basilico: China was already going down and had even agreed to buy more grains. Then they unleashed covid-19. Hiw long was Trump supposed to take in order to win the trade war? Why do you peopleple juat write crap?
AmazonTopaz: When you cannot accept that an orange clown lost an election you get sleepless nights over irrelevant things this is what MAGAts on social media are suffering now endless tears
The media? The media are in bed with him. Is it okay to cheat? Haters gonna hate
basilico: Complete frauds. Someone mentioned how he is going to face Putin at the G8? He has to attend , if he sends Kamala he needs to be impeached for it shows he is incapable. If he feigns covid19 then the vaccine is fake.
Caught between a rock and a hard place. ORemember Putin dating him to call him without the delays they insert in telephone conversations.Putin and Xi will eat him alive at the G8.
Biden read out figures. You people didn't even criticize him for picking journalists to answer questions or the easy questions he got- instead your claiming he got the answers before hand. MAGAts are losing it.
Hey coon on the fence, when you give speech: you take notes of what to talk, your speech. When you address people, you also take note of that and it is okay to read it out. What you are not allowed to do is to take predefined questions from planted journalists with their faces on your booklet in sequence on how to call them in accordance to the answer given. Which is why when he was ask a question he gave an answer totally unrelated.
Joe Answers....Well I was in Pittsburgh today ..about infrastructure....good well paying jobs.... U[font=Lucida Sans Unicode][/font] He was answering sequentially , essentially he was expecting an infrastructure question.So he went ahead and answered wrongly and totally out of topic.
Joe Biden needs help
The Coons on this forum voted for dementia You cant make this shit up. As it stands the US is shit. He won't be getting this kind of sequencial question when he goes for the G-8 where Putin will be waiting for him
wirinet: The second amendment was promulgated when the most deadly weapon at the hands of the US Army were the Gatling I and Gatling II machine gun and the Hale rocket launcher. Compare that with today's General Purpose Machine Gun GPMG or the Apache attack helicopter, and we are not even talking about B-52s yet. Can militias acquire GPMG or Apache helicopters?
budaatum: Are you intentionally being dishonest on purpose or do you just not understand the meaning of demilitarized?
You ask if a militia can acquire an Apache helicopter and the answer was yes, then you called me intentionally being dishonest then brought an article that says yes.
wirinet: The second amendment was promulgated when the most deadly weapon at the hands of the US Army were the Gatling I and Gatling II machine gun and the Hale rocket launcher. Compare that with today's General Purpose Machine Gun GPMG or the Apache attack helicopter, and we are not even talking about B-52s yet. Can militias acquire GPMG or Apache helicopters?
Civilians can own tanks, fighter jets and attack helicopters. Some civilians in the US own those machines.
wirinet: What he is saying is that AR-15s and other automatic weapons are useless against the US military. It can only be used by civilians to kill each other, in mass killings or in militia wars. The weaponry, training and tactics at the disposal of the US military is not something any civilian militia can withstand.
Just watch how the US Marines took out Al-Bagdadi and you will have a glimpse of the awesome power of the US military.
The militia that carried weapons more deadly than AR-15 to confront the US military were killed like flies.
They have the right to defend themselves. How do you not understand that? Even if they are using toothpick to defend themselves it is better than being defenseless. This is not hard to understand. Nobody is talking about jet fighters like I have been saying.
You specifically said "government", and not "tyrannical government" you probably meant but never said, so perhaps learn to be a bit more specific next time since I'm certain you do not expect we read your mind.
Fool, for someone to defend themselves there have to be an attacker(agression) from whom they defend themselves. See why I said you have no atom of comprehension in you? To comprehend you have to reason but you can't reason to save your life.
edi287: You're dad is little. Indirect statements to a clown like you? You're even worse than Kwara Milo Yiannopoulos. Son of a coon/sellout. Go choke on Trump's balls or something.
This is more like it so you are still mad you lost a debate
budaatum: I'm glad you are not a coon. Please point me to the threads you've posted about blacks dying so that I know for certain that you care and are not just being a hypocrite.
budaatum: Seriously? You want to play the "AR-15 and a Gluck pistol and a sword, which is more deadly" game?
Personally, I think its a dumb game, but you must not take my word for it if you got mates to play with. Just make sure you record it and post on youtube please so we can see the outcome.
He read all I said and couldn't comprehend. I think Nairaland should do a comprehension test for users who uses their platform. This guy does not understand anything
edi287: Ahhh yes, the delusional sperm loving MAGAt has come to defend his type..."facts and logic my foot". Bleep you and that coon loving bastard. Kwara Milo Yiannopoulos piece of shit...
You have been reduced to making indirect statements. Little edi
budaatum: I think I'm beginning to get your point. Perhaps you'd like us to infringe upon The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution right of the people to keep and bear Arms.
I can deal with that.
Ban all guns!Ban all guns!Ban all guns!
See? Easy.
Ban all guns does not mean criminals won't have them cocaine is a banned substance but Mexico is your neighbor
Are you suggesting that when government sends police or FBI to arrest you you have the right to defend yourself, and resisting arrest is no more a crime?
If so, I guess I can forget about defunding police since this your "right to defend themselves from the government" makes police null and void.
Care providing me with evidence so I can wave this my right in front of any goddamn police who tries to infringe upon it please?
Fool if that was the case why didn't trump send the fbi to arrests anybody? The government cannot send the police to arrest anybody but if they do that is where the 2nd amendment comes into effect. Defend yourself from a tyrannical government
LordReed: This is how we we know you are a simplistic dunderhead. We arrived at this point because we were talking about how small arms cannot withstand the firepower of an army like the US has but dumbo like you says it means we said we should take away small arms. You're an unmitigated dullard.
LordReed: You are an unmitigated stupid. Are US civilian citizens supposed to have access to anti aircraft weaponry or what is dumbo on about?
basilico you see what I am saying the turd is arguing with himself. According to him because they can't have tanks and f-16 jets they should not have AR-15 or weapons. The only positive thing about this turds is that they can't go beyond the stupid of PrideofLincoln1
basilico: You are such a dumb ass. It was the cold war.Reagan won the cold war " Tear down that wall" he said to Mikhail Gorbachev. Russia invaded Afghanistan in 1979. They were propping up a Commie govt. The Talibans fought back. At the same time Russia commies controlled Eastern Europe and was actively seeking to overun Western Europe to impose your commie loving socialist ideals world wide. Reagan authorized stinger missiles to the taliban then sending many russians home in body bags. At the same time Reagan ratcheted up the SDI (Strategic Defense Initiative) space war outspending the Russians which caused Gorbachev to declare Glasnost and eventually allowed breakaway of Russia vassal states. Yes Russians are brutal Reagan had CIA supply Taliban with anti aircraft stinger missiles. An enemy of my enemy is my friend. The CIA supplied the Taliban with killer anti aircraft missiles.
Then the Taliban took over in early nineties but their idea of governance was different from what everyone expected them to be a democratic society. And Osama bin Laden was fighting the Russians in Afghanistan ,after they left he turned against america. This happened when Bush and Cheney stationed American troops in Saudi Arabia soil. The rest is history
That is going too far. He was making a point that because citizens can't stand the army they should not be allowed to try with the little guns they have. And I was telling him that the rebels in Afghanistan or anywhere can keep a mighty force at bay or give them something to think about with little arms.
The Turd just jumped into irrational arguments that CIA gives Taliban the weapons like that carries any sense whatsoever
LordReed: The CIA did not simply supply the Taliban with Semi automatic rifles or automatic rifles. They gave them Stinger Missiles for instance. Which US civilian has access to Stinger missiles?
LordReed: You are a slowpoke and have no argument.
I said a rebel group with Semi automatic rifle or automatic rifle can keep the US Army at bay or give them something to think about without fighter jets or tanks making them think twice on how they move and all you could come up with was
"THE CIA GAVE THEM THE GUNS" like do you know how to reason with your brain or you are just like a chimp with a keyboard. OMG