₦airaland Forum

Romantic discourse has rules? No. Because people challenge/ignore any rules set down in order to benefit themselves through doing so. So we must rely upon the Law to make the rules of romantic discourse. At any time a petition could count the numbers in favor extant in any society, yet this is never done. Why?

Context? Can we ever really receive it? Often we seem to have it but then we find that we need...AI has it's own dark subtext that accompanies it, so that any context provided by it is sketchy.

Affidavit? This might help. That way everyone will know what it is that they need to know and be able to accept matters better.

Men should be counted by petition regarding this matter. Petition should be used for this type of matter too. That way the numbers would be know for certain. A voluntary petition just to count/for counting purpose alone could be assembled. Otherwise, know that that is not the only function of the human body and that the social functions of the human body in that respect are largely personal as between the couple and the state. In other words just report your concerns to the state and let the state take care of matters.

Striking the body will put you in debt to the person you struck. She has had as many experiences perhaps as you and even if not some may have been superior. You are now due to striking her----you are of the same righteousness as her. Plus you may have damaged her. You wronged the state. Righteousness doesn't need you to help it alongs

Are you talking about self-indulgence brought on by doing this already-self-indulgent practice? Self-indulgence is not non-focussedness. Self-indulgence can't be regulated in any way. So, again, are you talking about someone having even additional self-indulgent practices?

Money is pretty easy to get. Every adult should try to get their own. Obsession over other people's sources/streams of income is detrimental to all. That is because money responds to only one thing.

Was she put up to it, though?