candidtalk:


That is not what I mean and you know it. When international agencies like interpol lean on the UK, especially over issues like terrorism, then the Country will comply regardless of how much they personally want to protect Kanu.

Countries do this because of rules of reciprocal cooperation. If the UK cannot assist Nigeria snare a terrorist in their Country then they should expect no help when, for example, a radical British terrorist is hiding out in Nigeria and directing crimes against Britain from there.

Olarewaju89:


I have sent you message

fozapi:


Britain leaked his whereabouts to the fulanis, but kanu already said he was coming to Nigeria even oyigboupdate the rat have been saying it that Kanu is in Cameroon

candidtalk:


Stop fooling yourself. The UK would have initiated the severing of diplomatic ties with Nigeria immediately if Kanu is a citizen they value or are convinced is innocent of the terrorist charges me and you know he is 100% guilty of same as Shekau and others.

If you think the UK had no hand in Kanu's arrest, wherever he was picked up eventually, then you are even more naive than a Nigerian child living in the most remote village with no school and no TV, radio or internet acccess.

Do you people live underground not to understand how the likes of interpol etal work when everyone agrees it is time to stop an individual they all consider a terrorist persona non grata?

Seniorwriter:


You'll get an appropriate response tomorrow if you sent it to the facebook Id name on my profile here.

@Seniorwriter

Olarewaju89:


I searched for Charles adarokaren

Nemere2020:

https://www.thecable.ng/breaking-british-high-commission-speaks-on-nnamdi-kanus-arrest/amp
Mynd44
Lalasticlala

gidgiddy:


The UK is not Nigeria, they act based on the rule of law and not sentiments. If the UK felt that Kanu was a terrorist, they would arrest Kanu and allow him to go to court to say why he should not be extradited to Nigeria. There is no way the UK would hand over their own citizen to a country with a very bad human rights record like Nigeria without letting it go through the process of the law. If the UK thought that IPOB was a terrorist group, they would never have offered IPOB asylum

Olarewaju89:


I searched for Charles adarokaren

ZZ22:
too much talk zero sense. What do you mean by the citizen they value? They are not your niggarea that will choose cow over you. Sane countries care about every of their citizen

gidgiddy:
Of course the UK would never hand over their own citizen to a country with a very bad human rights record such as Nigeria

candidtalk:


You're an unexposed individual and an IPOBian who knows nothing about international relations.

Everything for you begins and ends with hate of the "zoo", "niggarea" or other derogatory named you enjoy tagging Nigeria with.

If you are openly sponsoring acts of terror abroad from your nation of citizenship then you will become less valuable to that nation.

That is because that nation will have to do damage limitation sooner or later, to sacrifice and facilitate the conviction of its own citizen, or risk being viewed as guilty of a cardinal sin in international relationship i.e harbouring terrorists from facing jusfice.

ZZ22:
The report said Kanu was not kidnapped by Nigerian government from the UK but you are here typing lengthy rubbish to make believe that UK will easily give up their citizen to your country laden with terrorism and human rights abuse. Anu

gidgiddy:


The UK is not Nigeria, they act based on the rule of law and not sentiments. If the UK felt that Kanu was a terrorist, they would arrest Kanu and allow him to go to court to say why he should not be extradited to Nigeria. There is no way the UK would hand over their own citizen to a country with a very bad human rights record like Nigeria without letting it go through the process of the law. If the UK thought that IPOB was a terrorist group, they would never have offered IPOB asylum

MajorLeaguePlay:
He wasn’t born there, they don’t really care.

MajorLeaguePlay:
He wasn’t born there, they don’t really care.

gidgiddy:


The UK is not Nigeria, they act based on the rule of law and not sentiments. If the UK felt that Kanu was a terrorist, they would arrest Kanu and allow him to go to court to say why he should not be extradited to Nigeria. There is no way the UK would hand over their own citizen to a country with a very bad human rights record like Nigeria without letting it go through the process of the law. If the UK thought that IPOB was a terrorist group, they would never have offered IPOB asylum

candidtalk:


Lol. Think what you want Mr.Empty chest beater. Have you ever been to the UK and do you know how the nation works?

Google the story of British-born Shamima Begum, unlike naturalised Briton Kanu, to know what the UK is capable of.

You emotional mofos will just open mouth and be yapping nonsense because of hate of the "zoo" and Nigerians.

candidtalk:


Precisely. Even British-born Shamima Begum was stripped of her British citizenship and made stateless talk less of Kanu who is a naturalised Briton.

MansoryMX:



If Buhari kill that man he will answer to 3 set of people below;

UK government because he is a UK citizen

The Hague for illegal detention and abuse of fundamental human rights

Igbos all over the world, Jewish Igbos all over the world

IPOB, ESN, Militia and South South as a whole.



We are watching l!

candidtalk:


Stop fooling yourself. The UK would have initiated the severing of diplomatic ties with Nigeria immediately if Kanu is a citizen they value or are convinced is innocent of the terrorist charges me and you know he is 100% guilty of same as Shekau and others.

If you think the UK had no hand in Kanu's arrest, wherever he was picked up eventually, then you are even more naive than a Nigerian child living in the most remote village with no school and no TV, radio or internet acccess.

Do you people live underground not to understand how the likes of interpol etal work when everyone agrees it is time to stop an individual they all consider a terrorist persona non grata?

gidgiddy:
Of course the UK would never hand over their own citizen to a country with a very bad human rights record such as Nigeria

theFilmtric:

Lol
How old are you?



You are a clown

candidtalk:


Stop fooling yourself. The UK would have initiated the severing of diplomatic ties with Nigeria immediately if Kanu is a citizen they value or are convinced is innocent of the terrorist charges me and you know he is 100% guilty of same as Shekau and others.

If you think the UK had no hand in Kanu's arrest, wherever he was picked up eventually, then you are even more naive than a Nigerian child living in the most remote village with no school and no TV, radio or internet acccess.

Do you people live underground not to understand how the likes of interpol etal work when everyone agrees it is time to stop an individual they all consider a terrorist persona non grata?

candidtalk:


You're an unexposed individual and an IPOBian who knows nothing about international relations.

Everything for you begins and ends with hate of the "zoo", "niggarea" or other derogatory named you enjoy tagging Nigeria with.

If you are openly sponsoring acts of terror abroad from your nation of citizenship then you will become less valuable to that nation.

That is because that nation will have to do damage limitation sooner or later, to sacrifice and facilitate the conviction of its own citizen, or risk being viewed as guilty of a cardinal sin in international relationship i.e harbouring terrorists from facing jusfice.

GuyWise101:
Nna mehnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

If this is true then that means Kanu wanted Bulhari to arrest him purposefully.

Nemere2020:

https://www.thecable.ng/breaking-british-high-commission-speaks-on-nnamdi-kanus-arrest/amp
Mynd44
Lalasticlala