₦airaland Forum

Justhere:
please throw more light on the bolded.

I would be smiling to the bank if single event odds add up.

If I were to bet on two games say Benfica vs Sporting and Aston Villa vs Newcastle. The game has nine outcomes. It's either Benfica wins in the first and Aston Villa wins in the second game, which I would call the first possibility. It's either Benfica and Newcastle, second possibility. It's either Sporting and Aston Villa, third possibility, Sporting and Newcastle, fourth possibility.

So we have covered the win outcome and the loss by implications because if you win, the opposition lost - so there is four outcome for that.

Then again, it's either Benfica wins and the second game ends in a draw. Sporting wins and the second game ends in a draw. Aston Villa wins and the first game ends in a draw or Newcastle wins and the first game ends in a draw. That one too has four outcome.

Then it's either both matches end in a draw. No matter how you look at it. The game is going to end that way.

With that being said, I intend to cover all the possibilities across three or four bookies taking one position one at a time.

The thing is, I am going to look for matches with draw odds of 3.2 and above. The odds isn't really that good for some markets except you want to balance potential earnings and your stake. Anyways, the odds tells me that even the bookies and logic aren't really sure who wins the match - and that in itself ramps up my odds when I pick one position and thunder my stance. How?

Let's say I want to claim first possibility, a Benfica wins.

Okay, this is what I am going to do. I would claim a Benfica wins market with absolute confidence but without exaggeration. A 1 - 0 win is the furtherest I would go. So I would look for all the market that thunders Benfica wins. See the screenshot I took when I was playing around with bet9ja for the first time the day before yesterday. There are still markets I haven't chosen and by the time I'm done, the Benfica odds for a win would be approaching 9 - 10 when multiplied. Same for other teams to win.

Similarly, I would bet agressively for a draw. Anything draw would be chosen. A draw would be even higher because it has more odds like claiming the match total would be even and others in the draw odds market you have to painstakingly find yourself. This is, of course, without any exaggeration whatsoever. If you have a market for 0-0/1-1 and another market for 2-2/3-3/4-4/5-5. You don't want to pick either unless it's something a bit less risky like 0-0/1-1/2-2/3-3/4-4. That said, suppose our draw odds is 6.

Hmm. 9 * 9 and 9 *6 And 6 * 6 which is 81 and 54 and 36 odds if you bet on two matches for all possibilities. If you bet on all the possibilities with 5000 naira, it would cost you 45, 000 naira. If you win, you don blow be that but you......


MUST SURELY WIN.

81 * 5000 or 54 * 5000 and 36 * 5000. You would make atleast 200k in profit every time you stake. Technically, I am not gambling, just trying to use the system's advantage to my profit. The reason is, multiplication of numbers is a bitch. A bad bitch. It's unlike addition and that's why the bookies use it to entice punters to bet on seperate events which is extremely risky.

When I discovered this thing ehen, I was just screaming I am rich. I am rich. I have it made. I No no say.... Shey o ti ye e

Catfishing:
Best of luck

Thanks boss.

hhmmcj:
England

Barnsley u23 game

Over 0.5goals


ODD

B⚽⚽⚽⚽⚽⚽⚽⚽⚽⚽MMMMMMMMMMMM

Baldwretch:
I would be smiling to the bank if single event odds add up.

If I were to bet on two games say Benfica vs Sporting and Aston Villa vs Newcastle. The game has nine outcomes. It's either Benfica wins in the first and Aston Villa wins in the second game, which I would call the first possibility. It's either Benfica and Newcastle, second possibility. It's either Sporting and Aston Villa, third possibility, Sporting and Newcastle, fourth possibility.

So we have covered the win outcome and the loss by implications because if you win, the opposition lost - so there is four outcome for that.

Then again, it's either Benfica wins and the second game ends in a draw. Sporting wins and the second game ends in a draw. Aston Villa wins and the second game ends in a draw or Newcastle wins and the second game ends in a draw. That one too has four outcome.

Then it's either both matches end in a draw. No matter how you look at it. The game is going to end that way.

With that being said, I intend to cover all the possibilities across three or four bookies taking one position one at a time.

The thing is, I am going to look for matches with draw odds of 3.2 and above. The odds isn't really that good for some markets except you want to balance potential earnings and your stake. Anyways, the odds tells me that even the bookies and logic aren't really sure who wins the match - and that in itself ramps up my odds when I pick one position and thunder my stance. How?

Let's say I want to claim first possibility, a Benfica wins.

Okay, this is what I am going to do. I would claim a Benfica wins market with absolute confidence but without exaggeration. A 1 - 0 win is the furtherest I would go. So I would look for all the market that thunders Benfica wins. See the screenshot I took when I was playing around with bet9ja for the first time the day before yesterday. There are still markets I haven't chosen and by the time I'm done, the Benfica odds for a win would be approaching 9 - 10 when multiplied. Same for other teams to win.

Similarly, I would bet for a draw. A draw would be even higher because it has more odds like claiming the match total would be even and others in the draw odds market you have to painstakingly find yourself. This is, of course, without any exaggeration whatsoever. If you have a market for 0-0/1-1 and another market for 2-2/3-3/4-4/5-5. You don't want to pick either unless it's something a bit less risky like 0-0/1-1/2-2/3-3/4-4. That said, suppose our draw odds is 6.

Hmm. 9 * 9 and 9 *6 which is 81 and 54 odds if you bet on two matches whichever way you want. If you bet on all the possibilities with 5000 naira, it would cost you 45, 000 naira. If you win, you don blow be that but you......


MUST SURELY WIN.

81 * 5000 or 54 * 5000. You would make atleast 200k in profit every time you stake. Technically, I am not gambling, just trying to use the system's advantage to my profit. The reason is, multiplication of numbers is a bitch. A bad bitch. It's unlike addition and that's why the bookies use it to entice punters to bet on seperate events which is extremely risky.

When I discovered this thing ehen, I was just screaming I am rich. I am rich. I have it made. I No no say.... Shey o ti ye e

Haha haha, we have a professor in dah building. Welcome sir. More grease to your elbow.

Kingzrocky:
Haha haha, we have a professor in dah building. Welcome sir. More grease to your elbow.

Professor wey no reach anywhere. Professor wey no get money for pocket . Thanks for the compliment though, lol. Me na money be my only problem for this life o jare, lol.

I calculated Benfica wins odd and it's surprisingly 36 odds. Chai. And na one thing I dey hammer for that screenshot, forget the event - Benfica would win by atleast 1 - 0. Chai sense yaf finish me.

Nb: I have edited my post if you care to go back, adding the odds for both draws.

Baldwretch:
Professor wey no reach anywhere. Professor wey no get money for pocket . Thanks for the compliment though, lol. Me na money be my only problem for this life o jare, lol.

Nb: I have edited my post if you care to go back, adding the odds for both draws.

You dey intelligent though. I appreciate dat.

Indonesia

Persis Solos game

Over 0.5goals


ODD

Baldwretch:
I would be smiling to the bank if single event odds add up.

If I were to bet on two games say Benfica vs Sporting and Aston Villa vs Newcastle. The game has nine outcomes. It's either Benfica wins in the first and Aston Villa wins in the second game, which I would call the first possibility. It's either Benfica and Newcastle, second possibility. It's either Sporting and Aston Villa, third possibility, Sporting and Newcastle, fourth possibility.

So we have covered the win outcome and the loss by implications because if you win, the opposition lost - so there is four outcome for that.

Then again, it's either Benfica wins and the second game ends in a draw. Sporting wins and the second game ends in a draw. Aston Villa wins and the first game ends in a draw or Newcastle wins and the first game ends in a draw. That one too has four outcome.

Then it's either both matches end in a draw. No matter how you look at it. The game is going to end that way.

With that being said, I intend to cover all the possibilities across three or four bookies taking one position one at a time.

The thing is, I am going to look for matches with draw odds of 3.2 and above. The odds isn't really that good for some markets except you want to balance potential earnings and your stake. Anyways, the odds tells me that even the bookies and logic aren't really sure who wins the match - and that in itself ramps up my odds when I pick one position and thunder my stance. How?

Let's say I want to claim first possibility, a Benfica wins.

Okay, this is what I am going to do. I would claim a Benfica wins market with absolute confidence but without exaggeration. A 1 - 0 win is the furtherest I would go. So I would look for all the market that thunders Benfica wins. See the screenshot I took when I was playing around with bet9ja for the first time the day before yesterday. There are still markets I haven't chosen and by the time I'm done, the Benfica odds for a win would be approaching 9 - 10 when multiplied. Same for other teams to win.

Similarly, I would bet agressively for a draw. Anything draw would be chosen. A draw would be even higher because it has more odds like claiming the match total would be even and others in the draw odds market you have to painstakingly find yourself. This is, of course, without any exaggeration whatsoever. If you have a market for 0-0/1-1 and another market for 2-2/3-3/4-4/5-5. You don't want to pick either unless it's something a bit less risky like 0-0/1-1/2-2/3-3/4-4. That said, suppose our draw odds is 6.

Hmm. 9 * 9 and 9 *6 And 6 * 6 which is 81 and 54 and 36 odds if you bet on two matches for all possibilities. If you bet on all the possibilities with 5000 naira, it would cost you 45, 000 naira. If you win, you don blow be that but you......


MUST SURELY WIN.

81 * 5000 or 54 * 5000 and 36 * 5000. You would make atleast 200k in profit every time you stake. Technically, I am not gambling, just trying to use the system's advantage to my profit. The reason is, multiplication of numbers is a bitch. A bad bitch. It's unlike addition and that's why the bookies use it to entice punters to bet on seperate events which is extremely risky.

When I discovered this thing ehen, I was just screaming I am rich. I am rich. I have it made. I No no say.... Shey o ti ye e

While am trying to study this strategy, I must acknowledge your openess, most peoole wont share this type of secret , I also comend your English, you are really educated.

Stephenmoka4:
He post often, at least 1.4+ odds twice, na double (rollover)

Maybe I no dey follow up, coz na live bet I dey always see him bet..

Austema:
While am trying to study this strategy, I must acknowledge your openess, most peoole wont share this type of secret , I also comend your English, you are really educated.

I must admit that people pay to receive this strategy but the thing just occurred to me when I dabbled on bet9ja. Thanks a lot for the compliment oga. I'm flattered.

pls summarize i dont understand

Baldwretch:
I would be smiling to the bank if single event odds add up.

If I were to bet on two games say Benfica vs Sporting and Aston Villa vs Newcastle. The game has nine outcomes. It's either Benfica wins in the first and Aston Villa wins in the second game, which I would call the first possibility. It's either Benfica and Newcastle, second possibility. It's either Sporting and Aston Villa, third possibility, Sporting and Newcastle, fourth possibility.

So we have covered the win outcome and the loss by implications because if you win, the opposition lost - so there is four outcome for that.

Then again, it's either Benfica wins and the second game ends in a draw. Sporting wins and the second game ends in a draw. Aston Villa wins and the first game ends in a draw or Newcastle wins and the first game ends in a draw. That one too has four outcome.

Then it's either both matches end in a draw. No matter how you look at it. The game is going to end that way.

With that being said, I intend to cover all the possibilities across three or four bookies taking one position one at a time.

The thing is, I am going to look for matches with draw odds of 3.2 and above. The odds isn't really that good for some markets except you want to balance potential earnings and your stake. Anyways, the odds tells me that even the bookies and logic aren't really sure who wins the match - and that in itself ramps up my odds when I pick one position and thunder my stance. How?

Let's say I want to claim first possibility, a Benfica wins.

Okay, this is what I am going to do. I would claim a Benfica wins market with absolute confidence but without exaggeration. A 1 - 0 win is the furtherest I would go. So I would look for all the market that thunders Benfica wins. See the screenshot I took when I was playing around with bet9ja for the first time the day before yesterday. There are still markets I haven't chosen and by the time I'm done, the Benfica odds for a win would be approaching 9 - 10 when multiplied. Same for other teams to win.

Similarly, I would bet agressively for a draw. Anything draw would be chosen. A draw would be even higher because it has more odds like claiming the match total would be even and others in the draw odds market you have to painstakingly find yourself. This is, of course, without any exaggeration whatsoever. If you have a market for 0-0/1-1 and another market for 2-2/3-3/4-4/5-5. You don't want to pick either unless it's something a bit less risky like 0-0/1-1/2-2/3-3/4-4. That said, suppose our draw odds is 6.

Hmm. 9 * 9 and 9 *6 And 6 * 6 which is 81 and 54 and 36 odds if you bet on two matches for all possibilities. If you bet on all the possibilities with 5000 naira, it would cost you 45, 000 naira. If you win, you don blow be that but you......


MUST SURELY WIN.

81 * 5000 or 54 * 5000 and 36 * 5000. You would make atleast 200k in profit every time you stake. Technically, I am not gambling, just trying to use the system's advantage to my profit. The reason is, multiplication of numbers is a bitch. A bad bitch. It's unlike addition and that's why the bookies use it to entice punters to bet on seperate events which is extremely risky.

When I discovered this thing ehen, I was just screaming I am rich. I am rich. I have it made. I No no say.... Shey o ti ye e

Sparekey:
Abeg which bookie I fit see this option?

22bet
Or
1xbet

Oga BetBuilder365 will definitely love this Maths by Prof. Baldwretch..

Baldwretch:
I must admit that people pay to receive this strategy but the thing just occurred to me when I dabbled on bet9ja. Thanks a lot for the compliment oga. I'm flattered.

pls help me i dont understand the long write up help me with your booking code when u done the analysis lets risk together can i dm u?

Abba114:
pls help me i dont understand the long write up help me with your booking code when u done the analysis lets risk together can i dm u?

The summary is that if I could pick seperate events in the same game and have the odds multiplied like they do for seperate events in seperate matches, I would be wealthy. I would pick seperate events in two games but these seperate events would cover all my range of possibilites and would actually be just a different way of echoing the same sentiments. If you say a team would win, you also claim that the match would score above 0.5 and they would be the one.

Since these are seperate events with their own odds, you can pick seperate events in a match and do multiple with another match by picking seperating events in it too and pairing up. If you bet on all the possibility, you would break even by a very wide margin no matter what, but the bookies do not allow a punter to bet on seperate events in the same match so I guess this is useless.

Remijuice:
Oga BetBuilder365 will definitely love this Maths by Prof. Baldwretch..

And funny enough, na Math I read for OAU.

I need sure 2 odds

Baldwretch:
The summary is that if I could pick seperate events in the same game and have the odds multiplied like they do for seperate events in seperate matches, I would be wealthy. I would pick seperate events in two games but these seperate events would cover all my range of possibilites and would actually be just a different way of echoing the same sentiments. If you say a team would win, you also claim that the match would score above 0.5 and they would be the one.

Since these are seperate events with their own odds, you can pick seperate events in a match and do multiple with another match by picking seperating events in it too and pairing up. If you bet on all the possibility, you would break even by a very wide margin no matter what, but the bookies do not allow a punter to bet on seperate events in the same match so I guess this is useless.

those bookies,are smart they block any possible way to earn easy i have tried several analysis no one works

Johnchrix:
I need sure 2 odds

i have how much will u stake

Senegal

This "may" come in. Almost 4 odds on my 22bet

Johnchrix:
I need sure 2 odds

forest green rovers vs Brighton and hove Albion u21 ---1

D odd is now 2 odds

hhmmcj:
Sweden vs Greece (19:45)

TIP: Sweden Over 4.5 Shots on Target.

ODD : 1.95


Tomorrow game

Johnchrix:
I need sure 2 odds

SELECTED PROFITABLE GAMES

12/10/21 - In- Play - NORWAY -

Asker - Tromsdalen

(HOME WIN)

Baldwretch:
I would be smiling to the bank if single event odds add up.

If I were to bet on two games say Benfica vs Sporting and Aston Villa vs Newcastle. The game has nine outcomes. It's either Benfica wins in the first and Aston Villa wins in the second game, which I would call the first possibility. It's either Benfica and Newcastle, second possibility. It's either Sporting and Aston Villa, third possibility, Sporting and Newcastle, fourth possibility.

So we have covered the win outcome and the loss by implications because if you win, the opposition lost - so there is four outcome for that.

Then again, it's either Benfica wins and the second game ends in a draw. Sporting wins and the second game ends in a draw. Aston Villa wins and the first game ends in a draw or Newcastle wins and the first game ends in a draw. That one too has four outcome.

Then it's either both matches end in a draw. No matter how you look at it. The game is going to end that way.

With that being said, I intend to cover all the possibilities across three or four bookies taking one position one at a time.

The thing is, I am going to look for matches with draw odds of 3.2 and above. The odds isn't really that good for some markets except you want to balance potential earnings and your stake. Anyways, the odds tells me that even the bookies and logic aren't really sure who wins the match - and that in itself ramps up my odds when I pick one position and thunder my stance. How?

Let's say I want to claim first possibility, a Benfica wins.

Okay, this is what I am going to do. I would claim a Benfica wins market with absolute confidence but without exaggeration. A 1 - 0 win is the furtherest I would go. So I would look for all the market that thunders Benfica wins. See the screenshot I took when I was playing around with bet9ja for the first time the day before yesterday. There are still markets I haven't chosen and by the time I'm done, the Benfica odds for a win would be approaching 9 - 10 when multiplied. Same for other teams to win.

Similarly, I would bet agressively for a draw. Anything draw would be chosen. A draw would be even higher because it has more odds like claiming the match total would be even and others in the draw odds market you have to painstakingly find yourself. This is, of course, without any exaggeration whatsoever. If you have a market for 0-0/1-1 and another market for 2-2/3-3/4-4/5-5. You don't want to pick either unless it's something a bit less risky like 0-0/1-1/2-2/3-3/4-4. That said, suppose our draw odds is 6.

Hmm. 9 * 9 and 9 *6 And 6 * 6 which is 81 and 54 and 36 odds if you bet on two matches for all possibilities. If you bet on all the possibilities with 5000 naira, it would cost you 45, 000 naira. If you win, you don blow be that but you......


MUST SURELY WIN.

81 * 5000 or 54 * 5000 and 36 * 5000. You would make atleast 200k in profit every time you stake. Technically, I am not gambling, just trying to use the system's advantage to my profit. The reason is, multiplication of numbers is a bitch. A bad bitch. It's unlike addition and that's why the bookies use it to entice punters to bet on seperate events which is extremely risky.

When I discovered this thing ehen, I was just screaming I am rich. I am rich. I have it made. I No no say.... Shey o ti ye e

Guy are you talking about using correct score instead of direct win or draw odds...

Because a permutation of 2 games with all possible outcome won't add up to the odds your listed above.. even if we to have both underdogs winning... Their total odds won't add to that total you put out there.

BET OF THE DAY

WORLD CUP QUAL. - DENMARK VS AUSTRIA - 1 @ 1.50

https://www.floranbetting.com/2021/10/bet-of-day-soccervista_12.html?m=1

hhmmcj:
Indonesia

Persis Solos game

Over 0.5goals


ODD

how much are u staking on these small odds

bestmutiu2019:
B2RBK9L msport, try all your possible best to play this game

people that play this should signify

12odd

5CMKSL9