Oyindamolah's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Oyindamolah's Profile › Oyindamolah's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 112 pages)
Google about gps camera lite teemac01: |
Notable records and milestones The USA's 4–1 win over Paraguay is the highest-scoring match of the tournament so far. USA forward Folarin Balogun scored twice, becoming the first American player to score a World Cup brace since 1930. The tournament recorded its first-ever VAR reversal for mistaken identity during the USA-Paraguay match. This is the largest World Cup in history, featuring 48 teams and 104 matches across the USA, Canada, and Mexico. Current leaders The disciplinary record is already getting attention early in the tournament. 🟥 Red Cards So Far 3 red cards have been issued, all in the opening match between Mexico and South Africa. Two South African players and one Mexican player were sent off. Remarkably, that's only one fewer than the entire 2022 World Cup, which had 4 red cards in total. 🟨 Yellow Cards Paraguay received 5 yellow cards in their 4–1 loss to the United States. USA captain Tyler Adams also picked up a yellow card that will remain on his record going into the next group match. 📊 Interesting Record The Mexico vs South Africa opener became the first World Cup match since 2006 to produce 3 or more red cards. The all-time World Cup record for a single match remains 4 red cards and 16 yellow cards, set in Portugal vs Netherlands at the 2006 World Cup |
Download gps camera light and turn location setting on your phone teemac01: |
If this story is true, then it represents one of the most heartbreaking illustrations of how insecurity destroys lives long before it takes them. A young woman should be worrying about her future, her career, her education, her dreams—not about surviving captivity at the hands of criminals. The fact that families across Nigeria now discuss ransom negotiations as though they are a normal part of life is itself an indictment of how far we have drifted from what a functioning society should look like. This is why many Nigerians are increasingly frustrated. Security is the first responsibility of government. Without security, nothing else works. Businesses cannot thrive. Farmers cannot farm. Children cannot go to school without fear. Investors stay away. Families live in anxiety. The tragedy is that insecurity has become so widespread that many people have grown numb to it. Every few weeks there is another report of abductions, attacks, killings, or communities displaced by violence. Headlines come and go, but the victims and their families carry the trauma forever. As citizens, we must be careful not to normalize this situation. A country should never reach a point where kidnapping becomes a profitable industry and families are left to negotiate with armed criminals for the lives of their loved ones. Government deserves credit where progress has been made in some areas, but Nigerians are also justified in demanding more. Citizens do not judge security by press releases or official statements. They judge it by whether they can travel safely, send their children to school confidently, sleep peacefully at night, and return home without fear. The greatest tragedy is not just the loss of lives. It is the gradual loss of public confidence that the state can protect its people. Every victim of insecurity is someone's child, parent, sibling, spouse, or friend. Behind every statistic is a shattered family. Nigeria can and must do better. The measure of any government is not the promises it makes, but its ability to protect the lives and dignity of the people it serves. BlackViper: |
I think you're looking at dating purely from a cost-benefit perspective, and that's where the disagreement comes from. A date is not necessarily about food. The food is often just an activity that creates a relaxed environment for conversation. People eat together because it's a social experience, not because they're negotiating a contract. That said, I actually agree that not every first meeting needs to be at an expensive restaurant. A walk in a park, a coffee shop, a museum, or even a simple conversation in a public place can be just as effective for getting to know someone. Where I disagree is the assumption that a woman who accepts a meal is automatically looking for "free food." Most adults can afford to feed themselves. The value of a date is usually the company, not the plate of rice or pasta. The bigger issue is compatibility. If you're someone who prefers low-cost, simple first meetings, there's nothing wrong with that. Be upfront about it. The right person won't have a problem with it. Likewise, if someone prefers dinner dates, that's their preference too. The mistake is assuming that everyone who enjoys a traditional date is trying to exploit someone. Sometimes two people are simply meeting to see if there's a connection. If there isn't, both parties move on. Not every unsuccessful date is a scam. Sometimes it's just two people discovering they're not a match—and that's exactly what dating is supposed to help you figure out. Host78: |
Cum4me:I think this kind of thinking is exactly why many people are becoming cynical about modern dating. First, being financially challenged does not make a woman morally loose, just as being wealthy does not make a woman virtuous. Human beings are far more complex than their bank balances. Second, if a woman shows interest in a man because he has money, that doesn't automatically mean she's interested in him as a person. The same way a man who is only interested in a woman's appearance may not be interested in her character. The danger of viewing women through this lens is that it encourages men to mistake financial dependence for genuine attraction. Someone agreeing to spend time with you because they need help is not the same thing as someone choosing you because they genuinely like, respect, and admire you. In fact, relationships built primarily on financial leverage often become the most fragile. The moment the money disappears, the foundation is tested. A healthy relationship should be based on more than what either party can extract from the other. Men need more than admiration for their wallets, and women need more than admiration for their looks. The real win is not finding someone who is willing to follow you home because of what you can provide. The real win is finding someone who would still value your presence, character, and companionship even when life becomes difficult. Money is important, but it is a poor substitute for genuine connection. Many people discover that lesson only after they've spent years chasing validation instead of compatibility. |
Philosopher1979:I think you've touched on something important that often gets lost in these conversations. A date should not be viewed as a financial transaction where one person pays and the other is expected to provide sex as compensation. Human relationships simply do not work that way. One of the challenges many people face in modern dating is confusing access with entitlement. Spending money on someone may demonstrate interest, generosity, or effort, but it does not create an obligation. Attraction cannot be purchased, and genuine desire cannot be negotiated through receipts. I also agree that many men would benefit from learning to recognize genuine interest rather than assuming that every interaction with a woman is automatically progressing toward intimacy. A woman can enjoy your company, appreciate a meal, and still decide you're not the right person for her. That's not necessarily exploitation; sometimes it's simply incompatibility. At the same time, women should also be mindful of giving mixed signals or accepting repeated invitations from people they know they have absolutely no interest in. Respect and consideration should go both ways. The healthiest approach is for both parties to enter a date with realistic expectations. You're there to see if there's a connection, not to guarantee an outcome. Ironically, people often become more attractive when they stop approaching every interaction with the pressure of "Where will this lead?" and instead focus on getting to know the person in front of them. Dating works best when it's driven by curiosity, honesty, and mutual interest—not by a sense of entitlement from either side. A good date should leave both people with more clarity, not with the feeling that someone owes the other something. |
Sonnobax15:The whole purpose of a date is to find out whether two people are compatible. Sometimes you discover that you're a good match. Sometimes you discover that you're not. Both outcomes are useful. The truth is that many people don't fully know what they want until they meet different people and have different experiences. That's not necessarily dishonesty; it's part of self-discovery. As for people being glued to their phones during a date, I completely agree that it's disrespectful. If someone can't put their phone away long enough to have a meaningful conversation, it sends a message that they're not fully present or interested. However, replacing dates with a simple conversation in a cool environment doesn't solve the bigger issue. Whether you're at a restaurant, a park, a café, or sitting on a bench, two people still need time and interaction to figure out if there's genuine chemistry. Not every date will lead to a relationship, marriage, or even a second meeting. That's normal. The real problem isn't that some dates lead nowhere. The real problem is when people stop seeing dates as opportunities to learn about someone and start seeing them as investments that must generate a return. Sometimes a date's only purpose is to help two people realize they aren't right for each other. That may feel disappointing, but it's still a successful outcome because it saves both people from wasting months or years pursuing the wrong relationship. |
I agree that clarity is important, but I think this conversation is missing an equally important point: a date is not a contract. By all means, men should be honest about their intentions. If you're looking for something casual, say so. If you're looking for a serious relationship, say so. Clear communication prevents misunderstandings. However, being upfront about your intentions does not mean the other person owes you a particular outcome. A man paying for dinner does not automatically entitle him to sex. Likewise, a woman accepting a date does not automatically mean she is interested in a relationship. Sometimes two people meet and realize there is no chemistry. Sometimes attraction changes. Sometimes one person is interested and the other is not. That's part of dating. The bigger problem today is that many people approach dating as a transaction rather than a process of mutual discovery. One side feels cheated because money was spent. The other side feels pressured because expectations were attached to that spending. A healthier mindset is this: go on a date because you want to get to know someone, not because you are purchasing a guaranteed outcome. If your intention is casual, be honest. If your intention is serious, be honest. But also understand that the other person has the right to say yes, no, or change their mind. The real issue isn't that men need to stop dating without clear intentions. The real issue is that both men and women need to stop treating dates as transactions and start treating them as conversations between two adults trying to determine whether they are compatible. Clarity is important. Respect is equally important. |
I understand your frustration, especially if public funds are involved. However, I think there is an important distinction that needs to be made. The prisoner transfer agreement does not set anyone free. These inmates are not being pardoned, acquitted, or rescued from the consequences of their actions. They remain convicted prisoners and will continue serving their sentences under Nigerian authorities. Every country has a responsibility to protect the welfare of its citizens abroad, even when those citizens have made serious mistakes. Consular assistance and prisoner-transfer agreements are not endorsements of criminal behaviour; they are part of normal diplomatic relations between sovereign states. If we take the argument to its logical conclusion, should Nigeria abandon all its citizens overseas who find themselves in legal trouble, regardless of the circumstances? Most people would agree that there is a difference between respecting a foreign country's laws and completely washing our hands of our citizens. Also, not every Nigerian inmate abroad is a hardened drug trafficker. Some may have been convicted of other offences, and prisoner-transfer agreements are typically subject to legal reviews and eligibility criteria. Each case is not necessarily the same. I agree that anyone caught trafficking drugs should face the full consequences of the law. But justice and humanity can coexist. Allowing a prisoner to serve a sentence closer to family does not erase the crime; it simply recognizes that rehabilitation and family support can play a role in reducing reoffending and aiding reintegration into society. The message should not be that crime pays. The message should be that Nigerians remain accountable for their actions wherever they are, while still retaining their rights as Nigerian citizens. A country's commitment to its citizens is tested not only when they succeed abroad, but also when they fail. DomPerignon: |
While I understand why many of the inmates are celebrating, I'm not entirely convinced that being transferred to Nigeria is automatically the better outcome. Yes, being closer to family is a significant advantage. Family visits, emotional support, and cultural familiarity can play an important role in rehabilitation and mental well-being. No one should underestimate the value of being near loved ones during difficult times. However, many of those celebrating may not fully appreciate the realities of Nigeria's correctional system. Nigerian prisons have long struggled with issues such as overcrowding, inadequate healthcare, poor infrastructure, and limited rehabilitation programmes. For some inmates, the prison conditions they currently experience in Ethiopia may actually be better than what awaits them at home. There is also the mental health aspect to consider. Being moved from a relatively stable environment into overcrowded facilities with fewer resources could create new psychological and emotional challenges. The excitement of returning closer to home may quickly fade if living conditions deteriorate significantly. That said, human beings naturally value connection with family, and for many inmates, the opportunity to see loved ones more often may outweigh concerns about prison conditions. That is a personal calculation only they can make. The real question is whether Nigeria's correctional facilities are adequately prepared to receive these inmates and provide humane conditions that support rehabilitation rather than simply punishment. Returning home should not mean exchanging one prison for a worse one. |
While I understand why transporters have adopted this strategy, I don't think travelling in convoys at night should be celebrated as a solution. Rather, it should concern us that citizens have reached a point where they feel compelled to create their own security arrangements on major highways. There is also a significant danger that is often overlooked. A convoy of vehicles travelling closely together at night increases the risk of serious accidents. Poor visibility, speeding to keep up with the group, driver fatigue, mechanical failures, and sudden obstacles on the road can easily lead to chain-collision crashes involving multiple vehicles at once. Moreover, a convoy does not guarantee protection. If criminals are sufficiently armed and organized, a large group of vehicles could simply become a larger target. In fact, concentrating many passengers in one moving cluster could potentially increase the scale of casualties should an attack occur. The most troubling aspect of this story is not the ingenuity of the drivers but the fact that ordinary Nigerians have become accustomed to adapting to insecurity instead of demanding a situation where such adaptations are unnecessary. No citizen should have to choose between the risk of kidnapping and the risk of travelling in a high-speed nighttime convoy. While the solidarity shown by these transporters is admirable, it is ultimately a symptom of a deeper problem. Safe highways should be guaranteed by effective policing, intelligence gathering, and government action—not by citizens organizing survival tactics on roads that ought to be secure in the first place. A society should not normalize coping mechanisms for insecurity. It should address the insecurity itself. |
I agree with much of what you've written, but I think there is another side to this conversation that deserves attention. While social media has certainly amplified hostility between men and women, we should be careful not to reduce the problem to misunderstandings, emotional wounds, and online influence alone. Sometimes the frustration people express comes from very real experiences that cannot simply be dismissed as gender wars. Many men are exhausted by the pressure to provide in an economy that seems increasingly unforgiving. That is true. But many women are also exhausted by being told to lower their standards, ignore red flags, and accept treatment that previous generations quietly endured. Their caution did not emerge from nowhere. Likewise, many men who are guarded are not merely reacting to social media narratives. Some have genuinely experienced betrayal, manipulation, false accusations, or relationships where their sacrifices were taken for granted. Their concerns are often rooted in reality too. The challenge is that both sides sometimes expect empathy for their own struggles while struggling to extend that same empathy to the other side. A man wants his financial pressures understood but may dismiss a woman's concerns about emotional security. A woman wants her fears understood but may underestimate the burden many men carry daily. As a result, everyone feels unseen. I also think we sometimes overestimate how much social media created these tensions. In many cases, social media merely exposed conversations that were already happening privately. It gave people a platform to express frustrations that had been suppressed for years. The real solution is not asking men or women to stop talking about their experiences. The solution is encouraging conversations that seek understanding rather than victory. Because the goal of a relationship is not to prove which gender has suffered more. The goal is not to win an argument. The goal is not to collect evidence against the opposite sex. The goal is to find someone whose strengths complement your weaknesses, whose presence brings peace rather than conflict, and whose commitment makes life's burdens easier to carry. The healthiest relationships are not built when men and women stop acknowledging their grievances. They are built when both sides acknowledge them and still choose compassion over resentment, understanding over assumptions, and partnership over competition. Perhaps the problem is not that men and women have become enemies. Perhaps the problem is that too many people have forgotten that understanding someone is more important than defeating them. Dpsychologist: |
Hiring: Personal Assistant to the Founder ELARA Aesthetics & Wellness | Lagos ELARA is a premium aesthetics, wellness, beauty, and lifestyle brand in Lagos. As we grow, we're looking for a sharp, organized, and trustworthy Personal Assistant to be the founder's right hand, supporting both the business and personal life. If you're proactive, calm under pressure, and naturally one step ahead, this is for you. What you'll do: *Business * Manage the founder's calendar, meetings, reminders, and daily priorities * Coordinate with ELARA staff, nurses, vendors, suppliers, and service providers * Handle client follow-ups, WhatsApp messages, bookings, and inquiries * Track expenses, receipts, payments, invoices, and inventory * Follow up on orders, deliveries, and pharmacy items * Help prepare for events, collaborations, influencer visits, and content shoots * Keep every client experience smooth, and polished, and premium *Personal * Run errands and day-to-day tasks across Lagos * Coordinate household, driver, nanny, beauty, travel, and personal appointments * Make reservations, bookings, purchases, and personal shopping * Organize personal schedules, reminders, and important dates * Handle all personal and business information with complete confidentiality You should be: Based in Lagos, highly organized, and detail-oriented Good with WhatsApp, Google Calendar, Google Drive, and Excel/Sheets Professional, trustworthy, discreet, and proactive (you follow up without being reminded) A fast learner, resourceful, and great at solving problems before they grow Comfortable in a beauty, wellness, aesthetics, or lifestyle business Well-presented, with a presence that represents the ELARA brand well The role: Flexible hours with occasional errands, event support, and weekend availability depending on business or personal needs. Salary is competitive and based on experience. To apply, send: your CV or work experience, a short intro, your location in Lagos, availability. 📩 hello@elaraaw.com |
No loud am. As many people do not know this. Goo0dHardDick: |
Mr. President's speech is eloquent and hopeful, and no reasonable Nigerian would oppose stronger democracy, better security, economic growth, or prosperity. Those are goals we all share. However, for many ordinary Nigerians, the true test of any Democracy Day speech is not the promises made but the realities they experience daily. When citizens hear that inflation is being tackled, they compare it to the prices in the market. When they hear that security is improving, they compare it to the safety of their communities. When they hear that prosperity is coming, they compare it to the balance in their bank accounts and the opportunities available to their children. Democracy is not measured only by elections, speeches, and government statistics. It is measured by whether a trader can afford to restock goods, whether a graduate can find decent employment, whether a family can feed itself comfortably, whether businesses can survive, and whether citizens feel hopeful about tomorrow. Many Nigerians acknowledge that difficult reforms may sometimes be necessary. The concern is not that sacrifices are being made; it is whether the benefits of those sacrifices are reaching ordinary people quickly enough. The average citizen does not live inside economic reports. They live in markets, on farms, in offices, on the roads, and in homes where the cost of living has risen sharply over the past few years. The government deserves credit where progress has been made. At the same time, citizens have every right to ask hard questions about the pace of improvement because democracy is built on accountability, not applause. The heroes of June 12 fought not only for the right to vote but also for a Nigeria where government remains responsive to the people. Therefore, patriotism should not require silence, and criticism should not be mistaken for a lack of love for the country. The ultimate measure of success will not be how inspiring the speeches sound, but whether, in the years ahead, Nigerians can genuinely say that life became safer, more affordable, more prosperous, and more dignified than it is today. |
I agree that some young people underestimate the value of learning, mentorship, and proving themselves in the workplace. I also understand why employers feel frustrated when they invest in training only for an employee to leave shortly afterward. However, I think it's unfair to paint an entire generation with the same brush. Let's be honest: loyalty is a two-way street. Many employees have seen colleagues work tirelessly for years with little salary growth, no clear career path, no training, and no recognition. So when a better opportunity comes along, they leave. Not necessarily because they are ungrateful, but because they are trying to improve their lives. The question is: why are so many trained employees willing to leave in the first place? In many cases, it's because the market is correcting a value gap. If a worker acquires skills and another company is willing to pay three or four times more for those skills, it is difficult to expect them to stay purely out of loyalty. On the other hand, graduates should also understand that skills have to be earned. Nobody becomes highly valuable overnight. Most successful professionals started with limited experience and had to learn, adapt, and prove themselves over time. The reality is that employers take a risk when hiring inexperienced people, and graduates take a risk when accepting jobs that may not adequately reward their effort. Both sides have legitimate concerns. The healthiest organizations are those that create a win-win situation: they train people, compensate them fairly, provide growth opportunities, and build a culture that makes talented employees want to stay. Likewise, the best employees recognize the value of mentorship, hard work, and continuous learning. The goal shouldn't be to ask whether employers or graduates are the problem. The goal should be to build workplaces where investment, growth, loyalty, and reward go hand in hand. Cmeo: |
I understand where you're coming from, and to be fair, your experience highlights a reality that many Nigerians have lived through. However, I don't think the issue is as simple as "all employers are exploitative" or "all graduates are lazy." The truth is that both can exist at the same time. You're right that many Nigerian employers expect too much while offering too little. An entry-level role should not require years of experience, multiple certifications, and the ability to perform miracles for a salary that cannot cover basic living expenses. That's not employment; that's desperation being monetized. You're also right that previous generations benefited from structured graduate trainee programmes. Companies invested heavily in talent development because they understood that today's graduate could become tomorrow's executive. Many of Nigeria's successful professionals were not born with experience—they were trained, mentored, and given opportunities to grow. That said, we should also acknowledge that not every business owner is making billions. Many SMEs are struggling with high energy costs, taxes, inflation, exchange rate volatility, and weak consumer spending. Some genuinely cannot afford the salaries that graduates would like to earn. The real problem is that the relationship between employers and employees has become increasingly transactional. Employers want fully skilled workers without investing in training, while employees want higher pay without staying long enough for some companies to recover their investment. Trust has broken down on both sides. I think the lesson here is not that graduates should accept exploitation, nor that employers should be demonized. Rather, companies that want top talent must be willing to invest in people, and graduates must continue building valuable skills that increase their bargaining power. At the end of the day, nobody wants charity. People simply want fair compensation, meaningful opportunities, and a chance to build a decent life from honest work. That isn't entitlement. That's a reasonable expectation in any healthy economy. ultraviolet27: |
Nne we know the matter. Chinny024: |
Are Nigerian Employers Expecting Too Much from Fresh Graduates? Lately, I've been wondering whether some Nigerian employers are expecting too much from fresh graduates. How do you advertise an "entry-level" position and then require: * 3–5 years of experience * Proficiency in multiple software tools * Strong project management skills * Excellent communication skills * Industry-specific knowledge * Professional certifications ...all for a salary that barely covers transportation and feeding? The average graduate already faces significant challenges. Many have had their education disrupted by strikes, economic hardship, poor infrastructure, and limited access to internships or practical training. Yet, upon graduation, they are expected to compete with experienced professionals for so-called entry-level roles. At the same time, employers are not entirely wrong. Businesses need people who can contribute from day one. Training employees requires time, money, and resources, and many organizations simply cannot afford lengthy onboarding periods. This raises an important question: **Has the gap between university education and workplace expectations become too wide?** Perhaps the real problem isn't that graduates are lazy or that employers are unreasonable. Perhaps our education system is not adequately preparing students for the realities of the modern workplace. Maybe companies need to invest more in graduate training programmes and internships. Maybe universities need to focus more on practical skills, digital literacy, problem-solving, and workplace readiness. Maybe both sides need to meet halfway. What do you think? Are Nigerian employers expecting too much from fresh graduates, or are universities producing graduates who are not ready for today's job market? |
![]() Hardeybohwarley: |
We are now seeing a pattern here. The bigger issue is that farmers no longer feel safe on their own land, and that should worry everyone because it directly affects food security and livelihoods. We need facts, arrests, and real solutions — not assumptions that fuel conspiracy narratives. |
hosemujica:FACT! |
But saying “they should have invited me first” assumes companies hire based only on years of experience and that’s not always how recruitment works. Sometimes it’s your CV formatting, keywords, certifications, how your experience is presented, or even internal hiring preferences. And to be fair, applying three times and getting the same response might be a sign to review the application strategy rather than conclude they’re sleeping. IamANigerianMan: |
Vision101:If an intern becomes valuable enough to leave after learning from you, that doesn’t automatically mean the investment was wasted. it means you helped build talent. The bigger question is: why do people feel the need to leave so quickly? In many cases, people leave because of poor pay, no growth path, toxic work culture, or feeling undervalued. And if someone is threatening you after gaining experience, that’s a separate character issue not a reason to stop developing people entirely. Also, bonding employees for years can backfire. Most talented people won’t agree to being tied down unless there’s a strong incentive attached (sponsorship, certifications, relocation support, etc.). Even then, forcing retention rarely builds loyalty. I think this approach is better: - Hire people with good character and willingness to learn - Create clear expectations from day one - Pay fairly as they grow - Build systems so your business doesn’t depend on one person - Make your workplace good enough that people want to stay Because the real risk isn’t training people and losing them. It’s refusing to train people and being stuck with mediocre talent forever. |
airsaylongcome:How do you know this? |
Personperson01:What's your point is exactly? |
![]() MT: |
Cmeo:Do you mind throwing more light on this? |
Rutherinspace:The bolded |
Vision101: |

. Some will even be busy with their phones all through the date, date that's supposed to be a time for both of use to get to know each other 