₦airaland Forum

where is your proof?

did any of you verify if this is true?

VeryWickedMan:
We men worldwide need to have a meeting and pick a better vessel for our future seeds becayse the human female selected by Adam has failed woefully in this regard.

Personally, I suggest Hippopotamus or ostrich because they have huge backsides but other suggestions are welcome.

guy, are u forgetting that sex is a two-person game? or are u a closet homo?

panafrican:
No woman would marry an uncircumcised man in my tribe . We Africans were closer to God's tradition , thousands of years BC, before the modified Bible full of European traditions came in.
Hopefully Liberals will not modify the Bible to say God allow LGBT behavior.

no, we weren't, it makes no sense whatsoever, where did you even hear that from? and this quote was from apostle paul himself and there is very little evidence that male or female circumcision was even around 300 years ago in west Africa much less thousands ago

plus, whatever adults want to do with their lives, let them do if they are not hurting anybody, if man wants to marry a man, let him as long as it is not affecting you

panafrican:
NO and no.
Circumcision is not mutilation.
A man who is not circumcised is does not deserve to deserve to get married. NO family will give their daughter to a scumbag . Idem for women.

except that it is from a medical standpoint and even in the bible it is not necessary

1 Corinthians 7:18

Was a man already circumcised when he was called? He should not become uncircumcised. Was a man uncircumcised when he was called? He should not be circumcised.

panafrican:
What do you mean? What you call "Mutilation" is part of African traditions. It is called circumcision not "mutilation".

it is still barbaric

JASONjnr:
Zelensky should opt for peace talks before he'd ruin everything for himself and his country....


Europe should leave Russia alone....

why? isn't Russia the aggressor?

Ilamina:
I read the European settlers brought in India and blacks slaves into the country when they arrived

That means black south Africans, were not originally from there

no wonder the white man in the sarafina movie told the black girl
How dare you cause commotion in my country
When the blacks were fighting against apartheid
I.was like wtf. .it's a black country. .how dare make that comment. .now I understand

So why did the blacks fight against segregation and ruled the country ever since
No white man has been president since apartheid

But I am sure, it can happen soon

That means xenophobic attacks against blacks is dumb

Not only black south Africans own the country

It's owned by indians and whites

Just like how blacks, natives and whites own America

This is not true in the slightest,

Have you forgotten about the zulus?

the one of main reasons why Biafra will never go anywhere is because they are trying to include niger delta into Biafra

this will never happen due to how important the niger delta is to Nigeria's economy and let's be honest, the only reason why ipob wants ND is because of the oil

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QcQ7h0DGHo0

Prettygirl200:
So as the topic implies am in a need of a boyfriend, when I mean boyfriend I mean real one, not all those broke ass redpillers ooo. He must have these qualities:


Must be rich
Must be handsome,
Must be tall,
Must be intelligent and above all must not have a body count that is above 3. Thank u!!

what do you have to offer that kind of man?

advanceDNA:
We dont marry early anymore...instead we get exposed to sexual contents like porń at tender age...pórn and masturbatìon go together...ask anyone that masturbates..there is always a visual or mental assist....which is poŕn.....

Take away poŕn and u will fix a lot of sexual and mind derailment.... some people's mind are messed up because weird poŕn like bdsm and masochism is the first thing thier eyes/minds got exposed to.....

even if you take away porn, people will still masturbate

https://miro.medium.com/max/864/1*tn255NrpUejtXJBjROZsHA.jpeg

this was from the time before even jesus was born, there was no porn then yet people still jerk off

Lvgirl:
Is there anal in the 80s ? Anal came from white demons. The pass it to us via blue film.
It's immoral ,dirty and disgusting. It's nothing to be proud of. Yes I know illicit things are "sweet"
Pls guy don't do anal.

yes actually,, it has been around since the time of the romans

JewsAreSatanic:
And YouTube is independent ?

The rule of thumb is that if its still on JewTube it is misinformation .

You are still on the surface web.

Dive deeper for the truth .

Ode.

yes youtube is independent

BentizilL:
You owe no one a proof bro.

if ur a dude, this is gay

ParasiteWest:
I've given you enough proof.
You just proved my conviction that you're dumb.

what was your proof then?

where are your sources?

what papers or websites did you link to back up your claims?

what were your rebuttals to my claim then?

i debunked your claims and all you did to refute it was repeat the same lines over and over again with no proof

the only proof you provided was that you are an idiot and i am done with this

ParasiteWest:
I've given you proof. Google it.
The US was unable to defeat Japan without nuclear weapons, they were pummeled and suffered heavy casualties.
The US was defeated in Vietnam as they were unable to deploy nuclear weapons due to deterrence and consequence from Russia and China

you did NOT GIVE ME ANY DAMN PROOF, it was from google i got my proof

i have given you proof that what you are saying is wrong and stupid

you are not very intelligent

ParasiteWest:
Attempting to impose your misconception of reality on people that do not agree with your ahistorical view of history is dumb.

guy, i give you proof of what i am saying, you haven't

i asked for proof of what you are saying, you haven't given me anything

i give reasons and used logic to justify what i believed, all you did was ignore my reasons and speak in circles

if what i am saying is wrong as you say, is it not only right for you to give the reason (backed with evidence) to why that is?

why is this so hard for you?

JewsAreSatanic:
You are a lazy baatard not to know there exist a thing called google.

This your Jewlensky even campaigned on the promise of ending the war by abiding to the Minsk Agreement brokered by Germany and France and even promised to mend relations with Russia.

Do your own fcking research and come to your own conclusion like an educated person.

the burden of proof is on you to prove what you are saying not me

source your claim

ParasiteWest:
I have strong reasons to believe that you are.

then please enlighten me to reasons why i am dumb

ParasiteWest:
The fact that the US was unable to defeat Vietnam without nuclear weapons is enough proof.
The Afghans in Afghanistan were equally supported by the West, nevertheless, they (Afghans and the West collectively) were defeated by the Taliban that received very little international support.

guy are you dumb?

all you are doing is circular reasoning and ignoring nuances/context to justify your bias

JewsAreSatanic:
Fool, for 8ys Zelensky has been waging a genocidal war on ethnic Russians in the east so much so that over 2 million had crossed into Russia to flee the ravaging kosher Nazis sent to murder them.

Jewlensky even signed a decree banning the Russian language

And you still for some reason believe the referendum to leave Ukraine for the Jewish criminals was a Russian sham plebiscite?

How foolish ate thou?

can i get proof of your claim?

JewsAreSatanic:
Idiot, I am not here to spoonfeed you.

i am NOT asking you to spoonfeed me, i am asking you to act like a logical human with a working brain and back up what you are saying with facts and logic

why is that so hard for you

ParasiteWest:
Your comments keep getting bizarre and somewhat disconnected.
Without support from Russia and China, the US would have deployed nuclear weapons and they would have been 'victorious'
But the fear of getting nuked gave the US small sense.

what?

do you have proof of what you are saying?

Russia and China not only supplied weapons and fighters to Vietnam, but they also trained the Vietcong and the US had more nukes that Russia and china combined at that point so if they wanted to nuke Vietnam, there was nothing Russia or china could have done

JewsAreSatanic:
As o said, I owe you no proof.

If after covid scam you still take. Jew media seriously then you are beyond redemption.

Keep watching jewnn.

Ode

says the idiot with no proof of wtf he is talking about

ParasiteWest:
But Vietnam is Asian.
If the US 'defeated' Japan why were they unable to defeat Vietnam?
No nuclear weapons?
The US is a big for nothing bully nation that was unable to defeat the small island of Japan without resorting to terrorism and the use of weapons of mass destruction.
Don't believe the hype in Hollywood movies.

in case you don't know, Vietnam was back by powerful counties like Russia and China so it is not like it was only Vietnam that fought the Us

JewsAreSatanic:
I owe you no proof .

Go and search for the truth.

The truth does not seek you, you seek for it.

When you want to be free of the lie you are living , you will begin your path to the truth.

But knowing how lazy you are and comfortable with the Jew hell hole you exist in, I don't expect you to search for the truth.

Keep watching JewNN.

all of this is just a nice way of saying you dont know wtf you are talking about

ParasiteWest:
The fact that the US had deployed nuclear weapons is enough proof.
Leave it or take it, I don't care as I'm not seeking your validation.
The US used nuclear weapons twice, ignorance is not an excuse.
If Russia hadn't prevailed over Germany, the US would have been unable to obtain nuclear weapons.
The US deployed nuclear weapons against civilian targets and not military targets (twice) that's an act of terrorism.
Russia will be justified to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine.

so what you saying is that you don't have any proof of what are you talking about and making these things up?

i have given you evidence to back my claim, you haven't done the same

so logically you are an idiot for believing this things without any eveidence