₦airaland Forum

Predator: Badlands: 4/10
Easily the Worst in the Franchise. Watching Predator: Badlands feels like when people hype you too much as a kid and it gets to your head, then you flop embarrassingly. That’s exactly what happened here. Disney dropped a killer 2-minute trailer, but the movie itself is painfully weaker.

Where’s the gore?
Where’s the brutality?
Where’s the terrifying hunter the franchise is known for?

Instead, we got a soft, watered-down Predator that feels more like a Disney adventure than a deadly sci-fi horror. It has none of the raw intensity Prey delivered and nothing close to the “killer of killers” energy we saw this year.

It got so cheesy I expected them to lock hands and break into Kumbaya. Honestly, they might as well have told us they were making a kids’ movie. This is the worst Predator film to ever hit my screen, a complete disappointment.

abduleez1:
The live action is here....👀


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKYFfYLe5rs?si=jHaBVljbpowJb_Qm

CGI na water.

08175047213
Add me up

Arizoner:
Your best wahlberg flick aside transformers?

I loved his performance in Lone Survivor and The Fighter. Lone Survivor was solid no doubt about that. He really carried the intensity and emotion of the story. But, The Fighter is hands down his best movie for me. He felt completely real there, quiet, determined, and full of heart. It wasn’t just about boxing, it was about family, struggle, and self-belief. You could literally feel the weight of every choice he made. That’s the movie where Mark didn’t just act tough, he owned and became the character.

The Conjuring: Last Rites:5.5/10

After The Conjuring 1 and 2, everything else has been a shadow of what made the series great. Honestly, I miss James Wan, his absence literally took the soul out of the franchise. The newer movies just don’t hit the same. Maybe it’s me, or maybe I’ve seen too many Hollywood horror films, that nothing really makes my skin crawl anymore. The jump scares in Last Rites were so predictable you could see them coming a mile away.

I understand it's based off actually events and they wanted to make it more character-driven, but the story dragged its feet with too much talk and too little tension. Some scenes felt like filler. At one point, I wasn’t even sure if I was still watching a horror movie or a slow family drama. The setup had promise, but the spark didn’t show up until the last 30 minutes.

For me, The Conjuring: Last Rites is like a candle burning out, it flickers with moments of hope but never truly lights up the room. A lackluster farewell to a franchise that once redefined fear.

Play Dirty:5.8/10

If you're a fan of Mark Wahlberg, you'd probably like this one..... just turn off your brain and enjoy. The film delivers a mix of action, suspense, and underworld intrigue.

Code 3: 6/10

Code 3 isn’t the slapstick comedy the cover suggests, so if you’re expecting laughs, you’d be disappointed. What you get instead is a gritty drama laced with dark humor, a raw dive into burnout and America’s broken healthcare system. Rainn Wilson anchors it with a sharp performance that makes the heavy themes land, which explains its strong ratings online, but ultimately it’s a solid one-time.

The Bad Guys 2 (2025): 7.5/10

Bad Guys 2 does exactly what a sequel should, turning the fun up a notch without losing what made the first one work. The animation is bold and stylish, the action is smooth, and the jokes actually land (yes, even the fart jokes). Diane steals the spotlight, the Bad Girls bring fresh energy, and Wolf’s growth gives the story some real weight.

It’s not rewriting the rules of animation, but honestly, who cares? It’s slick, funny, and far more charming than it has any right to be, and proof that not every sequel has to be a soulless cash grab. And with animation already on a home run this year, this one only keeps the streak alive.

Fantastic 4: First Steps (2025)- 5.8/10

This should’ve been Marvel’s big family reunion, but instead it plays like a stiff old stage play, flashy sets and lifeless dialogue.

The movie looks great, no doubt. The VFX, grading, and overall design are top-tier, and at times it feels like Jack Kirby’s comic book artwork straight off the page. Sue and Ben actually feel alive, but everyone else is trapped in cardboard writing. Reed Richards is meant to be Marvel’s brightest mind, but here he’s just a hollow, lifeless shell and Pedro Pascal himself couldn't save the day, as the script leaves him stranded, playing a cold shell of a character instead of the genius leader he should be. Joseph Quinn as Johnny Storm? Really? Who looked at that casting and said, “Yep, that’s our hotshot playboy”? It’s like they picked him out of a lineup for someone who’s never told a joke in his life. No spark, no charisma, just flat one-liners that made him look like he was forcing it the whole time.

By the end, I couldn’t shake the feeling that this was a waste of talent and hype. The trailers promised something epic, but the movie just coasted on nostalgia and shiny effects. Proof that good visuals can’t save a dead script.

Chief of War: 8/10
SPOILER ALERT!!!!!!!

Chief of War is easily one of the most unique historical dramas I’ve seen in a while. There’s definitely nothing not to like in this show the landscapes, the battle scenes, the attention to detail in costume and culture. Everything looks grand and well put together. Jason Momoa came through strong, but what impressed me even more was how deeply the series respects Hawaiian culture. From the language to the rituals and traditions, it all felt authentic and gave the story real weight.

The only real flaw in this otherwise epic saga is the pacing. Some of those middle episodes kinda dragged. Also, the heavy use of the Hawaiian language means a lot of subtitles, which I personally think adds depth. Honestly, if subtitled films feel like a burden to you, then you’re denying yourself the chance to experience some of the richest stories cinema has to offer.

Now, the finale was something else entirely a showdown I won’t forget anytime soon. The battle scenes erupted with volcanic energy, raw and heart-pounding enough to keep you glued. Hats off to the goat of the series, Jason Momoa. He was a beast, literally cutting down body parts left, right, and center. Keōua had no fighting chance against Ki‘ana; the fight would have been over even before it started. I think they wanted to keep his character alive a bit longer. Even though he was badly burnt, I strongly feel he survived. But when it comes to the quieter character moments, the spark just isn’t the same. Ka‘hūmanna, the so-called God of War, is the clearest example. He spends most of the time as a looming shadow, more ghost than thunder, and by the finale I was expecting a ground-shaking showdown that never came. Maybe the writers are holding him back for a future season, or maybe they’re just staying true to history where his role was more symbolic than brute force. Either way, it leaves you craving that god-level clash to live up to the name.

Looking at the way the story is unfolding, I expect the series to run at most up to season 3 before it wraps up.

Achilles100:
Na Chief Keoua dey annoy my soul. I will see the latest episode today though.

The guy na fighter oo. I bin think say na old man, but baba na brutal somebody. I go like see him one on one fight with Kaʻiana, the old fashion way without the red mouthed weapons.

Calibrator:
So nobody can catch this dull Chief Kamahemala for me?

That guy character just dey annoy me, he too dull for my liking. Anytime I see am, e dey vex me. And the members of his council, especially Kaʻahumanu’s papa, no dey help matters at all. Una go leave reality, dey chase one yeye prophecy. Anyways, my fingers are crossed for next week’s episode.

LINTUNE:
guy, im just so shocked with the bad review, im like, is it the film i watched or what, no real horror fan will rate this movie les than ur rating, i swear..this is one of the best horror movie of the year, remember this sam critics said the same shit about final destination bloodline, a film that came out to be the bomb..all this delusional ppl self

Exactly! I felt the same way reading those negative reviews. Honestly, if not for the ratings on IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes, I probably would have given it a hard pass. But after watching, I just kept asking myself did these people even see the same movie I did? Weapons was powerful, unsettling, and brilliantly layered...the kind of film that doesn’t just entertain you, it sticks with you and makes you think long after it ends. Sometimes I feel like we armchair critics can be too quick to tear things down without pointing to anything tangible.

oyaskii:
Weapons (2025).

Matthew 2:17.

Now, a typical horror flick almost always has two layers: “How it happened” and “Why it happened.” But Weapons is no ordinary horror film. It leans heavily into “How it happened” something that was even splattered across the trailers while the “Why” is never spoon-fed. You have to work it out yourself. And that’s why I think this is such a technically brilliant film.

How It Happened

From the trailers alone, most people could already grasp the central premise. As I mentioned earlier: 17 kids from the same class suddenly wake up at exactly 2:17 a.m. and run into the night in the same strange, synchronized fashion. This chilling event is the very first scene, the film doesn’t waste time getting to the core mystery.

Why It Happened

What followed was simply brilliant filmmaking. As the small-town community tries to unravel the mystery, the film dives into a non-chronological style of storytelling. Each thread is told through the POV of different central characters. A dramatic or shocking moment is shown first, then the film rewinds to reveal the events leading up to it, filling in the blanks while also building character depth.

The narrative explores how such a traumatic event can tear apart the fabric of a town, exposing secrets, scapegoating, and rising accusations as tensions boil higher each day the kids remain missing. By the time the story moves toward its final act, I was initially worried, the filmmaker seemed to be withholding too much context after such an excellent buildup. But the deeper the act unfolded, the more clarity it offered, and by the end, I was left deeply satisfied.


One thing I especially loved, something rare in horror films, was the dramatic, almost theatrical tone. It allowed for stronger character arcs and made the main cast more compelling. Julia Garner, who I honestly couldn’t stand in Ozark, truly surprised me here; she delivered a weighty, nuanced performance. Josh Brolin was solid as always.

The cinematography deserves special praise too. The recurring use of dark frames with a single lit element in the center created an unsettling, beautiful visual style that I absolutely loved.


I see why, Jordan Peele reportedly fired his team when they lost rights to this. It is such a technically brilliant and well scripted film with a lot to unpack and a lot of symbolism to unravel, hence the many pieces and explanations online, trying to decipher what the film was truly about, and that's what a good film does to you, and i probably believe the hype now, not that this year has been littered with good films, this is one of the very good ones.

A special.... special....film

8/10

Aptly written. That Matthew 2:17 reference I had to actually go back and read it and honestly it clicked for me. The prophecy about mass child loss and collective grief ties in so well here. 17 school kids missing, then that haunting dream with the AR-15 right above Alex’s roof… it’s very hard not to connect that to the tragic reality of school shootings in America.

And this is where the film shines: it refuses to spell everything out, instead it gives you space to draw meaning. When you link Matthew’s prophecy of children lost with today’s cycle of shootings, violence, and community trauma, the symbolism becomes even stronger.

This is the kind of layered storytelling you also see in movies like Elephant, Donnie Darko, The Killing of a Sacred Deer, and Joker. All these films use violence and symbolism not just for shock value but to push you into deeper thought. Weapons definitely belongs in that same conversation.

For me, Weapons is more than just horror, it’s a bold, thought-provoking film that lingers in your mind long after the credits roll. Truly one of the standout films of the year.

Weapons:8/10

If you go with most of our reviews here, you’d miss a lot. That’s why I keep saying: don't let any armchair critic, myself included discourage you from seeing a movie. You either like it, or you dislike it, Las las na data you waste, nobody die. Check out IMDb, Rotten Tomatoes, Metacritic et.al, they are saying a totally different thing from what's being said here.


I honestly don’t get people’s beef with this movie. Weapons is one of the most ambitious horror-mysteries I have seen in a long while. What I really fancied about the movie was how Zach Cregger took a chilling concept and built it into a layered story full of atmosphere, strong performances, and lingering dread. It doesn’t spoon feed or hand you every answer on a plate, but that’s part of what makes it effective because sometimes the unknown is scarier than any explanation.

If you enjoy horror that blends psychological depth with supernatural tension, Weapons will hit the mark. If you prefer a straightforward narrative with all the dots neatly connected, you may find the ambiguity frustrating. For me, the film’s mood, tension, and human drama are exactly what give it staying power.

Weapons is not just about scares it’s about mood, mystery, and the human cost of the unknown.

oyaskii:
Superman (2025)


I fear there might never be a truly great CBM blockbuster for a very, very long time…

I’m greatly at odds with this film because, with all the weight of expectations riding on it, there were so few things I liked and so many I disliked and it all stems from James Gunn being the maker of this movie.

The little things I liked:
For all the talk about the unusual CC and grading in the trailers and teasers, the final cut was a visual marvel. The whites of the snow were absolutely whiting, the green Kryptonite was bangingly greening, and Supes’ iconic red trunks were brilliantly red. It reminded me of GOTG Vol II's colour palette 🎨, no surprise since the same cinematographer worked on both.

David Corenswet as Superman was an all-timer casting choice. He looked born to play the role, and in the hands of a visionary filmmaker, his talents would have been put to much better use. Sadly, that’s where the positives end.

Now to the bad:
The plot was a clunky mess. From the opening scene, it felt half-done like we were supposed to have watched a previous film to understand what was going on. Crucial details had already happened off-screen, killing any chance of suspense or buildup that a good CBM needs. From there, it all went pear-shaped.

The most important part of Superman’s lore is his identity crisis wrestling with the weight of being the most powerful alien who wants to save everyone, while still being a Kansas farm boy working at the Daily Planet. We see none of that. For what’s supposed to be an origin story and the new DCU’s kickoff, his personal struggle is completely absent. Even his relationship with Lois Lane, another key arc, had already happened off-screen..zero buildup.

Worse, the story shifts focus away from Superman in a Superman movie to the “Justice Gang” (a goofy name, but hey, it’s James Gunn). Ironically, I was impressed with Mr. Terrific, he showed up and actually got things done, while Superman was constantly getting his butt kicked by every random goon Lex Luthor threw at him. It made the whole thing feel like a Justice Gang movie that happened to have Superman mumbling in the background. Superman is supposed to be larger than life, but Gunn stripped away the soul and essence that makes the character iconic. If he weren’t in the film, you’d barely notice, despite the title card saying Superman.

All of these problems come down to James Gunn. His strength has always been ragtag bands of misfit characters and that’s fine. But translating that style to a Tier-A comic icon doesn’t work. This movie feels less like the launch of a meaningful universe and more like Gunn’s nerdy teenage fantasy of “finally making a Superman movie.” It isn’t the beginning of something grand it looks like another one-off, forgettable CBM since 2019 that just happens to feature Superman. And this was supposed to be the biggest cinematic event of the year.

I’m close to my yearly rewatch of Infinity War (2018) and Endgame (2019), and I fear those two films have firmly closed the door on this genre. Even in Endgame, the cracks had started to show. CBMs are never reaching those heights again, not for a very long time. All we can hope for are the occasional huffs and puffs, praying one sticks and makes it worth your while which I thought this would be. Such a shame.

Ultimately, this is a close to nothing movie. It achieves nothing, builds towards nothing, and is an unmemorable, jarring mess.


5/10

I downloaded the movie yesterday, full of hope waiting to feast on a proper superhero epic in the morning. Everyone said Gunn would bring Superman back strong and kick off the new DCU. But after watching, I felt empty. I kept waiting for the big moment, the epic break that would make me cheer, but it never came. This film isn’t awful, but it’s got no heart.

David Corenswet makes a good Superman. He looks strong, kind, like he could carry the world. But the story? It’s like the script was scribbled with a kryptonite pen, leaving us with a weak-ass Superman who barely saves the day and is every goon’s bi.tch. The Man of Steel, who should command every frame, is bafflingly sidelined, outshone by a flashy Justice Gang entourage. At one point, Mr Terrific steals the show, leaving Superman looking like a guest star in his own movie. It’s not just awkward; it’s a cinematic sin.

Where’s the heart of Superman’s story? The soul-wrenching clash between Clark’s small-town humanity and Kal-El’s alien might? Vanished. His romance with Lois Lane? Already tied up in a neat bow, with no spark or buildup to make you care. These aren’t side notes they’re the essence of Superman, and this film treats them like afterthoughts. Gunn assumes we already know Superman’s story so F..... what? Can’t you retell it with some damn heart and make it better?

Visually, it’s an eye candy. The snow glints with icy menace, and Kryptonite glows like it’s plotting your downfall. That red cape? It flows with undeniable swagger. But it’s all surface level dazzle. Beneath the polish, the story is thinner than a roadside puff-puff. Suspense? Nonexistent. Emotional depth? Lost in space. Even Lex Luthor, who should be a scheming mastermind, comes off as a joke, and smooth-talking influencer with no real menace.

Yet, the box office receipts piled up like a politician’s campaign funds. A hit, they say. I couldn't help but smirk and wonder: was this a superhero saga or a clever front for some creative financial moves? The hype and the reality are worlds apart, leaving you questioning what kind of business this film was really doing.

This movie was supposed to reintroduce Superman in a powerful way and restore faith in comic book movies. Instead, it only confirmed what many of us already suspect: the golden age of superhero films ended with Infinity War and Endgame. Everything afterwards has been a hot pile of garbage or average at best.

I wouldn't rate it because my emotions would overcloud my sense of judgement making me go below what you scored.

The Son of Krypton deserved better. So did we.

Ne Zha 2 : 9/10 – The Pride of Chinese Cinema

Move over, Disney there’s a new kid on the playground and he's here for your throne. I totally agree with the poster above, Ne Zha 2 is hands down one of the best things to come out of Chinese cinema.

It’s not just about the record-breaking box office, the film delivers world-class animation quality, blending martial-arts magic with breathtaking wuxia-style visuals. The story is fresh, deeply rooted in Chinese mythology, and packed with emotional depth, all while appealing to audiences around the world without leaning on Hollywood formulas. If China’s animation industry can keep producing hits of this calibre, Disney will no longer dominate by default, they’ll have to compete.

28 years later :5.8/10

I’m starting to think the director has some kind of fetish cause why are we constantly getting dangling ju.nks in our faces?

Who else noticed that the Alpha looks like Jason Momoa?

Resident Alien 👽 Season 1 :7.5/10
Resident Alien 👽 Season 2 :7/10
Resident Alien 👽 Season 3 :7/10
Resident Alien 👽 Season 4 :8/10

Chris Sheridan is a director who truly knows his onion, and more importantly, knows when to step away. As much as I wanted the show to continue, stretching it further would likely have made it lose the charm, wit, and freshness that made the show so special. It ended just where it should, funny, heartfelt, and unforgettable.

To Kill a Monkey (2025):5.6/10

I don’t often see Nigerian films or series, but the buzz on social media and Nollywood fans hyping To Kill a Monkey as “the next big thing after jollof rice” convinced me to give it a shot. Here’s my take on how it played out.

✅ What Worked:

Acting
William Benson and Bucci Franklin(Ozzy Boy & Efe) absolutely stole the show. Their performances were raw, authentic, and emotionally gripping, carrying the series with undeniable chemistry.

Cinematography & Sound
Lagos comes alive with stunning visuals gritty streets and tense atmospheres are captured beautifully. The music score perfectly complements the mood of each scene.

Relatable Story
This is the crown jewel of the series. The way it captures everyday Nigerian struggles, financial hardship, family pressures, and crushing societal expectations hits home hard. It’s the standout element that made the show resonate deeply with viewers, reflecting the gritty reality of life a Nigerian living in Nigeria today.

❌ What Didn’t Work.

Cybercrime/AI Concept
The premise of a cybercrime thriller infused with AI sounded intriguing, but it fell flat. Beyond dialogue, there’s little to no action or tangible tech elements to back up the hype. As a tech enthusiast I wanted to see how, but it never happened.

Subplots & Character Arcs
Several subplots start strong but fizzle out, leaving characters like Sparkle and Teacher underdeveloped and underutilized.

Ending
The final episodes feel rushed, cramming too much into too little time. The resolution lacks impact and fails to tie up the story satisfyingly.

To Kill a Monkey is a visually impressive and well-acted Nigerian crime drama with a story many can relate to. However, it falls short in its cybercrime portrayal and has some uneven storytelling. It's a decent watch, but not as groundbreaking as the hype suggests.

RollinTNDA:
My father has a big compound.
As of 24 I was itching to get my own apartment. I finally did and I left the house.

I enjoyed my freedom to the fullest
My privacy my clubbing late night dates and sexcapades. I enjoyed it all.

But at the end my parents are old
And it got me feeling that I should move back to my father's house

It dint make sense that my dad has a huge compound and yet I'm living in an apartment where my rent has been increased to 850k

What do you think?
I want to completely move in the compound and live there and marry and born my children there.

Honestly bro, your plan makes a lot of sense. Don’t let anyone make you feel bad or gaslight you.

You’ve lived on your own, enjoyed your freedom, and experienced that phase of life. That’s something many people wish they had the guts to do. But now, you’re thinking of what’s sustainable and there’s absolutely nothing wrong with that.

If your dad has a big compound and you have the chance to live there, build your home, raise your family, and still save money in this economy why not? That’s wisdom. That’s maturity. It doesn’t mean you’re going backward; it means you’re planning smart.

People will always have something to say, but at the end of the day, they won’t help you pay rent or raise your kids. So go ahead with your decision. Set your boundaries, make the space yours, and build the future you want. No shame in that at all.

M3GAN 2.0 (2025) :6.8/10

M3GAN is back, and this time she’s louder, sassier, and more chaotic! Unlike the first movie’s horror-comedy vibe, M3GAN 2.0 leans into sci-fi action and to be honest it does feel generic in some parts. If you’ve seen Upgrade (2018), you’ll likely notice similar themes: AI going rogue, sleek fight choreography, and that whole "machine vs creator" angle. M3GAN 2.0 borrows heavily from that style, especially in how M3GAN moves and fights.

While switching genres, the film still follows the social commentary path of the first movie, highlighting how society’s growing obsession with artificial intelligence and profit-driven innovation can lead to emotional disconnect and unintended consequences.

M3GAN’s witty lines, cool fight scenes, keeps things fun and fast-paced. Though the plot feels a bit messy and the two-hour length drags in parts, it’s still an entertaining ride nevertheless.

M3GAN (2022) :6.5/10

In a world obsessed with convenience and AI, M3GAN asks: how far is too far?
M3GAN critiques our tech obsession, showing how AI can worsen bad behavior if unchecked and how gadgets often replace real human connection in parenting. With slick visuals, sharp dark humor, and eerie vibes, it’s a fun yet thought-provoking ride. Slightly predictable and more campy than terrifying, M3GAN cleverly blends suspense with relevant social commentary, making it both entertaining and thought-provoking.

oyaskii:
Squid Game S3 (2025)

Greed won and won big!.

This show peaked at Season 2, and I knew Season 3 (which, in hindsight, feels like Part 2 of S2) was going to crescendo into an ending that might not sit well with many people. But I’m not one of them.

To understand and digest that ending, you have to realize, there are no saints in this story only sinners. Not the rich Americans looking for a new bloodsport, not the organizers or enablers of the game, and certainly not the participants whose greed was so insatiable that even when given the option to leave, they kept voting to continue. (A fatal flaw of democracy: when the number of idiots outweighs the sane and rational.) In hindsight, it was a perfect ending, in my books.

Now to the elephant in the room: man, the Americanization of the entire S3,especially the last 15 minutes of the finale, was an eyesore. The actors playing the "Americans" were terrible. They spoke English, yes, but it felt like a foreign language. I know this was done in preparation for the show's crossover into Hollywood, but I’m still not convinced about what the gringos plan to do with this premise.

All in all, this show had already cemented its place in pop culture history long before this season. It's easily one of the GOATs,one of the finest exports from Korean cinema, and, quite frankly, one of the best-looking shows ever. The production value is top-tier. The cinematography? Top shelf. Every scene popped with colours, literally everywhere you looked. That’s just one of my many takeaways.

And yes, this Season 3 is totally watchable, and fitting, in its own twisted way. I liked it.

Special... Special... show. ✨

7/10.

You mirrored my thoughts exactly. They were no saints in Squid Game at all, everyone was guilty in one way or another. But what really got me was how the show reflected real life. It wasn't just about the violence or plot twists, the show literally exposed a lot of uncomfortable truths.

The whole idea of watching people suffer for entertainment? We already do that in real life. Reality shows, Nairaland trolling back in the day, Twitter drags, even people posting their pain online just for likes, it's all part of the same system. Squid Game just made it more obvious, more brutal.

And it hit globally because the struggle was universal, debt, desperation, trying to survive in a rigged system. It wasn’t just a Korean story, it was everyone’s story in some form. That’s why so many people saw themselves in those players.

Even the way the show looked, the colours, the childhood games, the creepy masks were all symbolic. They made something dark look playful on the surface, which is exactly how the world works sometimes. We package struggle in ways people can easily consume without feeling guilty.


So yeah, Squid Game wasn't just hype, it said a lot about us. About what we watch, what we ignore, and how far people will go when they feel like they don’t have a choice.

That's why it stuck. It wasn’t just a show. It was a loud, uncomfortable truth wrapped in bright colours.

Thunderbolt (2025) :4/10

I’m a big Marvel fan, so I was genuinely excited for Thunderbolts. The cast looked solid, the concept had real potential, and I honestly thought we’d get something refreshing. But after watching it? I’m seriously confused how this thing is rated 7.5 on IMDb.

The plot was weak. It felt empty like they just threw a bunch of characters together without giving them a clear purpose. No real buildup, no tension, and halfway through, I found myself wondering, “Wait, what’s this movie even trying to say?”

The writing didn’t help either. Dialogue felt lazy, emotional moments didn’t land, and even reliable characters like Bucky and Yelena felt wasted. They had no real growth, just vibes and recycled lines.

And the tone? All over the place. One second it’s trying to be deep, next thing it’s cracking dry jokes that ruin the mood. It’s like the movie couldn’t decide what it wanted to be and in the end, it ended up being nothing special.

The villain? Wait!! was there a vilian ? Easily forgettable. No real threat, no clear motive just there to fill space. Please don't give me that symbolism bull.shit many reviewers on IMDb were on about.

I really wanted to like it, but let’s call a spade a spade, this one no enter at all. If you completely turn your brain off, maybe you’ll enjoy the action. But if you’re looking for a solid story or anything meaningful, you’ll be disappointed.

Wetin pain me pass is that this was the nonsense studio was hoarding for months and refused to release on digital copy and at the end of the day they couldn't even reach break-even point.

MSGAMBLE9:
Is he older than Samuel L Jackson cos have seen Fury throw a few punches before ...


All fingers crossed sha... Fingers!!!!

Disney ain't playing around, they’re delivering back-to-back hits with the Predator and Alien franchises. Killer of Killers was fire, and I’m hyped for Alien: Earth on August 12, Predator: Badlands this November 7 and now we have Alien Romulus in the pipeline.

Is this who I think it's