (assuming an accurate and trustworthy isnad, or chain of transmission) and himself having a reputation of being "sincere" or "trustworthy" (ṣadūq).

Ref: M. R. Ahmad (1992). Al-sīra al-nabawiyya fī dhawʾ al-maṣādir al-aṣliyya: dirāsa taḥlīlīyya (1st ed.). Riyadh: King Saud University.

[quote author=Find Out!]Muslim historian, your answer is here. Ibn Ishaq was truly a 'historian', NOT a hadith collector.


www.answering-christian-claims.com/False_Stories_About_Prophet_Muhammad.html[/quote]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibn_Ishaq

the hadith was compilled by scribes after the death of mohammed from oral recitation.

what do you call that? Only the quaran was directed by your prophet, the rest was based on historical gathering.

Ibn Isḥaq collected oral traditions about the life of the Islamic prophet Muhammad. These traditions, which he orally dictated to his pupils,[6] are now known collectively as Sīratu Rasūli l-Lāh (Arabic: سيرة رسول الله‎ "Life of the Messenger of God" and survive mainly in the following sources:
An edited copy, or recension, of his work by his student al-Bakka'i, which was further edited by ibn Hisham. Al-Bakka'i's work has perished and only ibn Hisham's has survived, in copies.[7]
An edited copy, or recension, prepared by his student Salamah ibn Fadl al-Ansari. This also has perished, and survives only in the copious extracts to be found in al-Tabari's voluminous History of the Prophets and Kings.[7][8]
Fragments of several other recensions. Guillaume lists them on p. Bleep of his preface, but regards most of them as so fragmentary as to be of little worth.
According to Donner, the material in ibn Hisham and al-Tabari is "virtually the same".[7] However, there is some material to be found in al-Tabari that was not preserved by ibn Hisham. For example, al-Tabari includes the controversial episode of the Satanic Verses, while ibn Hisham does not.[6][9]
Following the publication of previously unknown fragments of ibn Isḥaq's traditions, recent scholarship suggests that ibn Isḥaq did not commit to writing any of the traditions now extant, but they were narrated orally to his transmitters. These new texts, found in accounts by Salama al-Ḥarranī and Yūnus ibn Bukayr, were hitherto unknown and contain versions different from those found in other works.[10]

[quote author=Find Out!]Oniro jatijati (yoruba for pathological liar). I'm fairly certain you dont even have a link for this false story. It just originated from ur head. Dude, i think you r going mental. Dont you think so too? Get help, seriously.

Best wishes[/quote]who is living in denial?

[quote author=Find Out!]ermmmm...... I think i just did. I just proved to you that you've been quoting from non existent books and materials. Akin to saying:

News headlines: Dangote to contest for Ikeja Local Government Chairman.

Source: The Cunning Daily newspaper.[/quote]ok. this just reaffirmed that you are just a reciting almajiri that does not even know that other than the Quaran there are the hadiths and surai books as well as other compiled doctrines which were based on oral recitation of people close to mohammed when he was alive. The quaran was dictated by Mohammed to scribes while the other books including the one I quoted were commissioned after his death to document the sayings and life of Mohammed i.e. they were posthumous bibliographs and biographies of your prophets by people closest to him.

[quote author=Find Out!]Please dont allow me to keep exposing your stup.idi.ty.[/quote]I am waiting for you to expose me.

[quote author=Find Out!]please what is ''Ishaq p.454''


no chapter in the Quran is named Ishaq

no hadeeth collection is named ishaq


www.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080923051843AAxPpHw

Please dont allow me to keep exposing your stup.idi.ty.[/quote]Muḥammad ibn Isḥāq ibn Yasār ibn Khiyār (according to some sources, ibn Khabbār, or Kūmān, or Kūtān,[3] Arabic: محمد بن إسحاق بن يسار بن خيار‎, or simply ibn Isḥaq ابن إسحاق, meaning "the son of Isaac" (died 767, or 761[2]) was an Arab Muslim historian and hagiographer. Under the aegis of the 'Abbasid caliph Al-Mansur, Ibn Ishaq collected oral traditions that formed the basis of the most important biography of the Islamic prophet Muhammad.

Powered by Translate
Did Aisha poison Mohammed?
(By Mohammad A. Khan)

In this article, I tried to present my analytical view about the followers of Mohammed and the tradition about Mohammed’s death, widely propagated by Muslims that a Jewish woman at Khaibar had poisoned him.

The story goes like this: a Jewish woman, captured in Mohammed's attack of Khaibar, was put on duty for preparing the meal, and she had put poisoned meat in Mohammed's and his companions' meals to take revenge for the murder of her husband, sons and brothers by Mohammed and his Jihadi companions.

This study will reveal that the truth about Mohammed’s murder may be different; his own wife Aisha might have killed him.

Abu Hurraira, a companion of Prophet Mohammed, entered the fold of Islam after his conquest of Mecca in 630 A.D., and became very close to Mohammed. He is well known for narrating many sayings of Mohammed, who shared with Abu Hurraira many confidentialities, which he had kept hidden from his other companions and dear ones.

For example, there is a famous incident regarding the confiscation of the state of Fadak by first Caliph Abu Bakar, allegedly gifted by Mohammed to his daughter Fatima. Soon after the prophet died, Caliph Abu Bakar confiscated the state of Fadak from Fatima and her husband Ali. When Fatima came to know about it, she quarreled with Abu Bakar, but Abu Hurraira informed that he learnt from her father that Prophets do not enjoy inheritance by law. This story tells us that Mohammed, the founder of Islam, kept many things hidden from his closest beloveds.

There's another incident in Shia tradition, also recorded by Abu Hurraira (father of cats, who narrated many Hadiths that are not verifiable through any means). A Shia scholar narrating the story that goes as below:

In the open market, a poor Muslim was trying to sell his onions, but no passers-by were buying his merchandise. This made the poor Muslim vender worried. He found his way to Abu Hurraira, as he was considered very pious and literate amongst Mohammed's companions. He told Abu Hurraira about his business situation; and that he was worried that his onion might start rotting if not sold.

Abu Hurraira said, “It’s not a problem; if you agree to share half of your profit with me out of your business, I can make your onions sell.” Poor vender had to agree to his terms.

Soon after, Abu Hurraira started to speak out loud in street to catch people's attention by saying:
“O people, do you know what our master Mohammed said?”

People in astonishment looked at each other and said, “No.”

Abu Hurraira replied, “Our master said that anyone who will eat onions today, he will be the first to enter heaven.”

All onions were quickly sold and the vender was very happy.

When Aisha, Prophet Mohammed's child-wife, came to know about this matter, she called Abu Hurraira and asked him, “When Mohammed said that on the day any who eat onions will go to heaven?”

To puzzle her, he retorted, “Prophet didn’t claim either that prophets don’t have their heirdom”, and added, “this is our wish wherever we navigate the sail or drag it to any direction”, puzzling her further.

This is a very old, nasty and deceptive tactic, which Muslims use to cover up their tarnished actions; they hurl their lies and irrational reasons to others, especially non-Muslims. Muslims thought that they will hide the real facts forever and their made-up history will be played out on the world-stage; they think others are stupid and would not be able to get the facts. Muslim historians had no clue to the fact that the history they left behind itself is not good enough to fool others. Muslim historians and hadith compilers themselves made problems for their own selves.

Treatise on Islam by many Muslim scholars raises too many problematic questions in the mind of rational readers to which Muslims have few answers. The list of such problematic questions keeps growing larger as Islamic historical and theological texts are being investigated by meticulous researchers.

The incident of Mohammed's massacre at Khaibar of many innocent Jews of Banu Nadir tribe, whom he had earlier deported from Medina, is undoubtedly true. Mohammed's biographers and hadith collectors narrate that he surrounded the Jews at Khaibar and besieged them. When they were defeated and surrendered, he ordered killing of the captured Jewish men above the age of puberty.

At dinner time, a Jewish woman, who was given the responsibility of cooking food, added poison in the meal. Mohammed and his companions started eating their meal. Soon one of his companions collapsed and died on the spot. Mohammed had eaten only a small part of the poisoned morsel. He threw it away and grabbed the Jewish woman, and asked if she had added poison in the food. She confessed and was put to death by Mohammed.

The event occurred in 629 A.D., but Mohammed died in 632. No history book gives any evidence that Mohammed fell sick or his health deteriorated from the day he consumed the poisoned food until his death. In these 3-4 years, Mohammed was in his good health, leading many Jihad wars. He fell seriously ill only during the last few days of his life, which eventuated into his death.

It is also ridiculous of Muslim historians to suggest that their master would give the responsibility of preparing the meal to a person, whose husbands, sons, brothers and fathers had been killed a while earlier by him.

Both the Quran and Islamic history give strong evidence that Aisha, who was married to Mohammed at the age of 9, was never happy with her husband---over 8 times older than her at the time of contracting the marriage.

There are evidences that Aisha and Mohammed both quarreled with each other over many issues so much so that Mohammed was on the verge of divorcing all his wives, just because of Aisha and Hafsa, who had shared the truth about Mohammed's lecherous habit with their co-wives. On another occasion, Mohammed had separated himself from Aisha on the suspicion of sleeping with another young disciple of his.

As Mohammed was very old and a fatherly figure to Aisha, the young and immature Aisha certainly could never like and love him in a romantic way. When young Aisha was dreaming for her charming prince of her age, with whom she could play, do emotional talking and share jokes---she had to sleep with a stinky old man. She probably was not happy of her parent’s decision either that they arranged her marriage with the person nearly of her father’s age. For about nine years, she bore Mohammed’s presence and sexual oppression.

So, it is possible that when Mohammed had become too much of annoyance and even older, she planned to get rid of old Mohammed, nearing death. Murdering Mohammed was the only way Aisha could get rid of him. Her plans for killing Mohammed, however, might have been instigated when Mohammed was showing greater interest in Maria, a Coptic slave of exquisite beauty. The fact that only Maria amongst his dozen wives had born him a child named Abraham—this might have had made Maria a favorite to Mohammed. He started cheating his wives, whereby he would send them away so that he could go to bed with Maria in their absence.


Aisha's hatred and bitterness of Mohammed had certainly intensified after he accused her of adultery---a story, supported by both the Quran and historical texts. Aisha, a young and immature girl, was certainly easy to be manipulated by Mohammed's young companions. When a rumour about her sleeping on one occasion with a young companion of Mohammed became popular in Medina, he lost his interest in her. He sent her back to her parent’s house. Ali, the close cousin and husband of Mohammed's daughter Fatimah, had eagerly advised him to divorce her.

Allah (aka Mohammed) maintained silence for about a month as the scandal kept on spiraling. It was important for Mohammed not to alienate Abu Bakar, who had many trusted friends and a strong power-base. At the same time, he had to somehow prove that Aisha was innocent, not to tarnish his prophetic credential. So, only after about a month had passed and Aisha's menses returned, proving that she hadn't fallen pregnant from the alleged adulterous affair that Allah sent down verses to declare that the rumour was false and Aisha was innocent. Thus, she returned to Mohammed's house (see the story: Rumors of Aisha's Adultery and Allah's Silence and Mohammed's Capture of Beautiful Slave-girl Juwairiya & Aisha's Adulterous Night-out).

Nonetheless, Aisha's father Abu Bakar, the first caliph of Islam, grew a grudge against Mohammed, because he brought shame and insult to his daughter and family by accusing her of adultery. Mohammed's absolving Aisha of the accusation was not good enough to assuage Abu Bakar's hatred toward him, not enough to pacify him. He certainly wanted to take revenge of this humiliation from Mohammed, whom he had supported utmost in his darkest hours. For this reason, Abu Bakar also probably encouraged Aisha to murder her husband, and also that he confiscated the state of Fadak from Ali and Fatimah as revenge.

A 'cold war' between Mohammed and Abu Bakar began to appear after the incident, and he perceived that some confederations had developed between Abu Bakar and his associate to conspire against him. So, he stopped trusting Abu Bakar, Umar and others, who were close associates. Then on, he adopted a new strategy and started focusing on and supporting his son-in-law, Ali.

Umar, the second caliph of Islam, was well-known for his rowdy and arrogant behavior, and often disagreed with Mohammed’s close companions and stayed besides Abu Bakar. It is well known that Umar behaved in a very rude manner with Mohammed when he signed the Treaty of Hudaybia with the Quraish.

The reason Umar got infuriated with Mohammed was because his daughter Hafsa, one of Mohammed's wives, caught him red handed with his slave-girl Maria in her Hafsa's bed, after he had sent Hafsa to her father Omar's house that he wanted to see her. Despite Mohammed’s best efforts to calm Hafsa down, she started shouting and went back to her father’s house; she told everyone about his lecherous husband.

When she told Aisha of Mohammed's lechery, they ganged up and started insulting Mohammed. Mohammed, though guilt-stricken, took a macho approach by refusing to sleep with his wives for their berating of him. However, the truth was probably that he quit sleeping only with Aisha and Hafsa, who had shown strong displeasure with him over the incident, and he might have feared threats or physical on his life from them.

Accordingly, an anti-Mohammed pact was formed, comprised mainly of Abu Bakar, Umar, Uthman, Talha and Saad bin abi Waqas. Mohammed knew he had been trapped, thanks to his ridiculous and lecherous actions; he could only prolong the drama to drag on, but could not find a way out of it. The silent breach between the two Muslim camps kept growing deeper and deeper with every passing day, but its control was neither within the power of Mohammed nor his alter-ego Allah.

Given that Mohammed led a healthy and able life for three years after the Khaibar attack, carrying no disability or ailment from the alleged poisoning incident there by the Jewish woman, it is very likely, given the enmity that existed between Mohammed and his opponents, including some of his wives---that if Muslim historians' claim of Mohammed death from poisoning is true, then it was done by someone closer to him and just before his death, not by the Jewish woman three years earlier. And we can only point fingers at Aisha, given her personal unhappiness and angst, plus her father's enmity against Mohammed.
As mention, Mohammed had quit sleeping with Aisha and Hafsa because of their compliant to his lecherous actions. Allah sent down strict verses, warning them of divorce and cursing them. Since people were observing the 'cold war' between Abu Bakar/Umar and Mohammed, they easily realized that those verses were solely directed at Aisha and Hafsa. Scandals were spiraling all around.

Muslims, as a cover-up for the credential of Mohammed and his prophethood, tell us that the Hudaibiya treaty between Muslims and the Pagan Quraish was violated by the Quraish. Thus, Muslims had to wage war against the Quraish to teach them a lesson for breaking the treaty.

Mohammed and his army of 10,000 to 12,000 heads -- comprised mainly of Ansar -- attacked Mecca. He showed much greater his amnesty toward the Quraish, his clansmen, than he had shown to the Jews at Khyber, whom he treated with extreme barbarism. The Ansar (helpers) of Medina figured out that Mohammed was not a prophet, but a selfish warlord, hungry for money, women and power.

Mohammed did another stupid mistake when, after the conquest of Mecca, he distributed all the booty among the people of Quraish. The poor Ansars -- who helped Mohammed and his companions in their dire situations and stayed beside him in many battles -- got nothing at all from the captured booty. Mohammed's bias towards the Quraish made it clear to his Medinan followers that he had no regard for them; he still missed his relatives, the Quraish, and was favorable of them. Hence, the Ansars lost their interest in Islam, and participated in intrigues alongside Abu Bakar and Umar. Thus, it is no surprise that many of the Ansars, after returning from the conquest of Mecca, became scattered in different groups.

When the Ansars, dismayed by Mohammed flawed action, returned from Mecca, Abu Bakar perceived their dissatisfaction with Mohammed. This was the golden chance for Bakar and Umar to take the Ansars in confidence in pursuance of their tactical moves against Mohammed.

Failure of Attempted Assassination of Mohammed at Tabuk

Islamic literature informs us that when Mohammed was returning from the expedition of Tabuk, some of his companions devised a plot to kill him. They decided to hide at Aqabah, a narrow path through mountains, which Mohammed had to pass riding his camel. They planned to throw stones at his camel, so that she would be sacred and fall down from mountain along with Mohammed.

But Mohammed’s spies got the wind that some men had already approached the area. Mohammed also recognized the 14 men, who devised the plot. Among the plotters, according to records of Shia and Bakri sects, were Abu Bakar and Umar. The plot thus failed. Allah sent down revelations targeting hypocrites (conspirators) as thus:

And Mohammed is no more than a messenger; many were the messengers that passed away before him; if then he died or is killed, will you then turn back upon your heels? And whoever turns back upon his heels, not the least harm will he do to Allah; and Allah will reward the grateful. (Qur’an 144:3)

Since both the Quran and other Islamic literature affirm this, the story appears authentic; more so because Mohammed stopped participating in further Jihad expeditions after Tabuk, until his mysterious death. The failed attempt of assassinating Mohammed made him scared that his life was now in danger from his own companions. He feared that if he went to Jihad, he might get killed by his own men amidst the upheavals of fighting. Thus, Allah started to reveal chapters about hypocrites condemning what the conspirators were planning against His prophet. Allah came to His prophet's support, threatening the conspirators with catastrophic calamity.
Last days of Mohammed
Mohammed was certain that something terrible would happen to him through the hands of his followers or his wives (Aisha and Hafsa). To reduce the threat and collective companionship of his opponents, he started sending the conspirators amongst Muslims away on Jihad expeditions for a certain period of time. Mohammed was sure that his opponents amongst his followers were not only against him and wanted to kill him, but also wanted to bring affliction to his son-in-law Ali and daughter Fatima.
Mohammed Husain Haykal writes in his book:
The Muslims did not stay long in Madinah following their return from the Farewell Pilgrimage in Makkah. The Prophet had immediately ordered the mobilization of a large army and commanded it to march on al-Sham. He sent along with that army a number of the elders of Islam, the earliest Muhajirun, among whom were Abu Bakr and Umar. He gave the command of the army to Usama ibn Zayd ibn Harithah. (The Life of Mohammed, Cairo, 1935)

Mohammed undertook those steps, to avoid death at the hands of his followers, as he wanted that his drama of prophethood that he started at the age of forty be proven true, and to put himself in history-books as a true messenger. As Mohammed had already lost only his male-heir Abraham, he now focused on Ali ibn Abu Talib to his seat of power, if something happened to him.

This event reflects Mohammed's intention, given the situation, that he did not want to send his trusted companions to the Jihad expedition of al-Sham; he, instead, wanted to send his opponent away, not only to ensure his safety, but also to work on nominating Ali, his son-in-law, as his successor.

It appears that the conspiracy to end Mohammed's life had been ripe. So, despite Mohammed's repeated orders, the appointed army deliberately delayed the departure. Meanwhile, Mohammed fell terminally sick and the army departed only after Mohammed's death was confirmed and the issue of succession was resolved, which went to the favor of his opponent camp of Abu Bakar and Umar. It appears that Aisha did her job well upon her father's directions to poison her husband.

Umar and Abu Bakar could not show him their antagonism against Mohammed openly during his lifetime. Once they were in control of the government in Medina, they were resolved not to let it fall, through miscalculation, into the hands of Ali. Had they obeyed Mohammed's order to depart for the Jihad expedition, they would have definitely lost power to Ali through Mohammed's stratagem.

In fact, in Mohammed's last days, when he was terminally ill, nearly all control was seized by Umar and Abu Bakar. Consequently, Umar, the arrogant character of the scene, dismissed all orders given by Mohammed. The issue of the pen and paper -- which Mohammed had demanded in his deathbed for giving the final direction to his Ummah -- was dismissed by Umar. Umar claimed that the Quran had been already declared fulfilled; therefore, there was no need of any new verses from Allah, although the prophet was still alive. To this, Umar said: the prophet has lost his mind and is uttering rubbish. Upon this, Islamic history holds records, that Mohammed uttered curses on his followers, and got them out of his room where he eventually died.

Soon after their master’s death and before his burial, the struggle for settling the succession of power started. Abu Bakar and Umar didn’t attend the prophet’s interment, but were busy in plotting to gain power. There was protest from Mohammed's trusted followers; but their number was small, because most knew that Mohammed was not a true prophet. As a result, Allah, Ali and his family were so weak that they couldn’t get what their prophet wanted. The death of Mohammed also proves that Allah was impotent, who couldn’t avert the situation; all he could do is to watch, like a silent spectator, the revolt against His apostle unfurl. All of Allah’s swears and promises -- which he kept mentioning in the verses and His boastings about his powers that He punishes those who trespassed their limits -- seemed nothing but fabricated fairytales.

It is also on record that six months after Mohammed's death, his daughter Fatima, aged about 27-28 years, was also got killed accidently. Abu Bakar sent some men along with Umar to get Ali's vote. Umar, known for his rough personality, broke the door of Ali's house as he wanted to drag Ali out of his house get his vote for Abu Bakar. Fatima, allegedly pregnant, was standing behind the door. The door, swung with brute force by Umar, fell upon her, which killed her.

Today, no one knows where the grave of Ali and Fatima is. However, the conspirators are still buried within the vicinity of Masjid-e-Nabwi, in Medina, where their master is buried.

After Mohammed was successfully delivered from earth, the Fadak state, given to Fatimah and Ali by the prophet, was confiscated from them.

Islamic literature depicts Mohammed as playing an innocent role in this event, in which he was conspiratorially murdered, most likely poisoned by his wives. But to the world, he will never enjoy the character of innocence, given his barbaric personality and creed brought immense brutality and sufferings upon mankind. He was 'Villain par excellence' in the history of humankind. He deserved no better.

Aisha committed adultery but Mohammed was scared to punish or divorce fearing that the alliance with her father which was already suffering would collapse. Aisha was then dispatched by her father to kill mohammed though poison so that He (mohammed will not anniont another rival as his heir).

Goes to show the level of deceit and backstabbing that surrounded your man of God.

The black slave will have no way to complain if his wife to cheated on him.

or will you deny the above quotes are not from the qua-ran?

^^^ again i have to quote myself

Cunninlingus: Slavery is also an integral part of Islam and to justify human booty and dehumanization of black Africans.

Here are some racist quotes from Mohammed on the description of Blacks:

Ishaq, p. 243:

"I heard the Apostle say: 'Whoever wants to see Satan should look at Nabtal!' He was a black man with long flowing hair, inflamed eyes, and dark ruddy cheeks.... Allah sent down concerning him: 'To those who annoy the Prophet there is a painful doom." [9:61] "Gabriel came to Mohammed and said, 'If a black man comes to you his heart is more gross than a donkey's.'"

Ishaq, p. 144:

"A rock was put on a slave's chest. When Abu Bakr complained, they said, 'You are the one who corrupted him, so save him from his plight.' I will do so,' said Bakr. 'I have a black slave, tougher and stronger than Bilal, who is a heathen. I will exchange him. The transaction was carried out."

Tabari, II:11:

"Shem, the son of Noah was the father of the Arabs, the Persians, and the Greeks; Ham was the father of the Black Africans; and Japheth was the father of the Turks and of Gog and Magog who were cousins of the Turks. Noah prayed that the prophets and apostles would be descended from Shem and kings would be from Japheth. He prayed that the African's color would change so that their descendants would be slaves to the Arabs and Turks."

Tabari, II:21:

"Ham [Africans] begat all those who are black and curly-haired, while Japheth [Turks] begat all those who are full-faced with small eyes, and Shem [Arabs] begat everyone who is handsome of face with beautiful hair. Noah prayed that the hair of Ham's descendants would not grow beyond their ears, and that whenever his descendants met Shem's, the latter would enslave them."

Ishaq, p. 450:

"It is your folly to fight the Apostle, for Allah's army is bound to disgrace you. We brought them to the pit. Hell was their meeting place. We collected them there, black slaves, men of no descent."

Bukhari 4.52.137:

"The Prophet said, 'Let the negro slave of Dinar perish. And if he is pierced with a thorn, let him not find anyone to take it out for him.... If he [the black slave] asks for anything it shall not be granted, and if he needs intercession [to get into paradise], his intercession will be denied.'"