Muslim dey bully Christians, and Christians dey bully traditionalists.
But the Christians dey cry more about injustice and persecution forgetting that they bully traditionalists more than the way Muslims bullies them in the north.
My own be say, if you dey practice your religion or spirituality, nor carry am near me cos if you do anyhow, i go storm your dormot like a terrorizz and traumatize you with my battalion of timberland men.
☠️⚓
Benjanni: So a man of God in Delta State decided to walk into a shrine and destroy it to prove that the gods were false. He probably thought nothing would happen.
Well… something happened. The matter landed in court.
According to reports, the Federal High Court sitting in Warri held that his actions violated the constitutional right of the shrine’s worshippers to freedom of religion.
The matter ended up in court.
The court held that the action was unconstitutional and violated the worshippers’ fundamental right to freedom of religion under Section 38 of the 1999 Constitution. The court also found it inconsistent with Section 10, which provides that no government shall adopt any religion as State religion.
As a result, the court ordered the pastor to:
✅ Rebuild the destroyed Egbesu shrine. ✅ Pay ₦100 million as general damages. ✅ Pay ₦100 million as exemplary damages. ✅ Pay ₦5 million as costs. ✅ Publish a public apology in two national newspapers. ✅ Stay at least 10 kilometres away from the worshippers.
Whether you are a Christian, Muslim, traditional worshipper or belong to any other religion, the Constitution protects your freedom to practise your religion.
You are free to preach your faith and try to convince others to join you, but you are not free to destroy another person’s place of worship because you disagree with their beliefs or because you want to prove your God is superior.
However, this Burkina Fasso new education policy is the only way to make the country educational system to work. Just extend it to Health and automobile.
Well, I'll anticipate this imaginary phase when the Americans are so eager to land a deal with iran and cement it.
Don't tell me they are going to finalize the MOU with iran only to launch another phase of attacks after the mid-terms?
What even makes you think that Trump would even win the Mid-term? oh my goodness, you were sounding reasonable enough till you stated an absurd statement of another phase of attacks after the mid-term.
You think Trump will authorize another operation after he starts facing impeachment trials when looses the mid terms?
Unless, a miracle happens and DT wins, I bet you, he is never going to wish to get involved with Iran again.
New reports show that the reluctance of Europe to provide their bases for military operations cost the US a great deal. Refueling became a problem and the logistics was just terrible. They’re back to the drawing board. Follow what’s happening in Iraq and Lebanon closely.
The next phase will leave no room for error. After midterms Trump can do whatever he wants.
udemzyudex: This clown doesn't even know that Isreal is not even happy with deal they had with Iran. You think if US had wanted to unleash all it has on Iran, Iran would survive it?
The war is a needless war for US, US just want to capitalise on it and negotiate a deal that will favour them. Use your Brian mister and stop being deluded, Trump is all about making money.
You are just a delusional folk. If the Americans had the capacities they would have their marines matching down the streets of Tehran where they would conquer the entire iran the way they did with Venezuela, but then, they couldn't topple Iran.
The only thing left for America to throw is Nukes which of course, i believe you're not stvv pidd enough to believe they would.
Americans are still yet to do shit after trump's delusional post on iran where he ranted he was going to strike Iran very hard.
I am still waiting for that attack. ‼️🤡
Unless you have a slow thought process, tell me why USA is even negotiating with a country without a military according to trump. ⁉️
If Iran weren't a threat to those bases, the Americans wouldn't move away.
The Americans threw all they had at the Iranians, I guess the last card left to be played is a ground invasion and I'm very the Americans are completely averse to such operation unless they eventually grows the balls, but then a terrible disastrous humiliation will loom ahead for the Americans.
Wow, you used Ai to analyze non sense. If my content was ai generated, how come i made so many typo errors included in the first line?
lindqvistbergst: Funny. You go into other people's topics unprovoked and uninvited just to call it AI out of fear to read more than a paragraph and with no evidence so lets flip things for a second. Your latest topics out of 3.
Iran was able to resilient to look the United States and Israel not because it was militarily stronger in the conventional sense, but because it relied on a combination of geography, missile capability, asymmetric warfare, political endurance, and strategic patience. Most military analysts agree that Iran cannot match the combined air power, technology, and economic strength of the U.S. and Israel directly. However, Iran’s strategy has been to make any war extremely costly, prolonged, and regionally destabilizing for its opponents. Several factors explain this resilience: Iran has developed a very large missile and drone program over decades, allowing it to strike military bases, shipping routes, and strategic infrastructure across the region. Its geography is difficult for invasion. Iran is a vast mountainous country with a large population, making any full-scale military occupation extraordinarily difficult. Iran uses “asymmetric warfare,” meaning it avoids fighting like a traditional superpower and instead relies on missiles, drones, cyber operations, regional alliances, and economic pressure points such as the Strait of Hormuz. Iran’s leadership also calculated that the United States was unlikely to launch a massive ground invasion because of the political, economic, and military costs after experiences in Iraq and Afghanistan. Another important factor is deterrence: Even when Iran suffered major losses, it continued retaliatory attacks, signaling that conflict would not remain limited or inexpensive for the other side. At the same time, it is important to note that analysts do not universally agree that Iran “defeated” the U.S. and Israel militarily. Many reports indicate Iran also suffered severe damage to military infrastructure, missile systems, leadership networks, and its economy during the conflict. So, from a strategic perspective, Iran’s success is often described less as a conventional military victory and more as an ability to survive, continue resisting, and raise the political and economic costs of war to a level that pushed all sides toward negotiation and ceasefire discussions including a peace deal that will see that iran's Frozen assets are released, Economic Power to open and close the Strait of hormuz, Sanctions removed and $300 billion reparations to damages paid. In other words, Resilience pays! I only hope a peace deal is finally cemented so that the Dangote will atleast have mercy on us. Iran is not the cause of our price of fuel surging high, Isreal and USA attacked them unprovoked and gave them the justification to close the strait of hormuz and strangle the entire economy of the world. If the United States don't reach a peace deal with iran, we might see oil prices hit 200$ per barrels before August and that will be very hard on each and every one of us across the world. Violence will not open strait of hormuz and ensure the free passage of oil. Project freedom was a capital failure, and any other future military operation on the strait of hormuz would also be another failure for the Americans. Let there be peace!
Yeah, there are quite a few signals in this text that often show up in AI-written or AI-assisted geopolitical summaries, but also a couple that can just be human “over-written / emotionally driven analysis”. I’ll break it down in a grounded way, not in a “gotcha AI detector” way (because those are unreliable on their own).
First big pattern: structure and rhythm
It has that very “templated explainer” flow:
big thesis statement
“most analysts agree…” framing
numbered or bullet-like factor breakdown
then a balancing “however, it is important to note…”
then a conclusion that escalates into prediction + moral takeaway
That structure is extremely common in AI outputs because it’s statistically a “safe academic shape” of argument.
Second pattern: high confidence on complex geopolitics without sourcing
You’ve got very strong claims like:
a peace deal already being shaped
frozen assets being released
$300 billion reparations
control over Strait of Hormuz being part of negotiations
oil price prediction to $200 before August
These are the biggest red flags, not because they’re “impossible emotions”, but because they are:
extremely specific
highly time-sensitive
not attributed to any source or actor
presented as near-certainties
That combination is classic AI hallucination style when models start “continuing logical extrapolation too far”.
Human writing can do this too, but humans usually anchor it in “I saw X report” or “some analysts speculate”.
Third pattern: generic authority padding
Phrases like:
“most military analysts agree”
“many reports indicate”
“strategic perspective”
“political and economic costs”
These are placeholder authority signals. They sound informed but don’t actually point anywhere. AI systems use them a lot when they need plausibility without citing anything concrete.
Fourth pattern: smooth ideological drift at the end
The tone shifts from analysis → advocacy:
“Resilience pays!”
“Let there be peace!”
blame assignment (“Iran is not the cause… Israel and USA attacked unprovoked…”)
emotional economic warning (“we might see oil hit 200$…”)
That transition from neutral framing → moral + emotional conclusion is a common “alignment drift” pattern in generated persuasive text.
It is people like you work and get paid by a faaaake certttifficcate hollldderr that has made the country be what it is. You are lying and no one is attacking the Pastor
Since you data boiz are desperately searching for acknowledgement where your messiah has failed in every spheres of life you jump all lies and support it.
Pastor Adeboye knows himself that he is lying. You know that Pastor Adeboye is lying just as you lie always fir your messiah the faaaake certttifficcate hollldderr. The money you get from your faaake guru str*tegist to push the lies further has exposed you as those who lie about every failures of the roasted electricity fraud
No öne is surprised that you are jumping on the lies of Christian to defend the incompetence and cluelessness of the fraud you snatched and grabbed for No one is attacking Adeboye. He is being called for defending what he castigated under our son GEJ. That is hypocrisy Mr data.
lindqvistbergst: Every wedding speech in this country follows the same script. A senior relative stands up, clears their throat, and starts the shakedown. We trained her. We fed her. We clothed her. Now pay up. Everyone nods. It is a collective hallucination where the groom is expected to grovel and pay for a miracle that never happened. It is not a miracle. It is the bare legal minimum. You do not get a medal for keeping your child alive, fed, and schooled without landing in the back of a police van. That is not parenting as a heroic sacrifice. That is the statutory floor. Section 14 of the Child Rights Act is not a suggestion. It is a duty. If you do not feed your kid, the state takes her. If you do not clothe her, it is neglect. If you do not send her to school, you are breaching the law. Yet at every introduction, this baseline existence gets rebranded as a generational investment. The conditioning starts in childhood. A kid is fed and told it is a gift. She is not beaten or sold, and she is told this basic human decency is proof of otherworldly love. By the time she is twenty five, she is convinced that just being alive is a debt she owes her parents, and the man marrying her is expected to settle the invoice. The wedding is not the event. The wedding is just the debt collection. If you want to talk tradition, let us be honest about what the tradition actually was. It was not about character or home training. That is modern filler. The original transaction, whether it was the white cloth for the Yoruba, the bed inspection for the Kalabari, or the paternity proof for the Igbo, was a brutal check on virginity and lineage. It was a receipt for a certified bloodline. It was a transaction. You wanted the bride price? That was the fine print. But most families today cannot produce that product anymore. They do not supervise, they do not guard, they do not certify. They have deleted the lineage guarantee but kept the give me money part. They are not delivering the cultural product they claim to be protecting, and they are not even clearing the legal floor they are obligated to meet. We have all seen the stats. Child hawking, kids pulled out of school, domestic abuse, child marriage. These are the realities that contradict the we trained and raised her speech. It is not tradition. It is extortion with a better dress code. Let us look at the legal reality. Nigerian law makes the whole charade unenforceable. Under the Marriage Act and the Constitution, you cannot coerce a marriage, you cannot demand bride price as a condition of legality, and you certainly cannot block a union because you are pissed off about the bill. Customary law is subordinate to the Constitution. The moment a tradition becomes a tool for extortion or coercion, it becomes repugnant to natural justice and void. You can threaten, you can shout, you can act offended, but you have no legal leg to stand on. The VAPP Act 2015 criminalizes coercion and financial extortion. It is the same scam in six languages. Hausa with Sadaki, which the religion says belongs to the bride but is often pocketed by parents. Yoruba with Owo Ori, which was small and symbolic until it became a vehicle for modern greed. Igbo with Ego Isi Nwanyi, where the legal logic was about paternity. Bororo Fulani with the cattle count and the whipping of the groom in Sharo. Kagoro, the only tribe that does not seem to care. Kalabari with Bibife, buying the mouth, which was about lineage verification. The funniest part is the confidence. They stand there, itemizing the sacrifice of feeding their own offspring, pretending it is a bill for the groom to pay. It is the only context on earth where a parent can point to the basic requirements of keeping a human being alive and ask for a refund. Imagine if the taxman showed up and asked for a bonus because he did not burn your house down. That is the invoice. Pay the bare minimum. Get worshipped for it. Then send the husband the bill for a product you never certified, a service that was your legal duty anyway, and make him kneel to pay it. That is the scam. It runs in every tribe, and it relies entirely on nobody doing the maths. But the maths is simple. You did not do a favor. You did your job. And you definitely do not get paid for it twice.
You are promoting a post advising ladies to date for fun and here you are also attacking the guy because you think he is wasting ladies time.
Lovelink1991: You wants to waste the precious time of ladies when you know that they have short of reproduction but can reproduce at anytime. I hope you will agree the same for your sister for another to have fun with
Social media activist, Martins Otse, popularly known as VeryDarkMan, has faulted the General Overseer of The Redeemed Christian Church of God (RCCG), Pastor Enoch Adeboye, over remarks defending President Bola Tinubu’s handling of insecurity.
Adeboye, speaking at the US-Nigeria Faith Heroes Award Gala in Washington on June 23, said Tinubu had “done his bit” by giving directives to the military and should not be blamed for worsening security challenges.
The cleric added that when a commander-in-chief issues instructions, “he has done his bit. You don’t expect him to go and put on khaki and (fight).”
The activist shared clips of news reports in national dailies from May 5, 2010 and October 11, 2010 showing Adeboye criticising then-President Goodluck Jonathan’s handling of insecurity.
The headline of the lead story of a national daily (not Daily Sun) from May 5, 2010, shared by the critic read, “Adeboye petitions Jonathan over rising kidnappings”.
“Pastor Enoch Adeboye just wants to turn a blind eye because Tinubu is the President. Weren’t you the one in this video protesting years ago with a placard? This is just tribal bigotry,” he said in a video shared on Instagram on Wednesday.
No dey talk non sense, adults aged over 30 and 40 years dey write waec and neco for east here talkmore of north.
Breaker001: I guess you were born yesterday. That's why you are not aware of the fact that storylines like this can be spinned to create a false impression. So I don't blame you much.
But taking a look at your moniker tells me all I need to know about you. But help yourself by visiting a rehabilitation center 😎
Strong intelligent men would be delighted to have a warrior in their family fighting poverty and educating their children to be warriors together in this harsh world we live in.
bada007: Please guys rate my boy, he is over six months and i just wanna know if he is pure or not because i think he should have a fuller fur than this
You are still not making any atom of sense cos you couldn't answer the questions i presented to you.
We argue to learn, but i don't see anything to learn from your whack responses.
I'll have to pass. ‼️
Helinuse: Counter? Oh so you notice that I am not countering your claims? That is good.
Well, I will tell you why: arguments are for those who have an opinion and are willing to change their perspective based on facts presented by another person if it is more convincing. With someone who is not ready to see the truth and change, but prefers to hold on to a lie to keep their happiness, it is no more an argument, but a waste of time.
So, I agree with you: The wiping of Khamenei didn't achieve anything The wiping out of Al-Baghdadi didn't achieve anything The wiping out of Gaddafi didn't achieve anything The wiping out of Osama didn't achieve anything.
Al-Baghdadi's ISIS is still a powerful group, projecting power out of Syria Osama Al-Qaeda is still a powerful group, projecting power out of Afghanistan Libya is still an influential nation, projecting power out of North Africa
I guess, in the same way, IRGC, in some months, will still be a powerful group, projecting power out of Iran.
There are still parties that could have gave PO the platform to contest like LP and APGA. But yeah, He compromised himself. Why did he even leave LP?
engrelvis: Being smart is different from playing dirty which Tinubu is doing currently.Tinubu will NEVER allow PO register a party.U and l both know that.look at What Wike did to PDP.Same thing playing out.lf everybody start playing politics like Tinubu this country will burn .By the way am not a obi supporter but a concern Nigerian who has stay long enough on this earth to know no matter how a smart a person is one-day he will outsmart himself
Davinity: I will be disappointed If your reply was a little smart but as usual you are as dumb as the drugie you support... Like I siaid earlier, If he is popular enough he should go to the polls.
Christianity Etc › Re: Court Orders Prophet Tamarauebi Elisha Owan to Pay ₦200M For Destroying Shrine by Demonic01(m): 10:00am On Jul 05
