₦airaland Forum

Akuruoulo:
we will nt invade ukraine, we will take over ukraine in 3 days , we will strke finland if the chose to apply for nato, we will deploy nukes in ukraine, we will nuke america if they involve themselves in this war, we wil nuke england, we etc.
which of these are nt falses ?

1. Russia said that they will not invade ukraine and they didn't. Ukraine was already a warring country before Russia intervened. Like will you say that UK invaded Biafra? Rather UK supported Nigeria's invasion of biafra. Russia sided with the self-proclaimed Donbass republics in an 8yr old war.
2. Russia never said they would take over ukraine in 3days. Pro-kremlin commentators and Pro-Russians may have said it but Russia never said it.
3. Russia only said they will nuke UK and USA. Pro-kremlin said that but Russia promised to defend her interest with all weapons in her disposal. "this is not a bluff"
4. Russia said that Finland and Sweden's joining NATO will attract political and Military consequences, they never said they would invade them. Military response might be building forces on the border

Akuruoulo:
CAN U PEOPLE JUST FEEL NORMAL AND ASHAMED OF URSELVES FOR 1S?
EVERYTHING THAT DOEST GO WELL WITH UR NARRATIVES IS CALLED A PROPAGANDA BT IF IT SAME WESTERN MEDIA SAY SOMETHNG IN FAVOUR OF RUSSIA THEN ITS LEGIT.

TO SUPPORT POOTIN COMES WITH A HUGE TASK

West dey lie too much. Ghost of Kyiv, Russia running out of missiles by March, loss of 24 Su-35, sinking of Makarov, e too much

Akuruoulo:
U said russia recieved su~35 and 57 from where ?

From her home grown industries

joyandfaith:
Honour among slaves. I see reason why Russia is running to iran and north korea for precision weapons

This Kain slavery na kpai o. Imagine a slave being the spokesperson of the Russian army. During mobilisation all regions including Leningrad and Moscow were mobilized, I don't understand the kind of slavery you think of.

joyandfaith:
Honour among slaves. I see reason why Russia is running to iran and north korea for precision weapons

How come Russians are running to Iran that has been sanctioned for 50yrs and North Korea that was the world's most sanctioned nation for more than 30 yrs. However way you put it, the sanctions can only slow down production not stop production of weapons. BTW proof that North Korean weapons are in Ukraine. The fact that Russia ran to then for weapons proves that sanctions don't work

[/b][/i][b][i][i][/i]

Faithti:
Bro prove the su-57

They even got Su-30 this year. Continue decieveing yourselves with sanctions. As far as Kim can still makes ICBMS then your sanctions don't work. Despite sanctions Hwasong-17 with 15000 know range has been tested

Faithti:
Bro prove the su-57

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://eurasiantimes.com/brand-new-su-57-stealth-fighters-set-to-join-russian-air-force/%3Famp&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwizzIW2jsb7AhXaRaQEHTD4BdUQFnoECAoQAg&usg=AOvVaw3b40TtRxpw9p_vFvRiU-J1
https://www.google.com/url?q=https://bulgarianmilitary.com/amp/2022/10/27/completely-new-smart-su-57-fighter-jet-was-tested-in-russia/&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwjTpN-hj8b7AhU6VKQEHSEjCJcQFnoECAEQAg&usg=AOvVaw2htplQkBFFQp5uiff3XqSN

joyandfaith:


Slave army and their chief Kadyrov.

https://www.politico.eu/article/the-chips-are-down-russia-hunts-western-parts-to-run-its-war-machines/

That's a propaganda source. Can you explain the delivery of the aforementioned weapons? Then do you know what it means to be a spokesperson? No slave gets to that office. Slaves supply the army.

joyandfaith:
Putin’s Russia are noise makers. Most chips they are using to produce high techs military gadgets are being imported from West. Russia cannot sustain internationall war efforts for a long time. Robust economy is needed to sustain war. US has that advantage than any other nation.
Also, Russians are indiscipline and lazy. They are used to slave labour/ army for centuries. Tsar used slaves and minorities to wage war. Soviet leaders used minorities to develop Russian- speaking regions in most cases. Holodomor was a mean of reducing minorities and later Russification. Presently, Russia government focuses development more on Russian-speaking areas of Russia. Most of elite troops with good gadgets are Russian natives. Minorities are being used as cannon fodders. Putin’s war in Ukraine is reducing population of minorities in their regions.

Favorite lie of Western media. Despite your sanctions, this year Russia recieved:
T-90M
A batch of the dreaded TOS-1A
Malka guns
3 Su-35
4 Su-57
Innumerable lancets and cubes.
As for your claims about nepotism, I think you ought to be more knowledged before parroting Kiev propaganda. Currently as we speak, spokesperson of Russian army is a moldovan. All the people's militias of DONBASS have been incoporated into the Russian army with equal salaries with their Russian counter parts. Razman kadyrov is now a colonel General so abeg park.

ken6488:
Russia that is running out of missiles strike Kyiv again

No mind them na washing machine. Abeg source na

Faithti:
what happens when US joins combat.this comments alone shows you are not a not a follower of military Tech's.
Let's use there main opponent for example,the US.they priorities the lives of there service members more than anything.
Apart from SOF units, all regular army are always in full battle gears there by reducing the chances of a fatal wound. Russia vs US isn't going to happen in the near future so what you said is tactically baseless.

US is richer than Russia
The fear of falling into enemy hands prematurely made Russia set it aside. Remember US didn't deploy the F-22 in Iraq and Afghanistan before 2007

1. Na you know wetin happen to Su-57. There are less than 20 units of the jet so how can it change anything in a war. By the way, a cheaper model, the Su-35 with 100 units dey give ukraine headache for warfront. In the past 3 months it has destroyed up to 3 S-300.
2. Ratnik exists but here's the problem, you don't expect Russia to send it into combat against ukraine at a time when the use of domestic components is still actualizing. There are many units but if it is expended today what happens when US joins combat. Also it's unnecessary to let it fall into the hands of sabos and ukraine

Ukraine reportedly tried to attack but failed. That means HIMARS isn't the Wunderwaffe that it's claimed to be. An entire attack of 33 missiles thwarted.

texazzpete:
No major stunt. The Dnieper isn't exactly the widest river in the world. They moved soldiers over 2 weeks via pontoon bridges. Used screening forces and artillery to keep Ukrainians from chasing.

Ukraine were happy to let them go. On one hand, it freed up 30k troops for combat in other theaters. On the other hand, getting Kherson without any bloodshed and without turning the city into a battleground is a much bigger achievement. Now they have their prize goal and there's nearly 50k Ukrainian troops that can be deployed to future offensives.

Rhetoric that seeks to glorify the success of the withdrawal is being amped up to try to cushion the impact of them being ousted from Kherson, one of their biggest prizes of the war so far. But Russian TV hosts and milbloggers aren't buying it at all.
Not really, the withdrawal of civilians went on for weeks but 30K soldiers remained with 500 PCs of mili equipment. They covered the retreat of the main equipment and also protected the bridge. Here's whattass saidon it but it sounds to good to be true. Even if 100 troops entered one car they would need 300 cars on a bridge that HIMARS has been working on. Prior to the retreat they boosted Air defense both on the pontoons and the main bridge after which they destroyed the bridge. It's quite a large stunt given their inorderly withdrawal from izyum



LOL. The Ukrainians wanted them gone. This was the outcome they wanted when the Kherson counter-offensive was put forward.

Putin's the one who held things up. This withdrawal should really have been ordered weeks ago.

Holding things up let Russia stage the retreat in her own way and also suppress the AFU.

When Russia spoke of a retreat from Kherson, I was shocked but I knew it will happen. What matters now is that Russia could pull 30000 men across the bridge. How did that happen? What happened to HIMARS? I thought Rusky air defense can't intercept them? Some one explain cause I don't have enough time to follow the war. Rottennaija Teaser4 Teazer4 Vl3ly Ken6488

When Russia spoke of a retreat from Kherson, I was shocked but I knew it will happen. What matters now is that Russia could pull 30000 men across the bridge. How did that happen? What happened to HIMARS? I thought Rusky air defense can't intercept them? Some one explain cause I don't have enough time to follow the war. Rottennaija Teaser4 Teazer4 Vl3ly Ken6488

Russia has started a strategic bombing campaign all over ukraine. IRIS-T, NASAMS and HAWKS aren't awake, they are sleeping but after this campaign what's the fate of the Russophone population? Are they supposed to die and suffer for Zelensky's sins? Kharkov, Odessa, Nikolaiv have been hit several times and these places are majorly Russian and we're founded by Russia so what's up? Does Putin want to freeze his brothers and sisters because of a political dispute this winter?
Teaser4, Teazer4, Vl3ly, Ken6488, rottennaija oya make una come Chuck mouth for this matter

ALLNIGERIANSMAD:
are you on this planet at all?

Name the regions simple. Last I checked Kherson, Luhansk, Donetsk and Zazaporozhye were the regions that were annexed and all are still in rusky hands

ALLNIGERIANSMAD:
and small Ukraine has retaken 2 already. Lion dey fight rat for over one year dey claim super power

Which 2 did they retake

vastolord4:
USA makes money from weapons by exportation and it's locality. Why this act?, Why now? Covering up their tracked

The act has been there since. It prevents Americans from being tried at the Hague

The American Service-Members' Protection Act (ASPA, Title 2 of Pub.L. 107–206 (text) (PDF), H.R. 4775, 116 Stat. 820, enacted August 2, 2002), known informally as the Hague Invasion Act, is a United States federal law which aims "to protect United States military personnel and other elected and appointed officials of the United States government against criminal prosecution by an international criminal court to which the United States is not party." The text of the Act has been codified as subchapter II of chapter 81 of title 22, United States Code.

American Service-Members' Protection Act
Great Seal of the United States
Effective
August 2, 2002
Citations
Public law
107-206
Statutes at Large
116 Stat. 820
Legislative history
Introduced in the House as H.R. 4775 by Bill Young (R–FL)
Passed the House on May 24, 2002 (280–138)
Passed the Senate on June 7, 2002 (71–22)
Reported by the joint conference committee on July 23, 2002; agreed to by the House of Representatives on July 23, 2002 (397–32) and by the Senate on July 24, 2002 (92–7)
Signed into law by President George W. Bush on August 2, 2002
Since the United States is not a member of the International Criminal Court (ICC), the law authorizes the President of the United States to use "all means necessary and appropriate to bring about the release of any U.S. or allied personnel being detained or imprisoned by, on behalf of, or at the request of the International Criminal Court". This authorization led to the act being colloquially nicknamed "The Hague Invasion Act", as the act technically allows the President to order U.S. military action—such as a theoretical invasion of The Hague, Netherlands, the location of the ICC—to protect American officials and military personnel from prosecution or rescue them from custody.[1][2] However, this is an extreme interpretation of the act, and the act does not expressly authorize nor mention military action against the Netherlands (a close ally of the United States) or any ICC members, nor does it threaten an invasion of The Hague.

The bill was introduced by U.S. Senator Jesse Helms (R-NC) and U.S. Representative Tom DeLay (R-TX),[3] as an amendment to the 2002 Supplemental Appropriations Act for Further Recovery From and Response to Terrorist Attacks on the United States (H.R. 4775).[4] The amendment passed 75–19 (S.Amdt 3597).[5] The bill was signed into law by President George W. Bush on August 2, 2002.

okeysoninv:
it means Russia has been driven off from that location.

Withdrawing aircraft doesn't mean that boy .

okeysoninv:
The Russians withdraw military equipment from the Chornobaivka airfield

So that means, ukra

okeysoninv:
The Russians withdraw military equipment from the Chornobaivka airfield

So that means it has fallen

okeysoninv:
lol yesterday Kherson airport was taken. they're closing in don't worry

no bi only airport. Sevastopol don kpai

okeysoninv:
hahaha HiMARS missiles is very difficult to shot down ask your Russians about the experience. beside air defense can't stop saturated missiles from hitting precision location.

;DYou are funny, what's stalling Ukrainian advance on Kherson, air defense have been tightened hence HIMARS is not swarming supply lines, depots, bases and checkpoints as in kharkov. In the face of potent ADS, HIMARS is nothing

[quote author
=rottennaija post=117975794]Ok[/quote]No mind am

okeysoninv:
you lied , belgorod is not a primary target for HiMARS. ask your telegram propaganda channel , because of devastating effects of HIMARS , Russia now has to switched over to mobile movement of ammo instead of traditional stationary depot. HiMARS is giving them wotowoto.

HIMARS is a cool system but not as good as you guys claim.
1. Despite bombardments, the ANTONOVSKY bridge is still okay. Ukrops punch holes in it often but Russian ADS punch holes in the swarm of missiles heading for the bridge, leaving only a fraction hence the bridge remains functional.
2. Russians are using mobile depots but there are still stationary depots. Like at Izyum, there were stationary depots that HIMARS didn't take out until the loss of Izyum.
3. Russia has adapted to HIMARS and is now making offensive charges to recapture lost land. Every weapon has its blitz period after which, the opposing army adapts to it.
4. There's no proof, that HIMARS has not been used to shell Belgogrod. Some weeks back Ukraine attacked Belgogrod with AGM-88 HARM.
5.

Vl3ly:
argue but not fight

Ok I just have videos of it

Shey make I screenshot

Yes and thank you

I know that lots of HIMARS missiles has been downed but I want proof to debate with ukraine trolls can I get the pics?
#Teaser4 Kingsnairaland, Vl3ly

rottennaija:
No be you ooo bro. Na those people who dey want believe wetin western propaganda dey feed them. I just hope they are making money from it

These trolls taye me. Una get time to argue with them.

rottennaija:

Guy you dey beef me, comment on the thread jare

Russian Su-57 fifth-generation fighter plane appears to have achieved its ‘first kill’ by firing a new long-range air-to-air missile to bring down a Ukrainian Su-27 fighter, local media claimed.

The report claimed a Ukrainian fighter jet was shot out of the sky with an R-37M missile. The report says that the Ukrainian Su-27 had barely moved above the safe height to intercept the Geran-2 kamikaze drone when it was shot down.

The Russia-Ukraine war has been flooded with claims and counterclaims. EurAsian Times has reached out to Russian MOD and awaits confirmation.

The Russian R-37M long-range air-to-air missile purportedly hit the Ukrainian fighter jet. According to the report, the Su-57 is most likely responsible for firing the missile, as AWACS in Poland and Romania operating in 24/7 mode could not detect it.

Furthermore, on October 10, residents allegedly spotted an R-37M missile above one of the Ukrainian cities. However, the Russian media report provided no additional proof to support the event.


Image
A recent image, reportedly from Ivano-Frankivsk, shows what appears to be an R-37M:
It also didn’t reveal the precise location of the incident in question. It is important to remember that the R-37M air-to-air missiles can also be launched from the MiG-31 and Su-35 Flankers.

It had previously been widely reported that MiG-31 fighter planes were using these missiles to attack targets in Ukraine. In line with this, Samuel Ramani, a foreign policy and defense expert, tweeted that Russian MiG-31 planes armed with R-37M missiles and Kinzhal hypersonic missiles recently landed in Belarus.

On October 9, Guy Pelosi, a defense analyst, also shared a photo of a MiG-31BM equipped with four R-37M long-range air-to-air missiles under the fuselage.

He tweeted, “Interesting photo uploaded by the Fighter-bomber Telegram page showing crowd-sourced equipment displayed in front of a MiG-31BM. Note what appear to be four R-37M long-range air-to-air missiles under the fuselage.”


Image
An R-37M long-range air-to-air missile under the port wing of a VKS Su-35S fighter. – Twitter
Meanwhile, Russian media claimed that the Russian Air Force is employing a new technique to locate Ukrainian air defense installations.

In this tactic, Russian fighter aircraft fire R-37M (RVV-BD) missiles in anticipation of a rocket or missile attack from the Ukrainian air defense systems. Thus, the Ukrainian forces’ counterattack reveals their positions.

Previously, Vitaliy Maletskyi, the Mayor of the Ukrainian city of Kremenchuk, claimed in a social media post, as cited by the Russian newspaper, that “the missiles fired at Ukraine specifically change the direction of the flight, attracting Ukrainian air defense forces.”

The Mayor refers to the R-37M missiles, which can kill high-speed air targets from over 300 kilometers.


Su-57
File Image: Su-57
R-37M Air-To-Air Missile
The R-37M, also known as the RVV-BD or AA-13 in the West, is a long-range air-to-air missile. It can hit high-speed air targets from more than 300 kilometers.

The missile is built by the famed Russian research and production company Vympel, which is situated close to Moscow and is best known for its air-to-air missiles.

The R-37M is a successor to or borrows technology from the Soviet Union’s R-37 air-to-air missile, built in the 1980s for the MiG-31M. The R-37M air-to-air missile can be fitted to Russian fourth and fifth-generation fighter jets. Experts believe it has the potential to increase fighter aviation performance dramatically.

The development of the R-37M was started in the late 2000s. Originally, the missile was supposed to be carried by MiG-31. However, it was later decided to upgrade the weapon to make it more compatible with the multirole fourth-generation Su-30, Su-35, and potential fifth-generation Su-57.

Su-35S aircraft started flying captive-carry missions with the R-37M in 2020, according to a report from the Russian daily Izvestia.
Russian Su-57 fifth-generation fighter plane appears to have achieved its ‘first kill’ by firing a new long-range air-to-air missile to bring down a Ukrainian Su-27 fighter, local media claimed.

The report claimed a Ukrainian fighter jet was shot out of the sky with an R-37M missile. The report says that the Ukrainian Su-27 had barely moved above the safe height to intercept the Geran-2 kamikaze drone when it was shot down.

The Russia-Ukraine war has been flooded with claims and counterclaims. EurAsian Times has reached out to Russian MOD and awaits confirmation.

The Russian R-37M long-range air-to-air missile purportedly hit the Ukrainian fighter jet. According to the report, the Su-57 is most likely responsible for firing the missile, as AWACS in Poland and Romania operating in 24/7 mode could not detect it.

Furthermore, on October 10, residents allegedly spotted an R-37M missile above one of the Ukrainian cities. However, the Russian media report provided no additional proof to support the event.


Image
A recent image, reportedly from Ivano-Frankivsk, shows what appears to be an R-37M:
It also didn’t reveal the precise location of the incident in question. It is important to remember that the R-37M air-to-air missiles can also be launched from the MiG-31 and Su-35 Flankers.

It had previously been widely reported that MiG-31 fighter planes were using these missiles to attack targets in Ukraine. In line with this, Samuel Ramani, a foreign policy and defense expert, tweeted that Russian MiG-31 planes armed with R-37M missiles and Kinzhal hypersonic missiles recently landed in Belarus.

On October 9, Guy Pelosi, a defense analyst, also shared a photo of a MiG-31BM equipped with four R-37M long-range air-to-air missiles under the fuselage.

He tweeted, “Interesting photo uploaded by the Fighter-bomber Telegram page showing crowd-sourced equipment displayed in front of a MiG-31BM. Note what appear to be four R-37M long-range air-to-air missiles under the fuselage.”


Image
An R-37M long-range air-to-air missile under the port wing of a VKS Su-35S fighter. – Twitter
Meanwhile, Russian media claimed that the Russian Air Force is employing a new technique to locate Ukrainian air defense installations.

In this tactic, Russian fighter aircraft fire R-37M (RVV-BD) missiles in anticipation of a rocket or missile attack from the Ukrainian air defense systems. Thus, the Ukrainian forces’ counterattack reveals their positions.

Previously, Vitaliy Maletskyi, the Mayor of the Ukrainian city of Kremenchuk, claimed in a social media post, as cited by the Russian newspaper, that “the missiles fired at Ukraine specifically change the direction of the flight, attracting Ukrainian air defense forces.”

The Mayor refers to the R-37M missiles, which can kill high-speed air targets from over 300 kilometers.


Su-57
File Image: Su-57
R-37M Air-To-Air Missile
The R-37M, also known as the RVV-BD or AA-13 in the West, is a long-range air-to-air missile. It can hit high-speed air targets from more than 300 kilometers.

The missile is built by the famed Russian research and production company Vympel, which is situated close to Moscow and is best known for its air-to-air missiles.

The R-37M is a successor to or borrows technology from the Soviet Union’s R-37 air-to-air missile, built in the 1980s for the MiG-31M. The R-37M air-to-air missile can be fitted to Russian fourth and fifth-generation fighter jets. Experts believe it has the potential to increase fighter aviation performance dramatically.

The development of the R-37M was started in the late 2000s. Originally, the missile was supposed to be carried by MiG-31. However, it was later decided to upgrade the weapon to make it more compatible with the multirole fourth-generation Su-30, Su-35, and potential fifth-generation Su-57.

Su-35S aircraft started flying captive-carry missions with the R-37M in 2020, according to a report from the Russian daily Izvestia.