Space X copied Soyuz as well, and musk pretended it were a new technology.
ariesbull: Russia and the Soviet Union have a rich history of scientific and technological innovation. Here’s a list of notable inventions and patents by Russian and Soviet inventors:
Engineering & Technology
1. Radio – Alexander Popov (1895) – Developed an early radio receiver, though Marconi is often credited.
2. Television – Boris Rosing & Vladimir Zworykin (1907–1911) – Early electronic television systems.
3. Helicopter – Igor Sikorsky (1910s) – Designed and built the first successful helicopters.
4. Synthetic Rubber – Sergei Lebedev (1910) – First practical synthetic rubber.
5. AC Transformer – Mikhail Dolivo-Dobrovolsky (1890s) – Key contributions to three-phase electrical systems.
Space & Aviation
6. Tsiolkovsky Rocket Equation – Konstantin Tsiolkovsky (1903) – Foundation of astronautics.
7. Sputnik 1 (1957) – First artificial satellite.
8. Vostok 1 (1961) – First human spaceflight (Yuri Gagarin).
9. Soyuz Spacecraft – Still in use today for ISS missions.
I wouldn't call them dogs, but they gave the USA military a big base on their land. There was no violation. The USA's military has more mil presence in Greenland that Danemark has in Greenland.
Many European countries basically gave away their sovereignty to the USA after WW2, because the USA brainwashed them into believing Russia was about to invade and take their sovereignty and that the only way to win against Russia was to give their sovereignty away to the USA...
Dvdpity: So USA can violates Denmark airspace and Territory, they only whine like a dog on heat...slaves.
List of all the countries with nuclear weapons: 1. Russia 2. USA 3. China 4. France 5. Uk 6. India 7. Pakistan 8. Israel 9. North korea
Russia is the country with the largest amount of nuclear bombs in the world and Russian arsenal of nuclear bombs plus that of the USA is bigger than the remaining nuclear arsenal in the world.
China, India, Pakistan and North Korea are allies of Russia.
On the European continent only Russia, France and the UK have nukes, russian nukes dwark the combination of uk and french nukes. Also notice that "the world" which you are expecting to respond to Russia nuking Lviv consists of only 4 countries which is less countries than Russia plus russian allies.
greggng: I want to ask you question that requires honest answer. IS RUSSIA THE ONLY COUNTRY THAT HAVE NUCLEAR WEAPON? ARE YOU SAYING RUSSIA DOESNT VALUE THEIR OWN LIVES TOO? WILL THE REST OF THE WORLD FOLD THERE ARMS AND WATCH RUSSIA USE NUCKEAR WEAPON ON ANIOTHER COUNTRY AND DO NOTHING ?
You said a bunch of nonsense, nobody has time to educate you, you are too far gone. I suppose you are black, yet you worship racists who see you as inferior.
basilico: Can't disapprove anything I say , eh? One scientist is turned back , no reasons and all of a sudden a govt is fascist. How many days is Tommy Robinson in solitary confinement in UK today ? Take your self righteousness away. Liberals are the fascists.
I totally agree with you on this one. But Nigerians back home don't understand the concept of facism. Actually many Nigerians admire military dictatorship. Some even think hitler was cool.
"Free speech"has always been a fight for the fascists to lie without being fact checked. Fascists are the biggest opponents of free speech. They will lie, besmirch, intimidate and use levers of power to turn America into a uni party, just like their main man Viktor Orban has done in Hungary
Being neutral doesn't mean you always say : "everybody is wrong" or "everybody is right". Being neutral means you state objective facts no matter whom the facts favour. Judges, for example, are neutral. It is intellectual bankruptcy which makes people think that to be neutral means to ignore facts and just claim everyone is wrong or everyone is right.
Unfortunately I've met some other people from the African continent who believe "false neutrality" = "neutrality".
Recently someone was asked what he thought of the current zelensky dick riders delusional statements about Kursk. The answer was exactly what a fake neutral would say. The answer managed to equate the obvious lies of the dick riders to the actions of their opponents. The guy answering basically refused to call a spade a spade and therefore provided cover for bad behaviour while pretending or believing he were being neutral.
Being neutral is always the best. While facts are not neutral, you can remain neutral while stating objective facts which may favour one side or the other. Some people think being neutral means to always equate what one does to what the other side does, for example they would equate the action of raping to the action of being raped. To these fake neutrals the rapist is as much a victim as the person he raped.
The guy is mentally ill. His level of delusion is clinical. Let's let him live in lalaland: So the Russians were repelled and then Alice in wonderland went to Kursk and ordered the azov Nazis to leave Kursk...Or perhaps it was a tag team of Merlin and Peter Pan who told azov Nazis to vacate Kursk after they had just repelled russian military (with no proof).
I hope Ukraine can just continue winning like this, so that the losing Russians would soon be in Kiev in which they would be repelled but Micheal Jackson's spirit would order zelensky to relocate to Warsaw with his army after their brilliant victory over Russia.
Masterviolence: If not for a deficiency in personal discernment, no rational adult would demand evidence for something so blatantly obvious that even the blind could perceive it.
One does not require a source to confirm that Russia's pipeline operation into Kursk facilitated its capture, especially when the UAF forces holding Sudzha lost their positions mere hours after the successful infiltration.
So in your mind, my claim that the Ukrainian military ran away must be proven with the video which you provided ? At this point your problem is not stupidity nor brainwashing, it's just mental illness.
Botragelad: Where does that video shows Ukrainian soldiers running away? Does the video shows Ukrainian forces destroying Russian soldiers and there equipment or not? 🤷🏼.
Ofcourse I didn't read the article. I'm not fund of reading propaganda. I focus on proof. And the video which is the only attempt of proof on that document doesn't show what the title says. I don't know how to explain this to you: you are hooked on propaganda. Don't bring your propaganda to me as proof ! Your belief in something is not proof of that thing. You look like those kids in primary school who go into debates and make claims then expect everybody to accept the claims as fact because the dads (of the kids making the claims) made those claims.
Your mind is a mess, you can't compete intellectually.
Botragelad: Did you even read the article accompanying the video? it's not about screaming “FAKE!”
The video doesn't show any repelling. Did you actually watch the video or did you just trust the title?
You like flogging dead horses. If the Russians were repelled then why did the Ukrainians run away ? How disconnected from reality are you ? You are a fantatic.
Botragelad: A weak one you are, you ran from the other thread after my last mention, when I challenged you to provide evidence that the Russians' assault through that tunnel was successful. I even shared a source showing that the Russian soldiers were repelled. You’ve turned up here because you know this thread is full of pro-Russia propagandists. If you’re genuinely interested in having a proper discussion, get yourself back to that thread and debate with me instead of cowering and hiding here just to chase likes! 😂😂
Given that internet is easily available in Nigeria and has been so for at least 20 years, I don't understand why there isn't an army of self thought Nigerian scientists today. It's like the Nigerians of today are not like my dad's generation nor mine.
With all the books which you can download or buy at a cheap price online, what are you guys waiting for ? You could educate yourselves and even get to a level in which you do your own research, you could build your own labs...
Who considers Einstein as the "father of modern day science" ?
What exactly do you mean by "modern day science" ?
I don't even think you can honestly attribute Einstein's first relativity papers to Einstein, he indeed stole the work of a mathematician (Henry Poincaré) and that of other scientists.
shoodboi2: The same applies to Einstein who is considered the father of modern-day science ...
But the point is that you don't know why the field was named after the guy ! You guys have a tendency to fill the information void while intellectual honesty makes you leave the void empty. In the field of history, most Nigerians are just writing science fiction and confusing it with history. When you don't know, don't use your imagination to fill the void.
Only say what you know. When you are speculating, make it clear that you are speculating, don't try to pass off your imagination as historical facts.
shoodboi2: Saying “it was named after the person in question” does not really capture why it was named after the person. There is a reason algorithm and algebra is named after Al-Khwarizmi and not after some other dude that contributed to it.
It is more like the golden age of the Arabs, an age in which they focused more on science than on religion, an age in which Europe focussed on religion and left science altogether.
The point is: religion doesn't mix well with science.
NoWam: The Islamic world made a lots of contribution and advancement during Islamic Golden Age. NA FACT
ariesbull: Zelensky is the Catalyst for WWIII. America needs to pull out of NATO and ally with Russia and all anti-Globalist Countries. Putin isn’t the bad guy here. It’s Zelensky and the other Globalist Puppets. Putin was just defending Russia. You can’t blame him for that.
What I learnt about history of science from my European schools is that in the dark ages, Europeans became religious fanatics and forgot all about science whereas the Arabs were less religious and focused on science, especially on ancient greek works. But I suspect the Europeans might be trying to take credit for Arabic science by claiming it is just the work of the ancient greeks.
I think "developed" or "discovered" are too strong, I think you should just say the field was named after the persons in question. Algebra is too wide to have been developed or discovered by a person. Please guys don't talk about things you are not familiar with.
Algebra is like a house in construction, the builders are those whom we call algebrists, each one adds a stone to the house, we call that his work.
A field being named after someone doesn't mean that person was the first to venture in it. I'm almost sure that there are papers in which algorithms were detailed which precede the name algorithm. A cooking recipe is an algorithm.
shoodboi2: He doesn’t know that every time he learns maths, he is literally learning what the Arabs discovered or developed. Geometry and Algebra, two major subdivisions that make up maths today, were developed by the Arabs.
It was the same Arabs who developed trigonometry. Trigonometry today is what we use to track satellites, moons, planets and everything else flying in the skies or outside the earth.
It is the same too with algorithms. Almost all social media sites, apps, and software out there today uses algorithm. Even AI relies on algorithms.
It was an Arab called Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi who developed algorithm. He is the same man that developed algebra. But trust the white man to slur “al-Khwarizmi” into “al-gebra” and “al-gorithm” just so we won’t know it was an Arab who developed it.
Don't waste your time, you guys should learn how to ignore trolls.
shoodboi2: Is there anything else you are good at other than stealing and lying?
I have never quoted you before, and I probably never would have until you quoted me. And this response of mine is the first time I will ever quote you and it will be the last.
You turned up here pretending to be pro-Russian and made comments in support of Russia, thinking everyone will warm up to you, but like the wolf hiding under the coat of a sheep, the facade disappeared quickly and you were ratted out for who you are, and consequently, ignored.
And you will continue to be ignored.
I will calmly wait until March 31 when you complete the ban on your beggar profile before I decide engage you again.
I won't engage you any further with this profile of yours since its username does not reflect the sort of liar that you are.
I guess you meant that impoverished, dispossessed, marginalized and uneducated people are predisposed to commit crimes, and they are predisposed to get harsher sentences and no clemency due to discrimination when they commit bloodless offences.
Educate yourself on things of life and quit being a white supremacist:
It's like how lawyers, within their bubble, see themselves as the smartest people on earth, while us scientists and even medical doctors see them as intellectual charlatans.
Intellectual charlatans := people who pretend to be intellectuals. Or people who falsely think they are smart.
I guess the guy fits what you think intelligence is. Well, we don't live in the same world, I'm a scientist and I'm not impressed by Jordan. Perhaps one man's genius is an other man's person with average intelligence.
pansophist: There are areas that I do not agree with him on, and I also think he covers the raw nature of gender dynamics, society and politics with beautifully worded jargons or euphemisms, but it would be disingenuous to say that he is not an intelligent man.
For example there is this one hour lecture of his on youtube titled ''the necessity of virtue'' where he made a statement that ''men have to be awake to outsmart women''.
He refuse to explain more on that, and I have seen threads on reddit where folks are trying to know what he meant by that.
So this is an example of an area I think JP sometimes talk like he is afraid of going too deep.
We definitely don't have the same definition for intelligence. Jordan is just a propagandist for fascism. The way people dash the "intelligent" adjectif around is worrisome. I generally only call "smart" the people whose intellectual work has impressed me.
Anybody can "look smart", that is why nothing but intellectual work matters, you can't fake intellectual work.