₦airaland Forum

Magnoliaa:
Is this still all from a chain reaction of CNA's article, or Obidients are actually DMing these guys with 'intel'?

💀💀💀💀💀💀

raumdeuter:
Tinubu had no conviction for a drug offence

Below is what the constitution says to disqualify a candidate, Find which section affects Tinubu that can lead to disqualification

Magnoliaa:
Is this still all from a chain reaction of CNA's article, or Obidients are actually DMing these guys with 'intel'?

💀💀💀💀💀💀

Drone17:
1. Tinubu was in Nigeria then and refused to appear for questioning.

2. The prosecutor opted for forfeiture after considering the legal cost of pushing for a full investigation. This is usually the case for drug crimes when the perpetrators are not easily reachable.

3. The forfeiture law in the US has a max limit of 500k. So even though the entire account was seized only less than 500k can be forfeited.

OasisX:


Fùck off you clown...... ain't get time for sand play.

Amigoss:
This DonJ sef,e no Sabi eyes,e no Sabi body.

Pesin wey dey die inside from obidients cookings and is masking it behind fire emojis,you still go dey whyne am

Donjazet2:
Is that guilty conscience, hoesis?

Are you seeing your hypocrisy flashing before your eyes you demonic demon?

Drone17:
1. Tinubu was in Nigeria then and refused to appear for questioning.

2. The prosecutor opted for forfeiture after considering the legal cost of pushing for a full investigation. This is usually the case for drug crimes when the perpetrators are not easily reachable.

3. The forfeiture law in the US has a max limit of 500k. So even though the entire account was seized only less than 500k can be forfeited.

GloriousGbola:
real wins by team obidient.

maybe next they can get XXL, alex jones, TMZ and other like minded 'news' blogs

real victories. i am sure joe biden , Rishi Sunak, and other world leaders are avidly reading these recycled exposes trending on twitter

Android17:
If you people want to replace him as the president, your next best option is 2027 because even if he dies, Shettima is the constitutionally recognized replacement. Not Peter Obi.

Former President Barack Obama made a rare foray into the cultural conversation this week, objecting to the prevalence of “call-out culture” and “wokeness” during an interview about youth activism at the Obama Foundation summit on Tuesday.

For more than an hour, Mr. Obama sat onstage with the actress Yara Shahidi and several other young leaders from around the world. The conversation touched on “leadership, grass roots change and the power places have to shape our journeys,” the Obama Foundation said, but it was his remarks about young activists that have ricocheted around the internet, mostly receiving praise from a cohort of bipartisan and intergenerational supporters.

“This idea of purity and you’re never compromised and you’re always politically ‘woke’ and all that stuff,” Mr. Obama said. “You should get over that quickly.”

“The world is messy; there are ambiguities,” he continued. “People who do really good stuff have flaws. People who you are fighting may love their kids, and share certain things with you.”

Mr. Obama spoke repeatedly of the role of social media in activism specifically, including the idea of what’s become known as “cancel culture,” which is much remarked upon, but still nebulously defined. It tends to refer to behavior that mostly plays out on the internet when someone has said or done something to which others object. That person is then condemned in a flurry of social media posts. Such people are often referred to as “canceled,” a way of saying that many others (and perhaps the places at which they work) are fed up with them and will have no more to do with them.

Mr. Obama talked about conversations he’s had with his daughter Malia, who is a student at Harvard with Ms. Shahidi.

“I do get a sense sometimes now among certain young people, and this is accelerated by social media, there is this sense sometimes of: ‘The way of me making change is to be as judgmental as possible about other people,’” he said, “and that’s enough.”

Donjazet2:
Nah. Obidients are something else.
Twitter na something else. you must dey laugh dey go.

OasisX:


Incoming Director of DSS.

OasisX:


Incoming Director of DSS.

larride:
From where to where ehn 😂

GloriousGbola:
i am not in agreement - however - the wicked wike once celebrated by proto-obidients will fit them

Drone17:
1. Tinubu was in Nigeria then and refused to appear for questioning.

2. The prosecutor opted for forfeiture after considering the legal cost of pushing for a full investigation. This is usually the case for drug crimes when the perpetrators are not easily reachable.

3. The forfeiture law in the US has a max limit of 500k. So even though the entire account was seized only less than 500k can be forfeited.

Android17:
If his lawyer was representing him in court that is as good as him being in court. Your lawyer is your legal REPRESENTATIVE.
But then remitted more money to the "drug baron" than was forfeited? How does that work? The US govt won't relinquish a penny to a drug baron. If in doubt, show us a legal precedent to justify this claim.
I wonder how people let you get away with this claim. It is flimsy at best and tbvh, it fails the logic test. If the max limit is 500k, then it means the govt is allowed to take up to 500k and not below it. So the govt would have confiscated 500K of his money not 460k.


The truth is, alot of what is going on is the same emotive hullabaloo that preceded the elections. I have been using this Tinubu court case to actually rate Nigerian SANs and most of them are dullards.

The US govt confiscated the entirety of Tinubu's money that they related to proceeds from heroin sale and basically accused him of being a money launderer for the drug barons.

However he defended himself is immaterial but the bottom line is, the govt could not convict him of that accusation so they switched it to an issue of tax evasion for said sum. What that means is, since you are arguing that you made these monies legally, we are now alleging that you never paid taxes on those. Tinubu agreed to that and forfeited what would have been his tax and fine for evading the tax which summed up to $460k. The rest of his mula was remitted to him. That is all that happened.

If you people want to replace him as the president, your next best option is 2027 because even if he dies, Shettima is the constitutionally recognized replacement. Not Peter Obi.

OasisX:


Incoming Director of DSS.

Eazzii:
Lol. You wanted that Calabar babe as minister of health. Now this.

Nostradamus1:
You seriously lied barefaced.

Tinubu's money was frozen. There is no limit to the amount that can be blocked by US(Example is Abacha dollars and Russia Millions)

Tinubu appealed the Freeze.
There was an out-of-court settlement. A prosecutor can not decide to freeze a certain amount and give the suspect the rest.

Do you mean that Russian frozen accounts will be released back to Russsians after 500k has been taken?

What is the price to investigate a case that can net USA 1.8 million dollars.


Why are you lying ?