₦airaland Forum

tinsel:
What do you mean by that?

are you in Nigeria presently?

FINAL MESSAGES TO OSUN RESIDENTS: IT'S NO LONGER A YORUBA AFFAIRS BUT A FIGHT TO PROTECT OUR MANDATE.

My fellow Osun citizens,

The tribunal panel has finished its terrible verdicts and it has gone permanently. The furious citizens have organized a peaceful protest which is valid under the constitution.

My advice to all the fans of Governor Ademola Adeleke and also lovers of the PDP is to begin to crusade vigorously from House to House, Ward to Ward, Local Government to Local Government, explaining to the residents the economic downturn the ruling party APC is committing every day and the difficulty will not be unraveled if they proceed to elect the ruling party APC.

Also, educating them that it's not a Yoruba affair, it is a fight to protect their mandate. The TINUBU and APC presidency's primary objective is to activate every alternative to abduct authority from the People's Governor, Ademola Adeleke.

Likewise, enlightening them about the opportunities we are going to have as a state and we are going to appreciate it. If Atiku Abubakar emerges, Osun will have a bright opportunity to become the most fortunate among states in Nigeria, for instance,
Adeleke has been cherished by Atiku Abubakar and Atiku's wife is from Osun state.

Finally, warning them that this is the last opportunity they can utilize to protect themselves from this ferocious party, APC, that doesn't look after the interests of the citizens.

Thank you all.
God bless Osun State.
Imole fun Ipinle Osun.

Good response from Mr Hashim Abioye ESQ here

10 QUESTIONS FOR LEARNED SILK, FEMI FALANA, BY HASHIM ABIOYE ESQ.

Help call the attention of Learned Silk Femi Falana to the following points, so as for him to retrace his position on Arise Tv interview today, and in his subsequent interviews as far as Osun 2022 Governorship Election Petition proceedings were concerned:

1. Let the Learned Silk be informed that the Tribunal rejected a certified true copy of the Court of Appeal judgment that cleared Senator Ademola Adeleke of forgery as per his academic documents submitted to INEC in 2018. Let him in good conscience assist us with the position of the law in this situation.

2. Let the Learned Silk also know that the Tribunal closed its eyes against the Law pavilion authority cited before it that reported the Court of Appeal decision that cleared Adeleke of forgery in respect of the same issue and document attached to his electoral forms both in 2018 and 2022, despite the mandatory provision of the Constitution and the Evidence Act that all subordinate courts must take judicial notice of and apply the decisions of superior courts. Infact, that all courts must take judicial notice of judgments of especially superior courts of record.

3.Let Oga Femi Falana SAN, be informed that the petitioners never challenged the accreditation on BVAS machines themselves, neither did they challenge the data extracted directly from the BVAS machines which never established over-voting as falsely claimed by the petitioners.

4. Let the Learned Silk know that the petitioners were challenging the election on the figures on the BVAS reports obtained from the INEC back end server as against the BVAS machines and the direct data on them. Let the Learned silk know that there were two backend server reports which were contradictory, however the information on the machines themselves never changed and they tallied with the Forms EC8As.

5. Let the Learned Silk advise which of the two contradictory BVAS reports from the server should be preferred over the other. Let him tell us which one was the primary source and the best evidence between the BVAS reports from the server and the data extracted directly from the BVAS machines.

6. Let the Learnes Silk, Femi Falana, enlighten us whether truly, voters register has no place again in our elections. Let him tell us if truly voters register has no place again in our elections and has been replaced by BVAs whether to establish over-voting you need not bring the BVAS itself the primary source.

7. Let the Learned Silk explain to us section 51 of the Electoral Act, 2022, whether when overvoting is truly established and it is substantial as to alter the results of the election, whether a declaration or return could be made as done by the Tribunal.

8. Let him also tell us whether he had really gone through the pleadings of the party vis-a-vis the proceedings at the Tribunal before rendering his opinion on National TV, because from his submission, he seemed not to grab it properly that what the petitioners queried was not the BVAS itself but the BVAS report obtained from the INEC back end server.

9. Let the Learned Silk educate us on whether the Constitutional provision mandating each court or tribunal sitting as a panel to not only express but also pronounce their opinion in writing, individually, even if in absentia, is sacrosanct.

10. Finally, let Oga tell us whether the Constitution envisages joint delivery of a judgment co-signed or counter-signed by judges sitting as a member, without each of them reducing his individual opinion separately in writing, even if to write "I agree".

Hashim Abioye Esq.

tinsel:
It is 9 16pm where I am please.

no wonder you are not in Nigeria

tinsel:
Go and sleep. It is sleeping time in Nigeria

lol you are still awake niiii

10 QUESTIONS FOR LEARNED SILK, FEMI FALANA, BY HASHIM ABIOYE ESQ

Help call the attention of Learned Silk Femi Falana to the following points, so as for him to retrace his position on Arise Tv interview today, and in his subsequent interviews as far as Osun 2022 Governorship Election Petition proceedings were concerned:

1. Let the Learned Silk be informed that the Tribunal rejected a certified true copy of the Court of Appeal judgment that cleared Senator Ademola Adeleke of forgery as per his academic documents submitted to INEC in 2018. Let him in good conscience assist us with the position of the law in this situation.

2. Let the Learned Silk also know that the Tribunal closed its eyes against the Law pavilion authority cited before it that reported the Court of Appeal decision that cleared Adeleke of forgery in respect of the same issue and document attached to his electoral forms both in 2018 and 2022, despite the mandatory provision of the Constitution and the Evidence Act that all subordinate courts must take judicial notice of and apply the decisions of superior courts. Infact, that all courts must take judicial notice of judgments of especially superior courts of record.

3.Let Oga Femi Falana SAN, be informed that the petitioners never challenged the accreditation on BVAS machines themselves, neither did they challenge the data extracted directly from the BVAS machines which never established over-voting as falsely claimed by the petitioners.

4. Let the Learned Silk know that the petitioners were challenging the election on the figures on the BVAS reports obtained from the INEC back end server as against the BVAS machines and the direct data on them. Let the Learned silk know that there were two backend server reports which were contradictory, however the information on the machines themselves never changed and they tallied with the Forms EC8As.

5. Let the Learned Silk advise which of the two contradictory BVAS reports from the server should be preferred over the other. Let him tell us which one was the primary source and the best evidence between the BVAS reports from the server and the data extracted directly from the BVAS machines.

6. Let the Learnes Silk, Femi Falana, enlighten us whether truly, voters register has no place again in our elections. Let him tell us if truly voters register has no place again in our elections and has been replaced by BVAs whether to establish over-voting you need not bring the BVAS itself the primary source.

7. Let the Learned Silk explain to us section 51 of the Electoral Act, 2022, whether when overvoting is truly established and it is substantial as to alter the results of the election, whether a declaration or return could be made as done by the Tribunal.

8. Let him also tell us whether he had really gone through the pleadings of the party vis-a-vis the proceedings at the Tribunal before rendering his opinion on National TV, because from his submission, he seemed not to grab it properly that what the petitioners queried was not the BVAS itself but the BVAS report obtained from the INEC back end server.

9. Let the Learned Silk educate us on whether the Constitutional provision mandating each court or tribunal sitting as a panel to not only express but also pronounce their opinion in writing, individually, even if in absentia, is sacrosanct.

10. Finally, let Oga tell us whether the Constitution envisages joint delivery of a judgment co-signed or counter-signed by judges sitting as a member, without each of them reducing his individual opinion separately in writing, even if to write "I agree".

Hashim Abioye Esq.

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid02NVWK9Lnwiz3kidC7kL2KEpPLUvduQ9UdAnbz6cxyKrasQivz4CYHnCtSdQV4LMBPl&id=100026656960460&mibextid=Nif5oz

tinsel:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_EF1QAscyU

*_10 QUESTIONS FOR LEARNED SILK, FEMI FALANA, BY HASHIM ABIOYE ESQ._*

Help call the attention of Learned Silk Femi Falana to the following points, so as for him to retrace his position on Arise Tv interview today, and in his subsequent interviews as far as Osun 2022 Governorship Election Petition proceedings were concerned:

1. Let the Learned Silk be informed that the Tribunal rejected a certified true copy of the Court of Appeal judgment that cleared Senator Ademola Adeleke of forgery as per his academic documents submitted to INEC in 2018. Let him in good conscience assist us with the position of the law in this situation.

2. Let the Learned Silk also know that the Tribunal closed its eyes against the Law pavilion authority cited before it that reported the Court of Appeal decision that cleared Adeleke of forgery in respect of the same issue and document attached to his electoral forms both in 2018 and 2022, despite the mandatory provision of the Constitution and the Evidence Act that all subordinate courts must take judicial notice of and apply the decisions of superior courts. Infact, that all courts must take judicial notice of judgments of especially superior courts of record.

3.Let Oga Femi Falana SAN, be informed that the petitioners never challenged the accreditation on BVAS machines themselves, neither did they challenge the data extracted directly from the BVAS machines which never established over-voting as falsely claimed by the petitioners.

4. Let the Learned Silk know that the petitioners were challenging the election on the figures on the BVAS reports obtained from the INEC back end server as against the BVAS machines and the direct data on them. Let the Learned silk know that there were two backend server reports which were contradictory, however the information on the machines themselves never changed and they tallied with the Forms EC8As.

5. Let the Learned Silk advise which of the two contradictory BVAS reports from the server should be preferred over the other. Let him tell us which one was the primary source and the best evidence between the BVAS reports from the server and the data extracted directly from the BVAS machines.

6. Let the Learnes Silk, Femi Falana, enlighten us whether truly, voters register has no place again in our elections. Let him tell us if truly voters register has no place again in our elections and has been replaced by BVAs whether to establish over-voting you need not bring the BVAS itself the primary source.

7. Let the Learned Silk explain to us section 51 of the Electoral Act, 2022, whether when overvoting is truly established and it is substantial as to alter the results of the election, whether a declaration or return could be made as done by the Tribunal.

8. Let him also tell us whether he had really gone through the pleadings of the party vis-a-vis the proceedings at the Tribunal before rendering his opinion on National TV, because from his submission, he seemed not to grab it properly that what the petitioners queried was not the BVAS itself but the BVAS report obtained from the INEC back end server.

9. Let the Learned Silk educate us on whether the Constitutional provision mandating each court or tribunal sitting as a panel to not only express but also pronounce their opinion in writing, individually, even if in absentia, is sacrosanct.

10. Finally, let Oga tell us whether the Constitution envisages joint delivery of a judgment co-signed or counter-signed by judges sitting as a member, without each of them reducing his individual opinion separately in writing, even if to write "I agree".

Hashim Abioye Esq.

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid02NVWK9Lnwiz3kidC7kL2KEpPLUvduQ9UdAnbz6cxyKrasQivz4CYHnCtSdQV4LMBPl&id=100026656960460&mibextid=Nif5oz

grandstar:
That action may even infuriate the Supreme Court and award judgement in favour of the plaintiff.

Adeleke's educational qualification is enough grounds for dismissal.

ma you be justice that will stop him from contesting for the governorship seat. APC and Oyetola will be heavily disgrace and shamed in the Appeal court of justice and Supreme Court of justice too

Ratello:
You can say that again....

Tinubu ma lule piii Lekan siii

tinsel:
Which victory? Sue INEC for damages. The havoc had been done.

everything will be done amicably under the purview of the law.

Qtrpst4:
Another point of note is that the number of cancelled vote is far above the difference between oyetola and adeleke which mean that instead of declaring oyetola winner, the tribunal should have called for a fresh election as you can't tell if the over voting was not given to oyetola? It will be upturned at the appeal court

yes soo. Oyetola will lose both in Appeal court and Supreme Court of justice

tinsel:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_EF1QAscyU

we will do that by God’s Grace . That’s where the victories will start from

alen4smith:
Johnyessence dey convulse because of election rigger

Oyetola will lose both in Appeal court and Supreme Court of justice

Few points on this judgement:
1. The first report given to APC actually showed over-voting in more than 700 polling units. It is actually around 1500 polling units or thereabout including units APC won. Therefore, the alleged over-voting is widespread although APC based their petition on units they lost (700). This was alluded to in the minority judgement. Therefore, it is not restricted to where PDP won.
2. The second report given to PDP was better but was also showing over-voting in some units as well. The majority ruling of the tribunal claimed that INEC colluded with PDP in the pendency of the petition by APC to produce the second reports. However, this argument is puerile at best by two reasons (a) PDP is entitled to ask for the same forms/reports given to APC to defend the petition and can only ask for it in the pendency of the petition. Why would the winner of election ask for BVAS report? PDP won the election. They asked for the report after studying the petition of APC.
(b) The second BVAS report cannot be said to be tampered with because it still showed over-voting as claimed by APC although in less polling units across the state.
3. The two reports are contradictory leaving the PDP to then ask for physical inspection of the BVAS machines. At least the reports are generated by BVAS machines. The BVAS machines were brought to the open court and inspected and the data there correspond with the election results. Now, there were three evidences. 2 BVAS reports (printed from server, mind you) and one physical reports of the BVAS machines in the open court. In fact the two BVAS reports are not in tandem with the results of the physical inspection of the BVAS machines. The majority ruling decided to go with first BVAS report, neglecting 2nd BVAS validly given to PDP and the data on the BVAS itself.
4. In the majority judgement, the judge harped heavily and compared the veracity of the two BVAS reports. He said the 2nd BVAS report is doctored. Okay, but what of the BVAS machines itself? Is it also doctored? The tribunal gave permission to inspect the machines by the two parties and everyone in court saw there was no over-voting in BVAS machines but the tribunal didn't even take a position on the results of BVAS inspection in their ruling.
5. The tribunal didn't dabble into whether the results of BVAS machines inspection are accurate or tampered with as well. The question is, are BVAS machines tampered with as well? I will answer in negative by two reasons:
(a) we learned that only the chairman of INEC and director of ICT can have access to data stored on the BVAS machines. Even one of them cannot access the machines data without the cooperation of other. We all know that immediately after election and after tribunal started sitting, the BVAS machines were housed in the tribunal and not with INEC in Osogbo.
(b) The second reason why I believe that the machines were not tampered with was because the inspection of the machines showed over-voting in 6 units. If INEC had tampered with it, no polling units will report over-voting.
5. There were 3 members of the tribunal. The chairman wrote the leading judgment and other member wrote minority judgement. The third member of the panel did not agree with either the majority or minority judgements in the open court. After reading of the judgment by the chairman, the third member only greeted people and say goodbye. No concurrence or otherwise. I dare to say there is no judgement of that tribunal.
In conclusion, I believe the fight is actually against BVAS machines to erode the confidence of people on the machines or INEC and bring apathy in the forthcoming general election. Everybody should endeavour to get their PVC and vote wisely. Your vote will count.

rolams:
No my bro. BVAS is the machine itself while the report is a paper.

Abeg enlighten him more, he’s ignorant in his response. No doubt Ademola Nurudeen Jackson Adeleke will win in both Appeal court and Supreme Court of justice cos’ the lordships will examine the Bvas machines that was been carried out by Inec itself in the tribunal. Infact they carried the Bvas machines to the tribunal court last month during one of the sitting in the tribunal and the Inec defend themselves on that . The Bvas machines synchronisation says that only 6 polling units was affected with over voting

garfield1:
They will update it before 11 march

Akpabio candidate ti lule. Congratulations to Pastor eno in advance

adesola89:
Stop being ignorant go and pick a copy of the 2022 electoral act as amended.
Even in 2018, the issue between Adeleke and Oyetola was dragged up to the supreme court.

Please stop misinforming the public.

Abeg school him more, he’s a illiterate ignorant APC urchin

adesola89:
Front page material

yes soo

Why Ademola Nurudeen Jackson Adeleke will win in the Appeal court and Supreme Court of justice in the next 4 months . Read the highlights here


HIGHLIGHTING THE ERRORS IN THE OSUN TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN'S VERDICT BY HASHIM ABIOYE ESQ.





1. NOTHING WAS WRONG WITH THE BVAS MACHINES BUT WITH THE INEC SERVER AS AGAINST THE ERRONEOUS HOLDING OF THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN.



2. ACCREDITATION WAS BY BVAS MACHINES CONCURRENTLY WITH THE VOTERS' REGISTERS. BVAS MACHINES, VOTERS REGISTER AND THE FORMS WERE WHAT WERE USED TO CONDUCT AND DECLARE ELECTION RESULTS, NOT THE SERVER WHICH THE APC RELIED UPON AND UPON WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN PREMISED HIS VERDICT.



3. INTRODUCTION OF BVAS HAS NOT REMOVED VOTERS REGISTER AS AGAINST THE HOLDING OF THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN.



4. DIRECT INFORMATION FROM BVAS MACHINES CANNOT BE EQUATED WITH THE INFORMATION FROM THE SERVER WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY NETWORK.



5. OYETOLA'S PETITION WAS DETERMINED UPON THE BVAS REPORT FROM SERVER NOT UPON THE PHYSICAL INFORMATION ON THE BVAS MACHINES WHICH HAS NOT CHANGED SINCE THE DAY AND TIME OF THE ELECTION.



6. BVAS MACHINE IS DIFFERENT FROM SERVER REPORT. BVAS IS THE DIRECT PRIMARY SOURCE, WHILE SERVER IS NOT, AS AGAINST THE VERDICT OF THE CHAIRMAN OF THE TRIBUNAL.



7. BVAS MACHINES USED FOR OSUN ELECTION WERE IN EVIDENCE BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL, THE INFORMATION ON THEM TALLIES WITH THE FORMS EC8A, THEREFORE NO DISCREPANCIES AS AGAINST THE DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL.



8. SERVER CREATED DISCREPANCIES BY PRODUCING TWO DIFFERENT BVAS REPORTS, BUT THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES PRODUCED ONLY ONE WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN JETTISONED.



9. THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN PICKED THE SERVER REPORT WHICH THE PETITIONERS SERVED AS THE PILLAR OF THEIR CASE, ABANDONED THE LATER SERVER REPORT. THE TRIBUNAL EQUALLY CLOSED ITS EYES AGAINST THE BVAS MACHINES AND THE FORMS EC8As THAT WERE PHYSICALLY BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL.



10. THE TRIBUNAL WAGED A WAR AGAINST THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES AND THE DIRECT DATA EXTRACTED FROM THEM, WHEN INDEED THE WAR SHOULD BE AGAINST THE CONTROVERSIAL BVAS REPORTS.



11. THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN GRANTED AN ORDER FOR PHYSICAL INSPECTION OF THE BVAS MACHINES, YET CLOSED ITS EYES AGAINST THE REPORT OF THE SAID PHYSICAL INSPECTION INCLUDING THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES.



12. THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES, AND THE REPORT OF PHYSICAL INSPECTION DID NOT ESTABLISH OVER-VOTING AT ALL, BUT THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN WENT ON TO HOLD OVER-VOTING ON THE BASIS OF THE SERVER REPORT.



13. NIGERIANS AND THE WORLD SHOULD KNOW THAT THE DOCUMENT WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN HELD TO BE FORGERY WAS THE SAME DOCUMENT IN RESPECT OF WHICH THE SUPERIOR COURT OF APPEAL HAS VINDICATED ADELEKE, SINCE THERE WAS EVIDENCE THAT HE ATTENDED EDE MUSLIM GRAMMAR SCHOOL AND SAT FOR WAEC. THE TRIBUNAL FAILED TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE OF THE SAID JUDGMENT WHICH CLEARED ADELEKE OF FORGERY.



14. NO NECO RESULT WAS CONTAINED IN ALL THE DOCUMENTS BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL AS FALSELY BEING PEDDLED BY THE APC AND THEIR PROPAGANDISTS.



15. THE WHOLE WORLD SHOULD RISE TO DEFEND THE BVAS MACHINES AS AGAINST THE CONTROVERSIAL SERVER REPORTS UPON WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN BASED HIS JUDGMENT.



16. THE APC PROPAGANDISTS AND MERCINARIES ARE HOLDING ON TO BIG LIES, A BASELESS REPORT TO TOPPLE A VALIDLY ELECTED GOVERNOR.



17. THE WORLD SHOULD BE TOLD THAT BVAS MACHINES USED FOR OSUN 2022 GOVERNORSHIP ELECTION HAD NO PROBLEM, NO OVER-VOTING, BUT A SERVER REPORT WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN ERRONEOUSLY RELIED UPON.



18. THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN LACKED JURISDICTION BY VIRTUE OF SECTION 51(1),(2),(3) & (4) OF THE ELECTORAL ACT, 2022, TO DECLARE OYETOLA THE WINNER AFTER CANCELLING VOTES OF THE PARTIES ON THE BASIS OF THE SERVER REPORT, EVEN THOUGH THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES AND THE FORMS EC8As TENDERED BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL DID NOT ESTABLISH SUCH.



- Compiled by Hashim Abioye Esq.



https://www.facebook.com/100028527937018/posts/pfbid02MqVzVaWGp2TAvYJdz2dhGKiLGL8JiwuZ81Lkn5a59wfHxBarqy5RajkH4MVye8DYl/?app=fbl

Toluwanise247:
Continue to buga your family…. F9 student must be sack …… third class student will be embarrass very soon…. Dull brain can’t rule us

Appeal court and Supreme Court will overturned the black market tribunal judgement. Governor Ademola Nurudeen Jackson Adeleke will be returned elected of July 16th governorship Election

Why Ademola Nurudeen Jackson Adeleke will win in the Appeal court and Supreme Court of justice in the next 4 months . Read the highlights here


HIGHLIGHTING THE ERRORS IN THE OSUN TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN'S VERDICT BY HASHIM ABIOYE ESQ.





1. NOTHING WAS WRONG WITH THE BVAS MACHINES BUT WITH THE INEC SERVER AS AGAINST THE ERRONEOUS HOLDING OF THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN.



2. ACCREDITATION WAS BY BVAS MACHINES CONCURRENTLY WITH THE VOTERS' REGISTERS. BVAS MACHINES, VOTERS REGISTER AND THE FORMS WERE WHAT WERE USED TO CONDUCT AND DECLARE ELECTION RESULTS, NOT THE SERVER WHICH THE APC RELIED UPON AND UPON WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN PREMISED HIS VERDICT.



3. INTRODUCTION OF BVAS HAS NOT REMOVED VOTERS REGISTER AS AGAINST THE HOLDING OF THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN.



4. DIRECT INFORMATION FROM BVAS MACHINES CANNOT BE EQUATED WITH THE INFORMATION FROM THE SERVER WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY NETWORK.



5. OYETOLA'S PETITION WAS DETERMINED UPON THE BVAS REPORT FROM SERVER NOT UPON THE PHYSICAL INFORMATION ON THE BVAS MACHINES WHICH HAS NOT CHANGED SINCE THE DAY AND TIME OF THE ELECTION.



6. BVAS MACHINE IS DIFFERENT FROM SERVER REPORT. BVAS IS THE DIRECT PRIMARY SOURCE, WHILE SERVER IS NOT, AS AGAINST THE VERDICT OF THE CHAIRMAN OF THE TRIBUNAL.



7. BVAS MACHINES USED FOR OSUN ELECTION WERE IN EVIDENCE BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL, THE INFORMATION ON THEM TALLIES WITH THE FORMS EC8A, THEREFORE NO DISCREPANCIES AS AGAINST THE DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL.



8. SERVER CREATED DISCREPANCIES BY PRODUCING TWO DIFFERENT BVAS REPORTS, BUT THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES PRODUCED ONLY ONE WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN JETTISONED.



9. THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN PICKED THE SERVER REPORT WHICH THE PETITIONERS SERVED AS THE PILLAR OF THEIR CASE, ABANDONED THE LATER SERVER REPORT. THE TRIBUNAL EQUALLY CLOSED ITS EYES AGAINST THE BVAS MACHINES AND THE FORMS EC8As THAT WERE PHYSICALLY BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL.



10. THE TRIBUNAL WAGED A WAR AGAINST THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES AND THE DIRECT DATA EXTRACTED FROM THEM, WHEN INDEED THE WAR SHOULD BE AGAINST THE CONTROVERSIAL BVAS REPORTS.



11. THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN GRANTED AN ORDER FOR PHYSICAL INSPECTION OF THE BVAS MACHINES, YET CLOSED ITS EYES AGAINST THE REPORT OF THE SAID PHYSICAL INSPECTION INCLUDING THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES.



12. THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES, AND THE REPORT OF PHYSICAL INSPECTION DID NOT ESTABLISH OVER-VOTING AT ALL, BUT THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN WENT ON TO HOLD OVER-VOTING ON THE BASIS OF THE SERVER REPORT.



13. NIGERIANS AND THE WORLD SHOULD KNOW THAT THE DOCUMENT WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN HELD TO BE FORGERY WAS THE SAME DOCUMENT IN RESPECT OF WHICH THE SUPERIOR COURT OF APPEAL HAS VINDICATED ADELEKE, SINCE THERE WAS EVIDENCE THAT HE ATTENDED EDE MUSLIM GRAMMAR SCHOOL AND SAT FOR WAEC. THE TRIBUNAL FAILED TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE OF THE SAID JUDGMENT WHICH CLEARED ADELEKE OF FORGERY.



14. NO NECO RESULT WAS CONTAINED IN ALL THE DOCUMENTS BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL AS FALSELY BEING PEDDLED BY THE APC AND THEIR PROPAGANDISTS.



15. THE WHOLE WORLD SHOULD RISE TO DEFEND THE BVAS MACHINES AS AGAINST THE CONTROVERSIAL SERVER REPORTS UPON WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN BASED HIS JUDGMENT.



16. THE APC PROPAGANDISTS AND MERCINARIES ARE HOLDING ON TO BIG LIES, A BASELESS REPORT TO TOPPLE A VALIDLY ELECTED GOVERNOR.



17. THE WORLD SHOULD BE TOLD THAT BVAS MACHINES USED FOR OSUN 2022 GOVERNORSHIP ELECTION HAD NO PROBLEM, NO OVER-VOTING, BUT A SERVER REPORT WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN ERRONEOUSLY RELIED UPON.



18. THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN LACKED JURISDICTION BY VIRTUE OF SECTION 51(1),(2),(3) & (4) OF THE ELECTORAL ACT, 2022, TO DECLARE OYETOLA THE WINNER AFTER CANCELLING VOTES OF THE PARTIES ON THE BASIS OF THE SERVER REPORT, EVEN THOUGH THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES AND THE FORMS EC8As TENDERED BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL DID NOT ESTABLISH SUCH.



- Compiled by Hashim Abioye Esq.



https://www.facebook.com/100028527937018/posts/pfbid02MqVzVaWGp2TAvYJdz2dhGKiLGL8JiwuZ81Lkn5a59wfHxBarqy5RajkH4MVye8DYl/?app=fbl

seunmsg:
In about 6 units.

that is the Pdp response and Inec after the full scale synchronisation of the Bvas machines affirmed it also that there were only 6 polling units that were affected with over voting

Osun Tribunal Judgement: Courts Should Not Determine Outcome Of Elections — NBA-SPIDEL Chair, Ubani

_Osun Judgement Questions Integrity of BVAS – Dr Abdul Mahmud_
_Fassy Yusuf Reacts, Says Judgement Upholds Rule of Law, Justice, Equity and Fairness_

_“The court cannot and the court will never determine who governs a state. They are limited to where there is any irregularity “But where the majority has spoken, the court cannot substitute the will of the people. If this is done, it is a grave danger to our democracy._
https://thenigerialawyer.com/osun-tribunal-judgement-courts-should-not-determine-outcome-of-elections-nba-spidel-chair-ubani/

*OSUN GUBER TRIBUNAL, A BROAD DAYLIGHT ROBBERY...*

The Osun Leadership Forum under the Chairmanship of Hon Sola Makanjuola has described the Friday judgement of Osun Guber Tribunal as a broad daylight robbery which should be resisted through legal means.

In a release made available to the newsmen on Saturday 28th January, 2023 through its Secretary, Com. Isaiah M. Fayemi, condemned the judgement in its entirety and pledged to support the leadership of the party in reclaiming the mandate willingly given to Gov Ademola Adeleke by the Osun people.

The Osun Leadership Forum is a forum of some concerned leaders in the state that sees into good governance. The Forum said that the people of Osun have spoken through ballots and their wish had been granted. Foisting of a rejected candidate on Osun people through the the judiciary will surely be challenged in the appellate court.

The split judgement of 2 against 1 is nothing but miscarriage of justice and naked injustice on the people of Osun State. That one of the three judges did not align with the judgement of the other two is a pointer to the fact that justice was murdered.

Osun Leadership Forum wishes to therefore appeal to all of us to remain still while the leadership of the party are on top gear to do the needful through the superior courts.

Remember that despite the 'Sakamanje' judgement, Gov Ademola Adeleke remains in office to continue with the discharge of his legitimate duties for the betterment of Osun State

OLF urges the good people of Osun not to be discouraged with the naked injustice orchestrated by the compromised judges and asked the people to intensify their efforts to campaign rigorously and cast their votes for the party's candidates in the forthcoming general elections.

It therefore concluded by appealing to the good people of Osun to remain peaceful, calm and still while justice is being awaited at the appellate court.

*E signed:*
*Hon Sola Makanjuola*
*Chairman*

*Com Isaiah M. Fayemi (IMF)*
*Secretary*

https://www.facebook.com/100028527937018/posts/pfbid022hNzHTdBwNsFLNsbjBi42CcnNWwc53hunhMH36PpEaF2duKnpujDgMbYQTXAMhcwl/?app=fbl

fergie001:
Osun and Anambra States are taking over in Court cases.

100% yes. You are very right. Since 2007.

RHYTHM OF DESPERATION FROM THE OPPOSITION:
NO CAUSE FOR ALARM, Sen. ADEMOLA ADELEKE REMAINS GOVERNOR OF OSUN STATE.

The Osun Tribunal today 27th January, 2023 gave 2 rulings.
The undeniable truth establishing the fact that His Excellency, Sen Ademola Adeleke is eligible and qualified to contest for the July 16 governorship election was the first, and the second that Oyetola won the election while claiming the documents APC tendered to prove over-voting were incomplete due to non-inclusion of registers of voters used at the challenged units.

Isn’t this some sort of malicious ruling?

Well, let’s consider this judgment as a tool to distract good governance in the state, which the Executive Governor will not fall for.

Leveraging on the Boast of confidence to be back in power by July 2023, as said by the outgoing speaker of the Osun House of Assembly, it is evident that the opposition are desperate to continue amassing the common wealth of the citizens of Osun.

To the interest of the general public, kindly consider the judgement of the tribunal as a means to wet the appetite of opposition, and to boost their moral to vote Tinubu as the next president such that when he wins, they can boycott and by over the Appeal and Supreme Court ruling against Sen Ademola Adeleke which must never happen.
The paradigm shift of a true Democracy has begun in Osun State and Nigeria at large, and no court of law presided over by any bias judge or judicial panel will clamp down the gong of a new democracy.

This publication will also serve as note of reminder to all citizens of Osun that everyone should be determined to vote the candidate of their choice and as such a candidate that can transform the economy of the nation at the presidential polls, for the good of the state and the nation at large.

Meanwhile, Sen Ademola Adeleke remains the Executive Governor of Osun State and the people’s mandate this time will not be taken.

We await a positive Appeal court ruling.

Godwin ADEDAYO
Broadcast Journalists and Corporate Communications Executive.
Osun State.

semmyk:
I read with interest items 1 to 18 as attributed to one Hashim Abioye Esq. I am immensely grateful to the legal luminary for the worthwhile compilation. In view of the law of evidence and the law of interpretation (of statutes), I'll be open to and request a live session with him to go over each of the #18 items as relating to the Osun Election Tribunal ruling. Perhaps a live Zoom or Channels TV might work.
I am of the considerate view that he owes a legal duty to defend his assertions and position. He is however welcome to reconsider his compilation where he sees legal lapses therein.
#IpadeDiIgbana #Ireeo

check channels tv and arisetv today or this week, they are interviewing him on the black market tribunal judgement already. Congratulations once to Adeleke in advance.

Cc mynd44 cc Seun cc lalasticlala cc OAM4j cc justwise cc Dominique cc nlfpmod cc fergie001 cc Angelicbeing Fp

I’m only congratulating the people’s Governor Ademola Nurudeen Jackson Adeleke in advance. Congratulations sir

The Lordships in Appeal court and Supreme Court of justice will do justice to Adeleke’s appeal, inec and Pdp appeals too. It will be like magic to us on nairaland.

Why Ademola Nurudeen Jackson Adeleke will win the Appeal court and Supreme Court of justice in the next 4 months . Read the highlights here


HIGHLIGHTING THE ERRORS IN THE OSUN TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN'S VERDICT BY HASHIM ABIOYE ESQ.





1. NOTHING WAS WRONG WITH THE BVAS MACHINES BUT WITH THE INEC SERVER AS AGAINST THE ERRONEOUS HOLDING OF THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN.



2. ACCREDITATION WAS BY BVAS MACHINES CONCURRENTLY WITH THE VOTERS' REGISTERS. BVAS MACHINES, VOTERS REGISTER AND THE FORMS WERE WHAT WERE USED TO CONDUCT AND DECLARE ELECTION RESULTS, NOT THE SERVER WHICH THE APC RELIED UPON AND UPON WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN PREMISED HIS VERDICT.



3. INTRODUCTION OF BVAS HAS NOT REMOVED VOTERS REGISTER AS AGAINST THE HOLDING OF THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN.



4. DIRECT INFORMATION FROM BVAS MACHINES CANNOT BE EQUATED WITH THE INFORMATION FROM THE SERVER WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY NETWORK.



5. OYETOLA'S PETITION WAS DETERMINED UPON THE BVAS REPORT FROM SERVER NOT UPON THE PHYSICAL INFORMATION ON THE BVAS MACHINES WHICH HAS NOT CHANGED SINCE THE DAY AND TIME OF THE ELECTION.



6. BVAS MACHINE IS DIFFERENT FROM SERVER REPORT. BVAS IS THE DIRECT PRIMARY SOURCE, WHILE SERVER IS NOT, AS AGAINST THE VERDICT OF THE CHAIRMAN OF THE TRIBUNAL.



7. BVAS MACHINES USED FOR OSUN ELECTION WERE IN EVIDENCE BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL, THE INFORMATION ON THEM TALLIES WITH THE FORMS EC8A, THEREFORE NO DISCREPANCIES AS AGAINST THE DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL.



8. SERVER CREATED DISCREPANCIES BY PRODUCING TWO DIFFERENT BVAS REPORTS, BUT THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES PRODUCED ONLY ONE WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN JETTISONED.



9. THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN PICKED THE SERVER REPORT WHICH THE PETITIONERS SERVED AS THE PILLAR OF THEIR CASE, ABANDONED THE LATER SERVER REPORT. THE TRIBUNAL EQUALLY CLOSED ITS EYES AGAINST THE BVAS MACHINES AND THE FORMS EC8As THAT WERE PHYSICALLY BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL.



10. THE TRIBUNAL WAGED A WAR AGAINST THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES AND THE DIRECT DATA EXTRACTED FROM THEM, WHEN INDEED THE WAR SHOULD BE AGAINST THE CONTROVERSIAL BVAS REPORTS.



11. THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN GRANTED AN ORDER FOR PHYSICAL INSPECTION OF THE BVAS MACHINES, YET CLOSED ITS EYES AGAINST THE REPORT OF THE SAID PHYSICAL INSPECTION INCLUDING THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES.



12. THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES, AND THE REPORT OF PHYSICAL INSPECTION DID NOT ESTABLISH OVER-VOTING AT ALL, BUT THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN WENT ON TO HOLD OVER-VOTING ON THE BASIS OF THE SERVER REPORT.



13. NIGERIANS AND THE WORLD SHOULD KNOW THAT THE DOCUMENT WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN HELD TO BE FORGERY WAS THE SAME DOCUMENT IN RESPECT OF WHICH THE SUPERIOR COURT OF APPEAL HAS VINDICATED ADELEKE, SINCE THERE WAS EVIDENCE THAT HE ATTENDED EDE MUSLIM GRAMMAR SCHOOL AND SAT FOR WAEC. THE TRIBUNAL FAILED TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE OF THE SAID JUDGMENT WHICH CLEARED ADELEKE OF FORGERY.



14. NO NECO RESULT WAS CONTAINED IN ALL THE DOCUMENTS BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL AS FALSELY BEING PEDDLED BY THE APC AND THEIR PROPAGANDISTS.



15. THE WHOLE WORLD SHOULD RISE TO DEFEND THE BVAS MACHINES AS AGAINST THE CONTROVERSIAL SERVER REPORTS UPON WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN BASED HIS JUDGMENT.



16. THE APC PROPAGANDISTS AND MERCINARIES ARE HOLDING ON TO BIG LIES, A BASELESS REPORT TO TOPPLE A VALIDLY ELECTED GOVERNOR.



17. THE WORLD SHOULD BE TOLD THAT BVAS MACHINES USED FOR OSUN 2022 GOVERNORSHIP ELECTION HAD NO PROBLEM, NO OVER-VOTING, BUT A SERVER REPORT WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN ERRONEOUSLY RELIED UPON.



18. THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN LACKED JURISDICTION BY VIRTUE OF SECTION 51(1),(2),(3) & (4) OF THE ELECTORAL ACT, 2022, TO DECLARE OYETOLA THE WINNER AFTER CANCELLING VOTES OF THE PARTIES ON THE BASIS OF THE SERVER REPORT, EVEN THOUGH THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES AND THE FORMS EC8As TENDERED BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL DID NOT ESTABLISH SUCH.



- Compiled by Hashim Abioye Esq.



https://www.facebook.com/100028527937018/posts/pfbid02MqVzVaWGp2TAvYJdz2dhGKiLGL8JiwuZ81Lkn5a59wfHxBarqy5RajkH4MVye8DYl/?app=fbl

Jnkay:
It is so funny how Urchins are jubilating while the judiciary is messing the whole system up! Same happened in Imo state, now in Osun state but if care is not taking to curb this injustice Nigeria will turn to Banana Island where anything goes. I trust that APC will fail in this Adeleke case. I told you that by January APC will have problem. Now today is 29th January, 2023 and time is 4:15pm. Adeleke will retain his seat as the governor of Osun state. Those Judges has scammed Tinubu and shop his dollar. Supreme court will deliver in the favour of Adeleke. Mark my words and you can as well screen shot this

Adeleke will win both in Appeal court and Supreme Court of justice. Oyetola case defence will be trash in the Appeal court of justice and Supreme Court of justice too. Senator Ademola Nurudeen Jackson Adeleke’s a goal

slivertongue:
Black market judgement that I'll be vacated

garfield1, Senatordave1, ejimatic, hear me well, the federal high court judgement will be vacated and the appeal court of justice will affirmed the victories of pastor eno as the validity Pdp governorship candidate of Akwa Ibom State