₦airaland Forum

Ibime:
Havertz

This one loud

Havertz10:
park the bus strikers you mean

Well Chelsea have evolved, we now go toe to toe against top teams, update your knowledge of our progressive club



If you consider timo's season a flop

Let's add up all the points he won for us by winning penalties, giving assists and the few goals he scored minus that from his misses and compare how many points were lost

Did he miss chances yes but they were mostly in games that we eventually won, I no understand una, it's not like we lost serious points because of him

Always look at the big picture

I once admitted my mistake for calling him a flop sometimes ago, Werner isn’t fully a flop.

But you admit that Werner of Bundesliga was better than Werner in Chelsea.

Toe to toe football against big teams is existing in Chelsea because of Tuchel, if he gets sack, it might turn to history.

Havertz10:
drogba was called a flop when he first arrived, he almost left chelsea in his 2nd season, Mourinho challenged him to stay and fight for his place

You are calling him a success but it's because you saw what he eventually became not how it started, go to youtube and watch his documentary

I don’t need to watch YouTube clips to remember how Drogba started at Chelsea.

Did Werner impress in his first season? No! Will Chelsea fans want him to leave? Most(If not all) will say NO.

When you see a committed and promising player, you’ll know even if he flops in his first season. That’s my point.

Halland isn’t a hustler who can play deep like the likes of Costa, Drogba, Lukaku, Aguero, Kane, Suarez of Liverpool and Benzema.

Na when dem serve am, en dey play, if them no serve am, he no fit play. His style might fit Tuchel’s style, but you must always understand that Tuchel isn’t guaranteed to stay in Chelsea in the next 2 years, he fit chop sacking at anytime for coaches with Mou, Conte and Allegri styles to be appointed.

MorataFC:
Haaa,
this one na wish or prayer.
Well maybe there is another player called Halland but I know our Haaland will not disappoint us.

I pray he doesn’t.

We need a good striker

Unlimited22:
Boss ibime take a look at these 3 DMs

Boubacar Kamara - Marseille
Aurelien Tchouameni - Monaco
Declan Rice - West Ham United.

Are these players better than Jorg?

Wetin we wan use them do?

BlueAngel444:
the bolded shows how crazy you are. If they ask you to mention all the strikers that Chelsea has messed up, you will shit your pants. Stop autotyping

The question should be, how many strikers aside Drogba and Costa has excelled in Chelsea since Roman bought Chelsea.

Una never develop 70m player, na 150m una wan develop. I pity Halland, because i foresee him ending up at ATM from Chelsea on loan.

BlueAngel444:
make I tell you secret, at times I dey wonder between you and havertz1 who craze pass, but this your post they stamp for award o.

So you relax, think say, Mbappe who was 18year old was tested after one season, where scummies kept comparing him to Rashford and some thought he would flop after a big money move of 180m and he had only played in France.

Na una go still come here talk if only Chelsea did not sign Torres but signed Aguero.

Never did I say Mbappe at 18 was tested and trusted.

You go read A, understand B, come reply with C

MorataFC:
(You said) Haaland is not good for Chelsea Kane is beyond our reach (if we consider Levi factor) pls can you suggest any good striker out there that is available.

Kane and Lukaku, aside them, I’ll choose Halland.

How is Messi finished? I no even understand.

Unlimited22:
Hasselbaink, Drogba and Costa. Since like 2000.

There was a reason I said almost 20 year, that’s starting from Mou2004, when Chelsea became more competitive.

It’s almost 20 years, Na only Drogba and Costa, do you know what that means? If you calm down check, we fit don sign more than 10 strikers.

Omo! To be Olesexual now must be frustrating.

OleOuters dey troll you
Chelsea fans dey troll you.

Bullet left and right, you can’t even support Ole again and shame can’t allow you become an OleOuter.

Proud Olesexual regardless, bottles on my sexy neck.

Capaldi:
Baba no body is picking Messi over Haaland in 2021 leave all this story. One is finished and old while the other is on the path to greatness if he can maintain his current progress.

Dembele, Harvertz, Morata, Martial, Jovic, Asensio and some few use to be on this table until reality hit them.

I’m not saying Halland isn’t good, I’m saying the price tag and the fact that he’s coming to Chelsea a club known for messing up promising strikers will be a big risk. The expectations will be high, he might not give it.

If he was going to ManCity, PSG or Liverpool, e for dey sure say he fit do well, but Chelsea?? Guy Na Chelsea we dey talk about oo!!

Close to 20 years, Na only Drogba and Costa you go count wey do well for Chelsea.

BlueMann:
Baba Donstan18, when Havertz eventually comes good...

U must come out to accept your L with your full chest oh

I accepted my L when Rudiger became good and influential.

I accepted my L when Tuchel won Ucl and took Chelsea from 9th to top4.

I’m ready to accept any L so long as it’s worth it, so long as it’s benefiting Chelsea and giving fans joy. Until then, let’s call a fraud a fraud.

Capaldi:
Choosing Messi over Haaland in 2021 is madness. Hell am picking Harry kane over Messi as at today. Messi that's finished

Harry Kane over Messi is understandable because he’s tested and trusted.

Hålland over Messi in Chelsea is a big risk, unless we’ll give Dortmund Harvertz with 20m.

DumaEmpire:
Your hatred for Havertz is disgusting aswell.

A dude that got a winning goal @ Ucl but you claim his goal is worthless.

That's a disgusting statement.

When it comes to returning shiits with shiit, you can count on me.

Capaldi:
So they are actual people that will buy a 34yr old finished Messi with over 1million weekly wages over a 20yr old Haaland and 21yrs old mbappe in 2021. It can only be ment na

Choosing Messi over Halland is okay, only few will do otherwise.

Messi is tested. If he doesn’t score goals, he’s creating and assisting. He’s intelligent and good with free kicks.

Mbappe is tested, did well in Monaco, did well them in UCl against top teams and took them to semi finals, did and still doing well with France.

Still doing well with PSG. A big game player, he dey tidy both big and small teams. He dey create, run defenders down, gives good passes.

No dey compare am with Halland abeg!

Halland isn’t tested yet. He’s not proven shiit against big teams with tough defenders. No be Chelsea he suppose use prove am, we are not good in developing strikers.

DumaEmpire:
Of what worth is money without trophies. So you're saying Chelsea sign Havertz just to prove he is better than Mount.

So PSG that signed Neymar for 222M signed him for what??.
Wonders shall never end.
Your Sentimental hatred for Havertz will take you nowhere

Stop using Neymar and Harvertz in the same line please.

It’s disgusting

swiz123:
Those that started the fraudvertz agenda with you have rested. You are not wiser than all of them. Except maybe you are trying to irk harvert1.0

That they’ve stopped talking about how pathetic Harvertz has been no mean say they want him in the club. They are just enjoying the Ucl glory moment.

Havertz is a fraud, he need to leave, I don’t support mediocrities, I want Chelsea to compete, I want them to be fearless, imagine Kroos has more IG followers than Chelsea, Chelsea will become lesser than Arsenal if we continue tolerating frauds like Harvertz hoping he’ll come good.

thorrvik55:
Havertz is a fraud, okay, I agree.. Oya bring the Chelsea attackers with better stats than Havertz

Mind u, Havertz was not a starter for the most part of the season

Good players are starters.

He would have made the starting lineup under two managers if he was good.

All Chelsea players are better than him,

BikeMan:
A fraud that scored your Champions League winning goal, DFKM!

Chelsea didn’t sign him for 75m+ to come and score Ucl goal that Mount gave him.

We defeated ManCity twice this season without him even before the finals.

Whatever is it you feel he did, Origi and Gotze did it, where are they today?

Harvertz is a fraud, it’s the bitter truth you must accept. He’s by no way better than any player in Chelsea.

BikeMan:
Lol, you still refer to Havertz and Werner as frauds? They massively helped in winning you the 2nd UCL. They both struggled in their first season but how do you know what they have in their pockets for the next 3 years? I hope you won’t disappear when they come good.

Including Werner was actually a mistake because he showed he’s ready to improve and also helped Chelsea a lot this season.


As for Harvertz, he’s a complete fraud.

Levy will never agree, Levy will never agree.

Like say una be en PA

Greatihex:
You mean, like the Kepa business?

I don tell una make una rest with all these things. You have no say in the signing. Just rest. Na all these things una dey do dey cause all these unnecessary arguments for here.
When Chelsea sign this Haaland now and em begin flop instead of you to accept say em don flop, you go begin write long Epistles on why he will come good and everything.

All club to sign player come. If em flop, you bash. If e do well, you hail. Simple. I stopped following transfer news and discussing incoming players since 2-3 years now.
Anything wey club like make dem sign, e no concern me. My own na to watch match, support players wey dey do well or try their best to do well. Flop and don't look like coming good, I bash you. Na my own be that.

Someone just caught this sub

swiz123:
Kane might offer short term success but in business, long term success is always the goal. Also, as a businessman which Roman is, he will look to buy someone that has resale value just like Hazard.

You want him to buy Kane for an outrageous fee for his age knowing fully well that Kane will fizzle out in 3 or 4 years. Look at it as buying an expensive Machinery that you will have to depreciate by a high percentage due to its fickleness so the financial statement will reflect a true financial strength of your company.

As you a fan, you don't care about this but the truth is, Roman will run his business to maximize profit and minimize cost.

Kepa, Morata, Dembele, Harvertz, Werner, Benjamin Mendy, Pepe, Depay and so many players, are fraud today because they were gotten with the mindset of “Long time success “.

Those things no dey work, whether he delivers for 2,3 or 4 years, it’s better than buying a youngster with the hopes that he’ll deliver.

Halland isn’t a fraud in my opinion, it’s just that I’ll prefer Kane to him.

nihilistjnr:
Kane is tested and trusted - the best 9 in the world right now imo.

The best part of it is that the man's game is not reliant on pace, so he could very well be banging them in well into his 30s.
I don't understand gambling on an unknown commodity instead of signing the man who won Golden boot 3 weeks ago...for the 3rd time.

It seems like the board are hellbent on Halaand. I only hope it's because Kane was not available

Na wetin dey pain me pass.

milann:
is Kane the only striker in world football?

It’s something to be a good striker, it’s another thing to be an EPl good striker.

Kane is tested and trusted, a complete package. I’ll choose him for Chelsea over any striker in the world.

How many strikers dey flourish in Epl? For the past 15 years, can you name 10 good strikers wey don do well for EPl?

EPl is a league known for killing strikers and making them struggle because of their pattern of play, it’s difficult to rely on strikers in England, Pep wey win league without steady striker no be fool. Harry Kane is the only striker that is worth splashing money for in Epl.

I’ll even choose Arnoutovic over Halland because he has tried EPl, Halland never try am.

Halland is good, but being good in Epl is another thing.

BlueAngel444:
HK of last season?? probably 7seasons ago or his first four seasons, is worth the amount but dem no give a fvck about your opinion on who is better.

Chelsea started chasing Haaland since January, so deal with it

Werner and Harvertz do pass this one, we saw how it all ended.

Any buy wey Chelsea owner buy, e dey end as flop.

BlueAngel444:
Levy that is quoting £150m for a 28year old English striker that will likely join city. You are here making noise

If you want to support English players go back to united

Kane is by far better than Halland.

They no be mate.

Ibime:
I no too trust that Lautaro guy. He no resemble point man, more like second striker.

Yea, you are right. Griezman kind of player.

Then we should focus on Kane.

Ibime:
Wetin consign us with Hakimi when we have James and Livramento coming through?

If club dey busy dey sign players, some of these greedy agents forming with youngsters go wise up.

Let’s just keep signing, make Riola abi Ramotu dey busy dey form with Halland.

Kpata kpata we’ll splash 100m for Kane or even get Lautaro for less.

Kane over Halland anyday anytime, una go dey talk generational talent and age factor bla bla.

Update has it that Chelsea just showed interest in signing Hakimi, I’m so glad about that, let that Halland deal no make management loose focus on the rest positions we should sign players for.

Get us Kane! He’s a complete striker, tested and trusted, a hustler. Get us Kane.

Halland this, Halland that.

Na this kind price tag, pressure and hype dey make young players flop.

Same Bundesliga, same Chelsea wey no get luck in signing top9, same age bracket.

Smh!