₦airaland Forum

Brazil will not win this world cup. Its between Spain and Germany. Either of them will win it. The other two, France and England are not serious. Netherland will try their best as usual. Nothing for Argentina and Portugal as long as the referee don't favor them

If this tournament can be free and fair, no free penalties to favour messi and ronaldo, i will be impressed

Roland17:
Watching the snake 🐍 lose his opening game after running his mouth in the pregame match conference is all my soul needs!

Did you see how saibari outpaced your defender to score? Replays showed him running like second runner up in a 100m dash

Roland17:
Switzerland had it coming. They were wasteful in front of goal and got punished.

So you also support AC Milan

Ibime:
Especially when na nonsense teams full everywhere.

At least man fit make effort in a 24 team world cup because almost every time will be a decent tie

nonsense teams that qualified based on merit. Haba, talk like a balanced individual. I used to think you were a sound pundit

gebest:
I don't like the blue light, I must see what I want to doke, hellooo

dogggy or mission?

IkePeters:
Any lady who walks in there already knows she's getting hammered. It never lacked alcohol, condoms and x rated videos and magazines. Sex tapes often emanate from these settings.

The lightening sets the mood for the slaughter.

Many of today's wives went through this stage in life.

but the light is not bright. How will u see the V hole

edungene7:
Any girl way enter here her heart go dey beat fast if she dey innocent because she go know say nah God go help her escape this temptation, the bad ones go take hand off pant immediately.

I fit carry gal cum ya house?

muyico:
Richest country in the world
Every years! more than millions Muslims, visit mecca, naturally resources is still there, largest producing crude oils, blessed country! Follow by Iran, they re forefathers paid the price

laya, US is the largest oil producer

Thundafireseun:
Igede girls and Idoma girls are very very beautiful…

Tiv girls too are not left out

you don sample any of them?

DonroxyII:
For the first clip, the woman head game and slamming na Lit .. She aced it ...

The Man is wack in Nackamuras Sha thus the Woman Won Him Hands-Down in the Game ..

Reporting Live from Base !

you go like fork her?

Akinpresident:
You're totally correct.
It still doesn't change the fact that you've been knacking guys not your husband.

this one is antimarrriage. Don't waste your time

highchief1:
married women in Asaba cheat more.Especially the ones wey their husband no Dey Nigeria.One give me 20m few months ago.her husband Dey South Africa.

she sabi suck?

airmark:
Kimbeast and Arteta are impressed.

look at how he is sweating more than a DM

airmark:
Your jakujaku Jackson fired 27 shots consecutively this season, none crossed the goal line. Jackson is the most wasteful striker in the history of Chelsea.

followed by chamakh and sanogo of arsenal

VicThory:
G/a? Those midfielders he mentioned control and dictate tempos. Enzo is just a long pass merchant

Enzo and mikel, i don't know whose ball is longer

popizaino:
Thank God i am not the only one who disliked him. Nonsense striker.

Anelka that could score and assist with good aerial ability is a nonsense striker. Nawa oh

Ibime:
Anelka is a golden boot winner with Chelsea. Very underappreciated. Na that penalty miss cause all these

His problem was that he never stayed long in one club

Sportsweb:
Atalanta will reap any team that comes for the serie A golden boot winner.

Make we sign Lookman na for that LW position

moses simon won't be a bad idea

Emaprince:
Abeg remove that fool called anelka..him and sancho dey the same boat.

Go and watch anelka in arsenal, mancity, madrid, fenerbachie and chelsea when there was black and white television set. He scored crucial goals for club and country

DeeScan:
like hell you are ..


Let wirtz come first and watch how we go farm the league.. we're going four - five seasons back to back ..

Is Wirtz better than musiala?

Starz825:
Cos your daddy believe say...

Once person na man.....he don automatically mean say money must fall from heaven for am...

Everybody with their principles

Me don lower my expectations on humans generally and on women particularly...

you go marry?

Mariangeles:
Her daddy is a very wicked man.

send me 4k

Klass99:
I think you have a good point but Pansophist also made some valid points, your response and reaction to him wasn't necessary.

Let's try and debate the issue sensibly and in a civil manner.

1. The difference between parents and children is that, parents made a choice to have children and that choice comes with responsibilities and obligations some of which you listed above. Children on the other hand didn't make a choice to come into this world, to have parents or to have the sort of situation OP is in thrust upon them. As children we try to make the best of it, by doing good, doing right and doing well by our parents.

2. It is a natural course of life that children will grow up one day and leave home. This is a normal and old practice, even the bible talks about a man leaving his parents to cleave to his wife. We leave the nest to build our lives and live out our dreams or purpose, most times that means physically parting from parents and leaving them behind.

3. Parents and children were never meant to be together until death do them part. That is an exclusive reserve of married couples. The OP"s parents are the ones who should be together till death does them part. I understand the sentiment you expressed about parents being old, doing things for us and wanting us around in old age, but I think what most of them truly need is companionship.

4. It can be companionship from one another as a couple, from their friends, church community, or a group of people with same interests, etc. It must not necessarily be from the physical presence of their children. This is one of the reasons why I believe companionship is more important in marriage than children. I also don't like this idea we have of birthing kids so they can look after us in old age. It creates scenarios like the one OP is in now and emotional blackmail as well.

5. I cannot relate to the desire or need, to bring non-existent people into existence, just so they can take care of us in old age. It is a lot work if you ask me, because the work you will do for those children before you reach old age, will be more than the work they'll do for you in return. And if they are children who refuse to catch sense, premium heartache and pain awaits you in old age.

6. So, yes, while parents fed us and took care of us, it was their responsibility and duty to do so, as a matter of the choice they made to bring us into this world. While we also have a duty to do right by them as godly and sensible children, we can do that without necessarily living with them.

My own mother told me once that while they do not see me often they feel my impact from miles away through the financial support I provide. Pansophist is not wrong when he says they should adopt children, in my case, we have a young girl of University age who lives with my parents.

She's in her 3rd year now, she's not a blood relative, I don't know how or where my mum found her but they've put her through primary and secondary school, now she's almost through with University.

I am more quick to send that girl pocket money for her personal use, than I am, to send to some of my own blood relatives. Blood is not thicker than water for me when it comes to that girl, the value she has provided and continues to provide exceeds the value some blood relatives have provided.

madam, when are you getting married

pansophist:
Your parents should adopt kids, thats the natural cure to this dilemma.

Children needs guidance, provisions and protection, and your parents needs their presence, and to see life through the eyes of children once again.

Also, the power dynamic between you and your parents have changed, unlike when you were a child. Right now, your parents have authority over you but without responsibilities, which is unfair to you.

For example, if they want to bath with hot water, prefer their eba extra soft, and maybe you have to clean their apartment, these are responsibilities on you, but you cant tell them what to do, or even scold them. You have no authority.

With children, your parents will have authorities and responsibilities, which is a balance. E.g, they kids do domestic work, and your parents wont feel lonely. But the trade off is that your parents have responsibilities towards the children.

I see that you have a good family that is united, and you care for your parents, this is very good, but consider what I said. Its an old practice that is solved by adopting kids, or men going into polygamy to birth more children.

are you still redpill?

Blitzking:
Heard the woman dey give style wey no good na why those women dey protest

which style you like?

highchief1:
anambra women can fork anybody they like na.all the anambra married women in Asaba Dey fork outside.All with no exception.I don fork plenty

dem dey give u head?

Brandiebird:
As long as you take into consideration that her prefrontal cortex hasn't fully developed which means she'll change dramatically when she hits 25 and above. What that means is you won't enjoy the same privileges you'r enjoying now. She could leave you in 7 years time because she'll figure herself out and may not enjoy the life you created for her. I'm against such union because the power dynamic is unhealthy.

but people are forking 18 years old in the north. What are u saying

MrJavaS:
You have sense, that prefrontal cortex talk is true. The age gap is too much, he should go after ladies in their mid 20s

but people are forking 18 years old. What are u saying

egojeny1:
Leave that girl to fully develop biko. Look for a girl of btw 24 and 28 years and marry

Shalom

but you hypocrites will say 28 is old and infertile and 24 is risky