₦airaland Forum

Three former Spanish football players were each sentenced on Thursday to 38 years in prison for gang-raping a minor in 2017, the latest high-profile sexual violence case in Spain.

The three men at the time played for fourth division club Arandina FC.

“They knew that the victim was underage when they raped her in their apartment in Aranda de Duero in north central Spain,’’ the judge said.

The issue of sexual violence has been thrust in the spotlight in Spain in the wake of several trials, including the so-called Wolf Pack case.

In this case, five men were sentenced for raping a teenage girl during Pamplona’s annual bull-running festival.

At issue in the Wolf Pack trial, as well as a string of others, was the fact that Spanish law currently does not legally recognise rape.

It only looks into it if physical violence or intimidation is employed.

The Socialist government has appointed a panel to review relevant parts of the penal code.

In the sentencing of the football players, the judge said the girl, who was less than 16 years at the time, was unable to react to the assault.

He said this was due to the disparity in age and physical strength between her and the attackers, NAN reports.

The attack took place with the lights off, taking the victim by surprise and creating an atmosphere of intimidation, the judge added.

The victim had initially told friends and relatives on social networks that she was not raped.

But the court said it accepted her subsequent statement that she did not submit voluntarily to the men.

The three men were convicted for rape and for helping the other two take part.

Olga Navarro, the players’ lawyer, called the sentence “embarrassing” and said the court was imprisoning three innocent young men, who have denied any wrongdoing.

The men insist the girl was lying.

“We’re not rapists. We were naive and they’re trying to screw up our lives,” one of the men, Carlos Cuadrado, said after the sentence.

Another, Victor Rodriguez, said the sentence was the result of social and media pressure.

The sentence can be appealed.

Why will one be treated this way Just because he was not at his duty post to open the gate. Wale assaulted and reached for spanner to hit the gateman. For self defense , the gateman picked up a bottle for just incase Wale hits him.
Wale decided to call 2 soldiers to deal with

I actually graduated with a 4.37 CGPA�, almost there