DavidMm's Posts
Nairaland Forum › DavidMm's Profile › DavidMm's Posts
"I heard motherfuckers sayin' they made Hov. Made Hov say, 'Okay, so? Make another Hov!'" Jay Z--Lost One PBAT told you guys he made PMB, y'all said he was bullshitting, so; He made himself president! Ameachi is telling us now he made PMB. Ok, so? Prove it! Make another one or, better yet, make yourself president! ![]() #ForwardEver #4+4 #PBAT |
This is arrant nonsense if true! The man should be able to see his personal physician, provided there exists a court's approval. On the issue of food, why is anyone allowed to bring in outside food to an inmate? Is the ICPC not capable of feeding the inmates they are holding? They need to stop this nonsense, if you can't feed an inmate. please hand them over to the NPS. |
WizardOfNG:You are 100% right on this being a policing issue. However, up until the Nigerian government officials started talking tough, one could argue that there was an implicit support within the SA government for these xenophobes, especially against Nigerians and Zimbabweans. Understandably so, after all. they are all politicians trying to win their next elections. Going against a populist movement (even when it is the right thing to do) would be political suicide. The only thing that get politicians to act against their political interests, is their financial interests[font=Lucida Sans Unicode][/font]. |
Someone tell Rufai that the FGN doesn't have to take the shares owned by Nigerians to Nationalize MTN or DSTv. They just need to acquire the controlling stake currently owned by the foreign entity temporarily or permanently. Temporarily, to be relisted on the stock exchange for local investors, or permanently, to be managed by the MOFI. While I do not support nationalizing private companies, an exception could be made in this case. #ForwardEver#PBAT |
PBAT and NSA Ribadu, quietly leveraged liability into an asset in the fight against terrorism! Now every time the terrorists gather in any forest within our soveriegn borders, they do so with bated breaths, praying it's not their last on this earth, all thanks to the cool headedness and reticent nature of the NSA--Round peg in round hole!! #ForewardEver#4+4 |
For all those that keep pretending they don't see the trend, you all will be left behind In the new Nigeria that's unfolding! God willing, Under PBAT's selfless leadership, Nigeria will achieve development. #ForwardEver#4+4 |
Make we tell them? lol!! #PBAT2027#OYETOLA #ForwardEver!!! Sighting a pod of dolphins can be a vibrant, albeit unconventional, indicator that macroeconomic policies focusing on environmental sustainability and the "blue economy" are yielding results. While dolphins aren't a direct metric like GDP, their presence signals health in sectors that drive national wealth! Indicator of Environmental Regulatory Success: Dolphins are an indicator species, meaning their health reflects the overall condition of the marine environment. Increased sightings suggest that policies targeting pollution reduction, waste management, and sustainable fishing are effective, creating a habitat healthy enough to support apex predators. Expansion of the Blue Economy: A thriving dolphin population is a primary driver for the ocean-based tourism and recreation industry, which contributed to a 7.4% growth in America’s marine GDP in 2021. In Hawaii, a single spinner dolphin can generate an estimated $3.3 million in lifetime revenue for the local economy through sustainable viewing. Job Creation and Local Multipliers: Frequent sightings support the dolphin-watching industry, which generates over $2.1 billion annually globaly. This industry provides above-average income for boatmen and fuels "leakage-free" spending at local hotels, restaurants, and retail shops. Long-term Resource Sustainability: Macroeconomic policies that shift from "extractive" (like intensive commercial fishing) to "regenerative" models are justified by these sightings. Nature-positive transitions are predicted to be worth $10.1 trillion by 2030, and dolphins help maintain the fish stocks that coastal communities rely on for food security and livelihoods. |
When it's time, it's time! There is nothing to it. If he can account for the missing Kaduna State funds under his management, he can go on his merry way. Hundreds of billions were misappropriated, some stolen under his watch. The man's got some explaining to do. Because the petition is from his own handpicked governor and HA members. |
I have said this before privately and will say it now publicly--The Federal Government through the ONSA needs to reassert its exclusivity over surveillance and counter surveillance nationwide. All vendors in this sphere has to be dully licensed, all sales registered and a reporting of all and every single instance of use reported on an ongoing/quarterly basis. Nigeria was one of the biggest markets for Circles Spyware and other such tools and technologies between 2007 and 2019. Some governors reportedly had had multiple vendors providing them access to such tools. I guess some of them procured a lifetime access and never handed it over to their successors. If they can take away mattresses and pillows from the governor's mansion, why would they relinquish access to a such a powerful tool. The ONSA needs to conduct a full audit and determine who bought and still has access to these tools asap. #ForwardEver #4+4#PBAT2027 |
The scope of Sharia Law as it is today in all these 12 northern states is unconstitutional. It has to be rolled back to pre-1999 version where it only applies to civil affairs of the adherents of the Islamic faith. Alternatively, the constitution has to be amended to incorporate codified Sharia as is being enforced in these states today. Anything short of these two options is unconstitutional, unlawful and a violation of the constitutional and fundamental rights of all non muslims citizens and residents of these states. To all those that think otherwise: Sharia enforcement is no more or less a violation of the constitution as Sunday Igboho's declaration of an Odua Nation in the Southwest, or Nnamdi Kanu's declaration of a Biafra State in the South East. And the FG must defend the constitution as is without fear or favor--not in parts but the whole of the constitution. Any group not happy with the constitution should seek an amended through the proper channel. |
"The entire Northeast has 7 nominees on the list, while the Southwest zone alone has 15 nominees. The Northwest and Southeast have 13 and 9, respectively. North Central has 10 nominees in the list of career and non-career ambassadorial nominees, while South South accounts for 12 nominees." Ndume and drama are 5 and 6! Here's that paragraph again; South West--15 North West--13 South South--12 North Central--10 South East--9 North East ---7 Making it 36 from the South and 30 from the North. Withdrawing the entire list would be like using a chainsaw for a job that calls for a scalpel! And the honorable Senator from the great state of Borno seems to favor the dramatics over the logical, which governance deserves. Yes, there was an oversight in submitting a list with a deceased name on it and the list might not satisfy the Federal character requirements as it stands today; but governance is a continuum, not isolated packets of events. These things can be remedied without throwing out the entire list. |
As an aspirant for the position of the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, would you endorse the public statement below in defense of the fundamental rights of the non muslims of SOKOTO State? "Actions not words"! ******************************** PUBLIC STATEMENT: A CALL TO RESTORE CONSTITUTIONAL ORDER IN SOKOTO STATE Date: [Insert Date] Location: [Insert Location] PREAMBLE We, the undersigned citizens and stakeholders dedicated to the preservation of constitutional democracy in Nigeria, issue this statement to express our grave concern regarding the recent executive actions taken by the Sokoto State Government under the administration of Governor Ahmed Aliyu. Specifically, we condemn the formalization of state-sponsored religious bias through: The institution of monthly state salaries for Imams, Deputy Imams, and Mu’azzins; Direct budgetary allocations to Jumu’at mosques; and The explicit elevation of "Islamic propagation" as a priority of government governance, ranking second only to security. These actions represent a dismantling of the secular firewall mandated by the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and threaten the social fabric of a multi-religious society. THE CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS 1. Breach of the Secular State Principle (Section 10) Section 10 of the Constitution is unequivocal: "The Government of the Federation or of a State shall not adopt any religion as State Religion." By utilizing the machinery of the state—including public treasury and policy prioritization—to propagate a specific faith, the Sokoto State Government has effectively adopted a state religion in practice, if not in name. This is a direct assault on the secular nature of the Nigerian Republic. 2. State-Sponsored Discrimination (Section 42) Section 42 prohibits discrimination against any citizen based on their religion. By restricting financial benefits and state patronage to the clergy and institutions of a single faith, the government has created a system of socio-economic apartheid. This policy treats non-Muslim residents—including Christians and Traditionalists—as second-class citizens who must fund, through their taxes, the propagation of a faith to which they do not subscribe. 3. Erosion of Religious Freedom (Section 38) True religious freedom implies freedom from state coercion. When the state explicitly prioritizes the propagation of one religion, it creates a coercive environment that implicitly pressures citizens to conform. The government’s role is to ensure a neutral playing field for all faiths, not to act as the missionary arm of one. 4. Misappropriation of the Commonwealth The treasury of Sokoto State belongs to all its residents. Diverting public funds—meant for education, health, and infrastructure—to fund religious propagation violates the principle of public trust. In a diverse federation, the state must remain a neutral arbiter, not a financier of sectarian interests. OUR DEMANDS To preserve national unity and constitutional supremacy, we demand the following: Immediate Reversal: The Sokoto State Government must immediately suspend and reverse these discriminatory policies and return all diverted funds to the public treasury for developmental use. Federal Oversight: We call upon the Attorney General of the Federation and the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) to urgently investigate these violations of the Federal Constitution. Judicial Review: We urge the Nigerian Bar Association and public interest litigators to challenge these policies in a court of competent jurisdiction to set a precedent against state-sponsored religious bias. CONCLUSION Nigeria’s stability rests on the twin pillars of Rule of Law and State Neutrality. The actions of the Sokoto State Government undermine both. We stand united in defending the rights of all Nigerians to live free from state-sanctioned religious discrimination. Signed: [Insert Names/Organizations] ******************************** #ForwardEver |
**************************** [b]IN THE FEDERAL HIGH COURT OF NIGERIA IN THE __________ JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT __________ SUIT NO: FHC///2025 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS UNDER SECTIONS 10, 38, 42, AND 46(1) OF THE 1999 CONSTITUTION OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA (AS AMENDED) AND ORDER II RULES 1–4 OF THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS (ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURE) RULES 2009 BETWEEN 1. ________________________________________ 2. ________________________________________ (Applicants) AND GOVERNOR OF SOKOTO STATE ATTORNEY-GENERAL & COMMISSIONER FOR JUSTICE, SOKOTO STATE SOKOTO STATE GOVERNMENT (Respondents) MOTION EX PARTE BROUGHT PURSUANT TO: Sections 10, 38, 42, and 46(1) of the 1999 Constitution; Articles 2, 8, and 19 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Ratification & Enforcement) Act, Cap A9, LFN 2004; Order IV Rules 3 & 4, and Order XI of the Fundamental Rights (Enforcement Procedure) Rules 2009; The inherent jurisdiction of this Honourable Court. TAKE NOTICE that this Honourable Court will be moved Ex Parte on the ___ day of ______ 2025 at the hour of 9 o’clock in the forenoon, or so soon thereafter as Counsel may be heard, on behalf of the Applicants for the following orders: 1. RELIEFS SOUGHT The Applicants respectfully seek the following interim orders: 1. AN ORDER OF INTERIM INJUNCTION restraining the Respondents, their agents, privies, officers, servants, or any person acting for or on their behalf from: implementing, executing, continuing, or giving effect to the newly introduced policies relating to: monthly allowances for Imams, Deputy Imams, and Mu’azzins; direct cash allocations to Jumu’at mosques; state-funded Islamic propagation programs, pending the hearing and determination of the Motion on Notice filed contemporaneously with this application. 2. AN ORDER directing accelerated hearing of the Motion on Notice in the interest of justice. 3. AND FOR SUCH FURTHER OR OTHER ORDERS as this Honourable Court may deem fit to make in the circumstances. 2. GROUNDS FOR THE APPLICATION This application is predicated upon the following grounds: The Respondents have commenced and continue to implement policies that utilize state funds to promote and propagate Islam, contrary to Section 10 of the Constitution. The continued implementation of the policies infringes the Applicants’ rights under Sections 38 and 42. Unless restrained, the Respondents’ actions will cause irreparable harm, violate constitutional neutrality, and render the substantive application nugatory. It is in the interest of justice, equity, and fairness that this Honourable Court preserves the status quo ante bellum until the substantive motion is heard and determined. 3. SUPPORTED BY THE FOLLOWING This Motion Ex Parte is supported by: A 12-paragraph Affidavit in Support deposed to by __________________________, the 1st Applicant. A Written Address in support of this Motion (attached). The Statement and Affidavit filed with the Originating Motion. All other processes already filed in this suit. 4. AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION EX PARTE I, ____________________, Male/Female, Nigerian citizen of ____________________, do hereby depose and state as follows: I am the 1st Applicant in this suit and I make this Affidavit on behalf of all the Applicants. I depose to this Affidavit based on my personal knowledge and the information supplied by Counsel, which I verily believe to be true. On ___ 2025, the Respondents publicly announced and began implementing religious policies using state funds. The Respondents are proceeding with monthly payments to Islamic clerics and allocations to mosques. The continuation of the said policies constitutes a continuing violation of our constitutional rights. Unless this Honourable Court intervenes urgently, the Respondents will continue to enforce these unconstitutional measures. Our substantive Motion on Notice raises weighty constitutional issues deserving judicial consideration. An interim order is necessary to prevent a fait accompli and irreparable injury to the Applicants. Granting this application is in the best interest of justice. I swear to this Affidavit in good faith, believing the contents to be true and correct. DEPONENT Sworn to at the Federal High Court Registry, ______, this ___ day of ______ 2025. Before me: COMMISSIONER FOR OATHS 5. WRITTEN ADDRESS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION EX PARTE ISSUE FOR DETERMINATION Whether this Honourable Court should grant an interim injunction restraining the Respondents pending the hearing of the Motion on Notice. ARGUMENT The threshold for granting interim injunctions is well established (Kotoye v. CBN; Obeya v. IGP). The Applicants have shown: a. A legal right in danger; b. A serious question to be tried; c. A possibility of irreparable injury; d. That the balance of convenience is in their favour; e. That refusal will render the substantive application nugatory. CONCLUSION Applicants urge this Honourable Court to grant the interim reliefs in the interest of justice and constitutional supremacy. 6. COUNSEL’S ENDORSEMENT Counsel to the Applicants Name: ________________________ Address: ______________________ Phone/Email: __________________[/b] ******************************** |
If payment is through public funds:: @Non-muslim residents, @CAN @PFN @CivilSocietyGroups @FGN *************************************** IN THE FEDERAL HIGH COURT OF NIGERIA IN THE __________ JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT __________ SUIT NO: FHC///2025 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS UNDER SECTIONS 10, 38, 42 AND 46(1) OF THE 1999 CONSTITUTION OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA (AS AMENDED) AND ORDER II RULES 1–4 OF THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS (ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURE) RULES 2009 BETWEEN 1. ________________________________________ 2. ________________________________________ (Applicants) AND GOVERNOR OF SOKOTO STATE ATTORNEY-GENERAL & COMMISSIONER FOR JUSTICE, SOKOTO STATE SOKOTO STATE GOVERNMENT (Respondents) ORIGINATING MOTION BROUGHT PURSUANT TO: Sections 10, 38, 42, and 46(1) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended); Articles 2, 8, and 19 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Cap A9 LFN 2004); Order II Rules 1–4 of the Fundamental Rights (Enforcement Procedure) Rules 2009; Under the inherent jurisdiction of this Honourable Court. TAKE NOTICE that this Honourable Court will be moved on the ___ day of ______ 2025 at the hour of 9 o’clock in the forenoon or so soon thereafter as Counsel may be heard on behalf of the Applicants for the following reliefs: 1. RELIEFS SOUGHT The Applicants seek the following: A. DECLARATORY RELIEFS A Declaration that the introduction of monthly allowances for Imams, Deputy Imams, Mu’azzins, and the allocation of cash to Jumu’at mosques by the Respondents violate Section 10 of the 1999 Constitution, which prohibits any State Government from adopting or promoting a religion. A Declaration that prioritizing Islamic propagation as a government agenda item constitutes unconstitutional conduct and violates Sections 10, 38, and 42 of the 1999 Constitution. A Declaration that the use of public funds collected from citizens of diverse religions to fund Islamic institutions and clerics amounts to religious discrimination and violates the Applicants’ rights under Section 42. B. INJUNCTIVE RELIEFS An Order of Court directing the Respondents to immediately stop and discontinue all state-funded religious propagation initiatives. An Order of Perpetual Injunction restraining the Respondents from using state funds or governmental institutions to promote any religion. Such further or other orders as this Honourable Court may deem just and fit in the circumstances. 2. GROUNDS FOR THE APPLICATION This application is based on the following grounds: Section 10 prohibits any state from adopting a religion. The Respondents’ actions amount to state-sponsored Islam. Section 38 protects freedom of thought, conscience, and religion. The Respondents’ actions compel non-Muslims to support Islamic propagation indirectly. Section 42 prohibits discrimination on grounds of religion. The Respondents have accorded exclusive financial privilege to Islamic institutions. There is no constitutional basis empowering any State Government to fund the propagation of a specific religion. The Respondents’ actions violate the principle of religious neutrality fundamental to democratic governance. 3. STATEMENT IN SUPPORT OF THE APPLICATION Pursuant to Order II Rule 3 of the FREP Rules 2009, the Applicants state as follows: NAME & DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANTS The Applicants are Nigerian citizens/non-governmental organisations committed to the promotion of constitutional democracy and protection of fundamental rights. RELIEF SOUGHT As set out above in Section 1. GROUNDS FOR RELIEF As set out in Section 2. FACTS OF THE CASE On or about ___ 2025, Governor Ahmed Aliyu publicly announced state-funded support for Islamic clerics and mosques. Government funds are now being deployed to: pay monthly allowances to Imams, Deputy Imams, and Mu’azzins; provide cash allocations to Jumu’at mosques; promote Islamic propagation as an official governmental priority. The said funds belong to all citizens of the state. These actions violate the constitutional rights of the Applicants and all non-Muslim residents. 4. WRITTEN ADDRESS IN SUPPORT The Written Address of the Applicants is hereby adopted and relies on the following Issues: ISSUE 1: Whether the actions of the Respondents violate Section 10 of the Constitution. ISSUE 2: Whether the use of public funds to promote a religion infringes the Applicants’ rights under Section 38. ISSUE 3: Whether the Respondents’ conduct amounts to discrimination contrary to Section 42. The Applicants humbly submit that all Issues must be resolved in their favour, for reasons and authorities elaborated in the Written Address. 5. VERIFICATION I, ____________________, of ____________________, do hereby make oath and state that I am the 1st Applicant herein and that I have read the foregoing Statement in Support and same are true to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. DEPONENT Sworn to at the Federal High Court Registry, ______, this ___ day of ______ 2025. Before me: COMMISSIONER FOR OATHS 6. AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT (As required under Order II Rule 3) I, ____________________, Male/Female, Nigerian citizen of ____________________, do hereby swear and state as follows: I am the 1st Applicant in this suit and I make this Affidavit on behalf of all the Applicants. I have the authority of the other Applicants to depose to this Affidavit. The facts of this case are as stated in paragraphs 1–4 of the Statement of Facts. The Respondents’ actions violate my constitutional rights and those of other non-Muslims. I swear to this Affidavit in good faith, believing its contents to be true and in accordance with the Oaths Act. DEPONENT Sworn to at the Federal High Court Registry, ______, this ___ day of ______ 2025. Before me: COMMISSIONER FOR OATHS 7. LIST OF DOCUMENTS TO BE RELIED UPON The public announcement by the Governor of Sokoto State. Newspaper and media reports detailing the policies. Any documentary evidence of funds allocation. The 1999 Constitution (as amended). Any other relevant materials. 8. COUNSEL’S ENDORSEMENT Counsel to the Applicants Name: ________________________ Address: ______________________ Phone/Email: __________________ **************************** #ForwardEver |
This invitation is long overdue! @EFCC waited too long on calling on Malami to answer for the many, many, many improprieties linked to his person and the office he occupied while he held sway. For all of his cronies that would be shouting political witch hunt, you all need to remember all the unscrupulous dealings that were linked to him and his children. #ForwardEver |
“So, all these questions I have is where is this money? And the other thing I found out through my FIFA connections is that if countries don’t have the money to buy business class tickets for everybody, FIFA will fund the money and buy those tickets and just deduct it from the monies you get from FIFA after the World Cup. Highly Incompetent people in positions of authority might be one of the biggest obstacle to Nigeria's development. Incompetence enables corruption, and corruption in turn, rewards incompetence in an endless cycle that permanently stagnates an organization. #ForwardEver |
The problem with Nigeria’s state is not that it is anti-Christian,[size=16pt] but that it is outrageously incompetent.[/size] The security forces that have proved so ineffective at providing law and order are merely a reflection of other parts of government: they are riddled with corruption and ill prepared. This is even more glaring at the state and local levels. We have state governments that seem to be oblivious of their responsibilities. Other than revenue collection, most members of the state executive do not know their roles and responsibilities as federating units of a federation. For the sake of the republic, this needs to change. #ForwardEver |
DavidMm: |
Brother please don't take this the wrong way because I do really trust you want the best for our country and trying to understand things as best as you can; I do however think you lack the capacity to grasp constitutional logicism. So with all due respect, please go run some errands, while the NSA and others play the game of "gives" and "takes", to forestall any violation of our sovereignty by a power we cannot challenge to fight. DomPerignon: |
When has alcohol consumption being integral to practicing Christianity ? whether it does or doesn't is irrelevant! You assuming you can take a constitutionally guaranteed right away through the back door because it serves you and there's nothing anyone can do is the issue! Your total disregard to the constitution of the country is at issue, By extension, that is why Boko Haram think they can get away with annexing a federal land and nothing would happen. Or bandits thinking they can institute their own fiefdoms in the north and nothing would happen. And oh yes; they both have and nothing is yet to happen to them. DomPerignon: |
I have asked you severally here to outline which law in sharia code that discriminates against Christians Asked and answered! But I will indulge you yet again! As it stands currently in the 12 Northern States, in its entirety including Hisbah, is description against non adherent of islam in Nigeria not only the christians in the north! Why? because it violates the constitution by elevating one religion into state sponsorship. Mention to me also why sharia is barbaric but your voodoo shrines you all troop to is better. Is Sharia barbaric? Is the death sentence in the penal code ( death by hanging) barbaric? You are the one talking about this, it's not part of this conversation! Is Voodoo better? Is Pounded yam better than eba? Irrelevant to this conversation but they are both swallow and fills the eater. Again, completely irrelevant to the subject at hand. The cho cho comment is in reference to anyone that is blind to what is happening, cannot provide any legitimate insight to dissuade the accuser nor action plan to remedy the situation. The Flippant Children that needs to be sent on an unending errands while the adult work to resolve the issues. DomPerignon: |
Alcohol is banned irrespective of religion--You just admitted to persecuting people of other faith by this simple statement! So because your religion forbids it, you are forbidding it for others, whether they agree or not. And most importantly, because you have a majority in the state house of Assembly, you are going to make it a law even if it violates the constitution. And you are going to create and fund an enforcement arm to shove it down the throat of everyone in that state against the constitutional provision the safeguards them against such. And you are going to make sure the FG does not intervene by putting like minded people in positions across the Ministry of Justice and the security agencies. I think we need to include the studies of Citizens' rights under the constitution into our academic program from early age. A lot of people don't seem to understand their rights, where it starts and ends and where thers' begin under the constitution. DomPerignon: |
This line of reasoning is what is causing us these problems today. You talk about the North as if the christians and non muslims in the north don't have a right to live free of hindrance from a religion they do not subscribe to, as enshrined in the constitution of the nation! Or do you not accept the Supremacy of the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria? And yet, you come out and deny the accusation leveled against us! Go and read up on what it means to be a member of federation. Rights and Responsibility of Federating states and all the illegality you've been perpetrating would become apparent to you. And if you don't have the time or mental capacity to, then please and please, go run some unending errands, before your ignorance does irreparable damages on "The North"! DomPerignon: |
Are we back to regional government? Sharia as it were was never the issue, rather Sharia post 1999 is the issue. The codification and extension of sharia into criminal matters beyond the civil and personal matters, as were customary is what is illegal. They promised it would only be enforced on adherents of the islamic faith but we all know today that that is not the case. DomPerignon: |
My guess is that is what would happen if the FGN disbanded Hisbah in its current form. They will go back to the drawing board and after much dialogue, it will be reorganized in its limited role as it was originally intended. WIN-WIN-WIN for everyone. The non adherents of the religion win because they can live their lives without hindrance from a religion that is not theirs. The adherents win because they get to continue being govern by the laws they want. And the FG gets to show the world that they would do the needful, to protect the rights of every citizen within its sovereign borders. Low Hanging fruit! BeardedMeat: |
Alas my friend, we are arriving at a common ground! Every Federating state like every seller in the market, has a primary objective to make the best decision for themselves. That a state gave it's people what they wanted is not the issue here, but that no other state or the official match referee, the FGN through the office and person of the Attorney General--the ultimate defender of the constitution, called a foul is the issue. So to government officials, elected or appointed feigning ignorance when the country is called out, cut the bullshit and do the needful! It's easy to get specialists at ethnic cleansing, minority persecutors and rights violators from around the world to come to our defense, but the does not negate what is true. We can either wake up and sit up or continue to pretend we don't see what's standing right in front of us. To the state governors and state commissioners for Justice; go and protest Hisbah and sharia! Seek an injunction against Hisbah and sharia enforcement, compel the federal government to defend the constitution at the Supreme Court. Get off your hands and act like the captain of your team for once a protest a noncall. DomPerignon: |
Freedom of religion and association is enshrined in our constitution however, state sponsorship of a religion is not. Shari'a and Hisbah as of today counts as state sponsorship of a religion in contravention of our constitution. So don't feign ignorance when we are called out for it. DomPerignon: |
Your questions are the answers! The prohibition was passed not by state laws but through a constitutional amendment and the subsequent Volstead Act of 1917 and 1919 and was also ended by the 21st amendment. Until Shari'a is promulgated via a constitutional amendment, any enforcement of it as it stands counts as state sponsored persecution of non adherent of islam within those jurisdiction--fruits off a poisoned tree! DomPerignon: |
Saudi Arabia is a Monarchical Theocracy just so you know. Voodoo, Okija or what other false narrative you are clinging to is not state sponsored like Hisbah is. In fact the existence of Okija shrine, voodoo, mosque, churches side by sides in most states in the south is a testament to the freedom of religion enshrined in the constitution. Every family have your kind but where I come from there is a saying that " when someone that can beat you and your entire lineage combined picks a fight with you, you send your flippant children on an unending errand". So please go run some errands while the people that mean well for Nigeria do the needful, because even the Saudi Arabia your are quick to mention, if the USA talks, they listen. DomPerignon: |
talking out of both sides of the mouth and lack of sincerity is what worries me. Pretending not to see or know what it means for something to be State sponsored is what is alarming in this case. Let me break it down for you: HISBAH persecutes Christians and non muslim, HISBAH is backed by the State. Hence the persecution of christians in these states is backed by the government. And since the FG has done nothing to challenge these States, it been inferred that the FG must be in agreement. Solution: The FG needs to disband the enforcement arm of sharia as it stands today asap, pending when the legality and scope of the law is determined. DomPerignon: |
The impunity behind the adoption rather than sharia itself, is actually the problem. Shari'a as you have in the 12 Northern states is at odds with our constitution and standing as a secular state. By adopting Shari'a in the North and empowering the Hisbah to enforce it statewide, these states became theocratic, and sent a message to non state actors that they could impose their religion on others in the state---because their religion is the state's religion. muyico: |