Hoodrat's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Hoodrat's Profile › Hoodrat's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 43 pages)
Don27tiky:This is not a maybe it is what many see as the hard truth. Healthcare gifts from foreign powers whether from the United States, Europe, Turkey, Russia, or elsewhere have often come with consequences for developing countries. History has shown, time and again, that global powers pursue their interests of eliminating us slowly and silently. Too often, our bodies and our societies have been treated as testing grounds, while some of our own leaders look the other way as long as funding is involved. That is the real tragedy..
|
Many have already fallen into the grave after injecting themselves with what Western authorities promoted as healthcare and disease-prevention vaccines for developing countries. Today, many others are battling severe health complications infertility, heart attacks, cancer, and other fatal illnesses after making the costly decision to take the COVID vaccines out of fear of losing their jobs or being left behind. Now we are being presented with another initiative, this time packaged as HIV prevention and again directed primarily at developing countries. He who has ears, let him hear. If anyone truly needs such medication, it should be the Western countries themselves, given their declining birth rates and aging populations. One would think their focus would be on restoring confidence in family life and childbirth among their own citizens. Yet instead, the American government is aggressively promoting this HIV prevention vaccine to African governments, reportedly offering large financial incentives for cooperation. Look at the statistics and ask questions many people today are still dealing with the consequences of decisions they were pressured into making just three to five years ago. Let this be wisdom. |
When monarchs are deliberately killed by fulani bandits rather than kidnapped for ransom, the tactic signals something beyond ordinary banditry or profit-driven crime. It becomes a strategic form of ethnic domination and intimidation. Traditional rulers (Obas in Yoruba land) are custodians of culture, land, and authority. Killing a monarch sends a message to the entire community...We control this area, and no one is untouchable. It undermines the legitimacy of local governance and traditional structures. |
treesun: The comparison highlights the fear that organized violence against rural communities could be part of a broader strategy aimed at intimidation, displacement, and control of territory. For many people, this historical memory intensifies the urgency of confronting insecurity and protecting vulnerable populations before such patterns become entrenched. |
Ijaya123:What you are seeing in that report is not Amotekun convicting or independently prosecuting criminals, but rather Amotekun acting as the complainant or arresting authority while a prosecutor files the case in court. Even though the news says Amotekun arraigned them, legally the charge must be filed by a prosecutor acting under the authority of the state. That normally means a lawyer from the Ondo State Ministry of Justice or a police prosecutor. |
The Ondo State Security Network Agency (Amotekun Corps) has arraigned three men before a Chief Magistrate’s Court in Akure over alleged kidnapping and assault.https://www.channelstv.com/2026/03/10/amotekun-arraigns-three-over-alleged-kidnapping-assault-in-ondo/
|
I do not agree wth the statement of calling the Minister of Defence General Christopher Musa Foolish for his proposition of border walls to protect Nigeria from terrorist infiltration , such security measure is very needed for our survival as sovereign country, even Eu, shenghen and USA now has a border and control within their teritorial arrangement in order to curb out terrorist coming from ukrain,belerus and the balkan countries.. I for sure kow not everyone with a charismatic voice has sense so i rest my case. |
Yet we have nothern youth coming out to protest in anger yelling death to america and israel but never death threat to boko haram and bandits who have shed more blood and destroyed communities and lives for criminal intention. I still struggle to understand why Nigeria cannot mobilize hundreds of thousands of able-bodied youths from across its tribes to confront the kidnappers terrorizing our communities. Why should criminals continue to operate freely while innocent people blood are shed on a daily by this wicked people? How long will we keep tolerating murderers and kidnappers in our midst? How many more lives must be lost before communities unite and demand an end to the violence and bloodshed caused by these ruthless groups? |
McLizbae:If there is truly strength in numbers, I still struggle to understand why Nigeria cannot mobilize hundreds of thousands of able-bodied youths from across its tribes to confront the kidnappers terrorizing our communities. Why should criminals continue to operate freely while innocent people blood are shed on a daily by this wicked people? How long will we keep tolerating murderers and kidnappers in our midst? How many more lives must be lost before communities unite and demand an end to the violence and bloodshed caused by these ruthless groups? |
AI propaganda. |
budaatum:I actually went through the link you quoted, line by line, and what you’re claiming simply isn’t there. The paper discusses Èbọ sacrifice in the general sense used across African traditional religions: food, animals, kola, palm oil, cloth, symbolic items, ritual offerings. Nothing in that text says Yoruba religion used human flesh or human sacrifice as a normative practice. Not one sentence. 1. Yoruba Ifá explicitly forbids human sacrifice. Ifá cosmology is built on: Ìwà (character) Òfin (moral law) Àṣẹ (order) Ìbòwò (respect for life) Human sacrifice violates all four,there is no Odu Ifá that prescribes killing a human being as an acceptable offering. There is no priestly tradition that normalises it, There is no historical Yoruba legal code that permits it. The paper you quoted talks about sacrifice, not human sacrifice, You added the human part yourself. 2. Sacrifice human sacrifice. Every culture on earth European, Asian, Middle Eastern, African has a history of ritual offerings. Food, animals, symbolic items, objects of value. Your own source says: Sacrifice occupies a fundamental place in African traditional religion. That is true. But it does not say: Yoruba ate humans,yoruba used human flesh, yoruba killed people for rituals |
Fenrir:Your entire rant collapses under one simple truth: you’re not here to discuss history you’re here to police Africans who refuse to see themselves through a colonial lens. Everything else is noise. 1. Your ideology is exposed it’s not history,it’s racial superiority dressed as analysis. You didn’t present facts. You presented a worldview where: one group is the builder of civilisation,everyone else is dependent,and therefore no one has the right to critique anything you identify with. That’s not history. That’s racial hierarchy ideology, the same script used for centuries to justify domination. And the moment someone challenges it, you explode into a 3‑page tantrum about inventions, toilets, and mattresses. That’s not confidence that’s panic. 2. Your white man built everything narrative is already shattered publicly, globally, and permanently.You’re angry because Africans today can open a browser and see african ... global contributions to science, global contributions to engineering, global contributions to mathematics, global contributions to medicine, global contributions to architecture, global contributions to technology You’re angry because the internet destroyed the monopoly on historical storytelling. You’re angry because people no longer swallow the old narrative that civilisation is the property of one group. You’re angry because Africans now know, many European inventions were global collaborations many breakthroughs were built on knowledge from Africa, Asia, and the Middle East many founders simply commercialised or appropriated existing work many white tech giants didn’t invent anything they acquired, copied, or repackaged. 3. The evidence is online nobody needs to flood the forum to prove anything. You’re demanding walls of text because you want the conversation to collapse under volume. But the truth is simple:, anyone can search, anyone can read, anyone can compare sources, anyone can see the contradictions in your narrative,there’s no need to overwhelm the forum to prove what is already public knowledge. Your anger is not about evidence. It’s about losing control of the narrative. This isn’t conspiracy. It’s public record. And it terrifies you. |
Fenrir:Your entire message is built on two assumptions that collapse the moment they’re touched.... that Africans must justify their existence to you and that you get to decide what counts as real invention Both assumptions expose exactly what you’re trying to hide you’re not debating you’re policing. 1. Your name one invention challenge is not a question it’s a colonial test of inferiority. You’re not asking for information, You’re demanding submission. You want Africans to stand in front of you and perform a ritual of prove your worth,while you sit on a throne built from selective history and racial ego. That’s not intellectual inquiry, it’s the same old hierarchy dressed in 2026 vocabulary. And the moment someone refuses to kneel, you panic and start listing household objects like a man trying to win an argument with a kitchen catalogue. Civilisation is cumulative. No group invented everything. No group owns modernity. No group gets to claim exclusive authorship of the world. Your question is not profound it’s outdated. 2. Your cannibalism argument collapses because you’re not using evidence you’re using obsession. You listed: colonial ethnographies,sensationalist headlines,crime reports,isolated cases, and Wikipedia summaries …as if they prove a cultural identity. They don’t. Crime is not culture, Colonial writing is not scripture, Isolated atrocities are not anthropology. And your refusal to distinguish between, historical context, colonial distortion, modern crime and cultural identity …reveals your motive: you’re not trying to understand you’re trying to degrade. That’s why you ignored every correction and doubled down on the same talking points. 3.Your hypocrisy is obvious you accuse others of lying while relying on outdated colonial tropes . You claim to care about historical accuracy,yet, you ignore modern scholarship, you ignore African academic sources, you ignore global research, you ignore corrections from historians, you ignore context, you ignore nuance You cling to century‑old colonial ethnographies as if they’re sacred scripture, while dismissing modern African journalism, modern African scholarship, and modern African voices. That’s not objectivity. That’s ideological selection. You choose whatever supports your worldview and discard everything else. You didn’t address it because you can’t. You buried it under paragraphs hoping the weight of your own words would hide it. It didn’t. You exposed yourself as someone who uses African dignity as a costume, not a conviction. 4. Your entire performance is projection. You accuse others of, insecurity, evasion, fabrication, intellectual weakness …but every accusation you make is a mirror. You’re the one shifting the goalposts, drowning the thread in noise, policing African identity, demanding inferiority rituals hiding behind selective history,collapsing into personal attacks when challenged You’re not debating. You’re defending a worldview that cannot survive scrutiny. 5. The real issue is simple: you’re angry that Africans no longer accept the script you’re reciting. You’re not upset about evidence. You’re upset about autonomy, You’re upset that Africans today question colonial narratives, reject inferiority tests, understand global history recognise propaganda, refuse to be intimidated by volume, and no longer need your approval to define themselves your anger is not about truth. It’s about losing control of the narrative. |
https://youtube.com/shorts/m4bgdcQF4yQ?si=ZlRBWj4hbmL_jjGk Job 30.8 (KJV) 8They were children of fools, yea, children of base men: They were viler than the earth. |
geoworldedu: take it easy guy. The day una realize how holly the Land is una go adjust una behaviour and the land itself will communicate and shield una from hunger,poverty,diseases and untimely death. You cant be involved in so many wicked stuff ,lack integrity , defiled your neighbours wives and swear falsely in the name of religion and expect to eat the good of the land, na why the land they steady vomit out its inhabitant because of the forgoten covenant. |
Antoeni:How true is this? Tell me more. |
Fenrir:You’ve written a long racist monologue pretending to be historical analysis,but all you’ve done is expose yourself as someone who doesn’t know history, doesn’t understand civilisation, and doesn’t realise how loudly your insecurity is screaming through every paragraph. Let’s dismantle your claims cleanly. 1. Civilisation is not white. It is global. Always has been. Your entire argument collapses instantly because you assume If you use something invented by someone else, you can’t critique anything about them. That logic is really childish for supposed to be older man ranting in such manner calls for question regarding IQ and emotional maturirty. Every civilisation on earth uses inventions from others: Europeans use algebra (Dark Skinned Moors/Islamic Golden Age). Europeans use numerals (India). Europeans use paper, printing, gunpowder, compass (China). Europeans use coffee, palm oil, sorghum, millet, yams (Africa). Europeans use vaccination concepts that existed in Africa and Asia long before Jenner. Europeans use architecture, astronomy, medicine from Egypt and the Middle East. If using another culture’s inventions means you lose your voice,then Europe would be mute. Civilisation is cumulative not racial property. 2. Many white inventions were not invented by white people at all. Your list is a museum of half-truths and stolen credit. Computing? The first programmable machine concepts came from Charles Babbage and Ada Lovelace, yes but the modern computer revolution was built by global collaboration, including Black, Indian, Asian, and Arab engineers. Bill Gates didn’t invent anything he bought, copied, and licensed existing systems. Microsoft’s core architecture was built by Indian engineers, including the man who became Microsoft’s CEO. Internet? The internet was built by global researchers, including Africans and Asians. The World Wide Web runs on protocols developed by international teams, not a single race. Facebook? Zuckerberg didn’t invent social networking he stole from indian students,also copied existing platforms like MySpace, Friendster, and Harvard’s own student directories and he was fined hefty cost for such theft. Medicine? Surgery, bone-setting, and early medical systems existed in Africa, India, and China thousands of years before Europe left the medieval era. Europe’s medical leap only happened after absorbing knowledge from Africa, Persia, and the Islamic world. Your argument is not history it’s colonial propaganda rooted in yt supremacy unfounded ideology. 3. Yoruba history was misrepresented in your rant. Your attempt to smear Yoruba people with fabricated claims is not only false it exposes your ignorance. Yoruba societies had strict taboos against cannibalism. Yoruba civilisation had urban planning, sanitation, metallurgy, philosophy, and governance long before Europe industrialised. Ifá is one of the most sophisticated knowledge systems on earth mathematics, ethics, psychology, governance, all encoded. Meanwhile, the Europe you’re glorifying: lived in filthy, unsanitary conditions for centuries suffered mass death from plagues like bubonic and black death due to lack of hygiene had no sewage systems had no scientific medicine, had no literacy for the majority of its population was still burning witches while Africa had universities Your attempt to rewrite history is not only wrong it’s embarrassing. 4. Your rant exposes you as an intruder, not a participant. You speak like someone who doesn’t understand African societies doesn’t respect African people doesn’t know African history doesn’t belong to the community he’s lecturing and is deeply threatened by African self-awareness You didn’t come to debate. You came to assert racial dominance in a space that doesn’t belong to you. That’s why your entire argument is built on superiority fantasies, colonial talking points, selective history, insecurity masked as confidence and a desperate need to feel above Africans, You exposed yourself more than you exposed anyone else. 5. The biggest hypocrisy: you use African inventions daily,If you want to play the who invented what game: You eat crops domesticated in Africa. You use metallurgy techniques pioneered in Africa. You use agricultural systems developed in Africa. You use mathematics influenced by African civilisations. You use medical knowledge that originated in Africa. You use cultural forms (music, language, art) shaped by Africa. You are as dependent on African contributions as anyone else is on European ones. Civilisation is shared. Your ideology is not. 6. The real issue: your rant is fear disguised as pride, People who are secure in their identity don’t need to list 200 inventions rewrite history,insult entire cultures, cling to racial superiority myths, attack Africans on African platforms Your entire message is a confession, You are terrified of a world where Africans know their history, their worth, and their contributions. That’s why you’re here. You didn’t write history you wrote insecurity. And the moment you stepped into African conversations with colonial propaganda, you exposed yourself as an intruder, not an authority. https://youtube.com/shorts/l0OzXgX6RiI?si=7CSiGOY_eUBCMM9m https://www.youtube.com/shorts/m4bgdcQF4yQ |
Fenrir:You’re typing paragraphs of insults and calling it conviction. That usually happens when someone’s frustrated they’re not getting the reaction they hoped for. I’m still waiting for something concrete from you an actual point, not noise. So far it’s just bluster. When you’re ready to say something real lets continue from any of the thread like we did last night, im bored too. |
Fenrir:Impressive energy. Sadly, I don’t rent out my attention to street theatre and thug. Carry on. |
Fenrir:Don’t bring race, culture, or family into this. That kind of talk says more about you than it does about me. If you have a real issue, state it clearly and respectfully. If not, stop trying to provoke something that isn’t going to happen. I’m not engaging in this level of conversation. |
Fenrir:Nothing is going to happen because I’m not meeting up. I’m not interested in whatever scenario you’re trying to create. Do whatever you feel like doing just leave me out of it. |
Fenrir:You aint white You RED.. I’m not interested in meeting up or entertaining this. If you’re looking for attention or a reaction, you won’t get it from me. I don’t engage in street theatrics or ego contests. Take care of yourself. |
StoriesUpdate:Lagos mainland needs genuin people like this who value the land. |
Fenrir: send me your address, i will order you tissues to wipe your tears. |
SafariHunter:Is that a darkie man been trampled upon? How is this connected to the savages going all out on each other?. Pushing Red supremacy on a lowkey whats up? |
Pasted as copied. As I watched the Argentina and Iceland match today and wondered why there were no black players in the Argentinean team when other South American teams had black or biracial players, I remembered a conversation I had last year. It was while I was on a cruise from Florida to the Grand Cayman Islands in the Caribbean. Between an Argentinean doctor and myself, who had walked up to me during lunch one day and struck up a conversation with me. There was no hiding the attraction. We had bonded much to the chagrin of her three Argentinean friends. On the deck of the ship that day, she kept going on about how she loves black men and looks forward to traveling so she can meet them. I asked her. "Don't you have black people in Argentina?" She said with a matter of fact candour. "No. Long time ago, after slavery, we killed them all." I was taken aback. She smiled. And continued. "Very bad. I am ashamed of my people. It was very systematic though. Very well thought out. First they forced most of the men to fight for Argentina against Paraguay. They knowingly sent them into battles that were poorly planned so that the Paraguay army will do for them what they couldn't themselves do. Kill the blacks. Most of them died there. The remaining of them they forced to live in this province were there was a plague. A disease that the government refused to curb so that it can also do for them what they couldn't do. Kill the blacks. The refused to set up hospitals, clinics, adequate shelter, food outlets, nothing. They created the best environment for the disease to thrive. It killed the rest of the men that had survived the war. The darker you are, the higher the chance they will send you to that place to live or to the war to die. The lighter skinned women they forced them to sleep with the white men, so that their children are biracial, then they forced the children when they grew older to sleep with white men, so that the blackness of the skin of the children became whiter and whiter until there was no longer any visibly black people seen. It was so bad that blacks fled to Chile, Peru, Bolivia, Brazil and even Paraquay where they were better treated even though not as well as they should be treated as human beings deserving full equality Atleast those ones did not want to kill them and accepted to give them protection and a means of livelihood. As a matter of fact in Chile, there was a city called Arica where Black people were so accepted and respected that in the 1700s two black free man, one called Anzuréz were elected mayors. But the white colonial masters from Spain came six months later and nullified the elections, they were afraid of other cities giving black people too many rights. But the blacks who had found succour did not complain, they sent word for others to flee Argentina and come join them. Afterall what was cancelled elections compared to certain death?" Then she went silent as though trying to replay the magnitude of the crime in her mind again. Then she said it in a sombre tone in order to drive it home to me. "The ones the Argentineans did not kill through war or disease, and rape and impregnate, fled the country and ultimately we got rid of the blacks." I listened in rising sorrow. She continued academically. So although they abolished slavery in 1815 in Argentina, it continued until 1853, after that the main preoccupation of the leaders was how to get rid of the black slaves and their descendants. Our president who ruled us from 1868 to 1874, Domingo Faustino Sarmiento, wrote in his diary in 1848, this was long before he became president and slavery ended that - 'In the United States… 4 million are black, and within 20 years will be 8 million…. What is to be done with such blacks, hated by the white race?' - It shows that he was already thinking of how to eliminate black people before he became President and when he became President, he succeeded." "Didn't the world say anything?" "No. They ignored it. I am sure most of them wanted to do the same thing but failed. At that time, they admired them. I remember when I will go to Brazil as a child, my father's friend will say in disgust as he looked at the black Brazilians - we should have had your guts and finished them off. All of them. Make Brazil white just like Argentina." "And the Europeans?" She laughed. "It is an open secret, just like King Leopold and his genocide in Congo. No one talks about it, but they know about it. Atleast the older ones do. The younger ones not so much. Why do you think all the Nazis ran to Argentina after World War 2?" I was silent. She continued. "Because it was the perfect place for the most evil racists in history to live." Then she looked out to the infinitely blue sea around the ship and sighed audibly before she continued. " Sadly, to some extent, it still is welcoming and accomodating of racial hatred. We took the Tango from the African slaves and made it our own. In Argentina, not one person will tell you the true history of that dance. They don't want to associate it with Africa. In fact if you ask them about black people in Argentina they will tell you that there has never been black people in Argentina. They teach them in schools. They rewrite the history. They make it all white. And as I said it is all underneath the surface. They never come out and say we hate black people. Argentina is only for whites or anything like that. They have just fixed the country to only be for white people." I looked at her friends, Argentineans like her, who were lounging on the chairs on the deck, clad in their tiny bikinis, drinking pina coladas and smiling. She followed my gaze and then turned to me. "Don't be fooled by all those smiles, scratch the surface and you will see that all they want is for you to disappear." Toronto. |
Fenrir:All you have is noise. Meanwhile, the facts, the context, and the history I’ve laid bare exist independently of your typing. Your words do not erase hypocrisy, they do not rewrite history, and they certainly do not confer moral authority. So type away. Spin your little digital wheels. You can’t elevate yourself by pretending that a forum gives you influence it doesn’t. The truth, the clarity, and the weight of your own words are already stacked against you. Enjoy your clicks, brother. That’s all they are. |
Fenrir:Let’s be clear. You’ve just spent paragraphs digging out my past post as if it justify what you trying to frame or project on the thread. accusing me of defending a doctrines and hating every pale person, glad you was able to expose every quote on my threads, under my usser name and now you try to pin guilt on me for quoting them? That’s not argument that’s projection and intellectual dishonesty. History and context matter. The texts you cite whether biblical passages or religious writings were freely published and distributed across African villages by your forefarthers the european missionaries and colonial systems. Texts themselves do not kill. Europeans massacred millions here in Africa in the name of religion; Palestinian children die under bombings as we speak; interracial children of darkie soldiers born to german,british, french and yt american women were murdered or sterilized in the U.S. and Germany and UK not too long ago after WW2,. Who acted? Who is responsible? Not the Hebrew Israelite bible readers of the bible or any known Darkie scholars. Not the one quoting history to highlight hypocrisy. Responsibility lies with those who commit the violence. You are trying to moralize and police discussion while conveniently ignoring context, nuance, and your own words. Quoting history, exposing your sources, and pointing out hypocrisy is not the same as endorsing murder. Until law and society punish acts of violence perpetuated by your forefathers, the blame for reading or quoting texts cannot be shifted to those who bring them to light. If you truly care about African women, community protection, or moral leadership, start with honesty and holding your people accountable for the atrocities they have committed and still continue to commit as we speak, your sources, and the consequences of your forefathers projecting religious texts as personal commandments to kill,to loot,to dominate,enslave to destroy, to plunder and pillage entire civilzation. Otherwise, your accusations collapse under their own weight. Case Closed. |
Fenrir:Ah, I see. So now we’re counting wins as if this were some boyhood sport. Let’s break it down slowly, so even your fragile sense of logic can keep up: You came here, on a public forum, flinging accusations without evidence, geography, or cultural sense yet you had the audacity to call me incompetent. challenging me to produce a quote,that’s not oversight; that’s failure on your part. You’ve lost the argument, the evidence, the facts, and apparently, your sense of humility. Meanwhile, I also sit in Ikoyi, a place you clearly don’t grasp the value of, comfortably retired after traveling the world on a mission, fully funded lifestyle by the Singaporean Government, enjoying the very lifestyle your words suggest you dream of because your mates are buying private mansions in Monaco. I travel, I live with ease, and I engage with conversations like this purely for Educative,public awareness and entertainment. And you? You’re straining to maintain relevance by throwing insults across a forum bragging about what you got in my country when you really dont got anything, hoping bluster can replace substance. So, yes look in the mirror, tally up your victories, and realize that all you’ve done is demonstrate how little you understand about argument, context, or the reality of the world you try to lecture about. Enjoy your rants on the forum. I’ll continue enjoying life in Ikoyi until mynext mission abroad. We are done. |