₦airaland Forum

TenQ:
Did you not just condemn me for using the word RELATIVELY in science ?



You are indeed baffling?

Did you even check up the meaning of RELATIVE as used in the sentence?
No!

I condemned the way you use it compared to what it means in science, see what you said “Relatively (to us) God is in the Highest Dimension because
In God ALL our dimensions exist!”

Is this how science use relativity?

TenQ:
Please stop this nonsense as you are giving me headaches

What are Evil Spirits? Evil Wind?
Ps 104:4:
"Who makes his angels spirits; his ministers a flaming fire:"

Half knowledge destroys my dear!

You are reading a book you lack his context.

What are “angels”?

You lack knowledge on your beliefs.

TenQ:
The spirit of confusion has entered you again so that in other to win an argument, your judgement and reasoning evaporate.

Relative doesn't exist in Science.

Is time absolute or relative?

So science use “relative” in the way you are using it?

In scientific discourse, the term "relative" is often replaced with more precise terms or concepts.

In physics, for example, the theory of relativity, specifically Einstein's theory of general relativity, describes the relationships between space, time, and gravity. In this context, "relative" refers to the dependence of physical phenomena on the reference frame of an observer or the curvature of spacetime caused by mass and energy.

TenQ:
So, you think that according to Christians and Jews God, Demons and Angels are wind/air!?

I oblige you to Continue in this delusion!

Does demon and angels have the same word as “spirit” lol.
Look up the origin of the seperste words and also, have you ever researched what jews think of demons?

TenQ:
A proof that you aren't reading for comprehension!

I said:

Acts 17:28:
"For in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also of your own poets have said, For we are also his offspring."
Relatively (to us) God is in the Highest Dimension because
In God ALL our dimensions exist!

What does the word RELATIVELY mean in the quote above?

A proof you do not understand what you are saying.

“God is in the Highest Dimension because
In God ALL our dimensions exist!”

You just suggests that God encompasses or contains all dimensions within Himself, he is the highest dimension doesn’t mean he is within the dimensions, he is higher and beyond dimensions.

How you are using relatively to discuss science is baffling lol

TenQ:
And you conveniently didn't see that it also mean SPIRIT!?

Check your attachment

Yes. Spirit means the same definition.
It seems your definition of “spirit” is muddled up.

TenQ:
God doesn't need any dimension!

I wonder if you are reading for comprehension or not.

So why does your god need to be in “higher dimensions” if he can exist without it?

TenQ:
Your train of thought is terribly muddled up here.

God is a Spirit: a spirit is not air!

If objects in lower Dimensions and subsets of higher Dimensions and we are IN God, that makes Him to be the highest dimension relative to us.

The word in hebrew here is rûaḥ, ruah means air, wind, breathe.
Even if you look up the origin of the word “spirit” in English it means the same.

Is the highest dimensions also not in God?
Did your god not create dimensions? Why then is he within his own creation?
Without dimensions will your god still live?

TenQ:
The dimensions came with the creation of the Heavens and the Earth my dear.

Your god existed before he created dimensions, heaven and earth right?
So he doesn’t need dimensions?
What then does he need “higher dimensions” for?

TenQ:
Genesis speak of God as a Spirit!
If my God was a physical being, you'ld have been right: unfortunately, He isn't!
Can a 2D object be made within a 3D space?

If Yes, your argument falls flat


Sorry, you don't understand Genesis 1:
Two phases:
1. In the Beginning of time God created the Heavens and the Earth
2. The EARTH already created with water was without form and void (messed up:chaos) darkness over the deep of water.

Did you see anywhere where water was created?

The dimensions came with the creation of the Heavens and the Earth my dear.

If your god is not an object then why does he need to be contain in dimensions?
Dimensions are for?

Heaven here means skies, if you notice the heaven here is plural, “heavens”.
Earth here means ground.
Spirit here means air.

When the waters were further separated into different parts, a firnament was created to hold and separate water from above from water below, which kind of dimension is that?
What does “firnament” mean here?

TenQ:
Relatively God is in the Highest Dimension because
In God ALL our dimensions exist!

You have contradicted yourself.

You said God encompasses or contains all dimensions. If God indeed includes all dimensions within itself, then it wouldn't necessarily need to be situated in “higher dimensions” because all dimensions already exist within it.
In that case, the notion of "higher dimensions" being God creation seems contradictory, as it implies that God is both contained within and the creator of these dimensions.

TenQ:
I have explained this before!

Acts 17:28:
"For in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also of your own poets have said, For we are also his offspring."

Relatively God is in the Highest Dimension because
In God ALL our dimensions exist!

Is your god an object, if your god created everything, is everything not in him?
That verse has nothing to do with dimensions.


Look up genesis 1:2, with no form and void, check the hebrew world, it means chaos.
There was no dimensions then, dimensions was introduced after light was created.

TenQ:
If God is indeed the Creator of Everything, then there cannot be any other Dimensions higher than His

If he created everything which includes dimensions, he is beyond that, he doesn’t need dimensions, why would a creator lower himself to the frame of his own creation?

A40:
Lebron literally missed a 10 team playin/playoffs with AD, Westbrook, Dwight and Carmelo on the roster.

How many games are played in NBA?
This season was also LeBron James' best points per game average since 2005-06 at age 37 despite playing 56 games because of injuries but “lebron literally missed”

A40:
Rondo, Wade and Allen all had rings you obtuse baboon

Lebron literally missed a 10 team playin/playoffs with AD, Westbrook, Dwight and Carmelo on the roster.

Story. Lebron would have had Scottie Pippen's 9ppg ass traded instead of growing and grooming them and fighting till they breakthrough

Fvck you and fvck your assumptions you smooth brained donkey. You can impale on a buzzsaw and a chainsaw for all I care

You are a dullard that can’t read, you mentioned 9 players and i said “ How many of these players have their own respective rings without lebron” now you have reverted to only 3. You’ve proved my point.
You are empty!

Was lebron not injured during those times?
How many games did he play? How healthy was he then?
AD was he healthy then? What were the numbers of dwight, carmelo and westbrook then?
I thought you are knowledgeable, how come you are not seeing all these context, hatred has blinded you.
If it was jordan your cum mate you would have found excuses for him.

You are shallow and empty.
Why didn’t lebron trade iman shuppert that was scoring less than 9ppg? Or Richard Jefferson?

A40:
When I say you're ret@rded I'm not even insulting you. I'm making an informed observation.

If Jordan did not pass the first round it didn't occur to you smooth brained ape that maybe he was encountering overmatched opponents.
Simple question. If Scottie was so integral to Jordan passing the first round. Why did they still lose to Detroit? They should have won now since Scottie is the secret sauce. What a ghoul!

Michael Jordan won a playoff game literally scoring 50pts with Scottie scoring a meagre 0pts and 2 rebounds and this disgusting ghoul is still asking dyslexic questions

Exactly. He didn't make the playoffs to get swept cos his teams were not good enough same way Jordan's teams were not good enough to beat Bird, DJ, McHale, Walton and Parish. And Pippen would have made zero difference. How complex is that for this sodomite to understand?

Bryant had Shaquille O'neal you spastic w@nker spanker

How many rings did Lebron have before joining D.Wade?

Wipe that catarrh from your keyboard. Imb€cile.

That’s why i called you a dullard. It’s what you are.

That’s dumb, why are you putting the excuse on others but not blaming jordan, spurs did not make it to the playoffs because they were not good enough not that they met “overmatched opponents”.
If you are not good enough, everything and anything will overmatch you, and let’s not forget that JORDAN WAS IN 8th SEED IN THOSE TIMES HE GOT SWEPT, that was why he was meeting the first seed, the team wasn’t good in the season and post season.


Fool, because you have a super team does not mean you will win everytime, what your brain should be asking is why did chicago bulls advance to the second round in pippen FIRST SEASON?
Some people credit bev for making timberwolves get to the playoffs, we should also credit pippen for making jordan and chicago bulls advace to the second round immediately he joined them.

Like i told you, you are empty.
How old was lebron when he joined wade?
You have excuses for jordan not beating “superior teams” at age 23
But your hatred blinded you from knowing lebron got to nba 18, and join wade at 25, you want lebron to beat “superior teams” at 18 and 25.

Your hypocrisy have been shown, and your shallowness exposed, water dey leak for your mouth as per you be imbe.cile , drink am

A40:
If you play with Wade, Bosh, Love, Allen, AD, Kyrie, Westbrook, Dwight, Rondo and don't win rings that's an indictment on you

Maybe when you show me the guys Jordan played with that matches that amount of talent I will assume you have some sense.

Irritant

Did he play with “Wade, Bosh, Love, Allen, AD, Kyrie, Westbrook, Dwight, Rondo” at the same time?
How many of these players have their own respective rings without lebron.

Show me where lebron played with Wade, Bosh, Love, Allen, AD, Kyrie, Westbrook, Dwight, Rondo in his first time with Cleveland then I’ll assume you are not entirely empty or show me the talents lebron had in his first time with cleveland.

Spits

A40:
You're asking what makes Bird's dynasty Celtics a superior team.

Lol. I have been engaging a ret@rd all this time

Pippen did not make the Bulls beat the Cavs you illiterate. If that was the case why didn't they beat the Pistons? Confusing correlation for causation is further proof of your room temperature IQ. Simple minded mofo.

Lebron didn't even make the playoffs his first 2 seasons you uncultured swine. Imagine asking why 23 year old Jordan did not beat the Celtics. What a doofus

Jordan literally won a playoff game scoring 50 points to Scottie's zero if that doesn't tell you you're a mor0n nothing else will

Ignoramus that doesn't know that moving from a 32 year old Wade in 2014 to a 23 year old Kyrie in 2014 and a 26 year old Anthony Davis in 2020 is an extremely smart way of extending your championship window.

Anyway no amount of crying and wailing will undo this sweep. With a top 75 teammate nonetheless

Wail on. You decrepit pile of kak

Dullard, i asked what makes a superior team not what makes “bird dynasty a superior team”
You are so desperate to defend your cum mate you can’t even read properly, just imagining like a lunatic.

Pippen did not make bulls beat the cavs, did jordan stop bulls from getting swept first round in his first 3 season post seasons?

Lebron did not make his playoff in his first 2 season, how old was lebron?
Why are you finding excuses for your cummate and not bron?
How old was bryant when he won his first ring?

And lebron did not win a playoff game without kyrie and kevin love, what does that tell you?
You nonentity.

How many rings does young kyrie and AD have before meeting lebron?
Your permutations is reeked with hypocrisy and it’s showing your true empty colour.

I thought you said even greats get swept, you are confused and full of hatred


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ucAo8M-_epI

“Pippen only dropped 9ppg”, i wonder why didn’t trade for a player that could drop 9ppg so they can beat “superior teams” and not get swept first round.

A40:
Yeah I'm sure staying with Wade and Bosh would have increased his chances to win more rings you autistic pleb, compared to teaming with #1 allstar caliber picks almost a decade younger than he is.

You are very dyslexic

I’m sure if pippen did not go to Chicago, your cum mate will still be getting swept in the first round to “superior teams” you irritating mucus.

“1 allstar caliber picks” guarantees a ring abi, that’s all that is needed ode

You are very delusional and suffering from hatred.

A40:
You're a kakpipe. Getting swept in the first round to a superior team is expected. Jordan was drafted 84 got swept 86 and 87.

All greats have been swept you pathetic pygmy.

Jordan was only swept by Boston. I want you to explain though how Pippen's 9 ppg would have helped the Bulls avoid the sweep to a team as good as Boston

Pippen was a passenger to Jordan. He had 1 Allstar appearance when the Bulls won their first title. Compared to Finals MVP Dwyane Wade in his prime.

If you can't show me where Bron beat any decent team without several top 75ers please fvck of my mentions.

Give Jordan Dwyane Wade, Chris Bosh, AD and Kyrie every 4 years to extend his prime and see if he doesn't win comfortably

You emotional troglodytes should keep crying. We would be here to dance again next year while LeNomad tries to assemble an Avengers squad and fails yet again to try and catch Jordan's legacy

Now piss off you boring and disgusting sodomite

You are an empty barrel. Getting swept in the first round in your first 3 seasons by “superior teams” what makes a superior team? Players?
Without pippen will Chicago be a superior team?
Did pippen make Chicago a superior team that’s why they were able to beat other “superior teams”?

Nobody said people don’t get swept, you useless manikin

Jordan was only meeting boston in the first round In first 3 seasons?
Why didn’t jordan points helped Chicago to win? If that’s what was needed?
Why was chicago winning ONLY after pippen debuted?

Why didn’t jordan find another passenger within those 3 seasons he got swept?
There are alot of passengers that can drop 9ppg, why didn’t he get those to beat the “superior team”?

If you can’t show me where jordan advanced to next stage without pippen please fuvk off my mention, it was you that quoted me, I didn’t you cretin.

“Give Jordan Dwyane Wade, Chris Bosh, AD and Kyrie every 4 years to extend his prime and see if he doesn't win comfortably”
The lunatic keep assuming, as if other people won’t be in their primes also, they came to sell coconuts in NBA, illiterate said they will “win comfortably”


You emotionless dingbats can keep being miserable and wailing, yes keep waiting till next year to watch lebron assemble avengers, do you think you said something cliche lol?

Now crawl off my mention, if you are not empty and emotional i wonder why you quoted me to defend your cum mate.
A ignorant lay man.

A40:
Yeah this shithouse is definitely on the autism spectrum


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLa2NoCwUKY

This cumhouse keeps imagining like a lunatic.

If anyone wants to win a ring all they have to do is “hop to play with a younger player every 4 years” and a ring is automatically guaranteed according to this dullard .

A40:
You want him to form a dynasty his first 3 years in the league.

Truly not all idiots are Bronsexuals but all Bronsexuals are idiots

You shithouse. Lebron is allowed to play with Wade, Bosh, Kyrie, AD, Westbrook, Ray Allen but Jordan cannot have just Scottie Pippen. You're a crackhead and you're losing it fast

getting swept in the first round is an indicator that there was a dynasty to come?
How come pippen was able to form a dynasty in his own first 3 season?
Jordan was dropping points why did he get swept in the first round in first 3 seasons? Did he face boston in those first rounds?

Truly not all dullards are bronasslickers but all bronasslickers are dullards.
Miserable things

You cumhouse, nobody said this “ So let me get this straight Lebron is allowed to play with Wade, Bosh, Kyrie, AD, Westbrook, Ray Allen but Jordan cannot have just Scottie Pippen.”
Your hatred has stopped your reasoning keep imagining and imagining.

A40:
The ignorance of Bronsexual muppets can never take me by surprise

I've learned not to take the opinions of you clowns seriously

The hatred of bronasslickers will only make them more miserable.

I’ve learned not to take empty barrel like yourself seriously.

A40:
You're still asking stupid questions. Like the typical Bronsexual knobjockey you are

Pause and wipe that jizz off your mouth first

Dave Corzine and Orlando Woolridge were Jordan's teammates. If you think Jordan beats Bird Celtics with Pippen's useless 10 points then you need to put down that Colorado

You can see they promptly lost when they faced the Pistons in the next round when Pippen's 10 pts would not cut it

And of course everyone needs help to win you dolt. You Muppets are the ones that swear Lebron can do it all by himself. And cry when we hold you to that standard

Why will Lebron need the same team to win a ring when he can just hop to play with a younger player every 4 years. Imagine Jordan left Pippen then went to play with Kevin Garnett. That's the equivalent of what Lebron did.

Tell us why they lost here despite Pippen's "important contributions" M0ron

You are the thinking like a dullard like the typical bronasslicker.
Stop reasoning from your anus and start using your head.
If points was all that is needed, why didn’t jordan win rings with 63 points?
He was dropping points, Was there a dynasty then?

What a dumb reasoning, so it is that easy to team up with a younger player every 4 years and that guarantees rings?
Why aren’t people doing it?

Also imagine jordan without pippen, would there have been a dynasty?

“Jordan scored playoff record 63 and still lost“. As if lebron wasn’t scoring points. Nincompoop

All these lebron haters are so removed from reality.
If it was scoring points that’s all needed to win why was jordan getting swept in the first round in his first 3 seasons before pippen?
They have all the excuses for jordan.
https://syndication.bleacherreport.com/amp/436214-the-truths-and-myths-to-scottie-pippen.amp.html

A40:
Because he faced the Celtics. Who were the best team in the league.

Pippen was not a star so your argument is not a gotcha moment

Nothing concern me with his numbers before he went to Miami. All I know is that it took him joining a Finals MVP before he could breakthrough. Jordan did not need that amount of help

He faced the same celtics in his first round in his first 3 seasons?
Did Chicago not trade for players within those 3 seasons?
Why didn’t they win until pippen came and they created a dynasty, or was there a dynasty before pippen?

The same way nothing concern me with jordan numbers before pippen came. All i know is that pippen had to debut before jordan stop getting swept in the first round, jordan needed all help he could get.

A40:
Common sense is too complex for Bronsexuals. Why did your Lebron get swept by Jokic and Murray even with AD.

Getting swept by a champion caliber Celtics at 23. No shame in that.

Jordan scored playoff record 63 and still lost. That tells me nobody not even your Lebron could have survived them.

Jordan did not run to Miami when he realized he couldn't win. Unless you're suggesting Jordan plays without teammates. Scottie averaged 8pts per game entering the league. He was not some star

Hatred has blind the reasoning of bronasslickers.
Why did jordan get swept in his first 3 seasons in chicago?
What are the names of his teammates in that 3 seasons before pippen came?

Lebron was averaging 20/30 in cleveland and still lost, using your logic “That tells me nobody not even your jordan could have survived them.”

Lebron did not need the same person to win a ring, he wasn’t getting swept first round.

Why didn’t jordan win with all his points before pippen?

When contemplating the intricate nature of creation and our connection with the extraordinary, it can be enlightening to explore different analogies and narratives that offer fresh perspectives.
One such narrative compares the traditional notion of a creator with the analogy of a Lake and its Streams.
By examining the distinctions between these narratives, we can deepen our understanding of the relationship between a Creator and Creation.

In traditional views, a Creator is often depicted as a conscious being with supreme omniscience and omnipotence. This creator possesses all-encompassing knowledge and unlimited power, deliberately bringing forth separate and distinct creations. The creator’s actions are imbued with intentionality and purpose, and a clear separation exists between the creator and what is created. This narrative emphasizes the idea of an external entity responsible for the act of creation, wielding its omniscience and omnipotence to shape the universe.

The Analogy of a Lake and Streams
Now, let’s consider an alternative analogy:
Imagine a serene and expansive lake nestled in a picturesque landscape. From this Lake, multiple streams gracefully flow outward, each carving its unique path through the terrain.
In this analogy, the Lake represents the source or essence, while the streams symbolize the emanations or expressions of that source.

While it is true that the streams are distinct from the Lake in terms of their individual expressions and functions, they are not separate creations. They are derived from the same source and carry the essence and properties of the lake within them. The streams are interconnected with the Lake, and their existence is intimately tied to it.

Rather than seeing a clear distinction between a Creator and Creation in this analogy, it is more appropriate to perceive a unified system where the Lake and the Streams are inseparable. The Lake represents the ultimate source of divine essence, and the Streams represent the various expressions and manifestations of that Essence.

Unity and Interconnectedness
One key difference between the traditional Creator narrative and the Lake and Streams analogy lies in the concept of unity and interconnectedness.
In the traditional view, there is a distinct separation between the Creator and Creation, highlighting a sense of individuality and autonomy. In contrast, the analogy of a Lake and its Streams emphasizes a deeper connection and interdependence between the source and its emanations.

The Lake serves as the originating point, embodying the Essence and Potentialities that give rise to the streams. It represents the underlying source from which the streams flow, carrying within it the qualities and properties that manifest in the various expressions. The Lake does not create the streams in a deliberate act, but rather serves as the wellspring from which they naturally emerge.

The streams, in turn, represent the diverse expressions and manifestations of the Lake’s essence. While they may appear distinct and separate as they journey along their individual paths, they are intrinsically connected to the Lake. The streams are not created as independent entities by an external force, but rather emerge as an inherent part of the Lake itself.
They carry within them the essence and qualities of the Lake, embodying its potentialities and contributing to the overall interconnected ecosystem.

Blurring the Distinction
In the analogy of a Llake and Streams, the distinction between Creator and Creation becomes more nuanced. Rather than perceiving creation as separate and distinct from the creator, the analogy suggests that creation is an expression of the creator itself, manifested in smaller vessels. The streams, in this context, can be seen as vessels or channels through which the essence of the lake flows and manifests in various forms.
Unlike a traditional understanding of Creation, where the Creator and Creation are seen as separate and distinct entities, the analogy of a Lake and Streams blurs those boundaries. It suggests that Creation is not something external to the Creator but rather an inherent part of its essence.
In contemplating the analogy of a Lake and Streams, we are prompted to embrace a deeper sense of unity and interconnectedness. We realize that we are not separate from the Creator but rather vessels through which its essence flows.

A40:
Causation != Correlation but Bronsexuals cannot know this

Tell me the significance of Pippen's contributions here.

If lebron had gone to miami and didn’t win, where will your own causation = correlation come from?

Tell me why jordan did not win before pippen very small contribution?
Was jordan not dropping 45 points before pippen, why was he still getting swept?

Using your logic, Drop lebron numbers in cleveland before he went to miami.

A40:
Nobody has done so without help. But Lebron took the easy route. Jordan did not run to play with Olajuwon when he couldn't beat Detroit. He faced them 4 times till he beat them. He could have easily ran away like Bron did when Scottie Pippen scored 2 pts in a Game 7. But he stuck with it while your guy ran from the grind to assemble a Superteam. And still found ways to lose with that Superteam btw

Why was jordan getting swept before they got pippen.
I’m sure they had trade of players, why didn’t jordan win with them?

Did jordan beat olajuwon before pippen arrived?

A40:
When I say Bronsexuals don't know ball I am not even being facetious

Why didn’t he win it before pippen?
Why was he getting swept in the first round?