₦airaland Forum

fergie001:
What happened to not entering appearances?

fergie001:
So, they are now doing it openly? The mafioso

😂

fergie001:
Political parties are bound by their constitution. Also, they have internal resolutions mechanisms to settle disputes which must firstly be explored on all matters as long as it doesn't infringe on the Electoral Act ipso facto.

Now, in general term, Our courts have always maintained that internal governance of a political party is not justiciable. Once it has to do with leadership issues within a political party, the Court has no business with it. If your internal mechanisms cannot solve it for you, the Courts also will not except via a narrow line.

A political party is a voluntary organization and it is supreme over it own affairs. A political party is entitled in law to decide for itself what rules it wants to bind its members, and a court cannot tell a party how that party is to be organized or administered. if a member of a party does not like any decision of the party it is open to such a member to resign. (Balarabe Musa v Peoples Redemption Party)
Supreme Court Judgement in 1981

To answer these questions directly, someone comes in and takes your position.
First question - Was it done with the consent of NWC or NEC?
Second question - Was it done in a democratic manner where majority of members of NEC or NWC were in support?
Third question - Were your fundamental rights infringed upon?
Fourth question - Was the 1999 Constitution or Electoral Act violated?

If 1 & 2 is Yes and 3 & 4 is No, then you apply the internal resolutions mechanisms of the Party, if they cannot help you, no Court can help you.

Even if all of these is No, the Court cannot reinstate you but can only say the process leading to your ouster was faulty. Courts cannot under any circumstances determine the leadership or membership of a political party.

Mitsurugi:
If the majority don't like you again and you can't take it, go to another party. If you can take it, stay and build your way back by persuasion and victories. Make yourself admirable and desirable. To lead is not by force and freedom of association is sacrosanct.

Borrow2222:
Good question.

Political parties have internal dispute resolution mechanisms, so you’ll need to channel your grievances to the appropriate authority within the party.

They’ll resolve the issues internally.

And remember, it is a political party the majority
carries the day.

fergie001:
An over-flogged issue, Supreme Court will be there trying how to de-link the ADC and PDP issues to save their starboy.

What Omotosho did in October, what Abdulmalik did in March, that's what Nwite is trying to draw attention to himself, Oya nah!

helinues:
If Yayi Indeed had all those listed projects in Ogun state he did not represent, then how much projects would he have in Lagos state he has been representing for over 20 years.

Shouldn't his projects in Lagos state he represented for over 2 decades gave him automatic ticket for Lagos state governor. Why Ogun state?

helinues:
That's Osun state bro. Why did some of you even want to be forcing rubbish on Ogun state people . Commissioner is not even an elected position like house of rep and senate

Someone represented Lagos state for over 2 decades as a House of rep and senator but all of a sudden, he remember about Ogun state. What sort of an insult is that self

yemkoguru:
bros what exactly do you want now tell the world? you want to return the laptop back after it has been through hell of use from you. What point are you trying to come with after he offered you more than ½ of purchase price. Bia comport.

Akuchinyere:
Who has been able to login please. The site is not opening

ikibekingsleyoo:
you will see it there ,print slip ,if it is on your laptop ,once you see your slip just press control P and save it as pdf .

ikibekingsleyoo:
i did for myself and my kid 6ta and i got application number,i have my slip and her slip...

Olanrewaju010:
Only for someone who studied statistics, according to him.. Not even mathematics..

uba1991:
you believe that Tinubu will win a PDP state because it is a Yoruba state but you don't believe that Atiku will win northern APC States. Is that not madness?
Let me tell you the truth, most of the northern APC states governors are working for Atiku.

Tflex01:
Exactly. You sound like someone currently living in the west. Spot on.

I pity all these Zombidients that will start crying rigging after election.

ItsTutsi:
Majority of Yoruba from SW claiming woke and liberal are too insignificant and inconsequential to change anything, majority won't vote, while the rest will likely vote Tinubu but just don't want to avoid Twitter drama.. I confident Tinubu will get 70% in SW

garfield1:
He can't.highest he will get in lagos is 55%,Ogun 70%,osun 55%,ondo,60%,ekiti 75%,Oyo 60%.thats an average of 62%...you hardly see igbos being against obi but you see so many yorubas being against tinubu

Kyase:
And south west
Something is not just right with his own people

fergie001:
My list plenty ooooo... Lol

Eaztzide geestunnar andrewfarms ghettokid1 angelfrost fuckingmallam45 ebukahades10 gbest90 Wordson crazygod kyase ray07 redblood01 dfrost lamasta chikason22 Oludharay rodwave Playermaker1 Sammy07 openmine numerouno94 silentgroper vickyrotex SamuelAnyawu engineerboat robosky02 oluDharay
mangekyoalt paulolee Ojeemah Playmaker1 egusishankly athemisia ojuntana yomi1504 obembet jasonscoolari freestuffsng odewaleadesoye aiel123 johnnyessence ejimatic agberagbaoye jokerman nwanyiogwashi odinga1of garfield1 saintkeppy aaa593 righteousness2 gloryhomemaker penguin2 vicdom naptu2 clockwisereport manna (Seun & his mods)



Some other omissions, make una no vex ooooo

fergie001:
Dapo Abiodun had submitted some information in 2015 when he contested as a Senator which were allegedly not true.

When it came up in 2019, Tribunal ruled
1. The Court of Appeal had dismissed the suit earlier so it stays with that Court.

2. It is a pre-election case with which the tribunal should not have been invited.

The Supreme Court judgement delivered by Ejembi Eko JSC as he was then:

By virtue of section 31(1) (2), (4), (5) and (6) of the Electoral Act the issue of alleged false statement in a candidate’s affidavit containing his particulars and personal information, Form CF001, is a pre-election issue. The National Assembly had by that provision provided for the determination or resolution of the issue. In the instant case, the appellants made an issue, in their petition, of the 2nd respondent’s affidavit, Form CF001, allegedly containing false statement of his qualification to contest the election to the office of the Governor of Ogun State. The tribunal and the Court of Appeal were right to have held that by virtue of section 31(1) (2), (4), (5) and (6) of the Electoral Act read together with 285(9) and (14) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) it was a pre-election issue to be disposed of under section 31 of the Electoral Act (as amended), and was therefore statute- barred.

I don't see the difference between these two cases.....

fergie001:
To add, APC is premising mainly on this certificate issue.

They brought only two out of 300 witnesses for the over-voting allegations. When INEC opens their defence, we will know more.

This Certificate saga is where APC & Oyetola intends to do the maximum damage.

Always welcome.

Oga Fergie001, so does the original file now contain of the clearer alleged forged certificate?

seunmsg:
When petitioners close their case, it means they have presented all their evidences, call all their witnesses and make all their arguments in support of the case. It is now left for the defendants (INEC, PDP and Adeleke) to open their defense against the case made by the petitioner.

So you see, there is nothing to celebrate for Adeleke here. The ball is now in his court to prove he not only won the election but also qualified to contest for governor. Thereafter, the tribunal will give judgement.

I hope you’re now better educated.

fergie001:
That's why I wrote there that PDP and INEC know what happened.

fergie001:
This is what I think happened.

Adeleke finished from Ede Grammar School whether 81 or so.
In a Court of Appeal suit in 2018, WAEC confirmed that Adeleke sat for the exam but he sat for only one subject which is English and scored F9. This is ok in Court and by our laws.

However, I think Adeleke before that suit, had allegedly tampered with the scores in other subjects. APC been the ruling Govt in the State must have found out from the school register. (This is my thoughts)...

There is no gainsaying the fact that the PDP and INEC do know what happened, the reason they provided a blank paper. They have said they cannot give what they don't have but can bring the original file. The original file haa the right one but it is obviously not what he submitted in 2018.

So, can the Court compel INEC to present what they don't have?
The Defence will definitely call WAEC to testify and push it to the petitioners to prove. and once that is done it will be difficult.

My bro, person wey hold the one wey Adeleke submit fit dey Belize now inside one room.

fergie001:
Case wey go end like Obaseki own.

@garfield1
@aiel123
@kyase

Court strikes out Aondoakaa's suit against Alia.

fergie001:
kyase informed me later, it's likely ending or early next month.

Yakubu is his Uncle