₦airaland Forum

jaephoenix:
1. Lol. Am I the one that wrote the articles on Josephus? Lol. Youre funny. It is a well known fact amongst scholars that his depositions are fake.
2. I don't even know 'the almighty Bart Ehrman' you're on about. But whatever he said, its irrelevant. What is relevant is the truth. Josephus account is clear forgery, spoken by many authors, not just one(and definitely not mine )

Ignorance is bliss...look up Bart Ehrman before displaying stupid attached to ignorance

Jashub:
Ignorance is bliss...look up Bart Ehrman before displaying stupid attached to ignorance

So I checked out about Bart Ehrman and he's just another christian scholar. Whats special about him?

jaephoenix:
So I checked out about Bart Ehrman and he's just another christian scholar. Whats special about him?

Bart isnt a Christian...he's agnostic. Note the difference

Jashub:
Bart isnt a Christian...he's agnostic. Note the difference

… but he's a New Testament scholar, takes his time talking about it. But whatever he is, is irrelevant. What is relevant is the credibility of his book. He tried to create an argument on Jesus existence, unsuccessfully

jaephoenix:
… but he's a New Testament scholar, takes his time talking about it. But whatever he is, is irrelevant. What is relevant is the credibility of his book. He tried to create an argument on Jesus existence, unsuccessfully

Oga, he's a renowned scholar in the US who has taught in alot of Ivy league schools. Currently, he's not a Christian but an agnostic who provided factual evidences that Jesus was indeed a historical individual. Kindly read up his work on the subject

Broveens42:
You got it wrong from your first paragraph.
The reason I ask you to go back to your native language isn't about the authenticity of the write up (Though I'm quite certain you now know there's nothing like second coming of Jesus according to op and clarified by me) It's simply because your native language does more justice to contextual reading.. It's a very straight forward write up; there will always be gods among gods, coming down to rule the weak and sometimes do not need to do that themselves but by appointing puppets.

There is absolutely no way you can read Charles Dickens "Nineteen Eighty Four" in your native interpretation that you would get its message.

And we have seen your "strongest government reign exactly as the Bible foretold.

Now the present time of hardness of buying and selling shows that God is Truly Coming as was prophecied.

And it is God Who is coming to rule by Himself and He is blowing up this world to put only those that qualified in the new world He intends to make to replace this one. So take comfort in your denial after all you already know that you are not qualified to be in the new world, so you have no choice but to wrap yourself in denial

"Denial is the way people handle what they can not handle". Anonymous.

Jashub:
Oga, he's a renowned scholar in the US who has taught in alot of Ivy league schools. Currently, he's not a Christian but an agnostic who provided factual evidences that Jesus was indeed a historical individual. Kindly read up his work on the subject

Lol
So suddenly he's 'factual' to you because he said Jesus lived. But he's not factual to you about his agnosticism . Why didn't you believe his agnostic message but you believe his message about Jesus? You now remember he's an ivy league scholar
Anyway about his book, Jesus: Apocalyptic Prophet of the New Millennium I went through it, and there was no historicity or credibility he attached to Jesus existence. Its just like J.K Rowling writing about Harry Potter. It doesn't mean Potter lived.
Do you understand? If I'm lying, check the book and point out his historicity there

jaephoenix:
Lol
So suddenly he's 'factual' to you because he said Jesus lived. But he's not factual to you about his agnosticism . Why didn't you believe his agnostic message but you believe his message about Jesus? You now remember he's an ivy league scholar
Anyway about his book, Jesus: Apocalyptic Prophet of the New Millennium I went through it, and there was no historicity or credibility he attached to Jesus existence. Its just like J.K Rowling writing about Harry Potter. It doesn't mean Potter lived.
Do you understand? If I'm lying, check the book and point out his historicity there

So you're discrediting a scholar whose reputation is widely recognized even in the atheist and agnostic communities...? Please how many of your works have you publish on the subject of existence or nonexistence of God. If you haven't then you're in a position to talk

Jashub:
So you're discrediting a scholar whose reputation is widely recognized even in the atheist and agnostic communities...? Please how many of your works have you publish on the subject of existence or nonexistence of God. If you haven't then you're in a position to talk

Fallacy of appeal to authority.
What I write is irrelevant. Its not being scrutinized. What is being scrutinized is Ehrman's book. I went through the book and there was no concrete historical points. Please go through the book and point out the facts and correct me.