Christianity Etc › Re: The Story Of Jesus: A Plagiarized Lie Christians Need To Stop Believing. by FSMs: 5:57pm On Nov 02, 2016 |
4everGod: Listen carefully if you would. When it talks about bursting the bottle it talks about fermentation and results of that and was not talking about wine. It was refering to an action or reaction but not about wine. Wine was used for this example...
New wine is the HOLY SPIRIT and the old Bottle is SINFUL MAN...The holy spirit and sinful man do not mix. ..that is what that scripture is talking about...THE OLD SINFUL MAN CANNOT CONTTAIN THE HOLY SPIRIT as that would mean that the sinful man is bringing condemnation to himself...
Scripture isnt a novel...its either you get the message or you dont. Good Good Good now it's a metaphor Clap for yourself my Hands are on my head right now |
Christianity Etc › Re: The Story Of Jesus: A Plagiarized Lie Christians Need To Stop Believing. by FSMs: 5:44pm On Nov 02, 2016 |
4everGod: All verses in Luke 5 and the one in Luke 13 are sti words in past participle talking about a comparative situation of an action done before and one compared with now..
I suggest you also click and read the link I posted for Raphiemontella so you would cease from being ignorant. Please can you Explain to me How UnAlcholic Wine would burst A Bottle? Luk 5:37 And no man putteth new wine into old bottles; else the new wine will burst the bottles, and be spilled, and the bottles shall perish. |
Christianity Etc › Re: The Story Of Jesus: A Plagiarized Lie Christians Need To Stop Believing. by FSMs: 5:43pm On Nov 02, 2016 |
Scholar8200: But since a newcomer would be intoxicated by a glass (least moderation) what would you say? So that verse is for new comers? |
Christianity Etc › Re: The Story Of Jesus: A Plagiarized Lie Christians Need To Stop Believing. by FSMs: 5:40pm On Nov 02, 2016 |
Scholar8200: How would Paul advocate something clearly condemned in Galatians 5? He didn't condem it he only condemned it in Excess Eph 5:18 And be not drunk with wine, wherein is excess; but be filled with the Spirit; |
Christianity Etc › Re: The Story Of Jesus: A Plagiarized Lie Christians Need To Stop Believing. by FSMs: 5:28pm On Nov 02, 2016 |
4everGod: Chai are you sure you went to school at all?
When men have well drunk means WHEN MEN HAVE FINISHED DRINKING.... its an old English expression in Grammer.
The word HAVE depicts an action and MEN depicts who carried out the action so WHEN MEN HAVE WELL DRUNK means WHEN MEN HAVE FINISHED DRINKING OR HAVE GONE FAR OR EXHAUSTED THE WINE AVAILABLE which is referred to as the Bad wine in this scripture then they praised the groom for bringing out the Good wine which is the one Jesus turned from water.
I know English is rocket science for some but something this elementary shouldnt be rocket science for someone who can register and type on Nairaland should it? So there is Good Fruit Juice and there is Bad Fruit juice? and also what is drunk used in this context? Luk 5:37 And no man putteth new wine into old bottles; else the new wine will burst the bottles, and be spilled, and the bottles shall perish. Luk 5:39 No man also having drunk old [wine] straightway desireth new: for he saith, The old is better. Luk 13:26 Then shall ye begin to say, We have eaten and drunk in thy presence, and thou hast taught in our streets. |
Christianity Etc › Re: How To Destroy An Atheist In An Argument. by FSMs: 5:26pm On Nov 02, 2016 |
7. You need the holy spirit to understand that passage in the Bible
Holy spirit way Day Rape girls |
Christianity Etc › Re: Now I Am Feed Up! I Am Done With The Christian Faith, I See What Athiets See Now by FSMs: 5:24pm On Nov 02, 2016 |
I was wondering Weda it was April fool buy the month ain't April |
Christianity Etc › Re: The Story Of Jesus: A Plagiarized Lie Christians Need To Stop Believing. by FSMs: 5:16pm On Nov 02, 2016 |
4everGod: When men have well drunk is the past participle for drink....in essence what the scripture said was WHEN MEN HAVE FINISHED DRINKING THE BAD WINE YOU HAVE NOW BROUGHT US THE GOOD WINE...
Its Past participle and was not talking about drunkeness. ..Na wa o English is not Maths na so why is it so difficult for some to understand? Here you are facepalming me when you should be facepalming yourself. What does Well Drunk in that context Mr English professor |
Christianity Etc › Re: The Story Of Jesus: A Plagiarized Lie Christians Need To Stop Believing. by FSMs: 5:15pm On Nov 02, 2016 |
hopefullandlurd: lol our dear 4evergod says his Jewish carpenter couldn't have turned it to alcohol because the grapes needed fermentation for months
never knew his imaginary friend has his limits
 No wonder he didn't turn The Stone into bread because he needed flour |
Christianity Etc › Re: The Story Of Jesus: A Plagiarized Lie Christians Need To Stop Believing. by FSMs: 5:12pm On Nov 02, 2016 |
RoadsAndGreen: the authors said. he was drinking and eating. then people criticized. here a glutton and a drunkard. Drinking what? grape juice? why do you pick what the critics thought and ignore what the authors though it The Sentence is this learn to comprehend Jesus Testifies about John … 33 For John the Baptist came neither eating bread nor drinking wine, and you say, ‘He has a demon!’ 34 The Son of Man came eating and drinking, and you say, ‘Look at this glutton and drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and of sinners!’ 35 But wisdom is vindicated by all her children." |
Christianity Etc › Re: The Story Of Jesus: A Plagiarized Lie Christians Need To Stop Believing. by FSMs: 5:08pm On Nov 02, 2016 |
4everGod: Besides John 2 vs 10 was speaking in past participle hence why the word DRUNK was used there and did not mean drunkeness. ...DRINK DRANK DRUNK...English grammer is good and I see why you atheists need a crash course in it. Joh 2:10 And saith unto him, Every man at the beginning doth set forth good wine; and when men have well drunk, then that which is worse: [but] thou hast kept the good wine until now. Well drunk is the past participle of What in that context |
Christianity Etc › Re: The Story Of Jesus: A Plagiarized Lie Christians Need To Stop Believing. by FSMs: 5:05pm On Nov 02, 2016 |
4everGod: Eyehategod and raphiemontella is it that English is not your strong point?
John 2 vs 10 spoke in Past participle just like when you have DRINK DRANK DRUNK ...Drunk there is not referring to intoxication but its referring to a past act of drinking and not drunkenness.
Gosh you guys need help in english comprehension
|