₦airaland Forum

a4cube:
Atiku did not with 25% in FCT. Rerun is imminent.

garfield1:
Nothing special about tinubu.ihedioha son at tribunal and appeal,wike lost at tribunal and appeal

Penguin2:
Hmmmm!

I’m surprised you are saying this.

You know I want Tinubu gone. I just don’t wanna keep my hopes high; that’s why I’m being conservative😏.

garfield1:
No.if tinubu is disq,his votes will be voided and new calculations will emerge putting atiku as winner.that fct matter won't fly

Penguin2:
Let’s assume Supreme Court disqualifies Tinubu and others that the next person that certified the constitutional provision should be issued Certificate of Return, what happens to Obi’s petition since he didn’t join Atiku?

Cc: Fergie001

garfield1:
If tinubu has to go,it must favour obi not atiku.thats the issue.you cannot escape from one mistake to another

FuglyGurl:
https://gazettengr.com/supreme-court-to-deliver-judgement-on-shettimas-alleged-double-nomination-may-26/

seunmsg:
The court of appeal already dismissed this matter and the Supreme Court will follow suit. The case is dead on arrival since it is not the business of PDP to determine who APC nominates or not. PDP lacks the locus to institute the case and they are nothing but a meddlesome busybody.

garfield1:
No.if tinubu is disq,his votes will be voided and new calculations will emerge putting atiku as winner.that fct matter won't fly

seunmsg:
The court of appeal already dismissed this matter and the Supreme Court will follow suit. The case is dead on arrival since it is not the business of PDP to determine who APC nominates or not. PDP lacks the locus to institute the case and they are nothing but a meddlesome busybody.

a4cube:
FCT matter shouldn't be ignored. 25% is a must. Moreover Atiku and Obi now met the required threshold to be declared winner but if Obi claws back his votes apportioned to Tinubu he will meet up with the requisite.

Fingers crossed sha.

Penguin2:
Lol

So you admit Tinubu is a mistake?🤔

garfield1:
Inyang okoro is heading the panel.I wonder who the other members are.
I believe the sc made that nwosu ruling per incuriam and later corrected itself by holding strictly to timeline

Penguin2:
Let’s assume Supreme Court disqualifies Tinubu and others that the next person that certified the constitutional provision should be issued Certificate of Return, what happens to Obi’s petition since he didn’t join Atiku?

Penguin2:
Let’s assume Supreme Court disqualifies Tinubu and others that the next person that certified the constitutional provision should be issued Certificate of Return, what happens to Obi’s petition since he didn’t join Atiku?

Cc: Fergie001

a4cube:
Atiku did not with 25% in FCT. Rerun is imminent.

IGBOGENE27:
In that situation, either the petitioner will be asked to amend his petition to make Atiku & INEC, the Respondent based on the Judgement, or APC & Tinubu's name would be struck out, leaving out only INEC as a Respondent. But, the 1st option is imminent, in the circumstance.

However, I doubt the possibility of SC sacking Tinubu and APC, based on Shettima's double nomination. My reason is that, since it was brought as a pre-election matter, PDP, does not have the locus standi to institute the action. They should have waited till after election, to bring it by way of post election matter. Should the suit be dismissed for lack of locus standi, Shettima will still have to battle double nomination at the post election matters before the PEPT, where the court will decide it on the merit.

seunmsg:
The court of appeal already dismissed this matter and the Supreme Court will follow suit. The case is dead on arrival since it is not the business of PDP to determine who APC nominates or not. PDP lacks the locus to institute the case and they are nothing but a meddlesome busybody.

garfield1:
If tinubu is disq,obi court case is dead

fergie001:
No, they lost at the FHC, lost at the Appeal Court and now before the SC.

It has a direct implication to Obi's petition on Shettima's double nomination. Once the SC rules, it will be binding on the PEPT...

Shettima's double nomination is disqualification ASAP but does the Atiku/PDP have the jurisdiction?

In the old Electoral Act, it is any person but not so in the new Electoral Act.

wis3:
fantasies of a zombidiots. 🙄

seunmsg:
The court of appeal already dismissed this matter and the Supreme Court will follow suit. The case is dead on arrival since it is not the business of PDP to determine who APC nominates or not. PDP lacks the locus to institute the case and they are nothing but a meddlesome busybody.

blacksam01:
Amaechi is coward...this where he shld stop tinibu..cuz he has a stake if the case goes through...who knows He may have joined the case with a noise based in Tinubu humiliation of him in Rivers state...

only Amaechi, umahi, ogbonanya onu, lawal etc will join and the vase will become solid..but they are cowards

Nice2023:
E go choke...now u will see them trying to bribe the judges.

It is only in Nigeria people like Lawal,Akpabio could be returned to power when it is obvious they all bought presidential ticket still ran for the same office amounting to double nomination.

I wonder the kind of judges we have in this country.

001Lagos:
The prayer of millions of Nigerians

IGBOGENE27:
In that situation, either the petitioner will be asked to amend his petition to make Atiku & INEC, the Respondent based on the Judgement, or APC & Tinubu's name would be struck out, leaving out only INEC as a Respondent. But, the 1st option is imminent, in the circumstance.

However, I doubt the possibility of SC sacking Tinubu and APC, based on Shettima's double nomination. My reason is that, since it was brought as a pre-election matter, PDP, does not have the locus standi to institute the action. They should have waited till after election, to bring it by way of post election matter. Should the suit be dismissed for lack of locus standi, Shettima will still have to battle double nomination at the post election matters before the PEPT, where the court will decide it on the merit.