Kriss216:
God bless you massively, OP.

I just don't know how to thank you for this great piece. Come and marry my girlfriend, you deserve her more.

BotRascal:
Whey you want this your post to fly to front page or what, men an endangered specie! Joke of the century.....
So the man was falsely accused or what, so the girl wasn't raped or she fell sick and suddenly developed VVF.. So may sick people around here.
The onus of evidence falls on the prosecution, and this is what failed, too many clashing evidence presented to court and sadly there is no technology that cAn detect semen sample after two months in a rape incident, mind you she was admitted two month for urinary problems bla bla bla, then VVF was detected for her age. Who caused it?
Did she just get VVF , the wife was convicted of negligence, she should appeal the case and sue NAPTIP, since her husband and son is innocent, she should. And she would win.

LilMissFavvy:
because I cannot understand how a man could be accused of rape, and he is unable to provide enough concrete evidence to prove his innocence.

LilMissFavvy:
I think out of 1,000 rape accusations against men, only one or two of such accusations would be false. Often times, men are always guilty of the rape' they are accused' of. Check the crime' section, and you will see the number of rape cases which some guilty men confessed to, and you will know that truly majority of men are rapist'. Men are not endangered specie. However, I feel that false accusations should carry at least 5yrs imprisonment, because I cannot understand how a man could be accused of rape, and he is unable to provide enough concrete evidence to prove his innocence.

As for the story above, I believe the guy might have been guilty, but has been able to get off the hook through bribe or something. Let me read the threads all over again.

PerfectStranger:

What prove did the accuser tender in court?
Or is the prove only limited to the accused? You don't sound too smart.

PerfectStranger:

What prove did the accuser tender in court?
Or is the prove only limited to the accused? You don't sound too smart.

TheChildOfGod:


One or two in a thousand? Where exactly did you get this statistics from? I'll tell you where. From emotions.

As for the issue of bribing the judge, it appears you do not know much about how trial works so I'll advise you research more. One free lecture though- the judge in a matter can only base his judgement from the fact presented and proven before him...not from what he sees on social media.

The man has been acquitted and the prosecution has a right of appeal. Until there is a contrary judgment from the appeal court, let's please let this innocent man try to put his life back together.

legallyminded:


You are a plague to a man. To your hell hole

LilMissFavvy:
Foools like you resort to insults when they lack sensible contributions to make. Check the crime' section and with the number of rape cases and update that daft' brain of yours.

ivolt:
When a politician is discharged by the court on money laundering charges due to lack of evidence or an incompetent prosecutor, nobody cries about false allegation. In fact, most people will curse the judge and accuse him of being bribed.

If a kidnapper or bandit is discharged by the court for lack of evidence, many of you crusaders will get
angry and lament about the corrupt country. In this case, nobody raises dust about false allegations.

If a Yahoo boy escape jail due to lack of evidence, the same crowd don't open thread
about "false allegations".

The reason many people give for supporting jungle justice is that the suspects are often
freed by the court. Again, these same people don't care about false allegations in such cases.

There was a thread about a man who spent decades in jail but was later freed. Surprisingly, these
activists are nowhere to be found on the thread to cry and lament about false accusations because his allege offence was not related to rape.

But immediately there is a news about a rape case, these crowd go into overdrive and starts to
convulse about "false accusations". They dive deep into conspiracies of the victim lying, or just
wicked or a setup.
We are told stories of how the posters or their family suffers similar "false allegations".

It makes one wonder what triggers the unhinged response to rape cases. Guilty conscience?

LilMissFavvy:
I am more interested in your second paragraph. This occurrences happened in Nigeria, fine. The crime section I told you to glance through has thousands of threads on rape cases which happened in Nigeria, yet you are here talking like you are not aware of all the corruption and injustices. Is the EFCC incorruptible? Is one assured of justice in Nigeria all the time? What happened to the Deeper life sexual assault case. what happpened to Sylvester who died last year, who was forced to drink substances for his refusal to join a cult', has he gotten justice? From what we read, one of the suspects said his father knows the chief judge. Search for the answers to my questions and keep it to yourself, but at this point, I will ignore you because, you do not accept reality.

ivolt:

There is no accuser as she is dead.
The case is between the Sate and Mr. suspected rapist.

legallyminded:


You're not worth it. You're sentimental and a man hater so why would your opinion be even logical to start with? You just typed trash and that was my reaction to it. You do not give a starfish brains because it's head can't contain one.

TheChildOfGod:


1.) It is normal to see ladies like you trivialize the plight of men. It's almost like you take pleasure from seeing men suffer. That not withstanding, let's analyze your response logically.

Well I see you are a men's activist. And probably people like you feel all the injustice melted to you was because of women. Once you understand that everybody has one problem or the other then you'll know where I'm coming from. To people like you every lady out there is a feminist.

2.) Firstly you said my assertion that men were endangered is a joke. I have no response to this as I believe it's unfortunate that despite all evidence, you still feel this way. I can't help you on that. Only God can...and yes, I believe this should be in the front page for more people to be informed.

Secondly, on whether the man was falsely accused, I answer in the affirmative. That is exactly what an acquittal means, and unless the prosecution succeeds on appeal, that man is an innocent man and has always been. You only judge him guilty on sentiments, not facts.

I guess you do not know what acquittal means also. In from the case, the man was acquitted due to conflicting evidence and this is where I blame the prosecution for not convincing the judge.

3.) On whether she was raped or not, let's be clear on what we actually know. The police was the prosecution and it is their duty to try to find him guilty. The police hospital said she died as a result of STIs related issues. The general hospital which is an independent party and also government owned performed an autopy and disputed the report of the police. They opined that she died of natural causes. I leave this for open minded readers to drawn an inference from.

Next, assuming but without conceding that she indeed had STIs. Is there a possibility that just like the chrisland girl, she was actually sexually active with people in school and elsewhere? OK, let's assume she was raped, is there anything to suggest that this was done by the man out of the billions of men on earth? The son is nowhere to be found so he hasn't been taken to court. Is there a possibility that the son is guilty but the man is actually innocent? Ponder about this.

Shey a teacher flogged a child to death what was the autopsy report............ Your guess should be good as mine. For your info autopsies only report on what happens( chemical, fluid changes in a dead body), and not exactly what caused the event. That is why they use word like "probably, maybe" because they are not sure.

You should seek for the the facts of the wife's conviction before commenting. What if she admitted to having reasons to believe that the boy was up to something and did nothing about it? If you weren't in that court during the trial, look for transcripts of the proceedings before you come to condemn an acquitted man here.

4.) I pray for you this morning, that someday you will not be wrongly accused of an offence you did not commit and the world calls for your head even after you have been cleared because they really wish you were guilty.

Na whom dem catch na im be thief"......are you saying the girl prob early lied to get to the man and his son? You should also tell me the girls dead body was a hoax, she's probably chilling in America because she made a video falsely accusing a MAN. She is a liar.
Let me use the same analogy as you pray you don't get raped by your fellow MEN so the court acquits them on the charge of previous advise of good conduct, and I am very sure they can prove beyond reasonable doubt that they were never gays.
Like you said...........

It is better to free 10 guilty persons against whom a case have not been proven than to convict one innocent person.

Antimarraige:
I didn't read your write up but I'm sure of one thing, if anyone (man or woman) accuses me wrongly and still watch me suffer for it, I will make sure they leave this world by my hands, anyhow e wan be they must die ni even if that's the last thing I will do