NLelectionWatch's Posts
Nairaland Forum › NLelectionWatch's Profile › NLelectionWatch's Posts
1 (of 1 pages)
holymayor5:51 posts. It's more of an established fact that most of this votes in favour of one contestant are by monikers which do not meet the voting criteria in totality. Cc: NLJega, Dygeasy |
Scent01:Alright,sir. In the spirit of democracy, you're entitled to your opinion. While you'd be soliciting for votes, I'd be fishing out the void ones regardless of the contestants - everyone playing their parts to make this truly a competition and not a pre- determined one. Good luck to you all. |
It's another day, people. Look alive. FISH OUT VOID VOTES. |
STFUareyouG0d:We ALL had a long day. While you, the agents, are high on emotions trying to protect your candidates' interests, independent observers like myself have to be slightly detached to stay rational as the whistleblowers. Go to bed, dude. You need to get rejuvenated 'cause you'd need all the energy to hurl curses at me all day tomorrow. Nothing new - I understand you have to be an agent. Good night too. ![]() |
STFUareyouG0d:Young man, stop quoting me. From the next round, a complete breakdown of voided votes would be given per contestant by this moniker. You have been begging the moderators to ban this moniker all day to cover your deeds yet it's still here. If by the next round, this irregular happenings aren't curtailed, Seun would have to wade it. Several known alternates voted today . That too wouldn't be tolerated in sequel rounds. |
Johneyhaz:Young man, stop quoting me. From the next round, a complete breakdown of voided votes would be given per contestant by this moniker. You have been begging the moderators to ban this moniker all day to cover your deeds yet it's still here. I'd let today go. If by the next round, this irregular happenings aren't curtailed, Seun would have to wade it. You are even a known alternate that voted with about three different monikers . That too wouldn't be tolerated in sequel rounds. |
NLjega: NLjega: NLjega:Not bad for the first day of voting. Though the voting process was relatively peaceful, it was fraught with irregularities by monikers with less than 300 comments, hence, too many void votes. ALL hands should be on deck to highlight these defaulting monikers during sequel rounds. The judges/organizers should do well to highlight the total votes of each contestant, the voided votes and net votes. Example: CONTESTANT : DOMINIQUE GROSS VOTES : 500 VOID VOTES : 55 NET VOTES: 445 This way, the viewing public would get a complete breakdown. Before you state how hectic it is, that's what observers do. LOOKING FORWARD TO THE NEXT ROUND. -Independent Observers. |
Dygeasy:Exactly what this moniker has been highlighting all day. That's the essence of independent observers. The guilty ones are the ones complaining about what I highlighted. Some monikers had as low as 3 posts and they still voted. Seun, your moderators need to be on standby to ensure a free and fair election. Counted void votes would amount to rigging and it wouldn't be tolerated. Concurrently, votes are being counted by independent observers. The disparities (taking into account the voided votes) should be as minimal as possible. Looking forward to a fair outcome. -Independent Observers |
9icegal:Here's an example, Dygeasy : 3 posts. Aden777:15 posts. bitchcrafts:241 posts June 02, 2016 Aruthy:27 posts Ayomide93:69 posts silas1475:22 posts. raquelraquel:82 posts MUVA:Double vote zeberebe:70 posts. ibehKachukwu:73 posts June, 2016 Invalid votes. Cc: NLJega |
Microflux: Every moniker whose vote I have highlighted as void doesn't have up to 300 POSTS. Go through my posts, if you can find even ONE INSTANCE in which I have been wrong, I'd tender an apology then deactivate this moniker. Those who have been complaining have been guilty of endorsing these voided votes as valid votes. Some monikers even have as low as 8 posts. Cc : Seun, Dominique |
Dygeasy:This account independently observes and points out void votes. Independent observers are never affiliated to electoral commissions. They act as watchmen to highlight the shortcomings of THE ELECTORAL COMMISSION, THE CANDIDATES AND THE VOTERS. An observer affiliated to an electoral commission is no longer INDEPENDENT. None of the complains thus far have suggested that the void votes that have been highlighted aren't void. NOT EVEN ONE. As long as the facts are presented, the observations of independent observers are tenable. If you try to gag an independent observer, then something is wrong. Vote and umpire responsibly. Cross check the posts by this moniker for proof of the validity. Cc: Seun, Dominique |
Cammo:262 posts BabaOneChance:152 posts INVALID VOTES! cc: NLJega, Tosyne2much |
As a side note, it has to be pointed out that most of the monikers voting a single candidate do not meet the voting requirements of either being created before April 1st or having less than 300 posts or even a combination of both. This correlation has been to a large percentage true in the cases of void votes that have been pointed out. NLJega, do take note. |
OGS1: i vote Ivyy cc: NLJega[b] Invalid vote. Number of posts: 32 Norstrademus:Invalid vote! 117 posts. emmyclassic:Invalid vote. 100 posts. hringbraut:Invalid vote. 100 posts. wiggle:Invalid vote. 98 posts. Cc: nljega, Dygeasy, Tosyne2much [/b] |
agarawu23:Alright, sir. You'd agree it's a tedious job to take on. As soon as I see void votes, I'd point them out. Thanks for your contribution. Vote Responsibly. |
Johneyhaz:Young man, this account is created to fish out void votes. If your contestant's votes happen to be the bulk of the void votes then it tells a lot. All votes I have quoted were made by monikers who flouted the election rules by Dygeasy. I understand the need to protect your candidate's interests, but rules are made to be obeyed. I am just doing my job here, a voluntary job just like you volunteered to be an agent. Do not be an impediment in the course to arrive at a free and fair conclusion. There's a reason why independent observers are needed in any election. This goes to everyone else. Curtail your raging emotions . Vote RESPONSIBLY. Have a nice day. Cc: Dominique, Dygeasy, NLJega |
Ebenezer1998:Invalid vote. Number of posts: 88 Cc: NLJega, Dygeasy, Wristbangle, Tosyne2much |
Aucun:Invalid vote. Number of posts: 40 (Too low). Cc: NLJega, Dygeasy, Wristbangle, Tosyne2much |
Jalonking:Invalid vote! Number of posts: 135 (Minimum requirement is 300). Cease trying to rig, people. Let's keep this free and fair. Take note. Cc: NLJega, Dygeasy, Wristbangle, Tosyne2much |
3strikes:Invalid vote. Account created on : April 08, 2016 Number of posts: 131 Cc: NLJega, Dygeasy, Wristbangle, Tosyne2much |
Jalonking:Invalid vote! Number of posts: 135 (Minimum requirement is 300). Cease trying to rig, people. Let's keep this free and fair. Take note. Cc: NLJega, Dygeasy, Wristbangle, Tosyne2much |
3strikes:Invalid vote. Account created on : April 08, 2016 Number of posts: 131 Cc: NLJega, Dygeasy, Wristbangle, Tosyne2much |
pode:Invalid vote. Account created on : 23 April, 2016. Number of posts: 10 Cc: NLJega, Dygeasy, Wristbangle, Tosyne2much |
1 (of 1 pages)


