₦airaland Forum

lecowas:
Lol I think u’re the one that is not current here. India and China has a never ending feud, India is a friendly nation to Russia and the U.S.

India is in the quad group with the US while it purchases weapons from Russia also. But the US wants India to be fully loyal cos when China will start, Russia will not be there to save them, cos Russia has more to gain from China than India.

AldrichAmes:
It's just laughable and it shows those who have no clue about the military and warfare. Logistics problem is part and parcel of warfare and no military can avoid it during war hence no army goes through war unscath. The Nazis who were the greatest military force in human history with technology more advanced that their time lost WW2 due to logistics problems. Allied Forces during the highly overhyped and excessively celebrated Normandy landings in western history took disastrous losses due to logistics problems. So, having logistics problem during military maneuvers is as normal as being in the military itself - it's about how you regroup and mitigate against it, which the Russians have done during the 2nd phase of the war.

US also had a lot of logistics problems in Iraq and Afghanistan hence a lot of their regular forces and special forces were killed in ambushes. It's also the reason why insurgency was very effective against them in both countries. And these countries aren't on Ukraine's level. Iraq is half the size of Ukraine and it was already demilitarised with arms embargo for a decade since most of Iraqi weapons were of US origin (the US propped-up Sadam to fight Iran and turned on him after that). Almost all of Iraqi lethal weapons were grounded because they couldn't get parts due to US emgargo. So the US attacked when Iraq couldn't even fight and all of Sadam's generals and their troops didn't fight because they thought the US would give them power once they get rid of Saddam. And once that didn't happen - they started the insurgency that broke the US' back, hence people tend to call the Iraqi insurgency the real US-Iraq war. As for Afghanistan: the country had no military and they're basically tribal goat herding militias with AK47 and RPGs. Evidently, none of these two countries had any army, if we're being honest. Ukraine (the 2nd biggest country in Europe) on the other hand had the largest army in Europe (only 2nd to Russia before the war) that was trained for 8yrs by NATO and was supplied the most sophisticated weapons.

The logistics problems Russian forces faced during the initial phase of this campaign were actually exaggarated due to this being arguably the first global war that happened during the social media era where you can see everything in real time and a lot of it is also propaganda. Most of these logistics problems weren't even because the Russians were incompetent - it was mostly because they didn't go in with an intention to fight a war of attrition. They went in thinking Ukrainians wouldn't put up a fight and would try to save their cities. Then both can get to the negotiating table. Hence they invade with a smal number of combatants and kept matching without guarding their rear. And that's basically why those ambushes were successfully. However, since they moved on to phase 2 and put their feet down to fight - how come the exaggerated logistics problems disappeared?

LMAO @ CSG and MQ-9B like China and Russia don't have advanced EW that would jam those overrated interfaces. Small Iran captured a much more advanced US drone that's superior to MQ-9B, with EW, without breaking a sweat. Ever wondered why even American F-35 stopped going anywhere near Iran? Well, it's because Russia gave Iran radars that can detect them from far away and knock them out of the sky. Now, imagine what Russia and China would do to them. Some of you just throw out names without any understanding of what the other side has.

BTW, China just launched semi-submersible surface ships. Russia on the other hand has stealth Corvettes that are fully submersible - so they can go under water or act as surface ships. NATO countries including the US don't have those capabilities. And when it comes to EW - there's no match for Russia right now in the world. Something to ponder on apart from all the other advantages they have.

Elvictor:


I thought I.. I .. Igbofam said China has abandoned Russia, what am I seeing?

Igbofam this is fake news right

Balogunodua:
Same weapons they used to bleep USA during Korea war

Drenimarcus:
SAY NO MORE

AldrichAmes:
It's just laughable and it shows those who have no clue about the military and warfare. Logistics problem is part and parcel of warfare and no military can avoid it during war hence no army goes through war unscath. The Nazis who were the greatest military force in human history with technology more advanced that their time lost WW2 due to logistics problems. Allied Forces during the highly overhyped and excessively celebrated Normandy landings in western history took disastrous losses due to logistics problems. So, having logistics problem during military maneuvers is as normal as being in the military itself - it's about how you regroup and mitigate against it, which the Russians have done during the 2nd phase of the war.

US also had a lot of logistics problems in Iraq and Afghanistan hence a lot of their regular forces and special forces were killed in ambushes. It's also the reason why insurgency was very effective against them in both countries. And these countries aren't on Ukraine's level. Iraq is half the size of Ukraine and it was already demilitarised with arms embargo for a decade since most of Iraqi weapons were of US origin (the US propped-up Sadam to fight Iran and turned on him after that). Almost all of Iraqi lethal weapons were grounded because they couldn't get parts due to US emgargo. So the US attacked when Iraq couldn't even fight and all of Sadam's generals and their troops didn't fight because they thought the US would give them power once they get rid of Saddam. And once that didn't happen - they started the insurgency that broke the US' back, hence people tend to call the Iraqi insurgency the real US-Iraq war. As for Afghanistan: the country had no military and they're basically tribal goat herding militias with AK47 and RPGs. Evidently, none of these two countries had any army, if we're being honest. Ukraine (the 2nd biggest country in Europe) on the other hand had the largest army in Europe (only 2nd to Russia before the war) that was trained for 8yrs by NATO and was supplied the most sophisticated weapons.

The logistics problems Russian forces faced during the initial phase of this campaign were actually exaggarated due to this being arguably the first global war that happened during the social media era where you can see everything in real time and a lot of it is also propaganda. Most of these logistics problems weren't even because the Russians were incompetent - it was mostly because they didn't go in with an intention to fight a war of attrition. They went in thinking Ukrainians wouldn't put up a fight and would try to save their cities. Then both can get to the negotiating table. Hence they invade with a smal number of combatants and kept matching without guarding their rear. And that's basically why those ambushes were successfully. However, since they moved on to phase 2 and put their feet down to fight - how come the exaggerated logistics problems disappeared?

LMAO @ CSG and MQ-9B like China and Russia don't have advanced EW that would jam those overrated interfaces. Small Iran captured a much more advanced US drone that's superior to MQ-9B, with EW, without breaking a sweat. Ever wondered why even American F-35 stopped going anywhere near Iran? Well, it's because Russia gave Iran radars that can detect them from far away and knock them out of the sky. Now, imagine what Russia and China would do to them. Some of you just throw out names without any understanding of what the other side has.

BTW, China just launched semi-submersible surface ships. Russia on the other hand has stealth Corvettes that are fully submersible - so they can go under water or act as surface ships. NATO countries including the US don't have those capabilities. And when it comes to EW - there's no match for Russia right now in the world. Something to ponder on apart from all the other advantages they have.

AldrichAmes:
Biden isn’t a weakling - he’s just a face of the power brokers and powerful force that run the US - just like every other US president. It’s by design and US presidents are mostly controlled puppets. Obama also wasn’t the one running things when he was the US president.

It’s also a misconception that the US was feared by all. That’s just make-believe like Hollywood movies. Those who fear the US are European countries and 3rd world countries. Countries like Russia and China have never feared the US. The US just never really troubled them until now. And what they’re doing now is basically reacting to American threats on their borders.

People tend to forget the poor China was the one that did most of the fighting during the Korean War against the US and allied countries and the Chinese technically won that war (but it’s regarded as a stalemate officially). And that was the US at its peak militarily because it was vastly superior to every other country on earth militarily (save for the Soviet Union) and China at its lowest both militarily and economically. So why would a country that pulled that off fear the US? And Americans have always been weary of Russia because it inherited almost everything Americans feared about the Soviets.

Regardless, NATO needs to be really scared. No NATO country has fought a country as strong as Ukraine on the ground since the end of WW2. Fighting defenceless goat herders is different from fighting a formidable peer military that has a lot of support. And Russia is currently doing that with a fraction of its military (less than 10%) despite being outnumbered by 4:1 and they’re achieving results (despite initial setbacks) whilst rotating forces to get the needed frontline experience and tactical battlefield awareness. Combine that with the Chinese and US + NATO countries don’t stand a chance in a real shooting match.

AldrichAmes:
It's just laughable and it shows those who have no clue about the military and warfare. Logistics problem is part and parcel of warfare and no military can avoid it during war hence no army goes through war unscath. The Nazis who were the greatest military force in human history with technology more advanced that their time lost WW2 due to logistics problems. Allied Forces during the highly overhyped and excessively celebrated Normandy landings in western history took disastrous losses due to logistics problems. So, having logistics problem during military maneuvers is as normal as being in the military itself - it's about how you regroup and mitigate against it, which the Russians have done during the 2nd phase of the war.

US also had a lot of logistics problems in Iraq and Afghanistan hence a lot of their regular forces and special forces were killed in ambushes. It's also the reason why insurgency was very effective against them in both countries. And these countries aren't on Ukraine's level. Iraq is half the size of Ukraine and it was already demilitarised with arms embargo for a decade since most of Iraqi weapons were of US origin (the US propped-up Sadam to fight Iran and turned on him after that). Almost all of Iraqi lethal weapons were grounded because they couldn't get parts due to US emgargo. So the US attacked when Iraq couldn't even fight and all of Sadam's generals and their troops didn't fight because they thought the US would give them power once they get rid of Saddam. And once that didn't happen - they started the insurgency that broke the US' back, hence people tend to call the Iraqi insurgency the real US-Iraq war. As for Afghanistan: the country had no military and they're basically tribal goat herding militias with AK47 and RPGs. Evidently, none of these two countries had any army, if we're being honest. Ukraine (the 2nd biggest country in Europe) on the other hand had the largest army in Europe (only 2nd to Russia before the war) that was trained for 8yrs by NATO and was supplied the most sophisticated weapons.

The logistics problems Russian forces faced during the initial phase of this campaign were actually exaggarated due to this being arguably the first global war that happened during the social media era where you can see everything in real time and a lot of it is also propaganda. Most of these logistics problems weren't even because the Russians were incompetent - it was mostly because they didn't go in with an intention to fight a war of attrition. They went in thinking Ukrainians wouldn't put up a fight and would try to save their cities. Then both can get to the negotiating table. Hence they invade with a smal number of combatants and kept matching without guarding their rear. And that's basically why those ambushes were successfully. However, since they moved on to phase 2 and put their feet down to fight - how come the exaggerated logistics problems disappeared?

LMAO @ CSG and MQ-9B like China and Russia don't have advanced EW that would jam those overrated interfaces. Small Iran captured a much more advanced US drone that's superior to MQ-9B, with EW, without breaking a sweat. Ever wondered why even American F-35 stopped going anywhere near Iran? Well, it's because Russia gave Iran radars that can detect them from far away and knock them out of the sky. Now, imagine what Russia and China would do to them. Some of you just throw out names without any understanding of what the other side has.

BTW, China just launched semi-submersible surface ships. Russia on the other hand has stealth Corvettes that are fully submersible - so they can go under water or act as surface ships. NATO countries including the US don't have those capabilities. And when it comes to EW - there's no match for Russia right now in the world. Something to ponder on apart from all the other advantages they have.

LocalStandard1:
Let the games begin....

railone:
You have idea about military and you just wrote that epistle.... Saddam was using American weapons? Guy, you do know the internet is free right!
Iraq that was using Soviet weapons and equipment.
Also, like do you guys have any idea of the map. Look at where America is and where Russia is compare to where Iraq is and Ukraine.
You talk about Nazi Germany yet the same people ran through Europe like child's play but had problems taking on Britain because it wasn't on mainland Europe. I mean they reached Moscow before Hitler made his now famous blunder. And you're comparing America that basically had to airdrop more of its logistics with Russia that have land advantage.

Russia that couldn't drop a single battalion of paratroopers behind enemy line, something the US does time and time again.

Where you lost me was saying Bombers have EW capabilities to knock out CSG.. do you even know the capability of a Carrier Strike Group. An AWC could see the bomber from thousand of miles away and you're talking about using EW... Bro go read up at this point.

Also comparing an RQ-7, a reconnaissance drone with the Reaper... lol
like how do you people type such crap with confident.

See lie, America don't have an F-35 forward base in the Middle East. How they Bleep would they be avoiding Iran with the Aircraft? F-35 is not a reconnaissance aircraft to begin with.
Israel have been using theirs to wreck havoc in Syria with the same supposed Russia superior radar.

Same radar that couldn't detect small Ukraine Neptune anti-ship missiles....

You can support Russia, I don't have any problem with that but abeg don't come here parading lies and make believe like others don't have Internet too.

Kingsnairaland:
you did not add ladies and gentlemen.

railone:
US have not threatened India with sanctions. Oga dz Internet no be only you get am

AldrichAmes:
It's just laughable and it shows those who have no clue about the military and warfare. Logistics problem is part and parcel of warfare and no military can avoid it during war hence no army goes through war unscath. The Nazis who were the greatest military force in human history with technology more advanced that their time lost WW2 due to logistics problems. Allied Forces during the highly overhyped and excessively celebrated Normandy landings in western history took disastrous losses due to logistics problems. So, having logistics problem during military maneuvers is as normal as being in the military itself - it's about how you regroup and mitigate against it, which the Russians have done during the 2nd phase of the war.

US also had a lot of logistics problems in Iraq and Afghanistan hence a lot of their regular forces and special forces were killed in ambushes. It's also the reason why insurgency was very effective against them in both countries. And these countries aren't on Ukraine's level. Iraq is half the size of Ukraine and it was already demilitarised with arms embargo for a decade since most of Iraqi weapons were of US origin (the US propped-up Sadam to fight Iran and turned on him after that). Almost all of Iraqi lethal weapons were grounded because they couldn't get parts due to US emgargo. So the US attacked when Iraq couldn't even fight and all of Sadam's generals and their troops didn't fight because they thought the US would give them power once they get rid of Saddam. And once that didn't happen - they started the insurgency that broke the US' back, hence people tend to call the Iraqi insurgency the real US-Iraq war. As for Afghanistan: the country had no military and they're basically tribal goat herding militias with AK47 and RPGs. Evidently, none of these two countries had any army, if we're being honest. Ukraine (the 2nd biggest country in Europe) on the other hand had the largest army in Europe (only 2nd to Russia before the war) that was trained for 8yrs by NATO and was supplied the most sophisticated weapons.

The logistics problems Russian forces faced during the initial phase of this campaign were actually exaggarated due to this being arguably the first global war that happened during the social media era where you can see everything in real time and a lot of it is also propaganda. Most of these logistics problems weren't even because the Russians were incompetent - it was mostly because they didn't go in with an intention to fight a war of attrition. They went in thinking Ukrainians wouldn't put up a fight and would try to save their cities. Then both can get to the negotiating table. Hence they invade with a smal number of combatants and kept matching without guarding their rear. And that's basically why those ambushes were successfully. However, since they moved on to phase 2 and put their feet down to fight - how come the exaggerated logistics problems disappeared?

LMAO @ CSG and MQ-9B like China and Russia don't have advanced EW that would jam those overrated interfaces. Small Iran captured a much more advanced US drone that's superior to MQ-9B, with EW, without breaking a sweat. Ever wondered why even American F-35 stopped going anywhere near Iran? Well, it's because Russia gave Iran radars that can detect them from far away and knock them out of the sky. Now, imagine what Russia and China would do to them. Some of you just throw out names without any understanding of what the other side has.

BTW, China just launched semi-submersible surface ships. Russia on the other hand has stealth Corvettes that are fully submersible - so they can go under water or act as surface ships. NATO countries including the US don't have those capabilities. And when it comes to EW - there's no match for Russia right now in the world. Something to ponder on apart from all the other advantages they have.

gambojimeta:
I would not trust the quality of Chinese ammunition/fire power just as I wouldn't put a China product in my vehicle

railone:
You have idea about military and you just wrote that epistle.... Saddam was using American weapons? Guy, you do know the internet is free right!
Iraq that was using Soviet weapons and equipment.
Also, like do you guys have any idea of the map. Look at where America is and where Russia is compare to where Iraq is and Ukraine.
You talk about Nazi Germany yet the same people ran through Europe like child's play but had problems taking on Britain because it wasn't on mainland Europe. I mean they reached Moscow before Hitler made his now famous blunder. And you're comparing America that basically had to airdrop more of its logistics with Russia that have land advantage.

Russia that couldn't drop a single battalion of paratroopers behind enemy line, something the US does time and time again.

Where you lost me was saying Bombers have EW capabilities to knock out CSG.. do you even know the capability of a Carrier Strike Group. An AWC could see the bomber from thousand of miles away and you're talking about using EW... Bro go read up at this point.

Also comparing an RQ-7, a reconnaissance drone with the Reaper... lol
like how do you people type such crap with confident.

See lie, America don't have an F-35 forward base in the Middle East. How they Bleep would they be avoiding Iran with the Aircraft? F-35 is not a reconnaissance aircraft to begin with.
Israel have been using theirs to wreck havoc in Syria with the same supposed Russia superior radar.

Same radar that couldn't detect small Ukraine Neptune anti-ship missiles....

You can support Russia, I don't have any problem with that but abeg don't come here parading lies and make believe like others don't have Internet too.

Simeonjoe1:
You dey mind that guy
They're compare Russia with US. dey compare US ESR platform to Russia ESR, what a joke. US that have the greatest surveillance system in the whole world that they even hide sensitive info from their allies self.
He should be comparing UK to Russia and not the US. I'm not a fan of any but in truth US is the world power.

gambojimeta:
How was the USA bleeped when China and North Korea lost more men than the USA and South Korea?

North Korea's invasion of South Korea despite support from China and USSR was also succesfully repelled.

And talking about further success, South Korea with the backing of the USA has since advanced economically and technologically, while North Korea with the backing of China is a mess.

Ps: North Korea gained 1100 sq km, while South Korea gained 3,900 sq km.

Kingsnairaland:
https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/nation/us-dilemma-over-sanctioning-india-for-buying-russian-arms-360959

AldrichAmes:


You're obviously an ignorant turd and a poorly educated kid.

1. Saddam Hussein

The making of Saddam Hussein by the CIA: A Tyrant 40 Years in the Making https://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/14/opinion/a-tyrant-40-years-in-the-making.html

U.S. Secretly Gave Aid to Iraq Early in Its War Against Iran: https://www.nytimes.com/1992/01/26/world/us-secretly-gave-aid-to-iraq-early-in-its-war-against-iran.html

Revealed: how the West set Saddam on the bloody road to power: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/revealed-how-the-west-set-saddam-on-the-bloody-road-to-power-1258618.html

^There are loads more to unravel/unpack but I'll stop there for now. If you can read, that should give you an inkling on how Saddam was armed to the teeth by the US and UK with American and British weapons. Saddam only switch to Soviet weapons after they discarded him and Iraq was under arms embargo. And he couldn't even get a lot of direct lethal Soviet weapons. So most of his lethal weapons were American and British made and those weapons were effectively grounded due to lack of parts caused by embargo.

In essence, Saddam was basically disarmed before Iraq was invaded by the US in 2003. Anyone with a brain (which you obviously lack) would know that.

2. Middle East is basically the US' playground. Israel is like a mega US aircraft carrier with almost 10million people. The US has bases with tens of thousands of troops stationed in Oman, Kuwait, Qatar, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and a massive military base in Turkey. So, the US can basically put a million troops in Iraq within 24hrs without the need to mobilise. Russia on the other hand, despite being next to Ukraine would need to mobilise to be able to put the same number of troops in Ukraine because its military isn't a wartime military. Again. you have no clue and you're a slowpoke who understands zilch about the military.

3. Nazi Germany didn't take Britain because they didn't want to and never even committed their strongest troops to taking Britain. The attck on Britain was mostly a feint and Hitler's eyes were on the Soviet Union hence he committed about 90% of his elite forces against the Soviet Union. If Hitler wanted Britain, it would've been a walk in the park but he didn't really pursue it for the following reasons:

a. PM Chamberlain already cut a deal with Hitler by giving the Nazis Czech republic with the Munich Agreement (before Churchill got to power). There was also some sort of connection between the British Royal Family and Hitler.

There's a reason why the US and UK absorbed the Nazis rather than destroy them after the war like the Soviets did. And Nazis preferred surrending to US and British forces than Soviet forces. Heck, Nazis founded NATO after WW2 and a lot of American secretary of state post- WW2 have Nazi lineage.

b. All the resources he needs to achieve his dream are in the Soviet Union. Britain has no resources. Nazi Germany was also part of the capitalist bloc while the Soviet Union was an opposing ideology with communism.

c. Taking Britain would've got the Americans involved (the US was neutral at this point). And that would've made him compromise the amount of elite forces he committed to the eastern front against the Soviets which would've been a disaster because he sent all his elite forces to the eastern front against the Soviets. Alas, it ended up being a disaster because the Soviets destroyed all his elite forces.

^I'll stop here because history is way deeper than what a lot of you know. You have to read extensively to know a lot of things.

4. LMAO. In the next 20yrs, American paratroopers wouldn't be able to pull off what the Russian VDV paratroopers did at Gostomel airport. Even American veterans alluded to this on Twitter. 200-300 paratroopers against 3 elites Ukrainian brigades and hundreds of NATO special forces and they held the Kiev airport from Feb.24 until other Russian forces got there and never lost it in any battle until they withdrew. And less than 30 of them were killed. That's one for the history books. Those VDV paratroopers are the ones crushing Ukrainians in Donbass right now, lol.

This is a video on CNN when CNN reporters went to the airport a few days after the paratroopers took it and Ukrainians lied that they have pushed them out, lol:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b40r8RX5MoE

He rushed there thinking they were Ukrainians because Ukrainian propaganda lied that they pushed them out. Only to find out that the VDV badarses were still in control, lol. And they never lost it. CNN basically exposed Ukrainian propaganda in real time.

5. RQ-7? . No, Iranians captured US RQ-170 stealth drone with EW. It's the most advanced US drone that Americans claimed were invincible/invisible and Iran captured it with EW without breaking a sweat. So none of the trash you posted is a match for the Russians and Chinese.

6. Moskva was hit by a sea mine - not Neptune missiles. Even the most rabid pro-Ukrainian shill on Twitter who're veterans said it's not Neptune missiles because nothing on the ship showed it was hit by a missile. And that corroborates Russian claims.

7. What's AWC? Or you mean AWACS? Well, US AWACS are mostly overrated and Russian EW jams it often.

Anyway, this isn't about AWACS - it's about American MQ-9B drones. So read what Russians did to Americans in Syria from an American general below:

The US has been concerned by the battle-field success of Russian EW systems. At the U.S. Geospatial Intelligence Foundation’s 2018 GEOINT Symposium, General Raymond Thomas, then commander of U.S. Special Operations Command, said that Syria has become “the most aggressive E.W. environment on the planet. They are testing us every day, knocking our communications down, disabling our EC-130s, etcetera,” he said without directly mentioning Russia.

There have been reports in the US media that Russia has been blocking small U.S. surveillance drones from receiving GPS satellite signals.
https://www.defenseworld.net/2020/02/03/russian-electronic-warfare-system-brings-down-hostile-drones-in-syria.html

-------

I'm done. You're out of your depth like most of the clowns on this forum. Most of you just parrot utter nonsense without an understanding of anything.

Dalil8:
Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times.

Joe Biden is a weakling. Times have changed, the U.S is no longer feared or respected on the global stage.

railone:
Read the report itself.... it's a bunch of analyst trying to decipher if the US will sanction India as they did Turkey or if the need to contain China will make them let it go

There's no official statement threatening to sanction India when they actually need India in the Indo-Pacific and unlike Turkey, India isn't fully immersed yet with the west.

Dalil8:
Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times.

Joe Biden is a weakling. Times have changed, the U.S is no longer feared or respected on the global stage.

NwaNimo1:
I blame Trump

https://www.reactiongifs.com/r/emb1.gif

AldrichAmes:
Biden isn’t a weakling - he’s just a face of the power brokers and powerful force that run the US - just like every other US president. It’s by design and US presidents are mostly controlled puppets. Obama also wasn’t the one running things when he was the US president.

It’s also a misconception that the US was feared by all. That’s just make-believe like Hollywood movies. Those who fear the US are European countries and 3rd world countries. Countries like Russia and China have never feared the US. The US just never really troubled them until now. And what they’re doing now is basically reacting to American threats on their borders.

People tend to forget the poor China was the one that did most of the fighting during the Korean War against the US and allied countries and the Chinese technically won that war (but it’s regarded as a stalemate officially). And that was the US at its peak militarily because it was vastly superior to every other country on earth militarily (save for the Soviet Union) and China at its lowest both militarily and economically. So why would a country that pulled that off fear the US? And Americans have always been weary of Russia because it inherited almost everything Americans feared about the Soviets.

Regardless, NATO needs to be really scared. No NATO country has fought a country as strong as Ukraine on the ground since the end of WW2. Fighting defenceless goat herders is different from fighting a formidable peer military that has a lot of support. And Russia is currently doing that with a fraction of its military (less than 10%) despite being outnumbered by 4:1 and they’re achieving results (despite initial setbacks) whilst rotating forces to get the needed frontline experience and tactical battlefield awareness. Combine that with the Chinese and US + NATO countries don’t stand a chance in a real shooting match.

Dalil8:
Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times.

Joe Biden is a weakling. Times have changed, the U.S is no longer feared or respected on the global stage.