₦airaland Forum

jedisco: Galaxy pocket is an android phone while Nokia 500 is symbian. Although 500 is more expensive, they are both low-end smart phones.

The fact is that android is a resource hungry OS and the experience you get with low speced android phones (especially in the area of UI smoothness and battery life) is not too good when compared to symbian with similar specs which is more resource efficient.

Also being a low end phone, it basically won't do some advanced stuff irrespective of the OS. So if you go with the android hype and buy a low speced one, you would be very disappointed just like most android users who come here to complain.

That said, the 500 is better speced in almost all areas I consider important e.g screen size resolution and pixel density, battery life, processor speed, camera, and being a Nokia phone durability and strength should not be a problem.

You can get a basic comparison here (although you should be careful how you interpret these comparisons as it should be in accordance with your needs and understanding what those specs mean) http://geekaphone.com/compare/Samsung-Galaxy-Pocket-vs-Nokia-500

jedisco: The only phone that fits your description is Nokia 500 as its the only recent symbian phone running symbian belle and I think it was released September last year

jedisco: The only phone that fits your description is Nokia 500 as its the only recent symbian phone running symbian belle and I think it was released September last year

jedisco: The only phone that fits your description is Nokia 500 as its the only recent symbian phone running symbian belle and I think it was released September last year

mekulonaire: c5- 20k ,c5-03 25k ,e5-25k

Holumighty: Bro, gone are the days of symbian, try android like Samsung Galaxy pocket for 18,600.

aze: Try Tokunboh

mhozzis: nokia c5-22k


nokia c5-03 (touch screen)-27k