Grandmeister:

Nawao! See how you made a false comment with so much assurance. Carbon dating isn’t even close to being accurate by a loooongg shot. Anything older than 15,000 years can’t be accurately dated by carbon dating.

I tire o
I felt by now, folks won't be screaming carbon dating when hundreds of thousands of years are mentioned not to talk of millions. So many 'science guys' on NL who want to make fun of religious folks, yet they shoot themselves most time

KBdownloads:


lmao, for ur mind u have made sense abi? you obviously don't know your bible, pls go back and read it well before u respond to me

I wonder why anyone would think that the fossil found should have legs. He correctly address the point that the 'SERPENT' mentioned is the DEVIL. This was explained further in Revelation 12:9 which says "...that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world..."

tollyboy5:

Don't be misinformed the church being in the affairs of government back then persecuted Galileo galililee , it years later when the power of the church reduced and people became more enlighten before sir Isaac newton was able to put to them fact not illusion

You obviously don't know the whole affair. The church was following the best of science of that time - Ptolemic geocentricity and Galileo was like a dissenter. It's worse because his novel idea was not well established scientifically as that of the ruling model, so 'big brains' then got the backing of the church to silence him.

Anyway, it was Keppler who made the best case for Heliocentricity and not Newton (though both of them were great Christians not as the media would want many to know now)