₦airaland Forum

WhoDeyHause:
Clips going round has even stated if it wasn't for the youths of the village that rallied to repel those terrorists the whole town would have gone down. These attacks have been going on for years right from buhari in that same state despite campaigns to beef up security which has turned to promise and fail.

During Buhari’s administration, it became painfully clear that those herdsmen were protected by the federal government.

Defend yourself on your own farmland, and you’d get arrested. Meanwhile, the same herdsmen who attacked you? They’d walk free. Let’s not forget there’s a farmer currently on death row simply because he refused to die quietly on his farm and fought back. That’s the level of injustice we witnessed 💔

It's still fresh how the military often ignored cries for help before attacks. But the moment villagers dared to mobilize and defend themselves, soldiers would magically appear oo, not to stop the attackers, but to de-escalate and disarm the victims. We saw this over and over again.

Now, with all the bold talk from Tinubu’s camp during the campaign, you’d think he’d at least tame the bloodthirsty madness from those herdsmen. But we're clearly seeing a version that is actually worse than Buhari. Empty promises, same bloodshed, only the face at the top has changed.

Just cho cho cho cho was what this mistake of a president was doing during Jonathan's presidency. Now that you're there, oya show workings..... kokororo

izzou:
[color=royalblue] Tinubu's statement in a nutshell;..

We are not trying to catch any killer or herdsmen. You people should just stop attacking each other online and offline, so these killings can reduce.

As for bringing anyone to book because of this? We have no plans for that.[/color]

Armed herdsmen slaughtered innocent villagers in cold blood, yet your response is to caution the community leaders not the killers to “act responsibly” and mind their words 😡

This is just a chilling display of indifference to human life. When blood is soaking the soil, you’re more worried about tone than the actual terror. Omo.

God please, let us be lucky for once with a good leader, we don too suffer na


😭😭😭

diggz:
The real question is: Why did Israel choose to escalate tensions at a time when they were supposedly in the middle of negotiating a deal?

Also, just to be clear—because I made a statement on NL that you perceived as a threat, you now think it’s acceptable to trace my family members and physically attack them? Simply because I said I’d confront you offline? Is that how you justify your actions?

Omo….

Lol you're trying to equate state-level, existential threats with personal online arguments, that’s a completely flawed comparison.

Let me repeat it again incase you missed it before. Israel is responding to years of organized, well-funded, and repeated violent attacks from groups who have literally declared their goal to wipe them out. That’s not someone typing on a forum, it is rockets, suicide bombings, and hostage-taking, backed by a state actor (Iran). I mean this is clear as day nau.

On the other hand, a comment made online even if provocative does not justify tracing or harming someone offline. That’s vigilantism, not self-defense.
Self-defense is rooted in real, imminent danger and not a perceived disrespect.

So no, you can't liken Israel's national security response to personal retaliation. That’s not logic at all, that’s a reach.

diggz:
How can my comparisons possibly hold any weight with you when you keep dodging direct questions and hiding behind a wall of empty grammar?

By the way, are you going to answer the question I asked earlier—or keep dancing around it?

And while you’re at it, can you clearly point out the specific and substantial threat that Israel was facing before they chose to escalate things again?

Let’s be honest—we all have seen firsthand how Israel has embedded itself within the internal power structures of other nations, actively causing disruption from within. So please, let’s not play the innocent or victim card here. No party in this situation is entirely innocent, and no one is simply a victim.

The real question is: Why did Israel choose to escalate tensions at a time when they were supposedly in the middle of negotiating a deal?

Also, just to be clear—because I made a statement on NL that you perceived as a threat, you now think it’s acceptable to trace my family members and physically attack them? Simply because I said I’d confront you offline? Is that how you justify your actions?

Omo….

I actually answered your question but the spambot banned both me and the answer

But this is the way I see it.... Israel’s stance isn’t just we have nukes, so no one else should. No. Their concern is who wants the nukes and why. So here's the distinction;

Israel has a policy of nuclear ambiguity (never officially confirmed or denied possession) and has never threatened to wipe any nation off the map. Meanwhile, Iran’s leadership, on the other hand, has openly declared its desire to destroy Israel, supports militant proxies that carry out attacks, and regularly chants “Death to Israel” at official events.

So imo, It’s not about fairness per say. It’s about intent, ideology, and stability. The fear isn’t just about Iran having a bomb, it’s about who would control it, how they'd use it, and who they’re targeting.

So for Israel, and honestly much of the world, stopping Iran from going nuclear isn’t about dominance it’s about survival.

I'm tired of this nonsense bot mahn.

diggz:
Israel’s envoy to the UN claims that their attack on Iran was an act of national preservation. But I still remember when Israel, alongside the U.S., justified the invasion of Iraq by saying it would bring lasting peace to the Middle East.

So, by that logic, is Nigeria also free to attack the U.S., the U.K., or any other country as an act of “national preservation”?
I honestly don’t understand this kind of reasoning.
At this point, I’m truly astonished.

Let’s be honest your comparison doesn’t hold water. Has the U.S., the U.K., or any of those countries ever publicly declared intentions to wipe Nigeria off the map? Have they openly funded armed groups that launch repeated attacks on Nigerian soil?

That’s the key difference.
Israel isn’t responding to vague threats at all. it’s responding to decades of open hostility, direct attacks, and consistent rocket fire from groups that are publicly supported and funded by Iran. When a nation faces existential threats, the calculus changes. It’s not about aggression; it’s about survival.

Self-defense isn't the same as unwarranted aggression especially when the threats are real, documented, and ongoing.

izzou:
[color=royalblue]Listen to yourself

He gave 60 days to make a deal, and then gave Israel the go ahead to strike

So this is how peace should come, right?

I don't understand the need to watch this as a movie. These are people's lives wasting per second.

How can giving the approval the strike be the path to peace?[/color]

I hear your concern and it is absolutely valid. But let’s not confuse the sequence of events. The 60-day window was meant to allow for diplomacy. Iran’s proxies continued provocations, and Israel made it clear that inaction wasn’t an option.

The U.S. didn’t “approve” violence as you're implying, it acknowledged Israel’s right to self-defense after repeated threats and attacks. Sometimes peace doesn’t come from silence or delay, but from deterrence.

Nobody wants war, but ignoring sustained aggression doesn’t produce peace either, it just invites more chaos.

That is who some so called intellectuals are projecting.

This girls reactions is everything to make your day. pic.twitter.com/NgdriefbpZ

— Haywhyalo USDCAD 🇺🇸📈🇨🇦📉 (@haywhyalo) November 25, 2022

Just watch and see for yourself... I don't even know whether to laugh or to be sad.
God abeg.

patrickmuf:
Expert17 the floor is open, agend any agenda...

Expert is shy

DeadPresidents:
He crosses better than all our wingers bro. I can stake my neck on that.

Rashford rarely crosses from the left (he prefers shooting). His crossing from the right is hit-and-miss.

Antony’s crosses are often too close to the keeper. Sancho has difficulty even getting space to produce a cross.

Early days for Garnacho so won’t say nothing.

Gakpo’s crosses have good height and whip on them. Even on a bad day, those are standout attributes.

E be like your head don tire you....

Why does Tinubu keep saying rubbish every time he's on the mic bikonu....

"You can't make a down payment for roasted corn for electricity"

Please who can help us with the speech renovation abeg..

eph12:
LMAO its always bitter when you're on the other side

I'm not on any side here as I don't stan players foolishly or criticize them perpetually.....and no bitterness here.

Lol you guys trying to reason with Trevor012 on anything concerning Bruno get energy. Even if Jesus Christ comes down from heaven to convince Trevor, he no go see anything positive about Bruno. It's a fool errand tbh.

afrodoc2:
Penduism and Pessimism are both terrible diseases.

I see what you did there