₦airaland Forum

Siena: Welcome back, Jallow.

why, thank you, dear sir/madam

coogar: there's a likelihood....
men are moved by what they see - women by what they hear.....i am a man - what do you know about a carrier of the xy chromosomes asides the patronising pillow talks you listen to every night!

Ah, bulls again. "a likelihood". If my husband was stupid enough to fall into "likelihood" of cheating cause I got saggy bo*bs, then fa*k him all the way out the damn house.

And I am moved by what I see as well, I even took my own damn husband as an example. He has some really bad scars on his face, they bother HIM at times, but not me. Its part of his history, and part of his beauty. It is part of everything about him.

And I dont get any pillow-talks at night. Lol. I married a fulani bush-man, you think they are teached that kinda crap?

coogar: or you envy her.......
continue to deceive yourself - your eyes would open your husband puts you in a recycle bin and start humping a younger version of you......

And there you go again; indicating that if a woman does NOT surgery up her body, her husband will go and cheat.

Bulls.

Siena: Why is it so hard for you to realise some people like nice, firm augmented breasticles, rather than empty, sagging tobacco pouches?

People will definitely have different taste, you're very correct there. For myself, I see nothing beautiful about a pair of breasticles that could be wrapped round the neck like a scarf. I'd rather play with a pair of bungee straps, if that were the case.

Because the people in here saying a surgery is alright are not saying so for the right reasons, its not about the woman feeling good about herself, judging on your comments.
You use words as "sagging tobacco pouches", thats the difference. I dont say anything bad about bre'sts with silicone in them, but hey, let me quote India-Arie: "Don`t need your silicone, I prefer my own, what God gave me is just fine."

You even talk about how the husband has a bigger change of "straying" if a woman have sagging br'asts. Pff, give me a break. Its the attitude to why I am reaction more to.
A woman who only have skin left after pregnancy and feeding the child, not just sagging, but ONLY SKIN...yeah, no problem understanding her.
A woman who have just sagging...? Come on, girl. There are so much more important things in life to put your money on. Go help Africa, f.ex.

Logicboy03: Wrong, simple google will tell you that you are wrong.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia#In_law_and_forensic_psychology
A pedophile is a hebefile and the fact remains that majority of pedophiles go for teenagers rather than infants

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100424112013AAIihrN The easiest one. Go educate yourself.

Logicboy03: A hebephile is still a pedophile. Most pedophiles actually molest teenagers rather than infants

No, pe*ophiles go to the people who have not reached puberty.
Hebefiles go to kids who are in their early teens. Google it.

For a hebefile, a 4year old is not attractive, and for a p-phile, a 12year old is not. There is a difference. They are still kids, yes, but there is a difference.

Obi1kenobi: Maybe he doesn't want to have séx with homosèxùals because he's simply not sexually attracted to men. He may be attracted to lèsbians for example. That you're not gay doesn't mean you can't defend the rights of those who are. Why is the simple concept so difficult to reconcile for some rabid fanatics? It's like saying you must be black to defend the rights of black people. Goodness me!

I was going to answer him, but then you did it even better then I could have done. Thank you.

Mr_Anony: Lol, let me put things in perspective for you a bit.... Scenario: A 40 year old man has sex with a 14 year old girl who prior to that instance was already very sexually active.

Please give cogent non-religious reasons why and how one of the parties in this arrangement is harmed.

Being with a 14year old does not make you a pedophile. It might make you a hebefile, depending on how far ahead the girl was in puberty.

wiegraf: It could have biological basis. If it does, then for the pedophile, that is normal, as that is what his physiology is programmed to do. Pedophilia though, is extremely harmful to one of the parties involved. You are comparing something that actively harms children to something done (and is considered pleasurable/desirable to all parties involved) by consenting adults?

This from the person who usually complains when someone appeals to emotions. You pick one of the most reviled groups of humans to garner emotional points, just so you could get your desired answer. Ignoring the fact that the conditions are completely different. One is totally harmless, the other one of the most harmful things one could do to a child. That is a particularly low and disgusting tactic anony.

..what this person said.

Being pedophile/hebefile ( as in being attracted to kids/young teens ) is not the bad thing here. What is bad, is when they go buy their attractions, and use other people for it. And yes, it IS use and abuse, because the younger ones are not grown enough to make this choice, specially not about s*x.

Google up people being born gay, there are actually many scientists supporting it. Why do you think that people wish to fight for their right to be gay, even in countries where they risk getting killed, beaten in public etc, for being gay...? Do people think they do it for fun?

As for having kids, well. It is part of human instinct to wish to reproduce.

And for the person asking if God made people gay; Hell, why not? There are gays in almost every living creatures, most likely to help slow down population.

Coogar..why is it so hard for you to realise that some people like real boo*bs, even the sagging ones, over fake ones..?

One persons perception on beauty is not the everyones.