TMKsouth:


The last I checked Nigeria was the one suffering from a begging culture, where everyone expects rich people to shower them with money. We don't have such a culture in SA. Ade and Uche lied to u once again. Get new friends.

BTW, when where u in South Africa?

Na lies,,, Nigeria spend better in SA.. You want my address to be friend or to come and shoot me? Which one?

TMKsouth:


I'm South African. The country has a workforce of around 10 million employed adults. Does SA have 10 million African migrants? But you're here insulting SA men for no reason.

U don't even know what facts are or how to use the internet for research (see bolded above). Let me help u out. Here is a fact below - the number of employed South Africans. Stop listening to Ade and Uche - they lied to u.

Hope u know how to read graphs atleast.

Now I understand why you defend this so much... However, still doesn't change my facts. Going by your statistics, 10m worker you say....see data of immigrants in mid 2020 alone captured.. 6.4m

Do you still wonder if 10million is too small for immigrants.?

TMKsouth:


Give us facts buddy, not wishful thinking. I told u SA has atleast 65% employment rate if u deduct the unemployment rate of 35%. That's around 10 million people . Are they migrantsReply with facts please, not what Ade and Uche selling drugs in Hillbrow told u. Stop being dumb and jealous.

Men that will just walk up to you like, give me 50r or 100rands as a begger o.. With so much entitlement mentality. Even as a visitor.

TMKsouth:


Give us facts buddy, not wishful thinking. I told u SA has atleast 65% employment rate if u deduct the unemployment rate of 35%. That's around 10 million people. Are they migrants? Reply with facts please, not what Ade and Uche told u in Hillbrow. Stop being dumb.

Do you live there?
I should forget about what Ade and Uche said.. So how do you investigate a research?
I should shallow everything I see on the internet hook, line, sinker. No na!

All the group stage does not even bother me. ...

Its Chelsea vs PSG in this final. Please book mark this admin.

LeSudAfricaine:
South Africa wouldn't be where it is if people refused to work. Use your brain please

Oga other Africa country migrants are the major workers. Hear it again, most SA men are lazy waiting for free money.

Please what's the slangs let me say it....

Rubbish!

A country where everyone literally expects everything free from their government refusing to work, you went ahead to allow the use of fire arms. ?

They surely will get busy with guns!

Bible asked a simple question; what is equal to a man's life? Same people who killed him are thieves themselves, only that they've not been caught...

Oh God of vengeance, arise and let all this herbalist.

Poster pls add very graphic to this post.

I don't pity cultist in anyway...

freshalien:
Rubbish! See how they trying so hard to make their Christianity claims real and relevant.

Quick fact check:

Creation story = Never happened
Garden of Eden = Never existed
Noah’s Ark = Never existed
Tower of Babel = Never existed
Pillar of Salt = Never existed
Ten Commandments = Never existed
Ark of the Covenant = Never existed
Job (“Faithful man of God”) = Never existed
Immaculate conception = Never happened
Jesus’ resurrection = Never happened
Jesus’ ascension = Never happened
Pentecost = Never happened

And the list goes on and on.


Summary:

Half of the bible (Old testament)
Story about the Israelites and their ecounters with other tribes and nations mixed with lies and false stories.

Other half of the bible (New Testament)
Tales about a middle-aged man who claimed to be the son of God; a Jewish extremist who was more interested in forming his own cult than worshipping his “God”.

Conclusion
Christianity = Fable-tales, lies and cooked up stories used by the powerful to dominate the weak-minded.

Hahaha.... Keep living in deceit you son of perdition!

Kobojunkie:
1. Your ideas of Jesus Christ aside,
What you described is exactly that, an emotional response on the part of Peter, which again, Jesus Christ did not decry as sin.

2. Peter did not sin, and Jesus Christ did not rebuke Peter for a sin. So Jesus Christ's rebuke of Satan was not that of sin committed. This passage does not in any way help your assertions so far.

To top it off, consider what the same Jesus said to Peter in Luke 22
Pay particular attention to what Jesus Christ said in response to Peter's claim in verse 33.

Reading that passage above and taking a close look at Jesus Christ's response to Peter's claim, one sought of begins to see Satan as God's Quality control manager, who tests each person to determine those who are of God and those who are not. Whether a person passes or fails the test does not depend on Satan nor the modes of his supposed test or what many of you like to call "attacks", but instead on the disposition of the tested. Blaming Satan pretty much amounts to blaming your examiner for your failing WAEC or JAMB.

Jesus Christ made it clear to Peter that He Peter would fail the test. And interestingly, Jesus Christ never mentions Satan being to blame for Peter's failure to come nor did Jesus Christ advice Peter to pray against the test nor be on the 'lookout' for Satan, the tester.

This is not far from the image we are presented of Satan in the Book of Job where God sends Satan out to test Job. God didn't warn Job of Satan, neither did the name Satan get any mention from Job throughout
ordeal. And we learn that the reason Job did not fail God's test was because Job held on to his conviction aka self control.

Do you now know from your explanation here that what you are pointing out is very different from what am saying...?

* You are pointing out occasions that refers to SIN whilst,
* I am pointing to everyone what could be responsible, or the forces behind men actions or even sinning.. I prefer probing the source to know the motive behind actions. The Bible calls it "the mystery of iniquity" . I myself was very harsh to anyone who lack discipline to hold himself from committing sin one way or the other until God showed me that men could be control too.

I was highly judgmental towards guilty Pastors, but now I have my reservations because I didn't send them.. Let God judge them. So it seem we're on different page here.

Kobojunkie:
Mislead me how?

To indulge you, I picked from KJV, so now will you answer my question?
1. From the passage, it seems Peter's concern was born of Peter's emotions rather than logic, and so his, Peter's, rebuke of Jesus Christ seemed an attempt at exerting CONTROL over the Will of God for Jesus Christ. Understandably, it was followed by a rebuke from Jesus Christ.

2. But I am more interested in why you chose to introduce this passage into this discussion. Please explain to me how Jesus Christ's rebuke of Satan amount to Him, Jesus Christ, suggesting Satan was to blame for a sin of some sort?

Read Jesus Christ's rebuke of Satan carefully to see what I see and why I am puzzled.

Okay, for me, I see Peter employing a simple logic rather than emotions. Peter became sad because what Jesus represented to them is what the Holy Spirit is to us now. Jesus too was a "stand by" and a "comforter" also a Helper. Who would want to lose such a company of person?

2) I chose this passage when it was argued that men's action has little or nothing to do with spiritual forces but Rather a self discipline prowess. Whereas careless statement in the Bible was motivated by spirit nicely played to the physical without the people themselves knowing.

LilMissFavvy:
Don't be stupiddd, next time you see my username, pass it and stop running your mouth. As you see me, I have the grace to be ignoring people who insult or troll me here, but for now I will not be ignoring your kinds, I will do that in future.

Lol At least I gave your busybody work. You buy market ni.

Kobojunkie:
I don't follow. Here's the passage you referred to again..
1. From the passage, it seems Peter's concern was born of Peter's emotions rather than logic, and so his, Peter's, rebuke of Jesus Christ seemed an attempt at exerting CONTROL over the Will of God for Jesus Christ. Understandably, it was followed by a rebuke from Jesus Christ.

But I am more interested in why you chose to introduce this passage into this discussion. Please explain to me how Jesus Christ's rebuke of Satan amount to Him, Jesus Christ, suggesting Satan was to blame for a sin of some sort?

Read Jesus Christ's rebuke of Satan carefully to see what I see and why I am puzzled.

Bro your translation could mislead you. Get it from Authorized KJV or NKJV so as not to go out of context. Thanks!

LilMissFavvy:
Did I tell you I'm single? Go and learn self discipline Mr. Man.

Naaaa.... Your type may be in a marriage all by yourself. Talking about discipline, you can't come close if you ever see me in action, that I can guarantee you. Bye!

Kobojunkie:
What logical explanation is controlled by Demons?

You are literally stating here that what is commonsense aka wisdom is of demons. Do you realize that?

Jesus Christ never even taught anyone that demons were responsible for sins nor did he suggest that they caused men to commit sins so where does this mind of yours come from?

Jesus told his disciples of his death, burial and resurrection.. How he must suffer.. In Mathew 16:21

See peters reply... In (vs 22 ) Peter took Jesus aside and rebuked him that it will never happen to him.

Vs 23) Jesus rebuke the devil talking in him.


Question was Peter's concern logical or not?

LilMissFavvy:
Take a look at this foooool. Does marriage stop your shameless ilks from committing all kinds of abominations? Keep deceiving yourself.

Be patient, marry first. you'll very soon understand. You'd be too dull to understand now. Talk is cheap!

LilMissFavvy:
That is how you shameful lots blame the devil over your shameful acts. Don't go and learn self control, continue to blame the devil, nonscence.

I am married drunkard. Self control comes with discipline backed by God. EVERYTHING in the physical is controlled whether you know it or not. Learn it fast before you logically kill yourself later.

LilMissFavvy:
Too bad, infact.....it's shameful. Yes it is majorly the Nigerian malefolk that watch these things. In romance section guys create threads on their stuggles against masturbation and pornography. Men in other nations spend time creating breakthroughs, inventions, but here it's all about sex, our culture supports them to mess around. Father's raping daughters, Yahoo, kidnapping, drug addiction. They say they are polygamous in nature, some churches supports them, they advice wives to keep mute even if the man is bringing in STDs, matcheeww!

What you think is common sense solution is highly influenced by the devil. Your logical explanations is controlled by demons.

Penaldo denied a penalty. Ref don't want to be fooled by penaldo even though it true.

Arrest the lady alongside the person behind the camera. He or she is an accomplice to the crime.

Obasanjo was right after all. Men as unstable as FFK are the most dangerous sycophant to keep around you. Fear them that can do anything for money.

He is a double face dog. A puppet!

We really have to check how some of these children were conceived. This things is based on who you beg to help you get a child. some are bloody demons in human form.

Lukaku has become a clinical scorer... One chance one goal.

Zenit bank come with their bus o

Leed go win

Lukaku is a focused striker....


Penaldo fans won't be happy right now.

Kyase:

Harvey’s is bellow average let’s be honest
He and VDB are in the same league

Average player don't score winning goal for champions league. He won it when penaldo was flushed out.

So the change is actually working o

These days, the ones you call a "kid" has gone farther than you think. Parent need better strategy for training their children.