DiskJokeyManic: Una no undastand me.... Wat I mean is dat,, corner go tooo play well well fr de game... Even if dere was to b Over 30.5,, e go play ...
Na watin I mean b dat
Roger that. I go wait for 1st 3 games then start playing corner.
I have a VIP group on WhatsApp for which you will need to pay #2,500 to be a member.
In the group, I drop not less than 5.25 odds two or three times in a week.
If you join the group, you will recoup all the money you have lost since you started betting, and you will make lots of profit.
Here is my deal for you.
I will give you my 8.13 odds selection for this weekend for you to bet on and win some money. After winning, contact me on WhatsApp at 07053350878, with #2,500, to join my VIP group.
If you are interested, below are details of the 8.13 odds selections:
ENGLAND: Premier League Chelsea vs. Manchester City Pick OVER 2.5 GOALS
NETHERLANDS: Eredivisie AZ Alkmaar vs. Nijmegen Pick OVER 2.5 GOALS
FINLAND: Veikkausliiga Vaasa vs. Haka Pick OVER 2.5 GOALS
NORWAY: Eliteserien Stroemsgodset IF vs. Lillestrom Pick OVER 2.5 GOALS
NORWAY: Eliteserien Rosenborg BK vs. Viking Pick OVER 2.5 GOALS
Odds: 8.13
Kickoff: 17/08/2024 at 5:00 PM.
Tunde well done oh, if na likebthìs you dey do for your VIP, better close am.
Kobojunkieee: First of all, owning a McDonald's franchise may earn you about $70,000-150,000 a year before taxes depending on the location and a whole other factors. This does not support the lifestyle claimed by Dino Melaye. Second, we are still to prove that the man's claims are true, to begin with. There is no mention in all of his stories of the year, state, or city he supposedly owned these franchises, or if he still owns them to date.
How many times have you heard someone tell you a story of doing business in the U.S. without at least dropping a year, a state, or even a city? Even the name of the president of the United States during the time would make sense to some. This Dino Melaye story is more likely of fraud.
You pointed out the obvious. Ask dino to submit his financial so you can trace his wealth, he'll most likely say it was destroyed in fire. The franchise line is toò fake.
Gbadebo19: Don't even try to back out now. It was you and vic2023 that posted my pic and location. He aped in on that and has began to threaten me. Whether you like it or not, you are complicit in this
I don't think he posted anything. He only pointed out you were in his state when your picture and location were posted.
shoodboi2: All die is not die. Say he was killed. This is the exact propaganda we have been seeing in Gaza. Western news reports would say “Israelis were killed” but when it comes to Palestinians, they say “Palestinians died.”
Killed and died carry different weights, and you know that very well. That is why you refused to mention “killed” and used “died” instead.
When you say someone was killed, the next question a listener would ask is “Who killed them?” But when you say “someone died”, they ask “What happened?” How people react to both is clearly different.
As for Obama, US foreign policy is more or less always the same, irrespective of who is in that seat. The Democrat and Republican party are collectively called The Establishment.
Despite all their noise and fake television arguments, they are both anti-labor and ultra-capitalists. Whether Obama was there or not, they would have killed Gaddafi anyway. If there is any difference, it would have been in the timing. Maybe Obama sped up his killing or delayed it, who knows?
Firstly, most of the reports I read said "cuz Palestinians killed or bombed. I hardly see died but I don't know your news source. I can provide proof.
Secondly, I agree US and NATO involvement in Libya regime change was uncalled for especially at a time when he was building bridges with europe. It was obvious they wanted Libyan wealth because I read back then that Italian PM gave the rebels support tied to their gold foreign reserve. Gadaffi may be erratic but for someone who has developed the lot of his people, the reason for the "arab spring" as related to other countries that experienced it, was lacking.
On the issue that brought this talk, you keep going round in circles. The question is: was Obama elected to topple Gadaffi's government. It's a simple yes or no question. It doesn't call for lecture.
obedience4: Bro you are trying ooo, Look at the person you are engaging in profitless discuss with, someone who believes president Obama won the seat of the US presidency because "They" wanted him to take out GADDAFI, so it will seems as a black man taking out another blackman🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
What kind balderdash is this??
That line of arguement weak me ohh. Conspiracy theorist of the year award should go to him. As we say in naija, agenda must agend.
shoodboi2: Gaddafi died? He wasn't killed but died? Did he die in his sleep or in an accident? Mention those who killed him and turned Libya into a battleground. Obama killed Gaddafi.
Whether he was run over by a car or train, fell over a cliff, etc, all die na die and I fail to see how obama winning in 2008 is linked to Gaddafi's death in 2011.
Kingsnairaland: There are many things you are not talking into consideration
First Muammar Gaddafi was mapped out to be taken out and if that period they put white man on that sit Africa would have seen it openly as an act against us in general view
So they put Obama in the sit and under his watch they took out Muammar Gaddafi of Libya Africa
Making it look like it was the best thing to happen for Africa
If this is your justification on why Obama won, then you did not know what really took place then.
Obama won 2008, Gaddafi died 2011. The lines just won't connect. And he won again in 2012 for what? Ukraine?
franchasofficia: If you know how many people Southern Sudanese separatists murdered before US came in to assist them secede from Northern Sudan, you won't say this.
Even US fought wars within themselves before they finally agreed to form a United States with each state being independent as a way of ending their civil war.
Everybody in the world knows that guerrilla warfare and gunmen attack is part of the struggle for freedom. South Africans fought theirs, so it's not new in the world and US is aware of this.
Same happened in former USSR before they finally got balkanized into several countries today
Wanted to respond to this until I read your signature. Enjoy your fun.
SmartPolician: Igbos in diaspora should stop wasting money on utopian Biafra. Nobody stopped anyone from developing their local communities with the money being used to fund this needless legal tussle.
On point!! Let the politicians develop the region period. Abi dem wan tell say ikpeazu na fulani?
Kingsnairaland: Any first block man that would have won the nomination of the gop or democratic part would have won the election even if he was a mechanic People vote out of sentiment mostly and skin color and religious reasons it not about real issues when looked at it
You don't really understand the logic of this things
By the way you could not even read in between the lines to know
He was still indirectly referring to white people mind set in a general view
Go back to study skills you will get there one day
What do you think white people used in replacing slave trade or stealing people resources
Your first paragraph is false unless you did not follow the "yes we can" movement. Obama's team were topnotch. Do you think beating Sen. McCain, a war hero was an easy feat?
Stoplying: You don't really understand racism. You know, in slave plantations, there was often one black man who was treated as equals with the white enslavers. That black man had the responsibility to subjugate the other black men. Don't be fooled into believing that racism is dead just because they put one black man in one position.
I never believed racism in US is dead and no where in my post was that implied. So many whites are racist and some are closet racist but him pointing at Democrats seems to exonerate Republicans. Most Republicans are open racists.
This clip will show you how democrat are still racist till today it basically how the white man is still racist nothing changed just method of tactics changed
I've been saying this same thing. Democrats are racists and that's why Obama won as a Republican candidate. Thumbs up to the Republicans.
CodeTemplar: Still processing the information... If I understand correctly, NBET hitherto, has been the one making GenCos generate irrespective of whether the DisCos distribute and optimally pay for power. Now NBET is out of the way. Gencos Can switch off if the DisCos dont pay up.
The DisCos now have to face the consumers and see that they sell profitably on time to meet their one-to-one obligations with GenCos. NBET and NERC will try to act like CBN/NIBSS to banks or like NCC to Telcos in the power sector.
Nothing Radical. Just a way of removing power subsidy without noise.
Like you pointed out, this is power subsidy removal but there'll be noise coming at a time the purchasing power of the naira has been eroded. Note there may be nothing like bands again as every customer may pay same rate.
Stoplying: if you see someone post propaganda then denounce him whatever side he's on then, but just notice how your side is mostly just propagandists.
Glad you acknowledged both sides indulge in it. Most times, I read and pass like that Maduro's issue as it changes absolutely nothing.
Stoplying: Show me one post of mine which is propaganda. You guys use the propaganda strategy of "flip the script" too often. Basically you are the thief who accuses the policeman of theft when he catches you red-handed in the act of thieving.
Gaslighting at it's best.
Mind if I ask why you've not called out Seun these days?
Stoplying: Nafo, there's a thread for you guys, stop polluting this thread. People come here to exchange information in good faith. We are not here to produce propaganda or to spread propaganda, you are not on the right thread. We are not hear to be lied to, nor to lie to people.