₦airaland Forum

dopeJemi:


See ​A♏.. dere must be excuses 4 any kinda performance he puts up

mama-gee:
[color=deeppink]Referee's help? Congratulations on being the first person to make that excuse!!!

Did the referee also help Luka Modric to strike a long range shot into the goal keeper's net?

What about the referee helping manchester united to score no legitimate goal except the own goal scored by sergio ramos?

What about the referee helping Sergio ramos to score an own goal that even gave manchester united a chance to start with?

Oh, Are you still wailing over that red card?


But Uefa body and committee already agreed with the referee that Nani deserved a red after stomping on Arbeloa's chest or were you too busy watching ronaldo score the winning goal against manchester united that you forgot to check out what was happenning off the pitch? [/color]

dopeJemi: If we wanna bring sentiments into dis argument den it is u barca supporters dat r being sentimentaL.. Why? because its ur team, u know messi wasn't at his best buh u don't wanna admit it, u r just using d fact dat he scored 2 cover his beLow average performance

caukerzee: Barca without messi would choke. It was evident in today's game. Alexis an Fabregas messed up.

dopeJemi:


Scoring a goaL doesn't mean he pLayed welL in d first haLf, he was just in d rite pLace at d rite time

mama-gee:
[color=deeppink]Wait a minute!!!

But that's what you Chelsea fans always said during his time in the club.

He spent a little over 8 years in Chelsea and only managed to win one champions league and he wasn't even the protagonist in the victory against Bayern Munich, it was Petr Cech who saved two penalties in two important games, one against barcelona in the semis and later bayern munich in the finals.

You're seriously hilarious!!!

Nobody except you takes tomorrow's match as a big game because everyone knows it's a scale through for madrid.

The only team that even had a chance of eliminating madrid was manchester united and they failed despite having Van Persie, rooney, Nani etc.

And you're here expecting a 6 goal Drogba to eliminate madrid not even beating them but ousting them.

LWKMD. [/color]

A A Adam: I beg i they can cut Messi may dem do it ronaldo go buy yam.

dopeJemi:

No dey give urseLf hope.. Why Were d defenders not in troubLe in d first haLf?

dopeJemi:


oh! I Love PSG.. Dey didn't disappoint Me and dey won't disappoint Me in d camp nou

biolabee: Sad deflection but more importantly the messi situation is critical
Also the defenders

dopeJemi: UP PSG


We wilL be in d Semi finaL

mama-gee:
[color=deeppink]Those goals will mean nothing when they lose by aggreggate next week. . .

Drogba? Are you serious?

You're comparing a guy that scored 6 goals in all competitions to a ballon d'or winner and a man that scored 60.

That a 54 goal difference combined.

Tell me when you have something serious to talk about. [/color]

fredoooooo: bros you get time dey discuss football with mama gee , all she know is ronaldo

mama-gee:
[color=deeppink]PSG equalizes!!!

I'm now 100% certain that PSG will oust barcelona, they'll pull a chelsea and eliminate barcelona in the quarterfinals.[/color]

ochukoccna: Itz OFFICIAL
Barcelona are a one man team
No Messi,No Barca

Red-Light:
nope i want to watch sumtin competitive

fredoooooo: people no go shout uefalona now o

Chimezie198: Omg! Dis one wey few ppl dey view dis thread nah... Wetin happen

Abi PHCN take light

sweet-tease:
And wats dat supposed to mean?

orlaryhincah2: [img]http://1.bp..com/-EVBbwnlWhtk/UVRHjG1UZTI/AAAAAAAAnpw/zp_i60wfz-o/s400/ayo.jpg[/img]
Ayo (in blue) with other guests at a movie premiere.

Ayo Mogaji is an actress who went underground not too long ago. To know more about her please ask our dear google. Another pic of her below;
[img]http://1.bp..com/-lRN51TqRM7E/UVRH5eWkhnI/AAAAAAAAnp4/4yqosF9sHO8/s400/ayo+2.jpg[/img]
www.orlaryhincah..com

NoContract: [size=14pt]BIGGEST EEDIOT ON NAIRALAND!
So na Jesus destroy Sodom and Gomorrah for your own bible abi?

Gullible slave boi like you![/size]

ifeness: I will point it out in the bible to you: according to John 13:4-5 described the even Jesus washed his deciples feet

In verse 4 and 5 it states,


4. "He riseth from supper, and laid aside his garments; and took a towel, and girded himself."

5. "After that he poureth water into a basin, and began to wash the disciples’ feet, and to wipe them with the towel wherewith he was girded."

The average Christian would not see anything wrong with these verses. To them Jesus was simply demonstrating an act of humility by washing his disciples’ feet.

But, what most of them won’t see is that when scriptures said that jesus "laid aside his garments," it meant that he took off his clothes! And, without making a distinction, this suggests that he took off his clothes in front of his disciples, as if while they watched.

If this was the case, it was an improper thing for a man to do before other men, especially a holy man before his disciples. The reason why is because it disrespects the brotherhood and shows a lack of judgement and consideration on jesus 's part.

Also, when John 13:4 says that he "took a towel, and girded himself," this suggests that the rest of his body was left uncovered or naked.

Now, let me bring your attention to when John 13:4-5 said that after Jesus undressed, before his disciples, "he poureth water into a basin, and began to wash the disciples’ feet."

Just think. A "basin" is really not that big. One person can easily carry it. And, a man does not have to take off his clothes to fill it up with water and wash peoples' feet no more than the people who got their feet washed did not take off their clothes for it to be done!

The writers of the Gospels want us to believe that jesus took his clothes and got naked before other men, to fill up a basin with water, so he could wash their feet. But, common sense should tell you that it was not necessary at all for him to take off his clothes to do this!


Now lets go to John 13:12,15


12. "So after he had washed their feet, and had taken his garments, and was set back down again, he said unto them, Know ye what I have done to you?

15. "For I have given you an example, that ye should do as I have done to you."

Based on this order he gave to his disciples, they knew that they would have to take turns getting naked before each other and wash each other’s feet, with their joysticks in plain view, like Jesus did.

I am certain, that the disciples with small joysticks wished that the other disciples did not have to see how small their joysticks were.

All this does not sound right even to most Christians. This is why when they perform this rite today, many of them choose to disobey Jesus’ order and leave their clothes on!

Men taking off their clothes before each was not wrong in the sight of Jesus so why acting as if you know more than your master.

ifeness: I will point it out in the bible to you: according to John 13:4-5 described the even Jesus washed his deciples feet

In verse 4 and 5 it states,


4. "He riseth from supper, and laid aside his garments; and took a towel, and girded himself."

5. "After that he poureth water into a basin, and began to wash the disciples’ feet, and to wipe them with the towel wherewith he was girded."

U guys just tweak the bible to suite your selfish ambitions against the word of God. If I bath with my fellow male corp members for 3 weeks in the camp makes me a gay right? Did Jesus have sex with any of His disciples? Keep tweaking the word of God, but mind u, this same Jesus will judge u on the last day.




The average Christian would not see anything wrong with these verses. To them Jesus was simply demonstrating an act of humility by washing his disciples’ feet.

But, what most of them won’t see is that when scriptures said that jesus "laid aside his garments," it meant that he took off his clothes! And, without making a distinction, this suggests that he took off his clothes in front of his disciples, as if while they watched.

If this was the case, it was an improper thing for a man to do before other men, especially a holy man before his disciples. The reason why is because it disrespects the brotherhood and shows a lack of judgement and consideration on jesus 's part.

Also, when John 13:4 says that he "took a towel, and girded himself," this suggests that the rest of his body was left uncovered or naked.

Now, let me bring your attention to when John 13:4-5 said that after Jesus undressed, before his disciples, "he poureth water into a basin, and began to wash the disciples’ feet."

Just think. A "basin" is really not that big. One person can easily carry it. And, a man does not have to take off his clothes to fill it up with water and wash peoples' feet no more than the people who got their feet washed did not take off their clothes for it to be done!

The writers of the Gospels want us to believe that jesus took his clothes and got naked before other men, to fill up a basin with water, so he could wash their feet. But, common sense should tell you that it was not necessary at all for him to take off his clothes to do this!


Now lets go to John 13:12,15


12. "So after he had washed their feet, and had taken his garments, and was set back down again, he said unto them, Know ye what I have done to you?

15. "For I have given you an example, that ye should do as I have done to you."

Based on this order he gave to his disciples, they knew that they would have to take turns getting naked before each other and wash each other’s feet, with their joysticks in plain view, like Jesus did.

I am certain, that the disciples with small joysticks wished that the other disciples did not have to see how small their joysticks were.

All this does not sound right even to most Christians. This is why when they perform this rite today, many of them choose to disobey Jesus’ order and leave their clothes on!

Men taking off their clothes before each was not wrong in the sight of Jesus so why acting as if you know more than your master.