Elusive001's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Elusive001's Profile › Elusive001's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 (of 299 pages)
Iran says Qatar is holding 3 fighter pilots captured after wartime crashes Tehran says the three Su-24 pilots were shot down during a mission over Qatar and have been held for six months without access to relatives or Iranian officials; Doha has yet to respond Lior Ben Ari | published: 16:06 Iran accused Qatar on Saturday of holding three of its fighter pilots captive after their aircraft crashed in the Gulf state during the war in March, claiming authorities in Doha have prevented them from contacting their families or Iranian officials. Iran’s military first announced the pilots’ disappearance earlier this month, saying their aircraft went down on March 2 after being hit during a mission “against an enemy military base” in Qatar. At the time, Tehran said their fate was unknown. On Saturday, however, Baqer Zadeh, head of the missing persons committee at Iran’s Armed Forces General Staff, said the three men were alive and had been held by Qatari forces for roughly six months. Zadeh identified them as Javad Salehi, Abd al-Majid Dashtian and Omran Behroushian. He said their Su-24 fighter jets were shot down while carrying out strikes, though he did not specify how many aircraft were involved. “The Qatari government has so far prevented them from meeting, being interviewed or communicating with their families and with the officials handling the matter,” he said. Iran’s Tasnim news agency published a copy of a letter Tehran sent to the International Committee of the Red Cross asking it to assist in securing the pilots’ release. Qatar has not yet responded to the allegations. The new accusation comes amid continued tensions in the Persian Gulf and an intensifying war of words between senior Iranian officials and U.S. President Donald Trump. At a rally in New York on Friday, Trump said that “after we defeat Iran” he intended to declare the Strait of Hormuz, the strategic waterway through which Iran has disrupted tanker traffic since the war began, “American territory.” Iranian officials quickly rejected the threat and insisted the strait would remain under Tehran’s control. “This strait will open and close only under Iran’s control, and as long as you refuse to accept the reality of defeat and continue wallowing in illusions, Iran will continue enforcing the blockade,” Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi wrote Saturday on X. “The Strait of Hormuz cannot be taken over with a tweet or an aircraft carrier, by issuing an order or delivering an election speech,” he added. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, meanwhile, said Tehran considers the war itself to have ended under the memorandum of understanding signed in June, after the expiration of a 60-day period. He argued, however, that the 60-day ceasefire stipulated in that arrangement never formally began and therefore cannot now be extended. “We had an ‘end of the war,’ and now there is a new situation,” Araghchi told Iranian media. He also reiterated that even if Iran and Oman reach an agreement over the future movement of ships through Hormuz under close Iranian supervision, that would be separate from the actual reopening of the strait. Tehran has linked that step to a set of new demands from Washington, including compensation and the withdrawal of U.S. forces from the region. Although Trump has repeatedly said Hormuz is under American control as part of the U.S. blockade on Iranian ports, traffic through the strait remains largely paralyzed by the threat of Iranian drone and missile attacks. The United Arab Emirates said Saturday that one of its vessels, belonging to Abu Dhabi National Oil Company, or ADNOC, had been attacked while attempting to cross Hormuz on Friday. Abu Dhabi said there were no casualties, though it did not specify the extent of the damage. The UAE blamed Iran for the attack, the third reported strike this week against ADNOC vessels after two others on Thursday. Shipping intelligence firm Kpler said only two vessels crossed Hormuz on Friday, neither carrying oil, though other ships may have passed with their tracking systems switched off. Even accounting for possible unreported crossings, the figure is believed to be far below the prewar average of about 130 vessels per day. The paralysis of Hormuz has driven oil prices sharply higher and given Iran significant leverage over the global economy, increasing pressure on Trump to end the war. Iranian officials have repeatedly described control of the strait as a strategic asset comparable in importance to the country’s nuclear program and have resisted demands to relinquish it. For weeks, the U.S. administration’s main negotiating objective has appeared to be reopening Hormuz, easing fuel prices and reducing economic pressure ahead of the November midterm elections. The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump has privately expressed willingness to end the war and “declare victory” without a new nuclear agreement, provided the strait reopens. His administration has already accepted a degree of Iranian involvement in regulating traffic through Hormuz. Vice President JD Vance said Thursday that reopening the strait was the administration’s “No. 1 objective,” describing preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon as “objective No. 2.” Trump, however, struck a somewhat different tone Friday, telling Americans they may have to accept higher oil prices while Washington maintains economic pressure on Tehran. Paying “a little more for your gasoline,” he said, was a price worth paying to ensure that “a very evil country” could not obtain nuclear weapons. The average price of a gallon of gasoline in the United States is currently $4.08, up 29% from the same period last year. “What we’re doing is a great service for the world, not just for ourselves,” Trump said. “We’re really doing a great job.” He also appeared to address reports of deteriorating morale aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln, which has been operating in the Middle East after about 260 days at sea, saying its deployment “really wasn’t long enough.” The administration is preparing to send the USS George Washington to the region to replace it. https://www.ynetnews.com/article/hjcdkbrufl |
The strikes came a day after Lebanese reports said Iran had warned that an Israeli attack on the strategic Ali al-Taher ridge could draw Tehran directly into the escalating confrontation. Official sources told Lebanon’s Al-Jadeed television Friday that “Tehran conveyed a direct message to the relevant parties that an Israeli attack in the Ali al-Taher area would be met by Iran entering the cycle of escalation.” Iran oya over to you. Israel no send una. Shebi the attack na after una so-called direct warning. Clowns 🤡 |
Lebanon front heats up as Iran warns Israel over strategic ridge Seven reported killed in overnight strikes as Israel targets Hezbollah infrastructure, Tehran warns it could join the escalation over Ali al-Taher and Washington pushes back on plans for a long-term Israeli presence Lior Ben Ari, Gal Ganot | published:10:51 Lebanese media reported Saturday morning that seven people were killed and two others wounded in overnight Israeli strikes in the Ali al-Taher ridge area and the villages of Ansar and Nabatieh al-Fawqa. The IDF confirmed that it had struck Hezbollah infrastructure, saying the strikes came “In response to an action by the Hezbollah terrorist organization against IDF soldiers in the Ali al-Taher Ridge, which is located in the Security Zone where IDF soldiers are operating.” The strikes came a day after Lebanese reports said Iran had warned that an Israeli attack on the strategic Ali al-Taher ridge could draw Tehran directly into the escalating confrontation. Official sources told Lebanon’s Al-Jadeed television Friday that “Tehran conveyed a direct message to the relevant parties that an Israeli attack in the Ali al-Taher area would be met by Iran entering the cycle of escalation.” According to the report, Israel is refusing to withdraw from the area under terms that would allow it to be transferred to the Lebanese army, while Hezbollah insists the ridge cannot be handed over without a full Israeli withdrawal. The report came amid growing concern in Lebanon over a possible Israeli operation to seize the strategic ridge. A senior security official told the Lebanese newspaper Al-Joumhouria that authorities in Beirut had received messages indicating that Israel was preparing to launch an operation to capture Ali al-Taher. The official said Israel was ready to act and was awaiting a green light from the United States. The official claimed Washington had informed Lebanese authorities that it could not completely prevent an Israeli operation but had asked that any action be a precise, surgical operation with minimal civilian casualties and that it not undermine the framework agreement between Jerusalem and Beirut. “The Israelis need this achievement and will not back away from it,” the official said. Attention, he added, was now focused on Hezbollah’s response and whether the group would enter the fighting. “This battle has become a matter of time, and it is a race against the approaching U.S.-Iran agreement, which will undoubtedly affect the front in southern Lebanon,” he said. Lebanese television channels have in recent days carried widespread speculation about Israel’s next move in southern Lebanon, with particular attention focused on the Ali al-Taher ridge. Hezbollah operatives are trapped in an underground facility there as Israeli forces tighten a siege and cut water supply lines to the site. Hezbollah operatives have been attempting to break the siege by using drones to transport equipment and supplies. Operating in the West Bank, preparing for Lebanon Israeli troops who were operating deep inside Lebanon only about three months ago are now conducting intensive operations in the West Bank while simultaneously preparing for the possibility of renewed fighting on Israel’s northern front. Soldiers from the 931st Battalion of the Nahal Brigade are currently operating under the Ephraim Regional Brigade in the northern and central West Bank. Between nighttime arrests in Tulkarm and searches for weapons in Palestinian villages, the troops are being required to maintain combat readiness with an eye toward Lebanon. This week, the battalion completed an intensive two-day exercise in Nahal Kana, a rugged valley in the West Bank chosen to simulate fighting in the dense, mountainous terrain of southern Lebanon. Despite the demands of its ongoing operational deployment, the unit conducted a full battalion-level exercise. The terrain, characterized by deep ravines, steep ridges and dense vegetation, was used to replicate the challenging conditions troops could encounter in Lebanon. “We took advantage of the terrain that best simulates Lebanon,” the battalion commander, identified only as Lt. Col. N. In accordance with IDF rules, told ynet. “It was a full battalion exercise, despite the manpower constraints of holding an operational sector, with all the supporting capabilities — firepower, drones and a complete operational command structure surrounding us, along with simulated enemy forces and FPV drones,” he said. “The terrain of the ravines and dense vegetation required commanders and soldiers to analyze the ground all over again,” he added. “That is a central lesson from the fighting: Everything begins with terrain analysis, especially in a place like Lebanon, which is unlike any other sector.” One of the major threats Israeli forces have faced in Lebanon is Hezbollah’s use of explosive-laden fiber-optic first-person-view (FPV) drones, which can be difficult to disrupt through conventional electronic warfare because they are controlled through physical cables rather than radio signals. The battalion commander acknowledged that the military initially struggled to respond to the threat. “It’s no secret that there was frustration in the military over the threat at the beginning,” he said. “But today we are preparing for the war that will be, not the war that was.” The military has since developed standardized procedures, defensive measures and technological solutions for protection and interception in cooperation with civilian companies, he said. “During the exercise, all of our systems were networked, and the soldiers practiced a precise response procedure,” he said. Katz vows long-term Israeli presence, drawing US criticism Defense Minister Israel Katz visited Lebanon on Wednesday and declared that Israeli troops would remain in security zones in Lebanon, Syria and Gaza for the long term. “The IDF is here to stay in the security zones in Lebanon, Syria and Gaza,” Katz said. “I have instructed the IDF to take all necessary steps to prepare for a long-term presence in the area.” His remarks drew criticism from Washington. A U.S. State Department official later said the United States “expects all parties to act in any manner consistent with the framework they agreed to, and Israel clearly stated that it has no territorial ambition in Lebanon.” “A permanent military presence in south Lebanon is not consistent with the commitments made in the framework or the long-term peace and security of both states,” the official said. The United States fully supports Lebanon’s territorial integrity and sovereignty, the official added, saying the framework explicitly provides for a conditions-based, phased Israeli redeployment tied to the verified disarmament of Hezbollah and dismantling of its infrastructure. During his visit, Katz referred to the Beaufort ridge, a strategically important high ground overlooking northern Israel and large areas of southern Lebanon. “We see the Beaufort Ridge here after the tunnels there were destroyed,” Katz said. “The IDF maneuvered here across the Litani. With extraordinary courage and skill, it defeated Hezbollah and captured the Beaufort, which protects Metula, the northern communities and IDF soldiers, and threatens all of Hezbollah’s territory on the horizon.” Katz said Israel had no intention of withdrawing from the security zone. “As the prime minister and I have made unequivocally clear, we are not withdrawing from this security zone,” he said. “I am standing here in the heart of the security zone, from the western coastline to the Beaufort area and the approaches to Mount Hermon in the east.” “The IDF is here to protect the northern communities and its forces,” Katz continued. “We will clear this area and ensure the security of the residents of the north — and under no circumstances will we withdraw from the security zones: not in Lebanon, not in Syria and not in Gaza.” Katz said the policy reflected lessons Israel learned from the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, which triggered the Gaza war and subsequent fighting across the region. “The lesson of Oct. 7 is that we protect residents by having the IDF here, in these places, protecting them from raids, gunfire and everything else,” he said. “That is our policy, that is our approach.” Katz said the Beaufort fortress demonstrated the logic of the strategy. “We are up here, they are down there, the residents are protected,” he said. “The IDF is inside; 200,000 residents are outside. We are destroying the underground infrastructure and all the terrorist infrastructure they built with Iranian backing to invade the Galilee, and destroying all the homes in the area.” Negotiations expected to resume after summer Earlier this week, a diplomatic source told the Hezbollah-aligned Lebanese television network Al Mayadeen that there were no plans for another round of negotiations between Lebanon and Israel next month. If another round takes place, it will likely be after the summer, the source said. According to the report, Israel and the United States rejected expanding pilot zones before progress was made in two previously designated areas. Both Israel and Washington also demanded that Hezbollah withdraw from the Ali al-Taher ridge in the Nabatieh area. The source said the Lebanese delegation rejected Israel’s assertion that explosions in southern Lebanon were the result of strikes on military infrastructure. The Hezbollah-aligned Lebanese newspaper Al-Akhbar separately reported that Israel had proposed an exchange involving civilians during talks with Lebanon and raised the issue of Lebanon’s historic Jewish community. According to the report, Israel noted that Jews who left Lebanon years ago were seeking to transfer the remains of relatives from Jewish cemeteries in Lebanon for reburial in Israel. The report said Israeli negotiators referred to “a significant number of remains” in Jewish cemeteries in Beirut and Sidon. Thousands of Jews lived in Lebanon until the period surrounding the 1967 Six-Day War, continuing a Jewish presence in the country that stretched back centuries. Estimates suggest that Lebanon’s Jewish population reached between 12,000 and 20,000 at its peak. The issue of Jewish remains in Lebanon was also raised over the weekend by the Saudi newspaper Asharq Al-Awsat. Sources told the newspaper that “the Israeli negotiating delegation demanded the return of the remains of Lebanese Jews who were killed during the civil war, and information about the fate of Lebanese Jews who disappeared during Lebanon’s civil war, particularly in the 1980s.” According to the report, Israel also sought information about Ron Arad, an Israeli air force navigator who went missing after his aircraft was shot down over Lebanon in 1986, or the return of his remains if he is dead. Sources quoted by the newspaper described the Israeli demands as “impossible,” saying the Lebanese state “knows nothing about the remains of the Jews, nor about Ron Arad.” Asharq Al-Awsat reported that the issues had also been raised during the U.S.-mediated negotiations that led to the 2022 maritime border agreement between Israel and Lebanon. The parties understood at the time, according to the report, that Lebanon lacked the ability to determine what had happened to the missing people. Lebanon’s LBCI television network reported last week, citing sources, that preliminary lists concerning prisoners and missing people had been exchanged. “The Lebanese side submitted preliminary lists regarding prisoners and missing persons, while the Israeli side presented a list of names of missing and deceased Lebanese Jews,” the report said. Lebanon’s Jewish community was historically concentrated in Beirut’s Jewish quarter, Wadi Abu Jamil. The community gradually dispersed during and after Lebanon’s 1975-1990 civil war, with many members emigrating abroad. Moshe Zafrani, who left Lebanon at age 14, has previously said communities of Lebanese Jews and their descendants can now be found in France, Mexico, New York and Brazil, as well as across Israel, including in Bat Yam, Holon and Haifa. https://www.ynetnews.com/article/rkhatj6ife#autoplay |
lexylaw09:Which new boss? The one that we read spent $2.98bn? You gave someone say N1,000,000 to some critical work for you that will affect yoyr kids positively and the person failed to do it. The person even lied that the work has been done, meanwhile, it was lie. Later the person comes tomorrow and tells you that he has another way to do the same job which requires your bringing another funds for the same work you gave him to do. What will you do? Would you foolishly agree with him and bring another funds for the same thing? You said PPP? Like the coastal road, right?The coastal road is a PPP right? So how much has Hitech Construction Company contributed to the project? Who is paying for the road? May GOD Almighty have mercy on una |
lexylaw09:You are talking about public Private Partnership PPP model for the same refinerie? So what happened to the money spent on them? So we should agree to a PPP like the coastal road? So Nigerians should forget about the said $2.98bn? So we should forget the money because it happened under Tinubu regime? Why can't you supporters of Tinubu/APC ask for accountability and stewardship for once? Let's not be stupid in this country. If some of you are, some of us are not. |
lexylaw09:Bros you are NOT CORRECT. Jonathan spent $496m in repairs and TAM from news outlets. Check Punch newspapers and others. Buhari spent about $25bn according to Reuters. The $19bn was NEVER from GEJ to date bros. Stop defending evil. In fact it was over $19bn that buhari was said to have spent according to the attachment below. Stop talking lies here
|
Lithiumite:As Jonathan left with importation and subsidy at 30m-35m litres per day and , $345m - $365m. Buhari came in and it mysteriously metamorphosised to 50million and over 60 million litres per day and $11bn - $15bn. Bros abeg go rest. |
Lithiumite:Bros abeg go and rest oooo Defending Tinubu, Buhari, and the APC makes one look fullish. Wetin you wan defend bros? During GEJ regime from 2010 - 2015, Nigeria paid a total subsidy of N3.9t - N6t. Daily consumption was said to be 30m - 35m litres. Under Tinubu, Nigeria has spent N11t - N15t in subsidy, nicknamed under recovery, so far oooo for how many litres kwanu? Daily importation varying from under 4 million to over 18 million litres/day in deficit periods. Bros, compare and contrast N3.9t - N6t from 2010 - 2015 (roughly 6years) for 30m - 35m litres/day compared to less than 4m litres to say 20m litres/day for just 2023 - 2026 ( say July), roughly 3years Abeg stop defending evil
|
So suddenly, Mrs Jonathan's opinion now matters? So the opinion of the woman you guys insulted and called "shepopotamus" now matters? Isoritr |
Parachoko:My concern is make you and your loved ones no from pick pocketing for parks at Olode and Araromi-Oke-Odo Axis come start armed robbery ooooo |
Lithiumite:Yeah. I heard myself. With $396 million to $495 million during Jonathan's regime, the refineries worked, but not to full capacity. With $25bn spent by buhari according to Reuters, what did we get? Did the refineries work at all? With $2.98b spent by Tinubu, what did Nigerians get? Did the refineries work at all? Do you know what $25bn + $3bn is compared with $396m (to $495m)? Bros, abeg go and rest. Stop defending evil. |
lexylaw09:Bros, it is counterintuitive, pure evil, and smelly corruption to just call for even a grain of investment or partnership without digging out what happened to the over $19bn spent from Buhari’s regime till date. Do not forget that Tinubu continued from where buhari stopped. It is pure criminal not to first of all dig this out very well before any other talks. Do you know what $19bn is? Rueters even said $25bn. During his presidency from 2010 to 2015, the administration of Goodluck Jonathan spent an estimated $396 million to $495 million on the Turnaround Maintenance (TAM) and repair of Nigeria's state-owned refineries. T At least, the Port Harcourt refinery worked during Jonathan's regime though not to full capacity. What does Nigeria get after spending, according to Reuters, $25bn? |
Parachoko:I no go ever shed tears for una. As how nah? Wetin concern me. One thing I know be say the suffering and evil wey Buhari bring and Tinubu continued with no go leave your family and loved ones. I say make the suffering make I know how and why. Ehe, least I forget, I hopd you collected the 2.5g rice and N20k I read that the APC shared at Osun State. |
Lithiumite:How much did GEJ spend on the refineries? During his presidency from 2010 to 2015, the administration of Goodluck Jonathan spent an estimated $396 million to $495 million on the Turnaround Maintenance (TAM) and repair of Nigeria's state-owned refineries. Note that during Jonathan's time, the refineries worked, but not to full capacity. How much has the APC spent so far? Over $19bn and yet not a single crude has been refined. |
Parachoko:I dey wait make things better for you and your loved ones make I see how. Tinubu is doing the lord's work on una very diligently. |
ogolemati:You never know dem. You are yet to understand what it means not to have integrity or principles. Na so dem be. |
ogolemati:He and he fellow APC supporters rejoiced over ordinary flare flame oooooo |
Lithiumite:What is the positive after the APC spent over $19bn on the refineries with nothing to show according to report? Are you guys normal? Must you defend evil? Remember that una celebrate flare flame in 2025.
|
Parachoko: ![]() One good thing Tinubu and Buhari have done for me they made=make sure that you and yours are currently suffering. This alone is heartwarming. Make things better for you make I see. ![]() |
Parachoko:My happiness be say your family and your people dey suffer in ypur god's regime. Your god is ruling, your and his people are suffering. I glad that islamic terrorists go still kidnap, kill, or rape you and ypur people despite ypur support for insecurity in the country. We are waiting for your country to make any meaningful progress make we see. |
Kalashnikov49:
|
This was an evil some people who say that they are human beings supported for 8 whole years just to spite some people. |
Petroleum Minister Tinubu Mute as Multibillion-Dollar Refineries Crumble Published 5th May, 2025 By Opeyemi Lawal President Bola Ahmed Tinubu serves as Nigeria’s minister of petroleum yet he has failed to provide updates on the failed repairs of the multibillion-dollar Port Harcourt, Kaduna and Warri refineries. In April, a document revealed that the Warri Refinery’s maintenance cost was about $656.9 million. The document also showed that the refinery shut down only one month after Mele Kyari, the former Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL) Group Chief Executive Officer, claimed it had kicked off. Similarly, the Port Harcourt refinery, which began operation in November and was allocated $1.5 billion for repairs, has been dormant since January 25 due to safety concerns in its Crude Distillation Unit Main Heater. While it operated, the refinery in Port Harcourt only worked at 37 per cent of its capacity. Meanwhile, the federal government had earmarked $740.6 million for the Kaduna Refinery. However, despite these huge sums and the promise to reduce Nigeria’s reliance on fuel importation, neither Tinubu nor the NNPCL has provided convincing explanations for the setbacks. In March, during a Senate hearing on the state of the refineries, lawmakers criticised the NNPCL’s lack of transparency and raised concerns about how billions of dollars were disbursed without measurable progress. Officials from the petroleum ministry were summoned but failed to appear, further deepening public mistrust and speculation over the true state of the facilities. Meanwhile, while touring the Warri Refinery at its kick-off event, Kyari claimed that real changes were possible in Nigeria, and restarting the refineries was one of them. “We are taking you through our plant. This plant is running. Although it is not 100 per cent complete, we are still in the process. Many people think these things are not real. They think real things are not possible in this country. We want you to see that this is real,” Kyari had said. “I must congratulate our team for their determination and extreme belief that this company can restart this plant. This has brought the result we are seeing in collaboration with our contractors. We have proved that it is possible to restart a plant that you deliberately shut down. We have proved this.” But as of Monday, FIJ can confirm that Tinubu, who doubles as the petroleum minister, has yet to issue any public statement or clarification regarding the setbacks these refineries have faced. Despite mounting questions and billions spent, neither his office nor the Ministry of Petroleum has communicated transparently with the public or the press. https://fij.ng/article/petroleum-minister-tinubu-mute-as-multibillion-dollar-refineries-crumble/ Cc Helinues Biodun556 Ttalk Seunmsg Madridguy NgeneUkwenu Manna_BBQgriller Etc |
Nigeria spent $25 billion to fix refineries, outgoing parliament says By Camillus Eboh May 31, 20236:02 PM GMT+1Updated May 31, 2023 ABUJA, May 31 (Reuters) - Nigeria spent more than 11.35 trillion naira ($25 billion) on fixing the country's three moribund refineries in the past 10 years, the outgoing parliament said in a report, calling for a forensic audit of the matter. Despite the huge amounts spent to rehabilitate the refineries, they were producing at less than 30% capacity, the lower house of parliament said late on Tuesday. This has kept the country reliant on fuel imports, which it subsidies to keep prices low. The Reuters Daily Briefing newsletter provides all the news you need to start your day. Sign up here. The report came as state oil firm NNPC Ltd on Wednesday hiked petrol prices to as high as 557 naira ($1.21) per litre, from 189 naira, days after new President Bola Tinubu said fuel subsidies would be scrapped. Tinubu has inherited a myriad of problems, including low economic growth, high public debts, double-digit inflation and militant activity. Parliament will be dissolved in two weeks' time after which new lawmakers will be sworn in. Lawmakers plan to pass on their recommendation to new members and government. NNPC has been working to revamp the refineries, which were shut down entirely in 2021 and produced little or no fuel over the past decade. Parliament said the Warri and Port Harcourt refineries were under rehabilitation and recommended that the Kaduna refinery should be also be subject to such treatment. Last week, Nigeria commissioned Dangote's 650,000 barrels a day refinery amid hopes of transforming the country into a net exporter of petroleum products, but analysts said securing crude supplies could affect it achieving full production this year. Reporting by Camillus Eboh; Writing by Chijioke Ohuocha; Editing by David Holmes https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/nigeria-spent-25-bln-fix-refineries-outgoing-parliament-2023-05-31/ Cc NgeneUkwenu Madridguy Sarki Seunmsg Manna_BBQgrillers Throwback Ttalk Helinues Biodun556 AntiChristian Etc
|
lexylaw09:Bros stop talking BS. Is it not morally right to ask of what happened to the $3b this government spent on the refineries? Buhari spent over $19bn on these refineries.
|
FSBoperator:So from the bolded, you indirectly confirm that there are lies in the qur'an. So are there fabrications in it? But na una dey claim say the Holy Bible was corrupted. ![]() Bros, please show me evidence of your claims. I have been showing you evidences. You have not shown me even one single evidence to buttress you assertions. Stop cooking lies. The hatred of muslims and Muhammad for jews since 600AD is well documented. Why did Muhammad kill jews in Medina? |
FSBoperator:Stop talking BS Why did Muhammad do when Jews rejected his claim of being a prophet? Why did Jews reject him as a prophet? Why did Zaynab bint al-Harith poison Muhammad? Why did Muhammad instruct muslims to stop facing Jerusalem and face Mecca during their prayers? So at the bolded, you now agree that Muhammad copied the Bible, but incorrectly. He altered things to suit himself. Which rabbis said that Jews can convert islam? Bros, I dey give you evidence, you dey cook up stories. Give me evidence bros It seems that lies is one of una foundations.
|
FSBoperator:You have Surah Al-Ma'idah Ayahs 51-69. Read it and stop looking for whom to deceive. I am well informed about islam and the Qur'an. You won't like my expose. You should have avoided me. |
safarifarms:Yes ooooo That's why I say that Israel is their god since she decides for them, organises them, controls them, and sends them to commit terror acts. Sometime ago, they even mentioned sa8d that israel is the country sponsoring islamic terrorism in Nigeria. |
FSBoperator:Bros, Muslims have not aligned to Jews Lies as usual. Why una dey lie like this? Not everyone is ignorant bros. First of all, your qur'an commanded you, muslims to hate Jews and Christians. It commanded you to slay them wherever you find them. Muslims dealt with Jews before 1948. They killed many Jews even before 1948. When jews rejected Muhammad, what did he do? What were his commands? If Jews and muslims were friends as you lied, why did muslims build their mosque on top of the ruins of the Jewish temple? Why did Muhammad stop facing Jerusalem during prayers and change it to Mecca? Muslims have been friends with Jews? Why did Zaynab bint al-Harith poison your prophecy? What did he do that warranted her doing so? Bros, abeg, go and rest. https://sephardicu.com/sephardic-history/history-of-muslim-jewish-conflicts/ https://sephardicu.com/sephardic-history/history-of-muslim-jewish-conflicts/ https://justiceforjews.com/facts-figures/ https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/the-farhud https://jcfa.org/article/verses-and-reality-what-the-koran-really-says-about-jews/
|
FSBoperator:Good to know that Israel decides for muslims. |
FSBoperator:So, make una respect israel. Israel fit be una allah sef since she controls muslims. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 (of 299 pages)
