HONESTFACT101:
use there flagships for this year......signing out

flagships for previous years nko

popweezy:
mtchew.... Do you know how long this technology has bee with samsung but not using it? maybe because no rival comes from other android phones.. so you know your xiaomi has to wait for samsung and Iphone sometimes to introduce a technology then they follow suit??. my brother, if you keep on comparing xiaomi to samsung, by the time samsung is done with ur xiaomi sorry ass, It would look like Itel

Ok sir. Please mention one Samsung or Apple's product with "Liquid lens".

.

popweezy:
Did I only mention the m11 ultra?? I made mention of s21 ultra now.. exclude these two phones from ur comparison and use all of their other models.. you will see how xiomi go turn tecno

This is how an argument is done, you mention any Samsung phone at any price point then wait for its equivalent from Xiaomi for proper comparison.

Mind you, for disregarding mi11 ultra and s21 ultra comparison, you have already removed their flagships(i.e S and Note series).

Valleys:


This is how an argument is done, you mention any Samsung phone at any price point then wait for its equivalent from Xiaomi for proper comparison.

Mind you, for disregarding mi11 ultra and s21 ultra comparison, you have already removed their flagships(i.e S and Note series).

you mean we should compare only the midranges right?? then you should know You have lost it bro compare both the flagships and midranges and let's see how far we can go

forget price, both brands didn't start same time.. the price is for the market..

let's do it this way...I mention a samsung model then you counter it with xiaomi model by mentioning their spec.. That was the reason I said we should exclude both m11 ultra and s21 ultra because it would look so absurd in a situation where I mention numerous samsung models and the only xiaomi model you would be able to mention is m11 ultra..you get me??

ATankado:


Ok sir. Please mention one Samsung or Apple's product with "Liquid lens".

read the first two lines of my comment again maybe you had comprehend better..

Or are you insinuating that xiaomi is better than both Iphone and samsung because of the liquid lens ish

popweezy:
Did I only mention the m11 ultra?? I made mention of s21 ultra now.. exclude these two phones from ur comparison and use all of their other models.. you will see how xiomi go turn tecno

redmi note 10 pro vs a52
poco f3 vs a72

how has it turned trashno?

HONESTFACT101:


Aunty why call me in a the thread

no be you dey find trouble now......signing out

You dis girl na wa 4u o

That settles it

durubennie:
That settles it

This...

sunshineV:
redmi note 10 pro vs a52
poco f3 vs a72

how has it turned trashno?

lol...comparing Xiaomi with samsung midrange very funny guy

sunshineV:
redmi note 10 pro vs a52
poco f3 vs a72

how has it turned trashno?

funny guy...you comparing xiaomi flagship with samsung midrange

compare midrange with midrange, flagship with flagship

All I want to say is compare phones within the price range then you will get your answers

popweezy:
funny guy...you comparing xiaomi flagship with samsung midrange

compare midrange with midrange, flagship with flagship

u don't have sense jor

popweezy:
funny guy...you comparing xiaomi flagship with samsung midrange

compare midrange with midrange, flagship with flagship

Poco and Redmi note series are midrangers. The Redmi note 10pro retail at 280dols while the galaxy a52 retail at 325 dols

sagieramos:

Poco and Redmi note series are midrangers. The Redmi note 10pro retail at 280dols while the galaxy a52 retail at 325 dols

Lmao tell him, before he disgraces himself here.

sunshineV:
u don't have sense jor

oh yeah that was my bad...calm down

sagieramos:

Poco and Redmi note series are midrangers. The Redmi note 10pro retail at 280dols while the galaxy a52 retail at 325 dols

yeah..agreed but you still considering the price... which is non of our business in this argument.

I think this is where the line between samsung and xiaomi will be drawn: let's judge both brands in terms of smartphone tecnologies.. can you you place xiaomi over samsung in terms of tecnology?? definitely not.
and you are here comparing xiaomi to almighty samsung...



xiaomi make phones almost equivalent to samsung models (mostly galaxy A series) and sells at cheaper price...agreed. That is why it seems they are winning the market.It's just like you introducing a new design as a shoe maker or fashion designer then someone else saw it and produced the same design, adds some features he thinks the shoe or cloth is lacking then sells it at a cheaper price. Definitely, he would win the consumers pocket.. not withstanding, the credit of that particular design still goes to you as the grand originator of that particular design.. but b4 you can compare xiaomi to samsung.. kindly look at their innovations in smartphone tecnologies and you would understand what I am saying. for example, samsung had been making waterproof smartphones but I dont think you can mention any xiaomi waterproofed smartphone. I dont need to mention the samsung fold series... now, I think You get my points

popweezy:
yeah..agreed but you still considering the price... which is non of our business in this argument.

I think this is where the line between samsung and xiaomi will be drawn: let's judge both brands in terms of smartphone tecnologies.. can you you place xiaomi over samsung in terms of tecnology?? definitely not.
and you are here comparing xiaomi to almighty samsung...



xiaomi make phones almost equivalent to samsung models (mostly galaxy A series) and sells at cheaper price...agreed. That is why it seems they are winning the market.It's just like you introducing a new design as a shoe maker or fashion designer then someone else saw it and produced the same design then sells it at a cheaper price.. not withstanding, the credit of that particular design still goes to you as the grand originator of that particular design.. but b4 you can compare xiaomi to samsung.. kindly look at their innovations in smartphone tecnologies and you would understand what I am saying. for example, samsung had been making waterproof smartphones but I dont think you can mention any xiaomi waterproofed smartphone. I dont need to mention the samsung fold series... now, I think You get my points

Mi11 ultra unboxed inside water


https://m.youtube.com/watch?reload=9&v=v7B5072P5CQ&feature=youtu.be

Valleys:


Mi11 ultra unboxed inside water


https://m.youtube.com/watch?reload=9&v=v7B5072P5CQ&feature=youtu.be

that is exactly what I'm saying... and that would be the first waterproofed smartphone xiaomi has made.. have it in mind that this is after samsung had made waterproofed smartphones

Xiaomi to the world jhor
Samsung A series are so trash, bad camera
redmi 7 camera(Gcam) beat most of the A series camera hands down

popweezy:
that is exactly what I'm saying... and that would be the first waterproofed smartphone xiaomi has made.. have it in mind that this is after samsung had made waterproofed smartphones

So you are saying that Samsung was the first company to produce a waterproof smartphone?

And if Samsung was not the first, then they also copied the technology.

Valleys:

So you are saying that Samsung was the first company to produce a waterproof smartphone?

And if Samsung was not the first, then they also copied the technology.

can you place xiaomi over samsung in terms of smartphone tecnologies?? answer me.. If not, then I'm done with you

popweezy:
yeah..agreed but you still considering the price... which is non of our business in this argument.

I think this is where the line between samsung and xiaomi will be drawn: let's judge both brands in terms of smartphone tecnologies.. can you you place xiaomi over samsung in terms of tecnology?? definitely not.
and you are here comparing xiaomi to almighty samsung...



xiaomi make phones almost equivalent to samsung models (mostly galaxy A series) and sells at cheaper price...agreed. That is why it seems they are winning the market.It's just like you introducing a new design as a shoe maker or fashion designer then someone else saw it and produced the same design, adds some features he thinks the shoe or cloth is lacking then sells it at a cheaper price. Definitely, he would win the consumers pocket.. not withstanding, the credit of that particular design still goes to you as the grand originator of that particular design.. but b4 you can compare xiaomi to samsung.. kindly look at their innovations in smartphone tecnologies and you would understand what I am saying. for example, samsung had been making waterproof smartphones but I dont think you can mention any xiaomi waterproofed smartphone. I dont need to mention the samsung fold series... now, I think You get my points

oga compare within the same price range oooo

To have a healthy convo lets bring both brand models within the same price range and make comparison, easy sturvs



this transsion pple don dey find ally with Samsung pple
Omo

popweezy:
can you place xiaomi over samsung in terms of smartphone tecnologies?? answer me.. If not, then I'm done with you

You're comparing the companies in general instead of their phones. Samsung is a very huge brand with ground breaking technologies and smartphone innovation. They make their own chipset, screen, camera and other stuff. It's obvious that they definitely have more innovation and technology than Xiaomi. Samsung is 85 years old and has been in the game for a very long time. Xiaomi is just 10 years old and has been able to compete and keep up with Samsung and other powerful brands. That is no small feat and they deserve whatever attention they're getting. In the nearest future, I'm sure Xiaomi will look towards producing their own chipset, screen and other stuff.

And I just want you to know that most of these things we call innovation are just recycled technology ( see Apple for more details) Samsung has a foldable phone, Xiaomi also does. Samsung is not the first brand to introduce waterproof devices and will definitely not be the last. You see LG, there are one of the most innovative phone companies out there, but their phone brands are dead today. Innovation is not enough to survive out there in the saturated market. You need sound marketing strategy and ways to make consumers itch to get their hands on your device to stay competitive, and Xiaomi has been able to do that.

Lastly, can we please stop all these unnecessary comparison and smartphone wars? The phone section is becoming irritating with all these fracas between phone brands. I'm a Samsung lover and I used most of their phones back then. I enjoyed using LG and HTC, too. Right now, I'm using a Xiaomi device, and they've got me by the balls with what they have to offer. My next device will probably be a OnePlus or a Pixel. Use any brand that appeals to you and let others hear word. Cheers!

popweezy:
funny guy...you comparing xiaomi flagship with samsung midrange

compare midrange with midrange, flagship with flagship

buddy pls stop stop stop.... Note 10 Pro is Xiaomi flagship??
Abeg no talk am again

RealEzee:
buddy pls stop stop stop.... Note 10 Pro is Xiaomi flagship??
Abeg no talk am again

the nigga too slow

popweezy:
yeah..agreed but you still considering the price... which is non of our business in this argument.

I think this is where the line between samsung and xiaomi will be drawn: let's judge both brands in terms of smartphone tecnologies.. can you you place xiaomi over samsung in terms of tecnology?? definitely not.
and you are here comparing xiaomi to almighty samsung...



xiaomi make phones almost equivalent to samsung models (mostly galaxy A series) and sells at cheaper price...agreed. That is why it seems they are winning the market.It's just like you introducing a new design as a shoe maker or fashion designer then someone else saw it and produced the same design, adds some features he thinks the shoe or cloth is lacking then sells it at a cheaper price. Definitely, he would win the consumers pocket.. not withstanding, the credit of that particular design still goes to you as the grand originator of that particular design.. but b4 you can compare xiaomi to samsung.. kindly look at their innovations in smartphone tecnologies and you would understand what I am saying. for example, samsung had been making waterproof smartphones but I dont think you can mention any xiaomi waterproofed smartphone. I dont need to mention the samsung fold series... now, I think You get my points

why should the price of the phones not be compared, is it not a criteria when choosing a phone?

Rareoil:



why should the price of the phones not be compared, is it not a criteria when choosing a phone?

we are talking about quality bro. You can choose to place ur product at a particular price. nobody go hold you... If tecno or infinix produced a phone similar to galaxy A52 at a very cheaper price will you then start comparing tecno to samsung or xiaomi

Buzx:


You're comparing the companies in general instead of their phones. Samsung is a very huge brand with ground breaking technologies and smartphone innovation. They make their own chipset, screen, camera and other stuff. It's obvious that they definitely have more innovation and technology than Xiaomi. Samsung is 85 years old and has been in the game for a very long time. Xiaomi is just 10 years old and has been able to compete and keep up with Samsung and other powerful brands. That is no small feat and they deserve whatever attention they're getting. In the nearest future, I'm sure Xiaomi will look towards producing their own chipset, screen and other stuff.

And I just want you to know that most of these things we call innovation are just recycled technology ( see Apple for more details) Samsung has a foldable phone, Xiaomi also does. Samsung is not the first brand to introduce waterproof devices and will definitely not be the last. You see LG, there are one of the most innovative phone companies out there, but their phone brands are dead today. Innovation is not enough to survive out there in the saturated market. You need sound marketing strategy and ways to make consumers itch to get their hands on your device to stay competitive, and Xiaomi has been able to do that.

Lastly, can we please stop all these unnecessary comparison and smartphone wars? The phone section is becoming irritating with all these fracas between phone brands. I'm a Samsung lover and I used most of their phones back then. I enjoyed using LG and HTC, too. Right now, I'm using a Xiaomi device, and they've got me by the balls with what they have to offer. My next device will probably be a OnePlus or a Pixel. Use any brand that appeals to you and let others hear word. Cheers!

God bless you bro... I only wanted to let that guy understand that xiaomi is not on the same level with Samsung currently... I dont know what might happen in the nearest future but right now, it's too early to start comparing xiaomi to samsung that has been in the phone tecnologies for so long... I really enjoyed ur explanation sir! have a nice day

popweezy:
we are talking about quality bro. You can choose to place ur product at a particular price. nobody go hold you... If tecno or infinix produced a phone similar to galaxy A52 at a very cheaper price will you then start comparing tecno to samsung or xiaomi

Oga your just avoiding the price stuff because you want to save face . How does adding price means we are removing quality? The topic is xiaomi vs Samsung. We can use any criteria we want to compare. You don't have the monopoly on the criteria we should use. If we one use price we go use am. Afterall before local man enters the market to buy phone he go don look him pocket.

Xiaomi phones are value for money. Meaning at their price range their phones are one of the bests if not the best. This is their business strategy. You can't come here and dismiss it because you want to win a argument. Put a xiaomi phone at a price and a Samsung phone at the same price and compare. 9 times out of 10 the Xiaomi phone is better.

You want to compare technology of a Tech giant not only in phones with so much capital and has been around for more than 60 years. To the technology of a company which is a little over 10 years old. And in your very biased mind thats a better comparison than using price ranges. SMH. Well done