₦airaland Forum

yahmohy27:
Also bcoz terrorist had been using it as a platform to destabilized the country ,infact this is enough for the president to act in that way.
so nothing is different here.
Or are you from that region

agabusta:
Where is the court order?

Theokolez:
People comparing Nigeria's blockade of Twitter to this are loosed upstairs..
The US government got a court order to do so..
Which village meeting held before FG banned Twitter?..
Una dey compare living thing to extinct rubbish

naijapips02:
So the Iranian people do not deserve freedom of speech? The same people promoting Twitter garbage in every country.

Bunch of hypocrites. Every country should ban Twitter.

insidelife22:
the US is A bully.
they have nuclear weapons but won't let others have.
On the other hand they should seize Lai Mohammed's NTA.

madridguy:
"Is this another example of US freedom of the press where if DC doesn't like what u say, ur domain is seized? (sic)," tweeted American-born Press TV host Marzieh Hashemi.

So the Iranian can't have freedom of speech in peace? And same USA will be going around preaching freedom of press/speech.

naijapips02:
So the Iranian people do not deserve freedom of speech? The same people promoting Twitter garbage in every country.

Bunch of hypocrites. Every country should ban Twitter.

Jeezuzpick:
Twitter is a social platform where INDIVIDUALS, INSTITUTIONS, BUSINESSES AND GOVERNMENTS place information and make their positions known.

It is also regulated and offensive tweets taken down.

These websites are run by biased people and created for the purpose of putting out their own biased information.

Will they regulate themselves and take down their own offensive posts?

No.

So, the comparison isn't really based on logic and reality.

Memberclub:
You want terrorists to have nuclear weapons? Next thing you will hear us mass killing in the name of someone

Fvck you lol

naptu2:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-57570044

Jeezuzpick:
Twitter is a social platform where INDIVIDUALS, INSTITUTIONS, BUSINESSES AND GOVERNMENTS place information and make their positions known.

It is also regulated and offensive tweets taken down.

These websites are run by biased people and created for the purpose of putting out their own biased information.

Will they regulate themselves and take down their own offensive posts?

No.

So, the comparison isn't really based on logic and reality.

ivandragon:
It's interesting how pmb's minions are trying so hard to twist a narrative.

PMB went against Twitter because he felt hurt that they rightly took off his tweet. His action was based on his ego which he couched as national interest.

By the way, the US got a court order to seize those sites, which one did PMB obtain?

madridguy:
"Is this another example of US freedom of the press where if DC doesn't like what u say, ur domain is seized? (sic)," tweeted American-born Press TV host Marzieh Hashemi.

So the Iranian can't have freedom of speech in peace? And same USA will be going around preaching freedom of press/speech.

insidelife22:
Bros why you come put fvck you for there.
just pray make you no come my village for sambisa forest

Monogamy:
I am not understanding.. Are those websites blocked from Usa or USA government seized the websites.

If the latter is the case, then Usa did not think this through

Btw, why should USA be building Nuclear weapons but fuming at others doing same?

madridguy:
"Is this another example of US freedom of the press where if DC doesn't like what u say, ur domain is seized? (sic)," tweeted American-born Press TV host Marzieh Hashemi.

So the Iranian can't have freedom of speech in peace? And same USA will be going around preaching freedom of press/speech.

valentineuwakwe:
Would nuclear weapons be safe in the hands of Iran's or a Muslim country? You know Iran has openly be supporting terrorist in Yemen, Syria, Hezbollah, Palestinian Hamas, Iraqi shutters, etc.

Memberclub:
Bruh. Ain't no one visiting Northern Nigeria except Northern Nigerians, Niger, Chad & other fulani terrorists countries.

insidelife22:
the US is A bully.
they have nuclear weapons but won't let others have.
On the other hand they should seize Lai Mohammed's NTA.

okosodo:
Especially that press tv. They just manufacture lies and propaganda by the second just like fulani and apc

Zetty177x:
...

See your mentality? U think an average Moslem is rational? If Moslem countries are allowed access to nuclear weapons, they will ground the earth. They are good at destroying not building. Imagine what we witnessed in Gaza recently...imagine then firing 1,500 missiles in a day, if not that Israel could intercept the rockets.... I beg US is the police of the world. Let them be. Imagine if those great countries had allowed Hitler succeed...abeg o

Bishopwizzy:
If those guys are allowed to have a nuclear weapon then nobody is safe.. Are they not the same people that mistakingly fired a missile at their own passenger air craft

insidelife22:
So for you mind I be northerner abi.
look the Us has nuclear weapons so why won't other countries.

insidelife22:
the US is A bully.
they have nuclear weapons but won't let others have.
On the other hand they should seize Lai Mohammed's NTA.

Jeezuzpick:
Twitter is a social platform where INDIVIDUALS, INSTITUTIONS, BUSINESSES AND GOVERNMENTS place information and make their positions known.

It is also regulated and offensive tweets taken down.

These websites are run by biased people and created for the purpose of putting out their own biased information.

Will they regulate themselves and take down their own offensive posts?

No.

So, the comparison isn't really based on logic and reality.

ivandragon:
It's interesting how pmb's minions are trying so hard to twist a narrative.

PMB went against Twitter because he felt hurt that they rightly took off his tweet. His action was based on his ego which he couched as national interest.

By the way, the US got a court order to seize those sites, which one did PMB obtain?