₦airaland Forum

Minemrys:
my man! You said my mind. Universal or li0nsgate w0n't be as messed up as wb with dc characterz. Or even fox then. WB are t0o negative inclined. Check the films that have been in development hell, wb has the highest percentage.

abduleez1:
Bros I understand what you're saying. But to say WB don't own DC comics is simply disingenuous.

Of course All authors have rights to their work and there's some contractual agreement between them and the publisher(in this point WB and DC Comics) and some author retains some exclusive rights to their big characters. If you as an author sold full rights of an IP to a company, forget no be you get property again.
The bone of contention is Smaug saying WB don't own DC and all characters under contractual obligations.

If that were so as you claim, at least we would have seen ONE DC character(s) get captured by rival studios. Not a single movie from any company other than WB in Theatrical Live Action. Why? For how many decades? If your claim were true we'd have seen the Marvel Comics scenario where they have to buy back rights to their IP. ALL DC TV SHOWS ON OTHER NETWORKS ARE SOLELY LICENSED BY WB. Why not Big Screen too? Even at that how many DC IP are under other Studios? Except Lucifer, Sandman and Epix Pennyworth.

Make Una help me explain that one. I no get strength for all this mental and lingual gymnastics. Or better still bring RECEIPTS.

SMUAG:
Yes, bro..
WB is one negative energy we have as a studio out there....
No proper time-table...
They just keep announcing DC movies left and right without any solid plan...

Minemrys:
their trademark. Wb are so reacti0nary than proactive.

Minemrys:
yes, wb owns dc. But the point smuag is making is, there are terms to owning dc. Okay, why is it that studios buy rights to b0oks then end up l0osing the rights? Bros, if wb go a certain length without making dc films, dc c0mics can sue and be on the l0ok out for an0ther owner. Why do u think fox kept making fantastic 4 films or why do u think disney can't make a hulk film? Dc c0mics is separate fr0m wb but then, there's a divisi0n in wb called dc entertainment. It acts as a link to dc c0mics. It's n0t like wb are the publishers or dictate what dc publishes. They just own the rights to all its characters. All, n0t the c0mpany itself.

pu7pl3:
I still don't know the meaning of that A>E he always types after his tweets

johnyace:
In my opinion WB or Ann sarnoff doesn't have the right to call snyder verse fans toxic, they created the toxic environment at first with their lies, betrayals and paying attention to critics instead of the fans, it might have been business for them but they forget that people have emotions attached to these characters and fandom that they are messing with.

Minemrys:
exactly. The fact it's a business means they owe m0re to their consumers. I d0n't blame thekingishere and abduleez1, i happened to have d0ne a course on PR back in my sch0ol days and i kn0w for sure wb effed in the area of PR. And management. So me ranting isn't just fanboyism al0ne.

Treyknowles:
If this isn't Toxic behaviour, I don't know what is

Minemrys:
oga, na wash. If wb had stick to a focus fr0m the beginning, be it snyder's or s0me0ne else's, there w0n't be this agitati0n, bros. D0n't insult fans by using the word toxic. When a c0mpany fails its publics, you are bound to see agitati0n or grievances. It is PR 101 and you can't manage the problem by tagging any0ne toxic. Yes, there are those that go overboard and do stupid things, but if there weren't eff ups or c0ntroversies early on, there w0n't be people going overboard. It's like with this rum0r that there's a black superman film in development. N0w, you haven't finished Kent's storyline, you are bringing in supergirl and black supes with no word on where or when Kent will return. Obviously, no one has heard anything abt Kent's fans or say s0mething like Kent's fans are toxic. But the minute the film is green lit and kent's story is relegated then you would start seeing 'toxic fans'. It's buying and selling, if a buyer aint happy, you d0n't say the buyer is bad. Bros, na business carry am c0me. No buyer would be nuts to go toxic if he loves what you are selling to him. It's just like, at the middle or after Winter soldier film, marvel went straight into making a film abt Wils0n as cap america and n0thing is heard abt steve rogers. There would be agitati0n. Just as people c0mplained or hate the current Cap america n0w while they are waiting for sam to take the mantle. Imagine marvel leave the current guy to be cap america all through the mcu.

TheKingIsHere:
Don't mind minemrys and co.

I will get the picture of the picture a fan drew of wonder woman holding a decapitated head of WB execs. Let them come and explain how that isn't toxic

Minemrys:
oga, na wash. If wb had stick to a focus fr0m the beginning, be it snyder's or s0me0ne else's, there w0n't be this agitati0n, bros. D0n't insult fans by using the word toxic. When a c0mpany fails its publics, you are bound to see agitati0n or grievances. It is PR 101 and you can't manage the problem by tagging any0ne toxic. Yes, there are those that go overboard and do stupid things, but if there weren't eff ups or c0ntroversies early on, there w0n't be people going overboard.

Minemrys:
my man! You said my mind. Universal or li0nsgate w0n't be as messed up as wb with dc characterz. Or even fox then. WB are t0o negative inclined. Check the films that have been in development hell, wb has the highest percentage.

Minemrys:
it would. But he'd be m0re similar to negative man. And the pattern the show went, it needed different pers0nalities. In essence, they should've used a diff character and n0t cyborg if they hadn't a plan to m0ve cyborg to titans. Cyborg doesn't fit DP altogether.

pu7pl3:
If you're going to water down and destroy a character like that then don't use him at all, there are many other misfits they could have pulled from Doom patrol comics

TheKingIsHere:
Which top studio doesn't tell lies?

You said that WB shouldn't have listened to critics, yet you guys were posting RT scores of the snyder cut as at last week. Doesn't that show that you guys pay attention to these critics as well? Is that not hypocrisy?

Also, I am in the Snyder cut fandom and push a lot for the snyder cut so I can fully tell you that there are toxic fans. Every fandom has it's toxic fans.

Ann has the right to call people toxic when fns drew a picture of wonder woman holding a decapitated Hamada head, and the heads of other wb execs. If that is not toxicity then what is?

Currently, some deluded people are reviewing bombing Godzilla vs Kong because Ann said she is not interested in continuing the snyder verse.

If you guys want to defend something do it constructively.

johnyace:
I don't and have never posted RT scores before, I don't depend on them to determine what I will watch.

Not all synderverse fans are toxic so her saying that wasn't really cool, I know some of them did appalling things like review bombing GvK and making horrible pictures which is not right and I will never support such.

I feel she shouldn't have commented on the state of the snyder verse to avoid shooting herself in the foot, because they once said stuff like the snyder cut didn't exist.

I am just wondering what did WB expect to happen after they released the snyder cut, because I don't want to believe that they released it without motive.

TheKingIsHere:
Uxas was watered down, beaten like a puss,y and sent to Apokolps general hospital in snyder cut, I don't see you guys complaining o

Nickshrapnel:
Accountability>Entertainment

He always say that because some people want him to forget about all he claimed happened at the JL set and continue playing Cyborg.

TheKingIsHere:
You people don't know that WB is a company that is running to make profit.

Yes, the wronged Snyder by giving into critics, but are you guys not giving into the same critics today?

Disney stars wars has the record for most directors sacked but you won't see SW fans behaving childish like some fake snyder fans?

Disney treated Boyega like trash but did you see boyega calling out the names of disney executives and insulting them? This is the mistake Ray made and Ann and even Kilar has supported Hamada and even the private investigator stated that Hamada never interfered in the investigation (something that ray fisher accused him of falsely).

The same disney that shot mulan at concentration camps in china, yet you kept quiet.. If it was wb that did same, you would've come here to start complaining about how evil and clueless WB is.

You're just pained emotionally, get over it.

Learn how business works.

As it stands, no top studio will want to work with Ray fisher because of his terrible behavior and diva attitude

TheKingIsHere:
Cyborg is seen as a freak, doom patrol is about freak superheroes. So, how won't cyborg fit?

pu7pl3:
Cc. Everyone who cares to watch


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v1dY7PqU01E

TheKingIsHere:
Cyborg is seen as a freak, doom patrol is about freak superheroes. So, how won't cyborg fit?

pu7pl3:
Okay...so if they don't take accountability for their actions he won't play Cyborg again?

TheKingIsHere:
The same universal that owns hulk and few other marvel characters and still don't know what to do with them that disney has to step in?

Even fox studios were so confused that they kept on messing up their x-men movies till they finally gave up.

You just like to dey misyarn sha.

TheKingIsHere:
If I tell you that Disney has the most toxic fandom (Star wars and MCU(spider man to be precise)) will you believe? .

This is despite the fact that their exec is yet to call them toxic, they are still the most toxic. But I don't see you castigating disney

TheKingIsHere:
If I tell you that Disney has the most toxic fandom (Star wars and MCU(spider man to be precise)) will you believe? .

This is despite the fact that their exec is yet to call them toxic, they are still the most toxic. But I don't see you castigating disney

Nickshrapnel:
Yeah, he specifically said he won’t appear in the Flash or any Cyborg movie if WB don’t take actions against their executives

Minemrys:
i w0n't castigate disney, cos no matter how they eff up, they kn0w how to please their publics. They have a goal, and they get their publics to share in them. L0ok how they handled spiderman or how they brought in the mandalorian. They are pro active n0t reactive. They're doing s0mething right that's why u d0n't see mcu fans or star fans attacking their execs.

TheKingIsHere:
It's been deleted from the net but I know I saved it on one of my systems.

Minemrys:
if that's what u call toxic, then i am tired of this your argument. I can see your point is clouded in riddles. You never were for the snyder visi0n. U just d0n't want to say it out.
People do stupid things especially on the media. They do it to act funny, express themselves or for publicity. You talking abt toxic fans i was thinking it was physically c0nfr0nting the execs or burning their properties or s0mething. Dude, i doubt you are into business, if u are you would kn0w there's n0thing like toxic cust0mer or client. Once a client isn't happy, they would let you kn0w. S0me are c0nsiderate abt how they say it, otherz believe it's their m0ney or time g0ne to the drain and they would be m0re loud. You can't tell s0me0ne n0t happy abt s0mething they were sold that they are toxic. It's like u saying the endsars protesters or those agitating for a better nigeria are toxic just for creating memes of politicians who are effing up.

Minemrys:
but fox were able to keep the x men going for 17 yearz. They gave you x men, x 2, first class, the wolverine, logan, days of future past without delays or development hell or having 2 visi0ns jumbled. Universal only had 2 hulk films and yes they still own the rights to hulk but can't make a m0vie n0w cause of mcu. Wb on the other hand can't maintain the dceu for 4 yearz without l0osing track. Universal kept the fast n furious franchise going without reb0oting even after t0kyo drift. Bros, wb na wash.