₦airaland Forum

happney65:
Always blaming the other person..When you know they cant solve anything even with you dumbheads in majority then why stop it?The orange one is so foolish like most of you and he did this for nothing but politics..He is going down and he knows obama is far far better ahead of him in all ramifications..

"....Obama is far far better...." You mean the most Anti-constitutional President Ever!? Because now someone with guts is following the Law and the Constitution, that enrages you? Trump reverses Obama's Disastrous policy and the stupid dimwit liberals like you are having a hard time with it *smh*

raumdeuter:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DI6NSUDV4AAWRaJ.jpg

Liberals on liberals

When will they start to take responsibilities and quit blaming, Hillary has blamed Trump, blamed Comey, blamed the DNC and Now Hillary is blaming Sanders for her loss

Hillary Clinton casts Bernie Sanders as an unrealistic over-promiser in her new book, according to excerpts posted by a group of Clinton supporters.

She said that his attacks against her during the primary caused "lasting damage" and paved the way for "(Donald) Trump's 'Crooked Hillary' campaign."
Clinton, in a book that will be released September 12 entitled "What Happened," said Sanders "had to resort to innuendo and impugning my character" because the two Democrats "agreed on so much."

http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/05/politics/hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-what-happened/index.html

The only thing that they do best is blame others and never take responsibilities. Not so surprised. I know most honest democrats are wishing she would just fade into darkness...never to be seen or heard of.

stanech:
Well then let congress work on that

That was a smart move. Let them get to work and seek out a long term solution.

DACA RESCINDED
OBAMA LIED DESPITE KNOWING DACA WAS ILLEGAL...WATCH

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gw4BIWiWyQg&t=9s

SAMBHOSS:
u no go really like ICAT

maybe u will.....it's only suspenseful small....and ended in tragedy....

Ok noted. Thrillers are one of my favourites

More Arrows

Picture of the Day

LordReed:
@stanech obixcel

What have you to say about this:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-obama-wiretap-claim-no-evidence-tweets-department-of-justice-a7926561.html

Basically, the surreal debate has gone like this:

MEDIA: Trump lied about Obama wiretapping Trump Tower.

REALITY: How do you know that?

MEDIA: Well, for starters, Obama can’t leave the White House without us knowing.

REALITY: I don’t think Trump literally meant that Barry pulled a Tom Cruise and used wire-fu to place literal wiretaps.

MEDIA: Trump’s own Justice Department Justice just said there were no wiretaps.

REALITY: Again, I don’t think Trump meant literal wiretaps. He obviously meant surveillance.

MEDIA: He said “wiretaps.” He’s a liar.

REALITY: Are you aware that the modern definition of “wiretaps” no longer means “the traditional term for interception of telephone conversations,” but rather surveillance of cell phones and almost all electronic means of conversation?

MEDIA: Trump said wiretap! He said WIRETAP!!! HE SAID WIRETAP!!!!!!!!!!

REALITY: Are you also aware that the New York Times used the exact word “wiretap” in a headline to describe the Obama administration’s surveillance of Team Trump?

MEDIA: Shut up, Nazi.
Over the weekend, the media’s avoidance of this inconvenient truth was resurrected when the Justice Department released a report stating that there is no evidence of any literal wiretaps placed by the Obama administration in Trump Tower.

So, this seems like the perfect time to remind everyone of the 12 times the very same media that is now lying about this, did in fact tell us that the Obama administration did in fact (using the modern definition) wiretap Team Trump.

In chronological order [emphasis mine throughout]…

1. The (now defunct) Heat Street – November 7, 2016

EXCLUSIVE: FBI ‘Granted FISA Warrant’ Covering Trump Camp’s Ties To Russia

Two separate sources with links to the counter-intelligence community have confirmed to Heat Street that the FBI sought, and was granted, a FISA court warrant in October, giving counter-intelligence permission to examine the activities of ‘U.S. persons’ in Donald Trump’s campaign with ties to Russia.

If you are wondering who Heat Street is and why you should care, just know that the New York Times re-published this information in March — you know, the information that the Obama administration spied on Team Trump.

2. The Guardian – January 11, 2017

The Guardian has learned that the FBI applied for a warrant from the foreign intelligence surveillance (Fisa) court over the summer in order to monitor four members of the Trump team suspected of irregular contacts with Russian officials. The Fisa court turned down the application asking FBI counter-intelligence investigators to narrow its focus. According to one report, the FBI was finally granted a warrant in October, but that has not been confirmed, and it is not clear whether any warrant led to a full investigation.

3. The New York Times – January 12, 2017

In its final days, the Obama administration has expanded the power of the National Security Agency to share globally intercepted personal communications with the government’s 16 other intelligence agencies before applying privacy protections.

The new rules significantly relax longstanding limits on what the N.S.A. may do with the information gathered by its most powerful surveillance operations, which are largely unregulated by American wiretapping laws. These include collecting satellite transmissions, phone calls and emails that cross network switches abroad, and messages between people abroad that cross domestic network switches.

Note the timing of “in the final days of the Obama administration.”

As I wrote at the Daily Wire back in March (where I first published this list): “This is the most important piece of the puzzle, because it explains how the media was getting all of its scoops via leaks via surveillance.”

4. The BBC – January 17, 2017

Lawyers from the National Security Division in the [Obama] Department of Justice then drew up an application. They took it to the secret US court that deals with intelligence, the Fisa court, named after the Foreign intelligence Surveillance Act. They wanted permission to intercept the electronic records from two Russian banks.

Their first application, in June, was rejected outright by the judge. They returned with a more narrowly drawn order in July and were rejected again. Finally, before a new judge, the order was granted, on 15 October, three weeks before election day.

Neither Mr Trump nor his associates are named in the Fisa order, which would only cover foreign citizens or foreign entities – in this case the Russian banks. But ultimately, the investigation is looking for transfers of money from Russia to the United States, each one, if proved, a felony offence.

A lawyer – outside the Department of Justice but familiar with the case – told me that three of Mr. Trump’s associates were the subject of the inquiry. “But it’s clear this is about Trump,” he said.

5. McClatchy – January 18, 2017

The agencies involved in the inquiry are the FBI, the CIA, the National Security Agency, the [Obama] Justice Department, the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network and representatives of the director of national intelligence, the sources said. …

A key mission of the six-agency group has been to examine who financed the email hacks of the Democratic National Committee and Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta. The London-based transparency group WikiLeaks released the emails last summer and in October.

The working group is scrutinizing the activities of a few Americans who were affiliated with Trump’s campaign or his business empire and of multiple individuals from Russia and other former Soviet nations.

The BBC reported that the FBI had obtained a warrant on Oct. 15 from the highly secretive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court allowing investigators access to bank records and other documents about potential payments and money transfers related to Russia. One of McClatchy’s sources confirmed the report.

6. The New York Times – Jan 19, 2017

Print headline: “Wiretapped Data Used In Inquiry of Trump Aides” …

The F.B.I. is leading the investigations, aided by the National Security Agency, the C.I.A. and the Treasury Department’s financial crimes unit. The investigators have accelerated their efforts in recent weeks but have found no conclusive evidence of wrongdoing, the officials said. One official said intelligence reports based on some of the wiretapped communications had been provided to the White House.

Yes, that’s right, the Times used WIRETAP in its headline and in its story.

7. The Washington Post – February 9, 2017

National security adviser Michael Flynn privately discussed U.S. sanctions against Russia with that country’s ambassador to the United States during the month before President Trump took office, contrary to public assertions by Trump officials, current and former U.S. officials said.

Flynn’s communications with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak were interpreted by some senior U.S. officials as an inappropriate and potentially illegal signal to the Kremlin that it could expect a reprieve from sanctions that were being imposed by the Obama administration in late December to punish Russia for its alleged interference in the 2016 election.

Flynn’s communications with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak were interpreted [.]

8. CNN – February 14, 2017

The New York Times quickly matched the story and said there was a transcript of the discussions.

This is CNN celebrating Flynn being taken down by a transcript of a phone call that the New York Times reported on in a story that used the word “wiretap” under a headline that declared it a “wiretap.”

9. NBC News – February 10, 2017

A U.S. intelligence official briefed on the matter confirmed to NBC News that National Security Advisor Mike Flynn discussed sanctions with the Russian ambassador before Flynn took office[.]

The official said he was told there was no quid pro quo and that there has been no finding inside the government that Flynn did anything illegal. …

Flynn spoke to Kislyak on Dec. 29, the same day the sanctions were announced.

Oh, yes, NBC News was well aware of the fact that the Obama administration was listening in on Flynn’s calls. And as you will read below, so was the AP, ABC and CBS.

10. The Associated Press – February 13, 2017

Two people familiar with the situation say the Justice Department warned the Trump administration about Michael Flynn’s contacts with Russia.

One of the people says the Justice Department told the administration there was a discrepancy between what the White House was saying publicly about Flynn’s contacts and the facts of what occurred.

11. ABC News – February 13, 2017

Embattled National Security Adviser Michael Flynn called Vice President Mike Pence Friday to apologize for misleading him about a conversation with the Russian ambassador to the United States, according to a senior White House official.

12. CBS News – February 10, 2017

Investigators believe that President Trump’s national security adviser, Michael Flynn, privately discussed U.S. sanctions against Russia in a phone call with a Russian official, law enforcement sources told CBS News on Friday.

Multiple sources told CBS News’ Jeff Pegues and Pat Milton that the conversation occurred before Mr. Trump took office and, if true, could be a violation of protocol and could be viewed as a violation of the law.

Before Trump blew up the truth about Barry’s spying and turned it into a liability, as you can see above, everyone in the media was not only openly admitting that the Obama administration spied on Team Trump, they were bragging about how awesome it was.

In a nutshell, here is what happened…

1) Believing Hillary would win, the Obama administration brazenly spied on Team Trump. You see, if Hillary won, they would never get caught. The goal was to personally (and falsely) destroy Trump as a Russian spy after he lost. Why? To destroy his powerful coalition. Duh.

2) The media knew the Obama administration had “wiretapped” Trump because they were the ones benefiting from selective leaks that could only come from monitored phone calls.

3) When Trump unexpectedly won the election, the media and the Obama administration simply launched the phony Russian narrative anyway.

4) Without thinking it through, the media openly reported on how their super-awesome Barry had busted Trump as a Manchurian candidate, cuz super-awesome Barry did some super-awesome spying cuz he’s super-awesome. But, this blew up in everyone’s face when…

5) Trump accurately accused Obama of (the modern definition of) wiretapping, and blew the lid wide open on Barry’s horrific and un-American behavior.

6) So now, the media lies about and covers up Barry’s spying by hiding behind the hyper-literal and outdated definition of “wiretap,” even though on 12 different occasions the MSM proudly reported on Barry’s wiretapping — even though the New York Times actually (and accurately) called it wiretapping.

Good thing the Internet … and the truth … are forever.

Queued
The LayOver
It Comes At Night
First Kill

President Trump wins big on DACA, Scraps program, refers it to the Legislature for a permanent fix.
This is a smart move by Trump, doing what Obama should have done in the first place -working with Congress. He could have ended it with a stroke of a pen but chose the honourable path. Good of him.

stanech:
Trust me. You will be so dissapointed with mueller's outcome it will hit you like the elections all over again.. Dont get ur hopes up

oh! They are still hoping on Mueller? The Russian hoax is dead and they ain't doing no sh*t. Let them keep waiting.

stanech:
Here you go again blaming hillary campaign staff. Did she punish or caution the staff?. She did not even rebuke the staff she just ran with it until the she lost the primaries..


But here is my qusetion. If Trump was racist why did they give him an award for his services to the black community

Each time they come up with Birtherism and those facts are thrown to them they always come up with same very excuse. Their tongues had been stuck right up Hillary's ass . Remember, they were "with her"

stanech:
more

More? You mean you wanna kill these snowflakes those pictures are like arrows their stupid asses.

THE HITMAN'S BODY GUARD...8/10

Akathriel:

It's not even funny....nice try though

President Donald Trump Serves Meals to Hurricane Victims at Houston Relief Center
President Donald Trump spent time meeting with Hurricane Harvey victims at the Houston NRG hurricane relief center on Saturday before serving meals from the Red Cross. Inside of the NRG relief center, President Trump and first lady Melania Trump met with families. He was seen speaking with and listening to families and taking photos with the children.

“Tomorrow, national prayer day, tomorrow,” the President projected to a pool of television cameras at one point.

“A lot of love,” the President told reporters of his time at the relief center. Asked about the families that the president met with, he replied, “They were just happy, saw a lot of happiness.”

“As tough as this was, it’s been a wonderful thing. I think even for the country to watch and for the world to watch,” Trump told the cameras. He then said he was going to leave the cameras to do “a little help over here.”

The president then moved over to an area where, alongside the first lady, he put on gloves and began serving meals that were labelled Red Cross. He was received warmly with handshakes from those in the line to accept meals. Some took selfies with the president. One man raised a concern with him about what he said was some were having trouble getting something from FEMA. Trump immediately asked him to bring these individuals up to him.

armadeo:
Obixcel is BACK...


Now that's what am talking about. Nice one dude.

once I get back after this break am gonna bend my data mast.

The Fed's May even come for me. Lol.

Lol....you may have to sharpen your sickle.

SAMBHOSS:
despicable me 3 baby!!!!

yep, spotted

ToyinDipo:
I understand
Thanks a lot

Welcome

ToyinDipo:
Do you have a link for spider man homecoming

Try this: hubfiles. pw/ 9383bb285e92e0ef (SIZE: I GB 720P HDTC)
hubfiles. pw/ 70336a9eb9e9dcac (SIZE: 354mb 480p hdtc)

Just add ''https://'' to either one of your choice and join the other spaced link characters together. Bear with me if it's a bit disorganised cos I'm trying to avoid getting caught up with spam bot

Ebubemg:
i is interesting?

I found the trailer both interesting and captivating, downloaded it into my system but I haven't watched it yet.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6ihJIjVGLo

Now we learn that James Comey Drafted Hillary Clinton's Exoneration Before FBI Interviewed Her and the other 17 Key Witnesses
hmm...interesting My Take is that Comey may need to go public and do some explanations on this revelation.

stanech:
I am thinking soon they will be renaming washington DC and some states if these liberals have their way.. Liberals are acting as if the US is the most racist country in the world.. Fact is majority of US citizens do not care about the color of your skin,,,.. Not saying there are no racists though but they are in the minority, And Trump supporters are not racists...

And this is why President Trump will keep winning. People are tired of Identity Politics, and yet this is what the liberals and the Democrats use as a weapon to divide and conquer. It ain't working anymore.

Abbeybailey:
Tyler Perry, who never called himself a Billionaire donated $1 million and many athletes and many Americans did without saying a word but an ego tripping maniac pledged. He will pay up because Americans and the Fourth Estate will hold his feet to the fire. Are you happy about your Nazi officer in Georgia telling a white woman they only kill black people. I see none of you Nazi loving people on nairaland is answering the question thrown to you guys by LordReed.

When It comes to State-wide Crisis of this magnitude, there's nothing wrong if one pledges publicly a particular sum of money to be used as AID. Tyler Perry is worth about 600 million dollars, and so he can donate likewise, but it is not a competition especially when lives are at stake. Trump is not bragging about it. And you even said he was shamed into doing it, I mean, According to you, Every thing about Trump, it's either
1) He was forced to do it
2) He was shamed into doing it
3) He can never do it well
4) It's never enough
From your postulations in general, I think you seem to have problems with Rich People.

stanech:
The truth is normal people not those crazy liberals like ABbey/Lucas can see through the Hippocratic behavior of the left. That is why they are loosing elections and cannot even raise funds for their party.

Like I asked few days ago where does this end? Because after removing these statues they will come with more demands they are never satisfied..

You have said it all, nothing would ever satisfy these snowflakes.

Abbeybailey:
It is a pledge from trump and hopefully it won't be a lie because pledging is different from actually donating. Americans with less wealth are giving more than that . Actually, he was shamed to doing that. What's the big deal here. Why don't you google Hurricane Harvey donors and see how generous Americans are. Trying to make it looks like trump is doing something extra ordinary.

Lucas you never cease to amaze me. How would it be a lie? and what would he gain from that?
- Americans with less wealth.....bla bla bla: Come on bro, why can't you use common sense? Let's say 150 Americans with ''less wealth'' donate 20,000 bucks each, that would be 3,000,000, surpassing the 1,000,000, So what's new there? And what's the big deal? Why do you allow your hatred for Trump becloud your sense of reasoning? President Trump isn't competing with anyone as to who donates the most, but if you want to see it as a competition, how much did Obama donate? Don't tell me it has to be in secret. You are really daft in your thinking, and nothing is enough for dimwits like you.

President Trump already pledged 1 million dollars to Hurricane Harvey victims. Nice and benevolent of him and all those who also donated and are stil donating. Moreover, they should ensure that these funds filter through and are used for the exact purposes for which they are meant.

The queen b*tch Hillary has finally decided to go to Wisconsin?!! Yes! Wisconsin, the State she ignored that contributed to costing her the 2016 Presidential Election. Funny but this time, it's about lucnching her new Book (WHAT HAPPENED) to whoever that wants to be fleeced again - wow! Wisconsin of all places? Wonder shall never End!

Not forgetting... I enjoyed the Roast of Hillary by Tucker Carlson and Mark Steyn

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYkk--NpNXE

THE LOST CITY OF Z
https://yadi.sk/i/NAca5LF13MVRLW

REMEMORY

UNLOCKED 2017
LINK: https://yadi.sk/i/NpmiOv7I3MUoiY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CCqISHuTgHE