₦airaland Forum

teemy:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNHUDDqTgdI

For months now, tens of thousands of US and NATO troops have been positioned along Ukraine’s western borders, with the most sophisticated war machinery in the world. Their leaders have issued thundering threats to Russian President Vladimir Putin. Yet, Russia unleashed air power, tanks and 190000 troops and has invaded Ukraine. Ukrainian civilians, reservists and troops are fighting a valiant but unequal battle, nearly 150 civilians including children have been killed within barely three days.

So where is NATO and why isn’t it helping Ukrainians fight the Russians? In an exclusive conversation with Padma Rao Sundarji for Times Online, India’s generals Ata Hasnain and Shokin Chauhan provide the answers.

ayindejimmy:
So you can turn around to say NATO has started the WWIII.
NATO is meant for defence not attack unprovoked.
I just wish Russia throw as much as just a stone into Poland

Nukilia:
If Russia did not throw a pin in Poland, I know what your Western brothers are capable of doing. They bomb Poland and tag it on Russia so that they can invade it. Nothing new in the playbook of the West

phorget:
Ukraine isn't a NATO member yet so why would NATO fight for them?

ayindejimmy:
So you can turn around to say NATO has started the WWIII.

NATO is meant for defence not attack unprovoked.

I just wish Russia throw as much as just a stone into Poland

teemy:
In the video, the same question was raised since Iraq and Afghanistan were both non-NATO states and yet, NATO went there.

Watch 3:57

Nukilia:
If Russia did not throw a pin in Poland, I know what your Western brothers are capable of doing. They bomb Poland and tag it on Russia so that they can invade it. Nothing new in the playbook of the West

ayindejimmy:
So you can turn around to say NATO has started the WWIII.

NATO is meant for defence not attack unprovoked.

I just wish Russia throw as much as just a stone into Poland